Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Three Line Strike
Four-candle shape: three rising up candles, then one big down candle that erases all three in a single bar.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.6%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (-4.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.36×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 38.6% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.6% | 43.3% | -4.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.2% | 26.6% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.6% | 17.5% | +5.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.4% | 51.9% | +9.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.8% | -4.8 |
642 occurrences · 5,480,996 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (-7.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.21×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.82R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.0% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry. The 7.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 137 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.0% | 42.8% | -7.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 19.7% | 26.2% | -6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.1% | 17.2% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.2% | 51.6% | +12.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.7% | 5.6% | -4.9 |
137 occurrences · 1,174,306 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (55). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
20.0%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random long entry (-22.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.56R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 20.0% of the time vs 42.6% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 20.0% | 42.6% | -22.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.5% | 26.2% | -11.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.1% | 17.5% | -8.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 76.4% | 50.7% | +25.7 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 6.7% | -3.1 |
55 occurrences · 397,381 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.1% for a random long entry (-17.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.15×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.67R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 42.1% for a random long entry. The 17.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 24 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 24 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 42.1% | -17.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 26.1% | -9.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 12.5% | 17.7% | -5.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 49.7% | +25.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 8.1% | -8.1 |
24 occurrences · 198,871 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (+4.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.57×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.4% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry. The 4.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 19 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 19 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.4% | 43.3% | +4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 36.8% | 27.0% | +9.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.3% | 18.3% | +8.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.6% | 50.5% | +2.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.2% | -6.2 |
19 occurrences · 98,675 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.8% for a random long entry (-19.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.69R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.15R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 44.8% for a random long entry. The 19.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±34.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 8 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 8 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 44.8% | -19.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 26.7% | -1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 12.5% | 17.2% | -4.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 49.9% | +25.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.3% | -5.3 |
8 occurrences · 22,510 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 46.7% for a random long entry (-13.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.16R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 46.7% for a random long entry. The 13.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 46.7% | -13.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 26.1% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 15.9% | +17.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 47.7% | +18.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.5% | -5.5 |
3 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random long entry (-0.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.94R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.94R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.2% of the time vs 40.7% for a random long entry. The 0.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 102 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.2% | 40.7% | -0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 21.6% | 23.1% | -1.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.6% | 14.1% | +4.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.8% | 54.8% | +5.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.5% | -4.5 |
102 occurrences · 5,414,731 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (46). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
56.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (+15.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.42R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 56.5% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry — a 15.1-point gap, wider than the ±14.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 56.5% | 41.4% | +15.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 43.5% | 24.4% | +19.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.1% | 15.5% | +10.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.5% | 53.3% | -9.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.2% | -5.2 |
46 occurrences · 1,205,028 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random long entry (+5.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.45×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.7% of the time vs 41.6% for a random long entry. The 5.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 15 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 15 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 41.6% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 24.9% | -4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 16.2% | +3.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.7% | 52.1% | -5.5 |
| Went sideways | 6.7% | 6.3% | +0.4 |
15 occurrences · 413,893 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (-3.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.66×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.88R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.5% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry. The 3.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±26.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 13 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 13 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.5% | 41.4% | -3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 15.4% | 25.0% | -9.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.4% | 16.5% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.5% | 51.0% | +10.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 7.5% | -7.5 |
13 occurrences · 208,252 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.7% for a random long entry (+2.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.30R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 45.5% of the time vs 42.7% for a random long entry. The 2.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±29.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 11 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 11 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.5% | 42.7% | +2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 36.4% | 25.9% | +10.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 27.3% | 17.1% | +10.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.5% | 51.2% | +3.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.1% | -6.1 |
11 occurrences · 103,596 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
66.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.9% for a random long entry (+22.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 43.9% for a random long entry. The 22.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 66.7% | 43.9% | +22.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 26.3% | +7.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 16.8% | -16.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 33.3% | 50.7% | -17.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.4% | -5.4 |
3 occurrences · 23,363 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.7% for a random long entry (-19.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.51×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.54R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 44.7% for a random long entry. The 19.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 44.7% | -19.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 23.8% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 14.3% | -14.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 48.9% | +26.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.4% | -6.4 |
4 occurrences · 4,708 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random long entry (+1.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.68×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.7% of the time vs 41.5% for a random long entry. The 1.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 274 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.7% | 41.5% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.3% | 25.1% | +5.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.4% | 16.4% | +7.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.9% | 53.6% | +3.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 4.9% | -4.5 |
274 occurrences · 5,688,049 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random long entry (+1.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.1% of the time vs 42.0% for a random long entry. The 1.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 109 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.1% | 42.0% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.1% | 25.5% | +6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.3% | 16.8% | +2.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.9% | 52.6% | +4.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.3% | -5.3 |
109 occurrences · 1,232,740 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (55). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (-2.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 2.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 55 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 42.3% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.1% | 25.9% | +3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.2% | 17.2% | +0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 51.6% | +8.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.0% | -6.0 |
55 occurrences · 417,900 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random long entry (+0.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.5% of the time vs 42.6% for a random long entry. The 0.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 23 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 23 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.5% | 42.6% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.4% | 26.3% | +4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.4% | 17.7% | -0.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.5% | 50.7% | +5.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.7% | -6.7 |
23 occurrences · 208,980 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.6% for a random long entry (-10.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.56×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 43.6% for a random long entry. The 10.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±28.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 12 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 12 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 43.6% | -10.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 27.2% | +6.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.7% | 18.2% | -1.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 51.0% | +15.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.4% | -5.4 |
12 occurrences · 103,457 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.9% for a random long entry (-19.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.69R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.18R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 44.9% for a random long entry. The 19.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 44.9% | -19.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 28.5% | -3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.2% | -19.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 50.6% | +24.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.5% | -4.5 |
4 occurrences · 23,354 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.9% for a random long entry (+52.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.35R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.25R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 47.9% for a random long entry. The 52.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 47.9% | +52.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 66.7% | 31.0% | +35.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 66.7% | 21.1% | +45.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 47.7% | -47.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.3% | -4.3 |
3 occurrences · 4,705 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
34.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-6.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.69×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.97R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 34.8% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 6.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 204 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 34.8% | 41.3% | -6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.5% | 25.0% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.6% | 16.3% | +4.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.7% | 53.9% | +10.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 4.9% | -4.4 |
204 occurrences · 5,524,023 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (70). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
51.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random long entry (+9.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.45×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.36R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 51.4% of the time vs 42.0% for a random long entry. The 9.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 70 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 51.4% | 42.0% | +9.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 37.1% | 25.8% | +11.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.6% | 17.0% | +11.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.6% | 52.7% | -4.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.3% | -5.3 |
70 occurrences · 1,206,661 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
29.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.1% for a random long entry (-12.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.75R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 29.6% of the time vs 42.1% for a random long entry. The 12.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 29.6% | 42.1% | -12.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.5% | 26.0% | -7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.5% | 17.4% | +1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 70.4% | 51.8% | +18.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.1% | -6.1 |
27 occurrences · 409,942 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
32.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random long entry (-9.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.40×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.90R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 32.0% of the time vs 41.6% for a random long entry. The 9.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 25 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 25 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 32.0% | 41.6% | -9.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.0% | 25.8% | +2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 17.5% | +2.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 68.0% | 51.1% | +16.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 7.3% | -7.3 |
25 occurrences · 205,208 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (-9.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.36×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.65R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 9.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 42.4% | -9.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.6% | -26.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.0% | -18.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 52.3% | +14.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.3% | -5.3 |
6 occurrences · 101,579 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.5% for a random long entry (-10.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.35×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.50R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 43.5% for a random long entry. The 10.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 43.5% | -10.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.7% | -26.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.4% | -17.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 52.4% | +14.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.1% | -4.1 |
3 occurrences · 23,153 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.3% for a random long entry (+55.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.82×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.35R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 44.3% for a random long entry. The 55.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 44.3% | +55.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 66.7% | 26.8% | +39.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 66.7% | 17.5% | +49.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 51.0% | -51.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.7% | -4.7 |
3 occurrences · 4,698 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random long entry (-0.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.75×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.4% of the time vs 40.4% for a random long entry. The 0.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 109 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.4% | 40.4% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.5% | 24.7% | +2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.8% | 16.2% | +8.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.7% | 54.4% | +4.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.9% | 5.1% | -4.2 |
109 occurrences · 4,070,518 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (69). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random long entry (+0.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.39×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.0% of the time vs 41.5% for a random long entry. The 0.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 69 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.0% | 41.5% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 36.2% | 25.7% | +10.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 29.0% | 17.1% | +11.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.5% | 53.2% | +3.3 |
| Went sideways | 1.4% | 5.3% | -3.9 |
69 occurrences · 939,861 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.8%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random long entry (+6.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.53×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.29R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.8% of the time vs 41.5% for a random long entry. The 6.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 23 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 23 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.8% | 41.5% | +6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 39.1% | 25.9% | +13.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.1% | 17.7% | +8.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.2% | 52.5% | -0.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.0% | -6.0 |
23 occurrences · 323,500 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
54.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random long entry (+13.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.20×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.48R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 54.5% of the time vs 41.2% for a random long entry. The 13.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 22 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 22 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 54.5% | 41.2% | +13.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 45.5% | 26.0% | +19.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 36.4% | 18.0% | +18.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 45.5% | 52.4% | -6.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 6.4% | -6.4 |
22 occurrences · 162,572 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.9%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random long entry (+1.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.76R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.9% of the time vs 41.9% for a random long entry. The 1.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±36.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 7 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.9% | 41.9% | +1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.3% | 26.9% | -12.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.5% | -18.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.1% | 53.6% | +3.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.5% | -4.5 |
7 occurrences · 80,670 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (+7.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.20×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.46R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry. The 7.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 42.5% | +7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.3% | +22.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.4% | -18.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 54.0% | -4.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.5% | -3.5 |
2 occurrences · 18,587 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 4 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.4% for a random long entry (-43.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.54×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.4% for a random long entry. The 43.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.4% | -43.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.8% | -27.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.1% | -19.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 53.8% | +46.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
1 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish three line strike is a four-candle shape that looks like a reversal but often is not. Three up candles climb in a steady staircase, each opening inside the last one’s body and closing higher. Then a fourth candle drops hard and closes below where the whole run began, wiping out all three gains in one bar. Despite the violent down candle, traders read it as a continuation of the uptrend, a flush that shakes out weak hands before price moves on.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- The first three candles are up (green) candles, each a real body, not tiny.
- Each of those three opens inside the prior candle’s body and closes higher than the one before.
- The fourth candle is a strong down candle that closes below the open of the first candle, erasing the whole run.
- The cleaner the three-step climb and the deeper the final flush, the more textbook the shape.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the four candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The three rising candles are an uptrend doing what it does, with buyers in control and stepping price higher one bar at a time. Each candle opening inside the last and closing above it shows a steady, orderly advance, not a panic. Going into the fourth bar, buyers own the move.
Then the big down candle hits and erases all three gains at once. That looks like sellers seizing control, but the move is usually a flush rather than a takeover. Profit-takers and short-term traders bail in a rush, and the speed of the drop scares out the weakest longs. Once that quick wave of selling clears, the supply it created is spent. The buyers who built the uptrend are still there, often happy to reload at the better price the flush just handed them. So the dominant side pauses, shakes loose the nervous money, and is positioned to press on rather than give up.
Whether the trend actually resumes after that shakeout is what the figures below weigh.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the 4 candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026, 3:56 AM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:06 PM CDT | 2.5 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 6:52 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 4:31 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:06 AM CDT | 20.25 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 6:04 PM CDT | 23 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 4:44 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 2:42 AM CDT | 6 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 8:54 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 8:40 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 12:12 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 29, 2026, 5:23 PM CDT | 32.75 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 7:31 PM CDT | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 11:06 AM CDT | 11.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 7:30 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 5:56 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2026, 1:32 PM CST | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 2:35 PM CST | 13.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 1, 2026, 5:03 PM CST | 73.25 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2026, 2:46 AM CDT | 4.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 6:55 PM CDT | 8.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 6:05 AM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 8:00 PM CST | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2026, 12:05 AM CST | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 8, 2026, 5:25 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2026, 3:10 AM CST | 12.25 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 6, 2025, 7:35 AM CST | 13.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 3:05 PM CDT | 54 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 26, 2025, 10:35 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 1, 2025, 8:15 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 31, 2025, 7:20 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 28, 2025, 2:55 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2025, 9:30 AM CDT | 22 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2025, 4:25 AM CDT | 7.25 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2025, 7:45 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 6, 2025, 6:50 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2025, 4:05 AM CDT | 10 | 2.02R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2026, 12:30 AM CST | 11.25 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2025, 10:45 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2025, 9:15 PM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 12, 2025, 1:45 AM CST | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2025, 2:45 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2025, 7:30 AM CDT | 16.25 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Oct 3, 2025, 12:45 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Aug 5, 2025, 6:15 AM CDT | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2025, 1:15 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2025, 7:30 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT | 19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2025, 10:46 PM CST | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 25, 2024, 9:30 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 22, 2024, 7:00 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 3, 2024, 9:00 AM CDT | 15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2024, 4:15 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2024, 11:45 PM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2024, 3:30 AM CST | 25.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2023, 3:45 AM CST | 5.75 | 0.57R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 20.5 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 2:00 AM CST | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2026, 7:30 AM CST | 53.5 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Sep 24, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2025, 3:30 AM CDT | 14.25 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 27.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2024, 1:30 PM CST | 22.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2024, 2:00 AM CDT | 19 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2023, 7:32 AM CST | 12.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2023, 3:30 PM CST | 17.5 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 26, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2021, 7:30 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2021, 10:00 AM CDT | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2020, 8:00 PM CDT | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2020, 7:00 PM CDT | 15 | 2.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2019, 2:30 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2018, 5:31 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2017, 8:07 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2016, 7:30 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| May 18, 2016, 7:17 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (19)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 19.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 8:00 AM CST | 11.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 2:00 AM CST | 25.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2024, 7:00 AM CDT | 46.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 31, 2023, 8:00 AM CDT | 22.75 | 2.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 13, 2021, 10:00 AM CDT | 48.75 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2021, 8:00 AM CDT | 10 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2021, 7:00 AM CDT | 37 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 27, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 10.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2020, 12:52 AM CDT | 83.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2018, 12:00 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2016, 12:28 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2016, 2:14 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2016, 9:54 PM CDT | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 3, 2011, 10:16 PM CDT | 4.25 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2009, 8:38 AM CDT | 3.75 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2009, 1:58 AM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2008, 2:14 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (8)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 87.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 8, 2024, 9:00 AM CST | 33.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 11, 2022, 5:00 AM CDT | 285.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 4, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 37.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 24, 2019, 9:00 AM CDT | 15.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2016, 5:14 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2015, 5:54 AM CST | 12.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2011, 2:22 AM CST | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2022 | 172.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 12, 2020 | 113 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2014 | 16.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2026, 9:25 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 10:35 PM CDT | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 5:56 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 7:44 AM CST | 2.25 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 25, 2026, 6:31 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 10:49 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 21, 2025, 4:54 AM CST | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2025, 2:00 PM CST | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2025, 10:46 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 13, 2025, 8:05 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 12, 2025, 8:56 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Jul 7, 2025, 7:55 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2025, 12:20 PM CDT | 3.5 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 6, 2025, 2:46 PM CDT | 2 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2025, 9:14 AM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2025, 3:36 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 10, 2025, 11:52 AM CDT | 13.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 3, 2025, 6:31 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2025, 2:50 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2026, 6:40 AM CDT | 4 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 9:55 PM CDT | 5.5 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 23, 2026, 8:40 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 7:20 PM CST | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 7:30 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2025, 9:15 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2025, 6:45 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2025, 11:06 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 29, 2025, 2:50 PM CDT | 2.5 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 2, 2025, 3:40 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2025, 10:55 PM CDT | 0.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2025, 2:30 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2025, 6:45 AM CST | 4 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2024, 1:55 PM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2024, 2:00 PM CDT | 2.25 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2024, 9:05 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 10, 2024, 7:30 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 29, 2024, 2:25 AM CDT | 1.5 | 2.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 21, 2024, 1:35 PM CDT | 3.75 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Aug 12, 2024, 3:10 AM CDT | 1.75 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (16)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2023, 6:30 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2022, 5:00 PM CST | 7.25 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 13, 2021, 8:30 PM CDT | 2.5 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2021, 11:45 PM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 31, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 3 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2020, 10:15 AM CDT | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2020, 3:15 AM CDT | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 31, 2019, 5:00 PM CST | 5.75 | 0.96R | Flat |
| Feb 23, 2018, 3:45 PM CST | 4.75 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 5, 2016, 5:00 PM CST | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2014, 8:34 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 8, 2012, 5:00 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2012, 5:36 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jul 1, 2010, 6:01 AM CDT | 1 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Jan 17, 2008, 2:23 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (13)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024, 7:30 AM CST | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2024, 6:01 AM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 14, 2023, 10:32 AM CST | 10.25 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2023, 3:01 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 12, 2023, 11:31 PM CDT | 2 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 14 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2022, 7:30 PM CDT | 8.5 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2018, 5:00 PM CST | 8.25 | 1.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 29, 2016, 12:54 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 2, 2016, 5:00 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2016, 11:30 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 12, 2009, 9:43 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (11)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2024, 10:00 PM CDT | 2.75 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2024, 3:00 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2020, 8:00 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2018, 7:00 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 26, 2018, 12:03 AM CDT | 2 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2015, 6:04 AM CST | 3 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2014, 11:41 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2009, 5:00 PM CST | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2008, 2:04 PM CST | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2016, 5:00 PM CST | 7.25 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 10, 2013, 5:08 AM CDT | 4 | 2.19R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2021 | 36.5 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 21, 2015 | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2008 | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 2, 2008 | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 4:42 AM CDT | 1.1 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:50 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:47 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 11:45 PM CDT | 2.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:32 PM CDT | 1.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 2:28 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 23, 2026, 1:39 PM CDT | 5.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 6:46 AM CDT | 1.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 7:25 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 12:16 AM CDT | 0.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2026, 6:00 PM CST | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 6:19 PM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2026, 9:32 PM CST | 2.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 10:22 AM CST | 0.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 11:46 AM CST | 0.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 3:57 AM CST | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2026, 6:49 AM CST | 1.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 4, 2026, 9:45 AM CST | 8.5 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 2, 2026, 10:15 AM CST | 9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 1:50 AM CST | 10.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2026, 12:15 PM CST | 4.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 3:05 PM CST | 15.6 | 2.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2025, 6:45 AM CST | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2025, 1:15 PM CST | 3 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 4:10 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.3 | 1.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 19, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT | 3.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 1, 2025, 8:45 PM CDT | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 24, 2025, 10:20 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2025, 2:55 AM CDT | 1.1 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 11, 2025, 7:55 PM CDT | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2025, 8:05 PM CDT | 3.4 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 12, 2025, 1:20 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2025, 8:10 PM CDT | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2025, 2:15 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2025, 5:20 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2025, 5:15 AM CST | 0.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 1, 2025, 11:40 PM CST | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2024, 9:55 PM CST | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2024, 3:15 PM CST | 1.3 | 0.38R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 12.3 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 10:15 PM CST | 35.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 10:31 AM CST | 7.8 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2026, 12:30 PM CST | 2.8 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2025, 6:00 AM CST | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2025, 10:00 PM CST | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 12, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT | 7.8 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2025, 11:15 PM CDT | 3.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 2, 2025, 7:45 AM CDT | 1.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 9, 2025, 2:15 AM CDT | 4.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2025, 11:30 AM CDT | 1.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2025, 9:40 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 31, 2024, 3:06 AM CST | 1.7 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 9, 2024, 9:15 AM CST | 6.1 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2024, 10:30 PM CST | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2024, 9:46 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2023, 2:15 AM CST | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2023, 7:31 AM CDT | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2023, 1:04 AM CST | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2022, 1:00 AM CST | 0.6 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 22.2 | 2.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2026, 3:01 PM CST | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2026, 5:30 PM CST | 2.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2025, 2:30 AM CDT | 3.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2025, 12:03 AM CDT | 3.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 10, 2025, 8:30 PM CST | 10.7 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Oct 1, 2024, 2:01 AM CDT | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2024, 1:08 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2023, 9:34 PM CDT | 10.1 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2022, 1:00 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2021, 9:02 PM CST | 3.7 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Mar 15, 2021, 9:00 AM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2019, 11:01 PM CST | 0.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2019, 9:00 PM CDT | 0.7 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 18, 2017, 7:31 AM CST | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2016, 3:07 AM CST | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 4, 2012, 9:42 PM CDT | 2 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2012, 2:34 AM CDT | 0.5 | 2.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2011, 6:56 PM CDT | 2 | 2.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2008, 8:03 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (12)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2025, 8:10 PM CDT | 29.2 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2025, 7:05 PM CDT | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 1, 2024, 1:02 AM CDT | 3.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2023, 8:00 PM CST | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 3, 2022, 7:00 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2022, 8:01 PM CDT | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 3, 2019, 5:00 AM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 21, 2019, 12:01 AM CDT | 0.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 30, 2013, 12:08 PM CDT | 1.6 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2010, 9:58 AM CDT | 1.4 | 2.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2009, 8:07 AM CST | 7.8 | 2.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2008, 8:03 PM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 48.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 16.5 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2022, 1:00 AM CDT | 3.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2018, 1:00 AM CST | 7.9 | 0.67R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2024 | 28.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2024 | 17.2 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 16, 2016 | 6.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:23 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 9:52 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 2:48 PM CDT | 0.26 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 5:47 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 12:38 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 5:22 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 30, 2026, 1:59 AM CDT | 0.17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 2:14 AM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 7:19 AM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 3:01 AM CDT | 0.15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 2:53 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 9:49 PM CDT | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2026, 7:07 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 2:10 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 30, 2026, 12:59 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 8:19 AM CST | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 6:25 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 4, 2025, 3:23 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2025, 12:31 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:05 AM CDT | 0.13 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 10:10 AM CDT | 0.14 | 2.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 0.15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2026, 10:35 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 6:27 PM CST | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2026, 5:25 AM CST | 0.19 | 1.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2025, 6:16 AM CST | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2025, 7:55 PM CST | 0.15 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2025, 9:27 PM CDT | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 13, 2025, 10:22 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2024, 9:35 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 2, 2024, 8:40 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2023, 4:55 AM CST | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2023, 5:55 PM CDT | 0.17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 10, 2023, 1:26 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 5, 2023, 1:07 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2023, 8:46 AM CDT | 0.12 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2023, 2:41 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2023, 3:20 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2022, 12:12 AM CST | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 1.37 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2026, 2:05 AM CST | 0.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2025, 6:30 PM CST | 0.05 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2025, 6:35 PM CST | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 2, 2024, 6:35 AM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 7, 2024, 6:46 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 18, 2023, 6:19 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2023, 8:15 AM CDT | 0.35 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 24, 2021, 9:15 PM CST | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2020, 11:50 AM CST | 0.17 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2020, 10:15 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2019, 8:34 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 4, 2019, 3:16 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 18, 2013, 1:04 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2011, 7:02 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2011, 6:17 AM CDT | 0.31 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2011, 8:22 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2011, 9:35 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2011, 7:48 AM CST | 0.16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2010, 12:12 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.53R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2025, 10:40 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2024, 6:36 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2024, 12:08 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2023, 2:36 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2022, 7:01 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 22, 2022, 12:00 PM CDT | 0.53 | 2.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 5, 2022, 9:05 AM CDT | 0.35 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2022, 6:30 PM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2020, 3:00 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2019, 1:04 PM CST | 0.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 18, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 24, 2018, 7:02 AM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2016, 4:57 AM CST | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2016, 2:02 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2016, 9:00 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 4, 2015, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.04 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2014, 10:30 AM CDT | 0.39 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2013, 2:49 AM CDT | 0.1 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2012, 8:25 PM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 31, 2010, 7:06 PM CST | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.29 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2024, 8:08 PM CDT | 0.12 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 15, 2023, 12:18 AM CDT | 0.18 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2016, 2:12 AM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2013, 6:51 AM CST | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 3, 2008, 7:50 PM CDT | 0.28 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2016, 5:00 AM CST | 0.22 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2011, 5:01 AM CST | 0.69 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2010, 1:58 AM CDT | 0.24 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2016 | 0.89 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2013 | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 12, 2008 | 3.22 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026, 5:56 AM CST | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 16, 2026, 7:53 AM CST | 0.004 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2026, 2:26 AM CST | 0.008 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Jan 30, 2026, 7:09 AM CST | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2025, 11:41 PM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2025, 3:14 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2025, 11:19 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2025, 2:12 PM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2025, 6:05 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2025, 4:02 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 17, 2025, 8:21 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 13, 2025, 5:19 AM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2024, 8:11 AM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2024, 10:01 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2024, 9:54 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2023, 9:15 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 7, 2023, 8:26 AM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2023, 1:33 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 28, 2023, 7:15 AM CST | 0.007 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 9, 2023, 1:44 PM CST | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026, 8:24 AM CST | 0.004 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 1:02 PM CST | 0.015 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2025, 10:59 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 26, 2025, 12:04 AM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2025, 6:58 AM CST | 0.011 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Oct 4, 2024, 1:21 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 3, 2024, 7:53 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2024, 7:30 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 29, 2023, 2:00 AM CST | 0.005 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Aug 30, 2023, 1:33 PM CDT | 0.011 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2023, 1:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 12, 2023, 11:52 PM CDT | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2023, 12:21 AM CST | 0.008 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 14, 2022, 8:41 PM CST | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2022, 1:19 AM CST | 0.024 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Oct 19, 2022, 12:26 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2022, 7:19 AM CDT | 0.041 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2022, 5:42 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 13, 2022, 5:58 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 17, 2022, 2:47 AM CDT | 0.013 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026, 9:47 PM CST | 0.007 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 16, 2025, 7:10 AM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2025, 11:31 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2025, 9:23 PM CST | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2024, 11:10 PM CST | 0.026 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 3, 2023, 5:15 AM CDT | 0.009 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 16, 2023, 8:08 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2023, 4:58 AM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2022, 5:00 PM CST | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2022, 1:58 AM CDT | 0.053 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 21, 2022, 10:03 PM CDT | 0.011 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2022, 7:45 AM CDT | 0.051 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2022, 5:15 AM CST | 0.027 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 29, 2021, 1:09 AM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 25, 2018, 9:42 AM CDT | 0.009 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2014, 11:11 AM CST | 0.041 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2012, 11:37 PM CST | 0.011 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2011, 3:23 PM CST | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2010, 11:25 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2009, 2:19 PM CST | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2024, 5:40 AM CST | 0.031 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2024, 4:02 AM CDT | 0.018 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2023, 10:02 PM CDT | 0.011 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2022, 7:43 AM CDT | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.048 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 25, 2017, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2014, 9:56 PM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 1, 2013, 1:39 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2013, 12:33 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2013, 8:09 AM CST | 0.027 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 3, 2012, 4:49 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2011, 3:48 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jul 13, 2011, 8:11 AM CDT | 0.019 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 12, 2011, 7:54 AM CDT | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 10, 2011, 3:04 PM CDT | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2011, 5:00 PM CST | 0.011 | 2.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 4, 2011, 6:57 AM CST | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2010, 7:29 AM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 11, 2010, 5:10 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2009, 2:19 PM CST | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (9)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2025, 12:11 AM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2025, 2:44 PM CDT | 0.061 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 18, 2024, 11:24 AM CST | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2023, 2:22 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 4, 2019, 6:13 PM CDT | 0.015 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2018, 2:03 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Jan 17, 2017, 1:23 AM CST | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 23, 2015, 9:11 AM CDT | 0.008 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 4, 2008, 4:55 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2020, 3:20 AM CDT | 0.014 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2019, 10:47 PM CST | 0.023 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three Line Strike Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2021 | 0.043 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.