Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bearish Two Crows
Three-candle bearish reversal after a rally: a long up candle, then two down candles that gap up but fade back into the first candle's body.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (+58.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.23×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.96R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
The 58.2-point gap over the 41.8% random-entry rate clears the ±48.3-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 41.8% | +58.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.1% | +22.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 18.7% | +6.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 55.9% | -55.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.3% | -2.3 |
4 occurrences · 1,730,193 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random short entry (-40.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.64×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 40.9% for a random short entry. The 40.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 40.9% | -40.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.8% | -26.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.8% | -18.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 56.5% | +43.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.7% | -2.7 |
3 occurrences · 356,238 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random short entry (-40.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.71×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.40R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 40.2% for a random short entry. The 40.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 40.2% | -40.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.9% | -26.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.5% | -19.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 56.8% | +43.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.0% | -3.0 |
2 occurrences · 119,642 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
66.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.0% for a random short entry (+26.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.53R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 40.0% for a random short entry. The 26.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 66.7% | 40.0% | +26.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 27.3% | +6.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 20.2% | +13.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 57.6% | -57.6 |
| Went sideways | 33.3% | 2.3% | +31.0 |
3 occurrences · 59,877 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.5% for a random short entry (+10.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.56×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.72R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 39.5% for a random short entry. The 10.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 39.5% | +10.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.4% | +22.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 20.3% | +29.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 58.6% | -8.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
2 occurrences · 27,699 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.8% for a random short entry (+61.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.32×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
3.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 38.8% for a random short entry. The 61.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±95.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 38.8% | +61.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 28.5% | +71.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 100.0% | 21.7% | +78.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 60.4% | -60.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.7% | -0.7 |
1 occurrences · 4,540 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.3% for a random short entry (+62.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.47×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
3.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 37.3% for a random short entry. The 62.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 37.3% | +62.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 26.2% | +73.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 100.0% | 19.4% | +80.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 61.8% | -61.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.9% | -0.9 |
2 occurrences · 4,683 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
27.8%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random short entry (-12.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.77R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 27.8% of the time vs 40.1% for a random short entry. The 12.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 18 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 18 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 27.8% | 40.1% | -12.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.2% | 25.0% | -2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.6% | 16.4% | -10.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 57.6% | +9.0 |
| Went sideways | 5.6% | 2.3% | +3.3 |
18 occurrences · 1,639,228 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random short entry (-15.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
3.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.69R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 40.1% for a random short entry. The 15.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 40.1% | -15.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 25.8% | -0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.8% | -17.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 57.3% | +17.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.6% | -2.6 |
4 occurrences · 348,606 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
75.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random short entry (+34.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.50×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.96R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 75.0% of the time vs 40.5% for a random short entry. The 34.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 75.0% | 40.5% | +34.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 28.0% | +22.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 20.9% | +4.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 25.0% | 57.9% | -32.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.6% | -1.6 |
4 occurrences · 27,546 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (-39.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.58×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry. The 39.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 39.6% | -39.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 29.2% | -29.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 23.0% | -23.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 59.3% | +40.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.0% | -1.0 |
2 occurrences · 4,521 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random short entry (-38.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.63×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 38.7% for a random short entry. The 38.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±95.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 38.7% | -38.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.9% | -27.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.9% | -20.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 60.2% | +39.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
1 occurrences · 4,677 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A two crows is a three-candle top where a gap up gets sold. A long up candle extends the rise, then the next bar gaps higher but closes red. The third bar opens inside that red body and closes lower still, settling back inside the first candle’s range. The two red candles, the crows, sit above the rally and show that the higher open could not be defended.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- The first candle is a long up (green) candle that fits the advance.
- The second candle gaps up but closes red, a down candle floating above the first.
- The third candle opens inside the second body and closes back down inside the first candle’s body.
- The gap is filled and then some, leaving two red candles overhead.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.
The psychology
The long up candle extends the rally and keeps the buyers in command. The next bar gaps higher, opening above the prior close, which at first looks like the advance pressing on. But that candle closes red. Buyers reached for new highs at the open and could not hold them, and the higher ground they claimed slipped away before the session ended.
The third candle drives the point home. It opens inside that red body and closes lower still, settling back inside the first candle’s range and filling the gap that had looked so promising. Two red candles now sit overhead, marking the level where buyers tried to push on and failed. The traders who bought the gap up are offside, and as they sell to escape they hand momentum to the bears. Control passes from the buyers who led the rally to the sellers who defended the highs against them.
Whether that failed push at the top turns into a real reversal is what the figures below weigh.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2009, 9:15 AM CDT | 1.75 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 19, 2009, 2:28 PM CST | 2.5 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2009, 11:12 AM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 24, 2008, 10:17 AM CST | 3 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2021, 8:35 AM CDT | 92.75 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Jul 20, 2021, 8:35 AM CDT | 74 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2008, 2:10 PM CST | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2021, 8:45 AM CST | 54.5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2020, 9:30 AM CDT | 138.5 | 0.44R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023, 9:00 AM CST | 233.75 | 0.44R | Flat |
| Mar 23, 2009, 11:30 AM CDT | 6.25 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 2, 2008, 9:00 AM CDT | 17.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2020, 9:30 AM CDT | 121 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2008, 9:30 AM CDT | 20.75 | 0.43R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 248.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2021 | 120 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2014 | 39.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (18)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2023, 8:31 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.19R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2020, 8:52 AM CDT | 5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Jul 7, 2010, 2:39 PM CDT | 0.75 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2010, 8:31 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2009, 9:19 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2009, 2:54 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2009, 8:34 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2009, 2:32 PM CDT | 0.75 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2009, 1:17 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2009, 9:22 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2009, 2:25 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2008, 9:06 AM CST | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2008, 10:09 AM CDT | 1.5 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2008, 9:51 AM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 13, 2008, 9:23 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2008, 2:29 PM CDT | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 18, 2008, 10:28 AM CDT | 2 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2008, 10:59 AM CDT | 1 | 2.75R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2011, 8:35 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Jun 2, 2010, 2:20 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2009, 11:25 AM CST | 1.75 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 16, 2008, 1:55 PM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2012, 9:30 AM CST | 9 | 2.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 23, 2009, 10:30 AM CST | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2009, 1:30 PM CST | 5.25 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Oct 27, 2008, 1:30 PM CDT | 22.25 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 32 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 30, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Two Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2013 | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |