Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Meeting Line
Two-candle bullish reversal: a down candle, then an up candle that gaps lower but closes at the same price as the first.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
51.6%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+9.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.06×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.31R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 51.6% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry — a 9.8-point gap, wider than the ±8.6-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 51.6% | 41.8% | +9.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 38.1% | 28.1% | +10.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.2% | 19.7% | +6.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.4% | 57.0% | -8.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
126 occurrences · 1,710,005 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (38). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+5.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.66×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.4% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 5.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±15.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 38 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.4% | 41.8% | +5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.6% | 28.0% | +3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.4% | 19.9% | -1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.6% | 56.4% | -3.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.8% | -1.8 |
38 occurrences · 355,242 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
80.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+37.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.23×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.69R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 37.7-point gap over the 42.3% random-entry rate clears the ±30.6-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 10 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 80.0% | 42.3% | +37.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.0% | 29.2% | +10.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 30.0% | 21.3% | +8.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 20.0% | 55.4% | -35.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.2% | -2.2 |
10 occurrences · 119,637 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
60.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.7% for a random long entry (+16.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.66R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.17R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 43.7% for a random long entry. The 16.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 60.0% | 43.7% | +16.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 60.0% | 30.7% | +29.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 22.8% | -22.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 54.6% | -14.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
5 occurrences · 59,963 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.0% for a random long entry (-20.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.74R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.22R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 45.0% for a random long entry. The 20.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 45.0% | -20.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 32.6% | -7.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 24.8% | -24.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 53.7% | +21.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
4 occurrences · 27,712 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.9% for a random long entry (-47.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.27R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 47.9% for a random long entry. The 47.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 47.9% | -47.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 34.7% | -34.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 25.9% | -25.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 51.4% | +48.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.8% | -0.8 |
1 occurrences · 4,697 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.4% for a random long entry (-3.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.74×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.97R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.7% of the time vs 39.4% for a random long entry. The 3.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 361 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.7% | 39.4% | -3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.0% | 25.5% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.2% | 17.1% | +0.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.3% | 59.3% | +5.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
361 occurrences · 1,607,385 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (72). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random long entry (+11.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.57×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 52.8% of the time vs 40.8% for a random long entry — a 11.9-point gap, wider than the ±11.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.8% | 40.8% | +11.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.7% | 26.9% | +7.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.4% | 18.7% | +0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.2% | 57.5% | -10.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
72 occurrences · 346,986 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random long entry (+5.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.62×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.6% of the time vs 41.9% for a random long entry. The 5.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.6% | 41.9% | +5.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 28.4% | +14.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.3% | 20.5% | -6.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.6% | 56.2% | -8.6 |
| Went sideways | 4.8% | 1.9% | +2.8 |
21 occurrences · 118,396 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
57.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.2% for a random long entry (+13.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.75R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 57.1% of the time vs 43.2% for a random long entry. The 13.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±36.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 7 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 57.1% | 43.2% | +13.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 57.1% | 30.0% | +27.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 42.9% | 22.1% | +20.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 55.1% | -12.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
7 occurrences · 59,643 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
16.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.6% for a random long entry (-27.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.38R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.20R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 16.7% of the time vs 44.6% for a random long entry. The 27.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 16.7% | 44.6% | -27.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 32.3% | -32.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 24.3% | -24.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 83.3% | 54.1% | +29.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
6 occurrences · 27,664 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
75.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 50.1% for a random long entry (+24.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.06×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.33R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 75.0% of the time vs 50.1% for a random long entry. The 24.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±49.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 75.0% | 50.1% | +24.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 75.0% | 37.0% | +38.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 75.0% | 27.8% | +47.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 25.0% | 49.1% | -24.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.9% | -0.9 |
4 occurrences · 4,544 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.0% for a random long entry (-47.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.47×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.71R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.24R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 47.0% for a random long entry. The 47.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 47.0% | -47.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 33.1% | -33.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 24.4% | -24.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 52.0% | +48.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.0% | -1.0 |
1 occurrences · 4,689 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish meeting line is a two-candle bottom where the two closes meet. A long down candle comes first. The next candle opens lower, gapping below the first, then rallies all the way back to close at the same level the first candle closed. Sellers pushed the open down, but buyers met them exactly at the prior close, a tug of war that ends the slide in a draw.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle opens lower, gapping below the first candle’s close.
- It rallies into an up (green) candle and closes at nearly the same price as the first candle’s close.
- The tighter the two closes match, the cleaner the meeting.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the two candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
Price is falling, and the first candle closes with sellers still pressing. The next session gaps lower, opening below the prior close, and the slide looks ready to extend. Then buyers turn it around and lift price all the way back to the exact level where the first candle closed. The two closes meet at the same price.
Traders read that meeting as a standoff. Sellers won the open and pushed price down, but by the end of the session buyers had matched them step for step and pulled the market back to even. Neither side ended the day with the upper hand, which after a steady decline is itself a change in tone. The selling that had been winning every session has, for the first time, only managed a draw. The tighter the two closes line up, the cleaner that balance looks, and the more it suggests the downward pressure has eased.
A draw at the lows is a hint, not a guarantee, and the numbers below weigh how often it leads somewhere.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026, 1:58 PM CDT | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 12:33 PM CDT | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 16.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2020, 1:28 PM CDT | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2020, 1:18 PM CDT | 5.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2020, 8:42 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2020, 11:34 AM CDT | 10.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2020, 11:15 AM CDT | 13.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 24, 2015, 1:29 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 27, 2013, 10:24 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2013, 1:47 PM CDT | 1 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 2.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 12, 2012, 11:11 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 1, 2012, 11:45 AM CDT | 1.25 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 19, 2011, 2:30 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2011, 1:38 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2011, 9:30 AM CST | 1 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2011, 8:59 AM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2011, 2:09 PM CST | 1.75 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 29, 2011, 10:06 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 50.75 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.25 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 25.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 26 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 17, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 46 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 28, 2020, 2:05 PM CST | 20 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 24, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.5 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 2.5 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2011, 12:35 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2011, 2:46 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 10, 2011, 12:15 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 24, 2010, 12:50 PM CDT | 2.25 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2010, 8:30 AM CST | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2009, 8:30 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 6, 2009, 9:00 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2009, 8:35 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2009, 1:20 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2009, 10:00 AM CST | 4.5 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2009, 1:55 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (10)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 148 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 22, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 84 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 46.25 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 33.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.25 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 21, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 27 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 29, 2010, 8:30 AM CST | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 24, 2009, 9:00 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2009, 1:00 PM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 30, 2008, 11:45 AM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 67.75 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 100.25 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| May 7, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.25 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Aug 16, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.75 | 2.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2009, 10:00 AM CST | 4.5 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 43.25 | 2.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 36 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 21.25 | 0.49R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2012 | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2020, 9:48 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 31, 2018, 1:25 PM CST | 2.25 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Jan 18, 2016, 11:04 AM CST | 0.25 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2014, 8:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 28, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Dec 21, 2011, 10:07 AM CST | 0.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 20, 2011, 12:14 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2011, 9:58 AM CST | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2011, 1:41 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2011, 11:36 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2011, 1:55 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2011, 2:00 PM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2011, 1:20 PM CST | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2011, 8:38 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 30, 2011, 12:41 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 28, 2011, 11:28 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2011, 11:07 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2011, 1:22 PM CST | 1.25 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 7 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Jun 2, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 16.75 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Jul 23, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 26, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 1.25 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Jul 11, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 28, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 21, 2011, 8:45 AM CST | 1 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2011, 2:35 PM CST | 2.75 | 1.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2011, 10:00 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 19, 2011, 12:45 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 3, 2011, 2:25 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2011, 2:40 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2011, 10:05 AM CDT | 1 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2011, 12:20 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2011, 9:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2011, 10:35 AM CDT | 2.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2010, 1:45 PM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 30.75 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Jan 4, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 9 | 2.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 23, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.74R | Flat |
| May 21, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 2.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2015, 9:00 AM CDT | 4 | 2.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2011, 1:45 PM CST | 2.75 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2011, 12:30 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 4, 2011, 12:45 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 18, 2011, 12:45 PM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 8, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2010, 9:30 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2010, 11:30 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 18, 2010, 10:45 AM CDT | 1 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 7, 2010, 12:15 PM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 4, 2010, 11:45 AM CST | 3.25 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2009, 9:45 AM CST | 0.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 1, 2009, 10:30 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 19, 2009, 11:30 AM CDT | 1.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 20, 2009, 2:45 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2009, 1:30 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (7)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 18.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 26, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 6, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 4 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 7 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Nov 30, 2011, 11:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2010, 11:30 AM CST | 1 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 25.25 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 36.75 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 25, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 3, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.75 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 2, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 6.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 15.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Meeting Line Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2012 | 10.5 | 0.71R | Stopped |
Sample backtest
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.