Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Two Rabbits
Three-candle bottom: a long down candle, an up candle that gaps below it, then an up candle that climbs back into the first candle's body.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.7% for a random long entry (-17.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.79R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 42.7% for a random long entry. The 17.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 42.7% | -17.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.1% | -27.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.2% | -18.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 54.4% | -4.4 |
| Went sideways | 25.0% | 2.9% | +22.1 |
4 occurrences · 1,733,079 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random long entry (+57.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.73×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 42.6% for a random long entry. The 57.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 42.6% | +57.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.0% | +23.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 18.3% | +31.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 53.6% | -53.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.8% | -3.8 |
2 occurrences · 356,990 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (-43.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
4.53×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry. The 43.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.3% | -43.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 28.4% | -28.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.1% | -20.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 52.5% | +47.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.2% | -4.2 |
2 occurrences · 119,910 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.9% for a random long entry (-45.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.33×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.45R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.23R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 45.9% for a random long entry. The 45.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 45.9% | -45.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 31.4% | -31.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 22.8% | -22.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 51.1% | +48.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
1 occurrences · 27,736 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 50.6% for a random long entry (+49.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.15×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.78R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.32R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 50.6% for a random long entry. The 49.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±98.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 50.6% | +49.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 35.2% | -35.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 24.4% | -24.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 47.5% | -47.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
1 occurrences · 4,547 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 49.1% for a random long entry (-24.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.26R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 49.1% for a random long entry. The 24.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±49.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 49.1% | -24.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 31.8% | -6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 22.2% | +2.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 48.4% | +26.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.5% | -2.5 |
4 occurrences · 4,698 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+5.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
3.46×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.33R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.2% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry. The 5.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±26.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 13 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 13 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.2% | 41.0% | +5.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 38.5% | 25.1% | +13.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.1% | 16.2% | +6.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.8% | 56.3% | -2.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.8% | -2.8 |
13 occurrences · 1,648,163 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random long entry (-2.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.46×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 42.0% for a random long entry. The 2.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±30.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 10 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 10 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 42.0% | -2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.0% | 26.1% | +3.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 17.4% | +2.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 54.5% | -14.5 |
| Went sideways | 20.0% | 3.5% | +16.5 |
10 occurrences · 350,702 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (-42.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.31×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.31R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry. The 42.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.8% | -42.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.7% | -27.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.3% | -19.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 53.3% | +46.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.9% | -3.9 |
3 occurrences · 119,005 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.9% for a random long entry (+56.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.06R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.16R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 43.9% for a random long entry. The 56.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 43.9% | +56.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 29.1% | -29.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.6% | -20.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 52.6% | -52.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.6% | -3.6 |
1 occurrences · 59,836 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.2% for a random long entry (-11.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.57×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.38R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.20R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 45.2% for a random long entry. The 11.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 45.2% | -11.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 30.8% | +2.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 21.9% | +11.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 51.9% | +14.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
3 occurrences · 27,713 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 50.0% for a random long entry (-50.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.30R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 50.0% for a random long entry. The 50.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±69.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 50.0% | -50.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 33.9% | -33.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 24.0% | -24.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 47.5% | +52.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.5% | -2.5 |
2 occurrences · 4,546 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.9% for a random long entry (-47.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.46R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.23R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 47.9% for a random long entry. The 47.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 47.9% | -47.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 30.7% | -30.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.5% | -20.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 49.1% | +50.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.0% | -3.0 |
1 occurrences · 4,689 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A two rabbits is a three-candle bottom that forms after a sharp fall. A long down candle prints, then an up candle gaps below it. A second up candle opens inside that first rabbit and rallies all the way back up, closing inside the body of the original long down candle. The two up candles are the rabbits, hopping up out of the gap. They show buyers stepping in hard after the drop and reclaiming most of the lost ground.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a long down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle is an up (green) candle that gaps below the first.
- The third candle is another up candle that opens inside the second candle’s body.
- That third candle closes back inside the body of the first long down candle, recovering most of the drop.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The sharp down candle is the sellers at full stretch, and the next bar gaps below it, opening at fresh lows where the bears look firmly in command. But that second candle closes green. Buyers met the gap-down and lifted price off the floor, a first small sign that the supply driving the fall is drying up.
The third candle is the one that turns the mood. It opens inside the second rabbit and rallies all the way back into the body of the original long down candle, recovering most of the ground the decline took. Two up bars hopping out of the gap show buyers arriving with real size and pressing their advantage twice in a row. Anyone who sold into the lows is now caught above the market, and their need to cover adds to the lift. Control has moved from the side that drove price down to the side now carrying it back up.
Whether that energetic recovery extends into a durable turn is what the figures below examine.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2020, 12:27 PM CDT | 16.5 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2011, 1:15 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2008, 12:50 PM CST | 1.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2008, 9:09 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.89R | Flat |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2021, 8:35 AM CDT | 41.75 | 1.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2008, 12:30 PM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2021, 8:45 AM CST | 205 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Nov 21, 2008, 1:15 PM CST | 10.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 12.75 | 0.45R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 70.5 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025 | 626.75 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2021 | 548 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2015 | 51.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 17, 2014 | 61.25 | 0.78R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (13)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2012, 8:31 AM CST | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2011, 1:12 PM CDT | 2 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 15, 2010, 8:34 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Oct 30, 2009, 10:39 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2009, 8:41 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2009, 12:41 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2009, 9:44 AM CDT | 0.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2009, 8:53 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2009, 11:15 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2009, 2:36 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2008, 10:16 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2008, 12:01 PM CST | 6 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2008, 8:32 AM CDT | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (10)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2016, 8:35 AM CDT | 10 | 0.97R | Flat |
| Oct 19, 2010, 1:10 PM CDT | 3 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Sep 14, 2010, 8:50 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 15, 2010, 8:50 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2010, 9:35 AM CDT | 4.5 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 20, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 8 | 0.88R | Flat |
| Aug 13, 2009, 9:00 AM CDT | 3.75 | 2.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 17, 2009, 8:35 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2009, 1:00 PM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 17, 2008, 10:20 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2010, 2:45 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Nov 26, 2009, 10:15 AM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2009, 9:00 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2008, 11:00 AM CDT | 4.5 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2021, 9:30 AM CST | 60.25 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2014, 9:30 AM CST | 14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 30, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.47R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 60.5 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Jun 18, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 18 | 0.32R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Two Rabbits Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025 | 141 | 0.46R | Stopped |