Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Stick Sandwich
Three-candle bottom: a down candle, an up candle above it, then a down candle that closes at the exact same price as the first.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.5%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.2% for a random long entry (-5.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 37.5% of the time vs 43.2% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.5% | 43.2% | -5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.1% | 27.6% | +3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.4% | 18.7% | +6.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.5% | 53.8% | +8.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.0% | -3.0 |
610 occurrences · 5,355,470 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (85). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (-1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.72×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.13R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.2% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 85 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.2% | 42.8% | -1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 37.6% | 27.3% | +10.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 31.8% | 18.5% | +13.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.8% | 53.6% | +5.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.6% | -3.6 |
85 occurrences · 1,165,570 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
28.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random long entry (-14.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.55×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.94R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 28.6% of the time vs 42.6% for a random long entry. The 14.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±25.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 14 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 28.6% | 42.6% | -14.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.6% | 27.2% | +1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.6% | 18.7% | +9.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 71.4% | 52.8% | +18.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.6% | -4.6 |
14 occurrences · 396,076 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
20.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (-22.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.88×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.60R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 20.0% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 22.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 20.0% | 42.4% | -22.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 27.2% | -7.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 18.8% | +1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 80.0% | 51.9% | +28.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.7% | -5.7 |
5 occurrences · 198,429 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.8%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.0% for a random long entry (-6.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.22×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.93R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 33.8% of the time vs 40.0% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.8% | 40.0% | -6.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.3% | 23.7% | +4.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.3% | 14.9% | +7.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.2% | 57.1% | +9.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.8% | -2.8 |
269 occurrences · 5,247,372 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (33). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (-4.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.62×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.99R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.4% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry. The 4.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 33 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.4% | 41.0% | -4.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 25.2% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.2% | 16.5% | +4.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.6% | 55.6% | +8.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.4% | -3.4 |
33 occurrences · 1,189,766 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
21.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-19.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.56R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 21.4% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 19.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±25.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 14 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 21.4% | 41.3% | -19.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.3% | 25.8% | -11.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.3% | 17.2% | -2.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 78.6% | 54.4% | +24.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.3% | -4.3 |
14 occurrences · 411,225 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (+8.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.96×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.50R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry. The 8.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 41.4% | +8.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 25.9% | +24.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 17.6% | +32.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 53.4% | -3.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.2% | -5.2 |
4 occurrences · 207,386 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (+7.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.34×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.50R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 7.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 42.4% | +7.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 26.8% | +23.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 18.2% | +31.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 53.3% | -3.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.2% | -4.2 |
2 occurrences · 103,338 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.7% for a random long entry (-43.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.7% for a random long entry. The 43.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.7% | -43.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 28.0% | -28.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.7% | -18.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 52.9% | +47.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.4% | -3.4 |
1 occurrences · 23,340 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-2.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.5% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 2.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 780 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.5% | 41.3% | -2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.3% | 26.0% | +4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.5% | 17.4% | +6.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.5% | 55.6% | +6.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.2% | -3.2 |
780 occurrences · 5,537,711 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (-5.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.9% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 5.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 103 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.9% | 41.8% | -5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.1% | 26.4% | +3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 27.2% | 17.9% | +9.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.1% | 54.7% | +9.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.5% | -3.5 |
103 occurrences · 1,222,042 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.2% for a random long entry (+7.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 42.2% for a random long entry. The 7.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±30.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 10 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 10 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 42.2% | +7.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 10.0% | 26.8% | -16.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.0% | 18.3% | -8.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 53.7% | -3.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.1% | -4.1 |
10 occurrences · 416,275 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (-42.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.25×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 42.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.4% | -42.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.1% | -27.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.7% | -18.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 53.0% | +47.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.6% | -4.6 |
3 occurrences · 208,504 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (+56.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.16×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
3.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry. The 56.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 43.3% | +56.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 28.1% | +71.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 100.0% | 19.4% | +80.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 52.9% | -52.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.7% | -3.7 |
1 occurrences · 103,337 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (+0.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.2% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry. The 0.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 614 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.2% | 40.9% | +0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.2% | 25.7% | +6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.9% | 17.3% | +8.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.8% | 55.9% | +2.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.2% | -3.2 |
614 occurrences · 5,363,489 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (93). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (-4.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.66×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.6% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 4.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 93 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.6% | 41.7% | -4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.3% | 26.6% | +5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.0% | 18.1% | +9.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.4% | 54.8% | +7.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.5% | -3.5 |
93 occurrences · 1,195,070 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random long entry (+8.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.39R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 41.9% for a random long entry. The 8.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±25.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 14 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 41.9% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 26.9% | +16.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 42.9% | 18.5% | +24.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 53.9% | -3.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.2% | -4.2 |
14 occurrences · 408,147 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+8.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.84×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.64R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 8.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 41.7% | +8.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 26.7% | +23.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 18.5% | +31.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 53.2% | -3.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 5.1% | -5.1 |
6 occurrences · 204,708 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (-42.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.34×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 42.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.3% | -42.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.4% | -27.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.1% | -19.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 54.1% | +45.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.7% | -3.7 |
1 occurrences · 101,426 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random long entry (+0.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.37×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.7% of the time vs 40.1% for a random long entry. The 0.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 427 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.7% | 40.1% | +0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.3% | 25.3% | +7.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.5% | 17.2% | +8.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.0% | 56.5% | +2.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 3.5% | -3.2 |
427 occurrences · 3,872,511 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random long entry (-1.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.91R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.3% of the time vs 41.2% for a random long entry. The 1.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 112 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.3% | 41.2% | -1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 26.5% | -1.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.2% | 18.2% | -3.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.7% | 55.2% | +5.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.6% | -3.6 |
112 occurrences · 925,705 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
5.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-36.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.38×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 5.0% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 20 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 5.0% | 41.3% | -36.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 5.0% | 26.6% | -21.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.0% | 18.6% | -13.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 95.0% | 54.6% | +40.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.1% | -4.1 |
20 occurrences · 321,213 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
16.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random long entry (-24.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.19×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.58R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 16.7% of the time vs 41.2% for a random long entry. The 24.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 16.7% | 41.2% | -24.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 26.8% | -10.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.7% | 18.9% | -2.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 83.3% | 54.3% | +29.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.4% | -4.4 |
6 occurrences · 161,929 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (-41.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.58×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 41.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 41.7% | -41.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.6% | -27.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.6% | -19.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 55.3% | +44.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.1% | -3.1 |
1 occurrences · 80,459 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+58.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
3.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 58.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 41.7% | +58.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 28.0% | +72.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 100.0% | 19.8% | +80.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 56.2% | -56.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.1% | -2.1 |
1 occurrences · 18,581 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
A stick sandwich is a three-candle bottom named for its shape. A down candle prints, then an up candle trades entirely above it, then a third down candle closes at the exact same price as the first. The two down candles are the bread, with the up candle sandwiched between. That matched closing price acts like a floor. Twice the market has tried to settle there and twice it has held, which traders read as support that may launch a bounce.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle is an up (green) candle that trades entirely above the first candle’s close.
- The third candle is a down candle.
- That third candle closes at the same price as the first candle, marking a shared floor.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The first down candle keeps the decline going, and sellers look settled. Then an up candle trades entirely above it, a flash of buying that on its own could be just a bounce inside a falling market.
The third candle is where the story turns. Sellers come back and push price down again, all the way to the exact level where the first candle closed. They reach the same floor a second time and stop there. Twice now the market has probed down to that price and twice it has refused to go lower. That repeated close at one level reads as a line buyers are willing to defend: sellers spend their effort getting back down there and find the same wall waiting. Control has not flipped outright, but the floor that held twice gives buyers something firm to lean on.
Whether a twice-tested floor actually launches a bounce is what the data below examines.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:45 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:37 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:55 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 2:18 AM CDT | 5 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 5:49 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 8:25 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 11:31 PM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 15, 2026, 11:41 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2026, 2:18 AM CST | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2026, 1:12 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 19, 2026, 12:15 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 11:34 PM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2025, 11:03 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2025, 9:09 PM CST | 2.5 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 21, 2025, 11:58 PM CST | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2025, 5:38 PM CST | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2025, 2:02 AM CST | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2025, 4:10 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 7, 2025, 7:07 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2025, 3:40 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026, 6:15 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 24, 2025, 4:43 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2025, 11:45 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2024, 12:45 AM CDT | 1.25 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 2, 2023, 11:45 PM CDT | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 5, 2023, 6:35 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2022, 1:25 AM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2022, 7:00 PM CDT | 3 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2021, 11:05 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2021, 9:26 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 15, 2021, 10:01 PM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2021, 6:30 PM CST | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2020, 9:05 PM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 17, 2019, 10:05 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2019, 10:50 PM CDT | 1 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2019, 6:07 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Sep 6, 2018, 6:36 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 24, 2018, 11:48 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 5, 2018, 5:45 PM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2018, 9:27 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (14)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2019, 10:30 PM CST | 1 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2016, 8:44 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 3, 2016, 12:38 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2016, 12:56 AM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2014, 5:21 AM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2014, 11:13 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2014, 1:06 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2013, 3:51 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 28, 2012, 12:49 AM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2012, 11:38 PM CDT | 2 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Aug 29, 2012, 5:32 PM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2011, 5:20 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2011, 11:32 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2009, 9:28 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2017, 1:45 AM CST | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2015, 4:44 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2013, 6:25 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 2, 2013, 10:57 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2009, 5:02 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:11 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 11:29 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 20, 2026, 3:24 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 6, 2026, 4:42 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 1:47 AM CST | 2.5 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 6:19 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 10:11 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 9:15 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 25, 2026, 7:13 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2026, 9:46 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 19, 2026, 8:10 AM CST | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 9:33 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 30, 2025, 3:38 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 29, 2025, 11:33 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 19, 2025, 1:34 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 8, 2025, 1:28 PM CST | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 30, 2025, 8:09 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2025, 5:08 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 8:26 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 27, 2025, 8:08 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026, 6:20 AM CST | 1.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2025, 12:45 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Sep 2, 2025, 11:10 PM CDT | 1 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 27, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2025, 7:55 PM CDT | 0.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 8, 2024, 4:20 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2024, 7:25 PM CDT | 2 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 19, 2024, 10:46 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 3, 2024, 3:41 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2024, 5:15 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2024, 6:59 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Feb 29, 2024, 7:00 AM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 15, 2023, 7:00 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2023, 12:10 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 13, 2023, 3:41 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 12, 2023, 7:36 PM CDT | 0.25 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2023, 11:20 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Feb 2, 2023, 4:45 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2023, 11:45 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (15)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2025, 5:15 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2023, 6:45 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2021, 12:00 AM CDT | 2.5 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2020, 7:30 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2019, 5:01 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 14, 2012, 4:32 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2012, 4:02 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2011, 11:24 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2011, 4:45 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2011, 11:20 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2011, 8:40 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2010, 8:27 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 30, 2009, 12:16 AM CST | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 6, 2009, 12:10 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Oct 7, 2009, 6:54 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020, 6:00 AM CST | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 18, 2017, 11:53 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 1, 2015, 5:30 PM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2008, 5:33 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2025, 12:00 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2024, 6:00 PM CDT | 20.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2011, 9:00 PM CDT | 6 | 0.21R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:12 PM CDT | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:15 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 9:01 PM CDT | 2 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 3:19 AM CDT | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 1:04 AM CDT | 2.1 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2026, 1:22 AM CDT | 0.7 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 10:53 PM CST | 1.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2026, 9:46 PM CST | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2026, 2:48 AM CST | 0.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 10, 2026, 3:44 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 26, 2026, 7:23 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 3:37 PM CST | 0.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2026, 5:40 PM CST | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 7:31 PM CST | 1.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 5:13 PM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 7, 2026, 4:24 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2025, 11:55 PM CST | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2025, 6:31 PM CST | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 1:55 AM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2025, 4:19 AM CST | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2025, 6:31 AM CDT | 0.8 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2025, 7:17 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2025, 8:47 PM CST | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 5, 2024, 11:36 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2024, 9:35 PM CST | 0.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2023, 3:36 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2023, 6:54 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2023, 4:51 AM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 29, 2023, 6:20 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 18, 2023, 7:57 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2023, 11:32 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 4, 2023, 6:50 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2022, 10:35 AM CST | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 2, 2022, 2:41 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 9, 2022, 10:11 AM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 3, 2022, 9:01 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 21, 2021, 6:26 PM CST | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2021, 2:51 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2021, 3:17 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Jun 18, 2021, 3:05 PM CDT | 0.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (12)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 1.5 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2022, 6:32 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2020, 1:03 AM CST | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 7, 2019, 12:32 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Nov 13, 2018, 10:45 PM CST | 0.6 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2014, 6:42 PM CDT | 0.7 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2013, 7:49 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| May 13, 2012, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2010, 7:15 AM CDT | 4.2 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 1, 2008, 1:06 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2008, 6:06 AM CDT | 1.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 22, 2008, 1:51 PM CDT | 1.6 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2019, 5:39 AM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2015, 10:00 PM CST | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2014, 1:34 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Dec 29, 2008, 7:46 PM CST | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2015, 6:20 PM CDT | 0.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026, 3:27 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 5, 2026, 5:36 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 12:28 AM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2026, 12:04 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2026, 10:43 PM CDT | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 10:57 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 3:05 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Feb 26, 2026, 12:11 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 6:08 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 2:20 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Feb 4, 2026, 12:46 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 12:25 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2026, 1:48 AM CST | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2026, 8:28 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 11, 2026, 5:54 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2025, 9:26 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 17, 2025, 11:50 AM CST | 0.02 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2025, 7:15 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2025, 2:10 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 8:07 AM CST | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2026, 10:15 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:44 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 2:11 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2025, 7:55 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2025, 5:30 AM CST | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 1, 2025, 5:21 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Sep 17, 2025, 10:27 AM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2025, 5:21 PM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2025, 11:55 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 29, 2025, 6:01 PM CST | 0.02 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 14, 2025, 4:24 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2025, 5:28 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Sep 18, 2024, 12:37 AM CDT | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2024, 12:30 AM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 15, 2024, 5:23 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2024, 1:56 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 4, 2024, 6:39 PM CDT | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 4, 2024, 2:29 AM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 31, 2024, 11:43 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2024, 11:29 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (14)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2023, 8:51 PM CST | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 10, 2023, 5:30 PM CST | 0.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 24, 2022, 7:30 PM CST | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2017, 11:15 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2016, 7:15 PM CDT | 0.13 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 22, 2016, 5:45 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2014, 7:20 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2012, 7:48 PM CST | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2011, 2:14 PM CST | 0.16 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 3, 2010, 10:49 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 22, 2009, 8:33 PM CDT | 0.06 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2008, 4:56 AM CST | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2008, 6:32 PM CDT | 0.19 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017, 11:03 PM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 9, 2017, 5:12 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2011, 12:24 AM CDT | 0.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2010, 8:12 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 27, 2009, 9:56 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Jun 2, 2008, 9:35 PM CDT | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2013, 3:10 AM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:29 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 8, 2026, 4:32 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 7, 2026, 9:34 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:12 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 4:13 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 12:45 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 23, 2026, 3:44 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 2:15 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 17, 2026, 3:29 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 12:50 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 5, 2026, 8:23 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Mar 4, 2026, 4:14 AM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 4:13 AM CST | 0.001 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 0.002 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2026, 7:25 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 18, 2026, 9:24 PM CST | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 18, 2026, 7:47 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 30, 2025, 11:37 PM CST | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2025, 11:36 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2025, 10:32 PM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026, 11:09 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2026, 9:25 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2026, 1:34 AM CST | 0.01 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2025, 12:54 AM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2025, 10:10 PM CST | 0.01 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2025, 11:38 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2025, 7:46 AM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 1, 2025, 3:53 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2025, 1:38 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2025, 5:11 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 18, 2025, 8:12 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2025, 8:28 PM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2025, 11:12 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 13, 2025, 8:00 PM CST | 0.003 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2024, 7:15 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 6, 2024, 3:10 AM CST | 0.002 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2024, 11:40 PM CST | 0.002 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2024, 3:57 AM CST | 0.002 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2024, 1:41 PM CDT | 0.003 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2024, 3:40 AM CDT | 0.001 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2026, 7:21 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2025, 6:05 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 22, 2024, 12:40 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2024, 9:36 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Feb 12, 2024, 11:01 AM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2024, 1:21 AM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2023, 6:15 PM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 16, 2021, 9:16 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| May 5, 2021, 7:11 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2021, 8:34 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2020, 5:13 AM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2020, 9:43 AM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2020, 3:09 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 30, 2020, 6:58 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Jun 12, 2019, 10:45 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Feb 27, 2019, 5:43 PM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2015, 6:40 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2015, 2:01 AM CST | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 21, 2014, 7:16 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Feb 16, 2012, 10:38 PM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (7)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2024, 10:35 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2019, 4:34 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2018, 1:48 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 9, 2016, 9:03 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 15, 2016, 3:34 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2012, 6:02 PM CDT | 0.014 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 20, 2008, 12:14 PM CDT | 0.054 | 0.48R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2010, 11:30 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Stick Sandwich Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2017, 9:03 PM CST | 0.022 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.