Pattern Detail
Bearish Downside Gap Three Methods
Continuation pattern in a downtrend: two long down candles separated by a clean gap, then an up candle that fills the gap before the slide resumes.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (-40.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.61×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry. The 40.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 40.7% | -40.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.7% | -27.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.8% | -19.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 58.3% | +41.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.0% | -1.0 |
2 occurrences · 1,706,892 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (-38.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.32×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.95R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry. The 38.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±95.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 38.5% | -38.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 25.2% | -25.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.2% | -17.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 60.5% | +39.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.1% | -1.1 |
1 occurrences · 1,599,351 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
A downside gap three methods is a brief gap fill inside a downtrend. Two long down candles fall in a row with a clean gap between them, so their ranges do not even overlap. Then an up candle opens inside the second body and rallies up to fill that gap. It looks like a recovery, but in this pattern the gap fill is just a pause before sellers take over again.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a long down (red) candle.
- The second candle is another long down candle that gaps fully below the first, with no overlap between them.
- The third candle is an up (green) candle that opens inside the second body and rallies up to close back inside the first body, filling the gap.
- The neat gap and the clean fill are what define the shape.
The psychology
The market is falling, and the two long down candles drive that home. They drop with a clean gap between them, ranges that do not even overlap, which is sellers leaning so hard that price jumped lower without trading the space in between. Coming into the third bar, the bears own this move completely.
The third candle is an up bar that opens inside the lower body and rallies all the way up to fill the gap. On its own it looks like a recovery, buyers stepping in to undo the damage. The point of the pattern is that it is not a turn. The bounce runs out at the level the slide began from, closing the gap but never breaking up through the candles that preceded it, and the sellers who had been dumping price never lose control. This is the dominant side reloading: nervous shorts cover, fresh buyers get filled at a better price, and once that demand is spent the people in charge are still the bears.
A gap fill can mean the bottom is in or just a pause before more selling, and the numbers below sort out which tends to follow.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Downside Gap Three Methods Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2023, 10:21 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Sep 27, 2021, 10:47 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2020, 12:01 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2013, 2:40 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 12, 2011, 12:33 PM CST | — | — | Open |
Sample Bearish Downside Gap Three Methods Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2025, 2:38 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2021, 1:19 PM CST | — | — | Open |