Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Kicking
Two-candle bullish reversal: a full-bodied down candle, then a gap up into a full-bodied up candle with no overlap.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
Limited sample (30). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+4.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.31×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.13R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.7% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 4.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 30 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 41.8% | +4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.7% | 28.1% | -1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 13.3% | 19.7% | -6.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.7% | 57.0% | -10.3 |
| Went sideways | 6.7% | 1.3% | +5.4 |
30 occurrences · 1,710,005 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (-1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.86×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 41.8% | -1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 28.0% | -8.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 19.9% | +0.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 20.0% | 56.4% | -36.4 |
| Went sideways | 40.0% | 1.8% | +38.2 |
5 occurrences · 355,242 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (-17.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.21×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 17.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 42.3% | -17.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 29.2% | -4.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 21.3% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 25.0% | 55.4% | -30.4 |
| Went sideways | 50.0% | 2.2% | +47.8 |
4 occurrences · 119,637 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.7% for a random long entry (-43.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.72×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.65R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.17R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.7% for a random long entry. The 43.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.7% | -43.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 30.7% | -30.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 22.8% | -22.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 54.6% | -54.6 |
| Went sideways | 100.0% | 1.7% | +98.3 |
3 occurrences · 59,963 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 50.0% for a random long entry (+0.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.69×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.50R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.35R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 50.0% for a random long entry. The 0.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±69.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 50.0% | +0.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 37.7% | +12.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 28.8% | +21.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 49.5% | +0.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
2 occurrences · 4,548 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.9% for a random long entry (+52.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.43×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.30R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.27R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 47.9% for a random long entry. The 52.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 47.9% | +52.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 34.7% | +65.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 25.9% | -25.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 51.4% | -51.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.8% | -0.8 |
1 occurrences · 4,697 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (60). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.4% for a random long entry (+10.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.75×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.97R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 39.4% for a random long entry. The 10.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 60 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 39.4% | +10.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.7% | 25.5% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 11.7% | 17.1% | -5.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.3% | 59.3% | -11.0 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 1.3% | +0.4 |
60 occurrences · 1,607,385 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random long entry (-40.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 40.8% for a random long entry. The 40.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 40.8% | -40.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.9% | -26.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.7% | -18.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 57.5% | +17.5 |
| Went sideways | 25.0% | 1.7% | +23.3 |
4 occurrences · 346,986 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random long entry (-41.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.51×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.33R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 41.9% for a random long entry. The 41.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 41.9% | -41.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 28.4% | -28.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.5% | -20.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 56.2% | +43.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
1 occurrences · 118,396 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.2% for a random long entry (-43.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.42×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.2% for a random long entry. The 43.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.2% | -43.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 30.0% | -30.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 22.1% | -22.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 55.1% | +44.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
1 occurrences · 59,643 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.6% for a random long entry (+55.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
4.50×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
3.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.20R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 44.6% for a random long entry. The 55.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 44.6% | +55.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 32.3% | +67.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 100.0% | 24.3% | +75.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 54.1% | -54.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
1 occurrences · 27,664 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.0% for a random long entry (+53.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.45×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.69R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.24R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 47.0% for a random long entry. The 53.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±69.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 47.0% | +53.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 33.1% | -33.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 24.4% | -24.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 52.0% | -52.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.0% | -1.0 |
2 occurrences · 4,689 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish kicking pattern is a sharp two-candle flip. The first candle is a full-bodied down candle with little or no wick, all selling. The next candle gaps straight up and is a full-bodied up candle, all buying. Price kicks from one extreme to the other with a clean gap in between, and the abrupt change of hands is the whole signal.
How to spot it
- The first candle is a full-bodied down (red) candle with little or no wick.
- The second candle gaps up, opening above the first candle’s close.
- The second candle is a full-bodied up (green) candle with little or no wick.
- The two candles do not overlap, leaving clean air between them.
- The cleaner both bodies and the wider the gap, the stronger the kick.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the two candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The first candle is selling at its purest. A full body with almost no wick means price opened high, fell all day, and closed on its lows without buyers ever putting up a fight. As that bar finishes, the sellers look completely in command.
Then the market gaps straight up and never looks back. The second candle opens above the first one’s close, leaving clean air below it, and runs higher into another full body with no wick. There is no overlap, no handoff, no contest in between. Price has simply leapt from one camp to the other overnight. The sellers who closed the prior bar on the lows are now staring at a market that opened well above them, and every one of them is offside from the first tick. That gap is the kick: control changes hands in an instant rather than through a slow tug of war.
How often such a violent flip carries through is the question the figures below take up.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026, 11:27 AM CDT | 24 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 6, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 154 | 0.15R | Flat |
| Jun 12, 2012, 2:52 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2011, 1:43 PM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2011, 12:05 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2011, 8:41 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2009, 2:32 PM CST | 1.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 11, 2009, 2:13 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2009, 2:47 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2009, 10:25 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2009, 12:59 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2009, 1:20 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 30, 2008, 2:25 PM CST | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 24, 2008, 10:00 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2008, 2:26 PM CST | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2008, 12:33 PM CST | 1 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2008, 11:27 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2008, 9:51 AM CST | 1 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2008, 11:16 AM CST | 3 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 27, 2008, 10:07 AM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 52.5 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 1, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 28 | 0.60R | Flat |
| Jan 15, 2009, 11:40 AM CST | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2008, 2:50 PM CST | 8.5 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 36.75 | 0.07R | Flat |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 197.75 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 23 | 0.78R | Flat |
| Sep 26, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 20.5 | 0.62R | Flat |
| Feb 5, 2009, 9:00 AM CST | 12.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 216 | 0.95R | Flat |
| May 20, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 173 | 0.29R | Flat |
| Apr 8, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 32 | 0.70R | Flat |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 612.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 41 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2011 | 89.75 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2014, 8:30 AM CST | 6 | 0.00R | Flat |
| Dec 14, 2011, 11:40 AM CST | 1.25 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2011, 2:49 PM CST | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2011, 8:52 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2011, 11:54 AM CST | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2011, 2:52 PM CDT | 2 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2011, 2:52 PM CDT | 1.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 11, 2011, 12:14 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2011, 12:45 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2011, 12:10 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2011, 2:04 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2011, 12:19 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2011, 9:18 AM CDT | 2 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 19, 2011, 12:45 PM CDT | 1.5 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 15, 2011, 12:14 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 15, 2011, 9:05 AM CDT | 2 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 12, 2010, 2:01 PM CST | 1 | 2.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 1, 2010, 10:28 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2010, 9:40 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 29, 2010, 12:17 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.42R | Flat |
| Sep 17, 2010, 2:15 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2010, 10:25 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2009, 2:50 PM CST | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 45 | 0.33R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.5 | 0.11R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 44.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Kicking Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2018 | 127.75 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2011 | 40.5 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |