Pattern Detail
Bearish Tri Star
Three-candle bearish reversal after a rally: three small doji candles in a row, the middle one gapped up, signaling indecision at the top.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (+8.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.84×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.48R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 41.8% for a random short entry. The 8.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 41.8% | +8.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.1% | +22.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.7% | -18.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 55.9% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.3% | -2.3 |
2 occurrences · 1,730,193 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
30.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random short entry (-10.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.77×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 30.0% of the time vs 40.1% for a random short entry. The 10.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±30.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 10 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 10 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 30.0% | 40.1% | -10.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 25.0% | -5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 16.4% | +3.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 57.6% | +2.4 |
| Went sideways | 10.0% | 2.3% | +7.7 |
10 occurrences · 1,639,228 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random short entry (+9.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.88R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 40.1% for a random short entry. The 9.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 40.1% | +9.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 25.8% | +24.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 17.8% | +32.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 57.3% | -7.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.6% | -2.6 |
2 occurrences · 348,606 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
A tri star is a three-candle top built from indecision. After a rise, three small doji candles appear in a row, where each open and close sit close together. The middle doji gaps up above the first, then the third gaps back down below the middle. Buyers and sellers are both exhausted, and that stall near the high often marks the end of the advance.
Steve Nison documents the tri-star in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), an unusual cluster of three consecutive dojis.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- All three candles are doji, meaning each opens and closes at nearly the same price.
- The second doji gaps up, sitting above the first.
- The third doji gaps back down, sitting below the second.
- The cleaner the two gaps and the smaller the bodies, the more textbook the signal.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.
The psychology
A rise carries the market up to these three candles, but the candles themselves stop telling a one-sided story. Each is a doji, opening and closing at nearly the same price, which means that within every session buyers and sellers fought to a standstill. After a clean advance, even one doji is a pause. Three in a row says the push that drove the trend has stalled completely.
The two gaps add to the picture. The middle doji gaps up above the first, a last reach for higher prices, and then the third gaps back down below it, surrendering that reach. Buyers tried to extend and could not make it stick, and sellers could not yet take command either. What traders see is exhaustion at the top: the trend has run out of fuel, and a market that can no longer make progress higher often tips the other way. The smaller the bodies and the cleaner the two gaps, the more textbook that exhaustion looks.
Indecision at a high is a clue rather than a conclusion, and the figures below put a measure on it.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Tri Star Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2009, 1:05 PM CST | 1 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2009, 12:33 PM CST | 1.25 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Tri Star Firings (10)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2011, 1:16 PM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2010, 1:21 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2010, 11:41 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2010, 2:29 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2009, 11:54 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.67R | Flat |
| Dec 4, 2009, 2:05 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 12, 2009, 10:53 AM CDT | 0.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 21, 2009, 12:30 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2009, 11:13 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2009, 9:34 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Tri Star Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2010, 12:55 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2010, 11:20 AM CST | 1 | 0.75R | Stopped |