Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bearish Three Line Strike
Four-candle pattern in a downtrend: three falling down candles followed by one big up candle that swallows them all.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random short entry (-3.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.42×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.7% of the time vs 42.8% for a random short entry. The 3.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 695 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.7% | 42.8% | -3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.5% | 26.7% | +1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.0% | 17.8% | +4.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.9% | 53.0% | +6.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 4.1% | -3.7 |
695 occurrences · 5,464,409 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (-2.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.20×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.8% of the time vs 41.8% for a random short entry. The 2.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 171 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.8% | 41.8% | -2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.8% | 26.2% | +3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.2% | 17.8% | +4.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.6% | 53.7% | +5.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.6% | 4.5% | -3.9 |
171 occurrences · 1,170,796 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (56). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
30.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random short entry (-10.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.79R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 30.4% of the time vs 40.9% for a random short entry. The 10.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 56 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 30.4% | 40.9% | -10.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.2% | 25.9% | -2.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 12.5% | 17.9% | -5.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 69.6% | 54.0% | +15.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.2% | -5.2 |
56 occurrences · 396,557 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (-2.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.89R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.0% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 2.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.0% | 39.9% | -2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.2% | 25.4% | -3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.8% | 17.9% | -3.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.0% | 54.2% | +8.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.9% | -5.9 |
27 occurrences · 198,546 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random short entry (+6.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.51×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.7% of the time vs 39.8% for a random short entry. The 6.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 15 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 15 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 39.8% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 25.7% | +7.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 18.2% | +15.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.3% | 56.1% | -2.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.1% | -4.1 |
15 occurrences · 98,519 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.5% for a random short entry (+60.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
3.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 39.5% for a random short entry. The 60.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 39.5% | +60.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 26.1% | +73.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 100.0% | 18.9% | +81.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 57.7% | -57.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.8% | -2.8 |
2 occurrences · 22,485 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+4.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.84×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.94R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.3% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 4.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 106 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.3% | 40.3% | +4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.4% | 23.1% | +4.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.7% | 14.3% | +7.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.7% | 55.8% | -1.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.9% | 4.0% | -3.0 |
106 occurrences · 5,385,601 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random short entry (-7.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.14×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.77R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 40.5% for a random short entry. The 7.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 40.5% | -7.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.8% | 24.5% | -9.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.4% | 16.0% | -8.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.3% | 55.2% | +4.0 |
| Went sideways | 7.4% | 4.3% | +3.1 |
27 occurrences · 1,199,313 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random short entry (+9.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.67×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 40.1% for a random short entry. The 9.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 24 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 24 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 40.1% | +9.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.2% | 24.9% | +4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 16.7% | +8.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 54.9% | -4.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.0% | -5.0 |
24 occurrences · 411,953 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
11.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (-28.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.71×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 11.1% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry. The 28.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±32.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 9 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 9 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 11.1% | 39.7% | -28.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 24.8% | -24.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 16.9% | -16.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 88.9% | 54.7% | +34.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.6% | -5.6 |
9 occurrences · 207,421 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (-6.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 6.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 39.9% | -6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 25.2% | +8.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 17.5% | +15.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 56.0% | +10.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.2% | -4.2 |
6 occurrences · 103,242 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.0% for a random short entry (-0.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.25×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.91R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 40.0% for a random short entry. The 0.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±42.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 40.0% | -0.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 26.4% | -6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 18.8% | +1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 57.4% | +2.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.6% | -2.6 |
5 occurrences · 23,310 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random short entry (-1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.56×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.9% of the time vs 41.7% for a random short entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 288 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.9% | 41.7% | -1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.8% | 25.5% | +3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.9% | 16.8% | +6.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.4% | 53.8% | +5.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.7% | 4.5% | -3.8 |
288 occurrences · 5,674,733 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (97). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.1% for a random short entry (+2.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.19×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.3% of the time vs 42.1% for a random short entry. The 2.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 97 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.3% | 42.1% | +2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 35.1% | 26.0% | +9.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.6% | 17.4% | +4.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.6% | 53.2% | +1.5 |
| Went sideways | 1.0% | 4.7% | -3.7 |
97 occurrences · 1,230,598 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (38). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random short entry (-2.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.5% of the time vs 42.0% for a random short entry. The 2.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±15.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 38 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.5% | 42.0% | -2.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.9% | 26.2% | +2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.1% | 17.7% | +3.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.5% | 52.6% | +7.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.3% | -5.3 |
38 occurrences · 417,391 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.1% for a random short entry (-4.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.86R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.1% of the time vs 42.1% for a random short entry. The 4.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.1% | 42.1% | -4.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 19.0% | 26.4% | -7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.5% | 18.1% | -8.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.1% | 52.2% | +5.0 |
| Went sideways | 4.8% | 5.7% | -1.0 |
21 occurrences · 208,693 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
16.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.7% for a random short entry (-26.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.53×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.66R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 16.7% of the time vs 42.7% for a random short entry. The 26.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 16.7% | 42.7% | -26.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 27.3% | -10.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.7% | 18.9% | -2.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 83.3% | 52.6% | +30.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.7% | -4.7 |
6 occurrences · 103,350 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random short entry (-9.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.59×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 42.4% for a random short entry. The 9.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 42.4% | -9.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 26.8% | +6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 18.3% | +15.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 53.7% | +13.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.9% | -3.9 |
3 occurrences · 23,343 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.6% for a random short entry (+61.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.45×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 38.6% for a random short entry. The 61.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 38.6% | +61.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 23.2% | +26.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 15.4% | +34.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 56.8% | -56.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.7% | -4.7 |
2 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random short entry (+5.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.58×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.7% of the time vs 41.2% for a random short entry. The 5.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 197 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 41.2% | +5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.4% | 25.0% | +4.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.3% | 16.5% | +3.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.3% | 54.2% | -1.9 |
| Went sideways | 1.0% | 4.6% | -3.6 |
197 occurrences · 5,523,131 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (71). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random short entry (-2.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.33×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.95R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.4% of the time vs 41.6% for a random short entry. The 2.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 71 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.4% | 41.6% | -2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.5% | 25.8% | -3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.5% | 17.3% | -1.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.7% | 53.4% | +4.4 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 5.0% | -2.1 |
71 occurrences · 1,205,438 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (32). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random short entry (+5.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.23×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.9% of the time vs 41.5% for a random short entry. The 5.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 32 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.9% | 41.5% | +5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.3% | 26.1% | +5.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.1% | 17.7% | +10.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.1% | 52.9% | +0.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.6% | -5.6 |
32 occurrences · 409,464 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random short entry (-1.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.38×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 41.4% for a random short entry. The 1.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 15 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 15 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 41.4% | -1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.7% | 26.3% | +0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.7% | 18.1% | +8.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 52.1% | +7.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.5% | -6.5 |
15 occurrences · 205,041 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.9%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random short entry (+0.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.9% of the time vs 42.4% for a random short entry. The 0.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±36.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 7 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.9% | 42.4% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 27.2% | +15.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.6% | 18.8% | +9.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.1% | 53.0% | +4.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.6% | -4.6 |
7 occurrences · 101,525 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random short entry (-9.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.63R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 42.5% for a random short entry. The 9.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 42.5% | -9.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.0% | -27.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.4% | -18.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 53.8% | +12.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.8% | -3.8 |
3 occurrences · 23,145 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random short entry (-14.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.15×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.62R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 39.8% for a random short entry. The 14.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 39.8% | -14.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 25.0% | -0.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.3% | -17.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 56.0% | +19.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.2% | -4.2 |
4 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random short entry (+0.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.5% of the time vs 40.2% for a random short entry. The 0.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 116 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.5% | 40.2% | +0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.6% | 24.5% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.4% | 16.2% | +6.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.8% | 54.6% | +3.1 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 5.2% | -3.4 |
116 occurrences · 4,058,645 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (55). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random short entry (-1.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 41.4% for a random short entry. The 1.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 55 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 41.4% | -1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.6% | 25.6% | -2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 17.1% | +2.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.2% | 53.3% | +4.9 |
| Went sideways | 1.8% | 5.4% | -3.6 |
55 occurrences · 937,646 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random short entry (+10.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.37R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 52.2% of the time vs 41.5% for a random short entry. The 10.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 23 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 23 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.2% | 41.5% | +10.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 43.5% | 25.8% | +17.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.1% | 17.4% | +8.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.8% | 52.4% | -4.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.1% | -6.1 |
23 occurrences · 322,959 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
53.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random short entry (+12.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.06×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.39R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 53.6% of the time vs 41.4% for a random short entry. The 12.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 28 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 28 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 53.6% | 41.4% | +12.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 26.0% | +16.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 17.8% | +7.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.4% | 52.0% | -5.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.7% | -6.7 |
28 occurrences · 162,387 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.2% for a random short entry (-4.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.26×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.5% of the time vs 42.2% for a random short entry. The 4.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 16 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 16 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.5% | 42.2% | -4.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.3% | 27.0% | +4.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 18.4% | +6.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.5% | 52.9% | +9.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.9% | -4.9 |
16 occurrences · 80,654 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random short entry (-41.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.21×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 41.7% for a random short entry. The 41.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 41.7% | -41.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 25.4% | -25.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 16.9% | -16.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 54.0% | +12.6 |
| Went sideways | 33.3% | 4.3% | +29.1 |
3 occurrences · 18,597 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
60.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (+20.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 20.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±42.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 60.0% | 39.9% | +20.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 22.9% | -2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 14.4% | -14.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 55.6% | -15.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.4% | -4.4 |
5 occurrences · 4,697 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A three line strike is the odd one out. Three down candles fall in a row, each closing lower, which looks like a clean slide. Then a single large up candle opens lower and rallies all the way back, closing above where the first candle began. It erases the whole move in one bar. Despite the bearish setup, the snap back often points to more upside, which makes this a tricky shape to lean on.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first three candles are all down (red) candles of decent size, not tiny.
- Each of the three opens inside the prior body and closes lower than the one before.
- The fourth candle is a strong up (green) candle that closes above the first candle’s open, wiping out the three-bar slide.
- The cleaner the three-step decline and the fuller the recovery, the more textbook the shape.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the four candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The first three candles look like a clean win for the sellers. Each one opens inside the prior body and closes lower than the last, a tidy three-step slide that tells everyone the bears are in control and the trend is theirs. Traders watching this would expect more of the same, and shorts grow confident.
Then the fourth candle turns the whole thing on its head. A single large up bar opens lower, in line with the slide, and rallies all the way back, closing above where the first candle began. Three sessions of selling are wiped out in one. The sellers who built positions during the orderly decline are now trapped above their entries, and the rush to cover feeds the move higher. Despite how bearish the run looked, control flips hard to the buyers in a single bar, and that snap back is why the shape so often points to more upside rather than less.
Whether that violent reclaim carries on is the question the numbers below take up.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the 4 candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:17 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:04 AM CDT | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 9:43 AM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:10 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 9:01 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 5:51 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2026, 1:16 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 12:51 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 7:53 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 10:01 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 30, 2026, 3:15 PM CDT | 6.25 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 12:41 AM CDT | 8.25 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2026, 5:38 PM CDT | 18 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 5:42 AM CDT | 5.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 5:42 AM CDT | 10.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 4:04 AM CDT | 11.75 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 8:06 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 17, 2026, 7:21 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 12, 2026, 3:42 AM CDT | 9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:35 AM CDT | 23.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 1:05 PM CDT | 12.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 2:35 PM CDT | 22 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2026, 5:05 AM CDT | 16.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 2:45 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 3:50 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 5:45 PM CST | 15.25 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 3:50 AM CST | 9.5 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2026, 11:50 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2025, 8:05 PM CST | 4.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2025, 8:55 AM CST | 20.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2025, 5:35 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2025, 2:35 AM CST | 15.75 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2025, 1:45 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2025, 6:26 AM CDT | 2.25 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 51 | 0.60R | Flat |
| Aug 25, 2025, 11:45 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 18, 2025, 6:45 PM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 18, 2025, 6:45 AM CDT | 4.25 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2025, 11:46 PM CDT | 2 | 0.25R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026, 8:15 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2026, 10:15 PM CST | 33 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2026, 12:30 AM CST | 6.75 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 3, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 27, 2025, 2:00 PM CDT | 52 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| May 28, 2025, 12:00 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2025, 8:00 AM CDT | 10.5 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 26, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2025, 4:45 AM CDT | 9.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 14, 2025, 5:42 AM CDT | 20.25 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2025, 2:45 PM CST | 79.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2025, 6:45 PM CST | 17.5 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Dec 5, 2024, 2:00 AM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2024, 7:15 PM CST | 11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2024, 5:45 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2024, 2:30 PM CST | 24.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 15, 2024, 7:30 AM CST | 16.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2024, 5:07 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2024, 5:45 PM CST | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2025, 11:30 PM CST | 14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2025, 12:30 AM CDT | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2025, 5:30 PM CDT | 12.5 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 4, 2025, 12:00 AM CDT | 23.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2025, 1:00 PM CDT | 82.75 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2025, 12:00 AM CST | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2024, 3:30 AM CDT | 18 | 1.47R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 4, 2023, 2:00 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 7, 2023, 8:30 PM CDT | 14.75 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Jun 21, 2023, 11:01 AM CDT | 47 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2023, 9:30 PM CST | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2023, 8:00 AM CST | 30.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2022, 1:00 PM CDT | 47.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2022, 2:30 PM CDT | 61 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 14, 2020, 9:30 PM CDT | 14.5 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 17, 2018, 4:11 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 28, 2017, 2:40 AM CDT | 4.75 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Apr 5, 2017, 5:30 PM CDT | 13.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2016, 12:42 AM CST | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2015, 6:05 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.23R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (15)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 29.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2025, 8:00 AM CDT | 50.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2023, 3:00 PM CDT | 23.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2022, 1:00 PM CST | 54.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 23, 2022, 11:00 PM CDT | 31 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2022, 2:00 AM CST | 31 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 9, 2018, 10:05 AM CDT | 7.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2016, 3:09 AM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 1, 2015, 1:10 AM CDT | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2014, 7:27 PM CDT | 2.25 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2012, 2:03 PM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 14, 2012, 1:30 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2011, 11:19 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2008, 4:41 AM CDT | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 18, 2008, 2:03 AM CDT | 4 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 23.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2020, 5:00 AM CDT | 39.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 2:32 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 2:36 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 4:04 AM CDT | 3 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 5:42 AM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 12:08 PM CST | 0.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 6:19 PM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2025, 12:00 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2025, 4:01 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Nov 20, 2025, 10:43 AM CST | 5.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2025, 9:43 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2025, 5:16 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 24, 2025, 11:51 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 17, 2025, 8:38 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2025, 7:06 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 29, 2025, 2:40 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2025, 12:07 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 6, 2025, 3:24 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 1, 2025, 2:44 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2025, 3:31 PM CDT | 17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026, 3:50 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2026, 1:00 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2025, 10:22 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2025, 11:40 PM CDT | 3.75 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2025, 4:15 AM CDT | 3.75 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Oct 2, 2024, 3:20 AM CDT | 1 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 5, 2024, 8:45 PM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2023, 12:56 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 18, 2023, 8:48 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2023, 2:40 AM CST | 1.75 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2022, 11:55 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2022, 6:15 PM CDT | 2 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 23, 2022, 7:55 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2022, 2:40 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2021, 4:05 AM CST | 11.75 | 0.30R | Flat |
| Jun 18, 2020, 2:10 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2019, 6:55 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2019, 11:50 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2018, 10:05 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 20, 2016, 8:06 PM CDT | 0.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2026, 11:30 PM CST | 5.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 20, 2025, 11:15 AM CDT | 5 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2025, 2:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2024, 10:00 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2024, 9:30 PM CDT | 8.25 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2022, 12:45 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2022, 3:45 PM CST | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2021, 7:45 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 26, 2021, 12:45 AM CDT | 2 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2021, 1:45 AM CST | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2020, 3:00 AM CDT | 7.75 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 14, 2019, 5:15 PM CDT | 3 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 17, 2019, 7:30 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2019, 5:15 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Jan 4, 2019, 7:15 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2018, 10:45 PM CST | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 11, 2016, 11:04 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 26, 2015, 11:45 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 19, 2013, 8:23 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 27, 2011, 6:02 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (9)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2025, 12:30 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 2.75 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 21, 2025, 12:00 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2024, 10:00 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2023, 3:35 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2023, 7:00 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 16, 2018, 3:01 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2015, 4:30 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2024, 1:00 AM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 17, 2022, 8:00 AM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2022, 2:00 AM CST | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2020, 9:00 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 28, 2016, 7:02 PM CST | 4 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2016, 2:03 PM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 69.5 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 30, 2022, 9:00 AM CDT | 8.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 21, 2017, 5:14 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2011, 5:00 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2009, 1:34 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:46 AM CDT | 1.2 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:41 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:16 PM CDT | 1 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 7:59 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 15, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 6:24 PM CDT | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 10:58 AM CDT | 6.1 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 2:49 PM CDT | 0.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 6:20 AM CDT | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 5:29 PM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 3:53 PM CDT | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 7:08 AM CDT | 2.5 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 27, 2026, 10:57 AM CST | 1.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2026, 1:48 PM CST | 0.6 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2026, 7:22 AM CST | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 6:51 PM CST | 2.9 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 6:07 PM CST | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2026, 10:10 AM CST | 2.6 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 8:08 PM CST | 4.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 1:55 PM CST | 1.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:15 AM CDT | 4.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 1:05 AM CST | 3.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2025, 12:50 PM CST | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 27, 2025, 6:15 PM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 27, 2025, 5:35 AM CDT | 3.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2025, 12:10 PM CDT | 4.7 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2025, 2:25 AM CDT | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2025, 12:20 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 29, 2025, 7:19 AM CDT | 0.9 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 12, 2025, 7:57 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 12, 2025, 3:51 AM CDT | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 24, 2025, 12:20 AM CDT | 0.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 3, 2025, 5:15 PM CDT | 1.7 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2025, 4:30 AM CDT | 1.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 12, 2025, 4:15 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2025, 11:20 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2025, 1:30 AM CDT | 1.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2025, 9:50 PM CDT | 1.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 27, 2025, 3:06 PM CST | 0.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026, 12:46 PM CDT | 3.5 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 8:04 PM CDT | 2.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 24, 2025, 2:30 PM CDT | 2.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 2 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 28, 2025, 12:30 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 24, 2023, 6:40 PM CDT | 0.8 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2022, 8:45 PM CST | 0.8 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 30, 2022, 7:15 AM CDT | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2022, 6:02 AM CDT | 2.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 12, 2022, 1:46 PM CDT | 1.3 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2021, 7:30 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2021, 3:15 AM CST | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 12, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.7 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2020, 12:45 PM CDT | 2.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 14, 2020, 6:30 AM CDT | 1.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2019, 7:15 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2019, 8:45 PM CDT | 1.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2019, 11:01 PM CDT | 0.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2018, 9:46 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026, 7:32 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2025, 6:30 AM CST | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 18, 2024, 6:00 PM CDT | 1.7 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2024, 7:30 PM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2024, 1:00 PM CST | 1.8 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 15, 2023, 1:31 AM CDT | 1.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 5, 2021, 8:00 PM CDT | 1.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 5, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.6 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 27, 2017, 6:30 PM CST | 0.9 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2017, 11:39 AM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 21, 2017, 6:00 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2016, 4:06 AM CST | 0.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 14, 2015, 9:33 PM CDT | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 6, 2014, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.5 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2013, 6:05 AM CST | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 24, 2012, 6:53 AM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 4, 2011, 12:19 PM CDT | 8.7 | 0.39R | Flat |
| Aug 13, 2010, 6:18 AM CDT | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2009, 1:16 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 3, 2009, 2:59 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 15, 2022, 8:02 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2021, 10:00 AM CST | 6.9 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2019, 6:00 PM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2014, 6:59 AM CDT | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2012, 2:16 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2014, 9:20 PM CDT | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2011, 1:05 AM CST | 24.9 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2008, 1:42 AM CDT | 7.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2013 | 36.6 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2013 | 22.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:32 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 14, 2026, 9:59 AM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 5:18 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 8:21 AM CDT | 0.1 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 10:42 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 8:56 AM CDT | 0.19 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 5:17 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2026, 5:29 PM CDT | 0.31 | 2.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 3:43 AM CDT | 0.15 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 6:29 AM CDT | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 6:38 AM CDT | 0.67 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 10:19 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 10:16 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 8:52 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 8:33 PM CST | 0.03 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2025, 4:55 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 12:06 PM CDT | 0.01 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 30, 2025, 8:46 AM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 13, 2025, 5:14 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2025, 8:20 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2026, 8:50 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 10:01 AM CST | 0.11 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2025, 9:03 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2025, 2:08 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2025, 5:56 AM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2025, 7:32 PM CDT | 0.04 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2025, 5:35 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2025, 10:32 AM CST | 0.09 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2025, 8:52 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Sep 17, 2024, 1:28 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2023, 1:51 AM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 27, 2023, 8:53 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 3, 2023, 11:09 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2023, 6:23 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2023, 7:31 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2023, 1:15 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2022, 12:17 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2022, 4:00 AM CDT | 0.21 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2022, 7:17 PM CDT | 0.09 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 4, 2022, 10:21 PM CDT | 0.27 | 0.85R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2025, 6:18 PM CDT | 0.1 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2025, 4:24 AM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 2, 2025, 8:12 AM CDT | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2024, 11:42 AM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2024, 6:25 AM CST | 0.16 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2024, 7:08 AM CST | 0.11 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 14, 2023, 7:50 AM CDT | 0.29 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 27, 2022, 8:32 PM CDT | 0.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2022, 12:45 PM CDT | 0.36 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 3, 2021, 8:30 PM CDT | 0.08 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2020, 9:18 AM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2020, 1:55 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2015, 4:10 AM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2014, 8:10 AM CST | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 14, 2014, 8:27 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2014, 3:59 AM CDT | 0.09 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Sep 14, 2014, 7:22 PM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 22, 2013, 11:39 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2012, 10:03 AM CDT | 0.19 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2012, 11:15 AM CDT | 0.21 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (15)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2024, 3:34 AM CST | 0.19 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 14, 2024, 9:29 PM CST | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2023, 6:36 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2022, 11:09 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2020, 9:18 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2016, 2:39 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2015, 3:34 AM CST | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 2, 2012, 12:03 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2011, 7:52 PM CST | 0.31 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 16, 2011, 2:19 AM CDT | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 1, 2011, 5:32 PM CDT | 0.33 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2010, 5:02 AM CDT | 0.57 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2008, 2:54 AM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2008, 9:41 PM CDT | 0.23 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2008, 9:20 PM CDT | 0.1 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (8)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2023, 6:02 PM CDT | 0.16 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2022, 7:00 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2021, 9:26 PM CST | 0.13 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 4, 2014, 2:57 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2012, 6:46 AM CST | 0.38 | 2.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 21, 2010, 7:25 AM CDT | 0.19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2009, 10:06 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Apr 6, 2009, 12:32 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 4, 2019, 5:03 AM CDT | 0.33 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 28, 2017, 5:05 AM CST | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2018 | 0.9 | 2.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 14, 2015 | 1.47 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2015 | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2010 | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026, 3:57 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 12:20 PM CST | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 2:07 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2025, 10:56 AM CST | 0.006 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 11, 2025, 3:06 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2025, 9:08 PM CDT | 0.006 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2025, 1:25 PM CST | 0.003 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 9, 2025, 11:42 AM CST | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 9, 2025, 12:27 AM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 31, 2024, 7:23 AM CST | 0.012 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 27, 2024, 7:24 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Sep 30, 2024, 6:34 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 28, 2024, 12:51 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2024, 8:11 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2023, 1:01 PM CST | 0.014 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 21, 2022, 2:01 AM CST | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2022, 7:09 AM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2022, 1:17 AM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2022, 2:30 PM CST | 0.009 | 0.78R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2022, 7:52 AM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2026, 7:41 PM CDT | 0.008 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 1:23 AM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2025, 10:47 AM CST | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2024, 1:27 PM CST | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2024, 9:32 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2024, 9:52 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Oct 8, 2024, 9:51 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 23, 2024, 11:33 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2024, 5:35 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 15, 2023, 9:05 AM CDT | 0.017 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2023, 5:15 AM CST | 0.018 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2023, 7:25 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 23, 2023, 8:37 AM CST | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2022, 2:29 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Sep 22, 2022, 1:28 PM CDT | 0.034 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 21, 2022, 3:37 PM CDT | 0.027 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2022, 10:20 PM CDT | 0.011 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2022, 11:26 PM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2022, 3:11 PM CDT | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 4, 2022, 6:08 AM CST | 0.035 | 0.51R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025, 12:09 PM CST | 0.012 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 3, 2024, 12:46 PM CST | 0.017 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2024, 7:19 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 30, 2023, 10:39 AM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2023, 12:44 AM CST | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2022, 10:22 AM CST | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2022, 12:38 PM CDT | 0.056 | 2.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2022, 12:08 PM CDT | 0.044 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2022, 1:51 PM CDT | 0.014 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 12, 2021, 1:46 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2017, 6:20 AM CST | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 7, 2017, 2:32 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2017, 6:53 AM CDT | 0.008 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2014, 6:04 PM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2014, 2:50 AM CDT | 0.009 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2012, 9:06 PM CST | 0.005 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 23, 2011, 4:32 AM CST | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 4, 2011, 8:56 PM CDT | 0.014 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2009, 1:39 AM CDT | 0.014 | 2.21R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2026, 9:55 AM CST | 0.023 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 25, 2024, 12:29 PM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2023, 7:41 AM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2022, 8:56 PM CST | 0.027 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 15, 2022, 10:15 AM CDT | 0.045 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.157 | 1.94R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2022, 6:49 PM CDT | 0.013 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 25, 2022, 10:14 PM CST | 0.005 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2020, 2:06 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 2, 2020, 5:23 AM CST | 0.01 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 11, 2019, 1:31 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 27, 2018, 1:31 AM CST | 0.018 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2017, 7:08 AM CST | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 4, 2015, 4:49 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2015, 5:00 PM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2014, 8:52 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2014, 1:02 PM CDT | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 18, 2014, 10:30 AM CDT | 0.013 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 14, 2014, 1:06 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Nov 12, 2013, 2:05 AM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (16)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025, 11:11 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2025, 6:28 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2025, 4:45 AM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2024, 2:07 AM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 21, 2022, 9:49 AM CDT | 0.054 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Oct 12, 2020, 8:16 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2020, 2:22 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2020, 6:57 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 27, 2018, 1:01 AM CST | 0.022 | 2.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2018, 10:31 AM CST | 0.084 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 28, 2016, 7:25 AM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 31, 2014, 11:02 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 27, 2013, 7:57 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 28, 2013, 11:21 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 29, 2011, 8:49 AM CDT | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 2, 2010, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.036 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025, 8:50 AM CST | 0.493 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Nov 3, 2022, 10:26 PM CDT | 0.053 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2013, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Line Strike Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2025 | 0.154 | 1.99R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 14, 2024 | 0.088 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2023 | 0.014 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2017 | 0.071 | 2.85R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 8, 2016 | 0.023 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.