Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bearish Separating Lines
Two-candle continuation pattern in a downtrend: an up candle is undercut by a down candle that gaps below it, and selling resumes.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
16.7%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (-24.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.69×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.57R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 16.7% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 16.7% | 40.7% | -24.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 4.6% | 27.7% | -23.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.9% | 19.8% | -18.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 13.0% | 58.3% | -45.3 |
| Went sideways | 70.4% | 1.0% | +69.3 |
108 occurrences · 1,706,892 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (80). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
28.7%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (-11.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.36×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.73R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 28.7% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 28.7% | 39.7% | -11.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 6.3% | 27.2% | -21.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 1.3% | 19.7% | -18.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 21.3% | 59.0% | -37.8 |
| Went sideways | 50.0% | 1.3% | +48.7 |
80 occurrences · 354,524 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (46). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
32.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.2% for a random short entry (-6.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.88×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.82R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 32.6% of the time vs 39.2% for a random short entry. The 6.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 46 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 32.6% | 39.2% | -6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 10.9% | 27.2% | -16.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 4.3% | 20.3% | -15.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 19.6% | 59.3% | -39.7 |
| Went sideways | 47.8% | 1.6% | +46.3 |
46 occurrences · 119,349 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (44). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
31.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (-7.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.96×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.83R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 31.8% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 7.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 44 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 31.8% | 38.9% | -7.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 11.4% | 27.5% | -16.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.8% | 20.8% | -13.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.9% | 59.9% | -19.0 |
| Went sideways | 27.3% | 1.1% | +26.1 |
44 occurrences · 59,789 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (42). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.4% for a random short entry (-0.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.24×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.95R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.1% of the time vs 38.4% for a random short entry. The 0.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 42 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.1% | 38.4% | -0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 19.0% | 27.5% | -8.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 2.4% | 21.2% | -18.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.8% | 60.7% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 7.1% | 0.9% | +6.3 |
42 occurrences · 27,675 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.2% for a random short entry (-2.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.30×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.3% of the time vs 38.2% for a random short entry. The 2.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 17 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.3% | 38.2% | -2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.5% | 29.2% | -5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 23.1% | -23.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.7% | 61.6% | +3.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.2% | -0.2 |
17 occurrences · 4,539 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
22.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.5% for a random short entry (-14.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.39R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 22.2% of the time vs 36.5% for a random short entry. The 14.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±31.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 9 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 9 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 22.2% | 36.5% | -14.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.8% | -26.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 21.0% | -21.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 77.8% | 63.1% | +14.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
9 occurrences · 4,681 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (59). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
8.5%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (-30.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.66×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.40R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.95R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 8.5% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 8.5% | 38.5% | -30.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 25.2% | -25.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.2% | -17.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 5.1% | 60.5% | -55.4 |
| Went sideways | 86.4% | 1.1% | +85.4 |
59 occurrences · 1,599,351 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (61). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
29.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random short entry (-9.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.73R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 29.5% of the time vs 38.7% for a random short entry. The 9.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 61 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 29.5% | 38.7% | -9.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 3.3% | 26.0% | -22.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 1.6% | 18.6% | -16.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 11.5% | 60.1% | -48.6 |
| Went sideways | 59.0% | 1.2% | +57.8 |
61 occurrences · 344,822 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (46). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (+0.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.84R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.1% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry. The 0.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 46 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.1% | 38.5% | +0.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 6.5% | 26.4% | -19.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 2.2% | 19.5% | -17.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 17.4% | 60.0% | -42.6 |
| Went sideways | 43.5% | 1.4% | +42.0 |
46 occurrences · 117,604 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (33). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (-2.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.22×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.91R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.4% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 2.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 33 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.4% | 38.9% | -2.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 15.2% | 27.3% | -12.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.1% | 20.4% | -11.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 24.2% | 60.1% | -35.9 |
| Went sideways | 39.4% | 1.0% | +38.4 |
33 occurrences · 59,279 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (52). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
34.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.2% for a random short entry (-4.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.95R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 34.6% of the time vs 39.2% for a random short entry. The 4.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 52 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 34.6% | 39.2% | -4.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 13.5% | 28.2% | -14.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.8% | 21.6% | -15.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.4% | 60.1% | -19.7 |
| Went sideways | 25.0% | 0.7% | +24.3 |
52 occurrences · 27,486 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.1% for a random short entry (-2.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.45×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.4% of the time vs 39.1% for a random short entry. The 2.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 22 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 22 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.4% | 39.1% | -2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.7% | 30.1% | -7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.1% | 24.5% | -15.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.6% | 60.5% | +3.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
22 occurrences · 4,520 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.6% for a random short entry (-4.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.69R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 37.6% for a random short entry. The 4.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±31.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 9 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 9 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 37.6% | -4.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 28.5% | -28.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 21.9% | -21.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 61.9% | +4.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
9 occurrences · 4,671 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bearish separating lines is a two-candle continuation, not a reversal. The market is falling, and one up candle interrupts it with a brief bounce. Then the next session gaps below that bounce and turns down again, fully separated from it. The counter move gets erased in a single gap, and the downtrend picks back up where it left off.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a brief up (green) candle that bounces against the trend.
- The second candle gaps below the first to open.
- The second candle is a down (red) candle.
- The whole second candle sits below the first candle, with clear separation between them.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the 2 candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
This is a continuation, not a turn. The market is already falling and sellers hold the upper hand. The single up candle is a bounce against that trend, the kind of counter rally that tempts buyers to think the bottom is in. For one session it looks like the sellers might be losing their grip.
Then the next session gaps below that bounce and opens down, undoing the counter move in a single jump, and closes lower still. The sellers did not just reappear, they reloaded and pressed harder, refusing to let the bounce build any base. The brief show of buying gets erased and the downtrend resumes from where it paused. The clean separation between the bounce and the gap below it is what makes the message stark: the trend never really yielded, it only caught its breath.
A pause that resolves back into the trend is the claim here, and the figures below test how often it holds.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 269 | 0.16R | Flat |
| Mar 18, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 98 | 0.20R | Flat |
| Feb 26, 2026, 8:30 AM CST | 93.5 | 0.91R | Flat |
| Dec 10, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 60.25 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 137.75 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 171.25 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 214.25 | 0.60R | Flat |
| Oct 17, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 131.5 | 0.25R | Flat |
| Jun 19, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 181.75 | 0.66R | Flat |
| May 23, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 343.75 | 0.07R | Flat |
| Mar 20, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 183 | 0.08R | Flat |
| Feb 25, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 56.25 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 30, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 67.25 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 4, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 19.5 | 0.79R | Flat |
| Mar 19, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 106.5 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Feb 13, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 351.5 | 0.06R | Flat |
| Nov 24, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 53.25 | 0.15R | Flat |
| Oct 9, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 111.25 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Jul 18, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 56 | 0.70R | Flat |
| Jun 22, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 71.5 | 0.05R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 196.75 | 0.86R | Flat |
| Nov 14, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 460.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 194.25 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 209 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 20, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 106 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 1, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 360.75 | 0.59R | Flat |
| Dec 20, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 227.5 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 113.75 | 0.48R | Flat |
| Jul 24, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 349.75 | 0.52R | Flat |
| May 30, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 93.5 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 81.25 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 2, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 201.75 | 0.73R | Flat |
| Nov 21, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 83.5 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 16, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 46.75 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 184 | 0.41R | Flat |
| Sep 26, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 119 | 0.80R | Flat |
| Sep 25, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 81.75 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Aug 14, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 35.75 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 149.5 | 0.40R | Flat |
| Feb 14, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 99.25 | 0.09R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 179.75 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 8:30 AM CST | 225.75 | 0.23R | Flat |
| Dec 12, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 167 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 25, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 101.25 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 477.25 | 0.06R | Flat |
| Dec 30, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 378.5 | 0.21R | Flat |
| Oct 11, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 103.5 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 124.25 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 402.25 | 0.51R | Flat |
| Sep 19, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 65.75 | 1.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 11, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 141.5 | 0.23R | Flat |
| Feb 10, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 130.5 | 0.68R | Flat |
| Oct 5, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 177 | 0.58R | Flat |
| May 24, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 296 | 0.57R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 305.5 | 0.46R | Flat |
| Aug 11, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 67.5 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 79.25 | 0.16R | Flat |
| Jan 3, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 103 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 16, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 85.25 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Nov 9, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 90.5 | 0.98R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 337.25 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 161.75 | 2.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 90.75 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 30, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 162.5 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 20, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 303.75 | 0.46R | Flat |
| Jun 19, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 320.75 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Jan 10, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 325.25 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 125.25 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 40 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 113.25 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 342.5 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Sep 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 236.5 | 0.07R | Flat |
| Jan 18, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 233 | 0.98R | Flat |
| Sep 7, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 61.25 | 1.94R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 92.5 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Feb 7, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 56.75 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 76.25 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 3, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 127.75 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Nov 9, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 84.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 76.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 491 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 2, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 492.5 | 1.98R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 24, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 510.5 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 30, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 144 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 1, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 253.5 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 279.75 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Jul 20, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 245.25 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 24, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 159.5 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 262.25 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Sep 1, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 209.5 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Aug 9, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 148 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Apr 11, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 334.25 | 0.60R | Flat |
| Jan 10, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 436.75 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Jun 3, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 130 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 232.75 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 251.75 | 2.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 220 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 347 | 1.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 2, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 134.25 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Aug 2, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 140 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (17)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 358.75 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 742.5 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 28, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 408.75 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 132.75 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 332.5 | 0.99R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 206.75 | 2.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 81.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 109 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Jun 28, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 57 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 27 | 2.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 1, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 47.5 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2009, 8:30 AM CST | 34.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 22, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 53.5 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2009, 8:30 AM CST | 63.75 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 143.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 71.5 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 9, 2008, 8:30 AM CST | 77.75 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (9)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022 | 628.25 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2020 | 485.5 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2020 | 459.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2018 | 384.25 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2017 | 71.75 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2015 | 138 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Jun 28, 2012 | 41 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 22, 2009 | 52.75 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2008 | 97.5 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 60.25 | 0.09R | Flat |
| Nov 17, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 30 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 35 | 0.71R | Flat |
| Nov 7, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 40.75 | 0.56R | Flat |
| Oct 17, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 21.75 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Jan 10, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 49.75 | 0.53R | Flat |
| Oct 30, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 10 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 16, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 21.25 | 0.05R | Flat |
| Aug 5, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 226.25 | 0.01R | Flat |
| Jun 21, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 14.5 | 0.86R | Flat |
| Mar 19, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 15 | 0.45R | Flat |
| Jul 18, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Jun 22, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.75 | 0.18R | Flat |
| Jun 20, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 14.25 | 0.09R | Flat |
| Mar 28, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 10.75 | 0.51R | Flat |
| Oct 7, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 46.75 | 0.58R | Flat |
| Apr 25, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 35.75 | 0.36R | Flat |
| Mar 18, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 20.25 | 0.36R | Flat |
| Sep 17, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.75 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 19, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 54.75 | 0.16R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 88.25 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 29 | 0.31R | Flat |
| Oct 2, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 24.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Sep 3, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 42.75 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 30, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 19.25 | 0.79R | Flat |
| Sep 25, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 20.75 | 0.06R | Flat |
| Sep 15, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 20.5 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 19, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 31.5 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 30, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 53.5 | 0.58R | Flat |
| Jun 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 100.5 | 0.39R | Flat |
| May 18, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 51.75 | 0.86R | Flat |
| Oct 18, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 25 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Jul 19, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 58 | 0.55R | Flat |
| Mar 15, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.5 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 24, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 24.75 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Jul 24, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 22.25 | 0.61R | Flat |
| Aug 5, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 51 | 0.42R | Flat |
| Aug 2, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 14.5 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 30, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.75 | 2.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.49R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 27.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2026, 8:30 AM CST | 45.75 | 0.75R | Flat |
| Jan 8, 2026, 8:30 AM CST | 22.75 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 31 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 62.75 | 0.14R | Flat |
| May 20, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 24 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 57.75 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 26.25 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 94.25 | 0.20R | Flat |
| Aug 27, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 20.75 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 23.25 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Aug 3, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 29.5 | 0.21R | Flat |
| Mar 13, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 47.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 63.75 | 0.16R | Flat |
| May 24, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 53 | 0.92R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 55.25 | 0.42R | Flat |
| Jan 18, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 60.5 | 0.56R | Flat |
| Sep 7, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 21 | 0.64R | Flat |
| Jan 28, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 30 | 0.41R | Flat |
| Jan 3, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 27.75 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 71.5 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 115 | 0.13R | Flat |
| Feb 13, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 75.75 | 0.42R | Flat |
| Jan 3, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 29 | 0.75R | Flat |
| Mar 10, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 39.25 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 97.75 | 0.94R | Flat |
| Sep 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 69.5 | 0.07R | Flat |
| Sep 7, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 24 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 16, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 25.5 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Dec 21, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 58 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Mar 12, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 215.25 | 0.25R | Flat |
| Mar 7, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 25.25 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 21, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 13.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 3, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 33.5 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 20.5 | 2.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 12.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 40.25 | 0.45R | Flat |
| Sep 28, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 25.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 24, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 25.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jul 27, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 12 | 0.54R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 58.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 28, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 108.25 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 20.25 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Aug 2, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 116.25 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 24, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 97 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Apr 2, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 54 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 59.5 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 63.5 | 0.11R | Flat |
| Jun 20, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 35.75 | 0.81R | Flat |
| May 31, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 41.75 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| May 24, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 43.5 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 63.75 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 66 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Oct 5, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 60 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 66.75 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 86 | 0.35R | Flat |
| Oct 2, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 49.25 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.75 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.75 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 25 | 0.07R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 208.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 115.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 111.75 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Apr 11, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 89.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 21, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 167.75 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 217.75 | 2.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 39.5 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 108.75 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 46.25 | 2.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 64 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 14, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 39 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 47.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 76 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 20.75 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Nov 23, 2011, 8:30 AM CST | 26.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 3, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 42.5 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Jun 15, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 25 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2011, 8:30 AM CST | 24.25 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 29, 2010, 8:30 AM CST | 20 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Nov 16, 2010, 8:30 AM CST | 29.25 | 0.15R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Separating Lines Firings (9)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022 | 169.5 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2020 | 106.25 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 29, 2018 | 36.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2015 | 56.25 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2012 | 23 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Jun 15, 2011 | 27.75 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2011 | 28.75 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 26, 2008 | 53.25 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 23, 2008 | 23.5 | 0.15R | Stopped |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.