Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bearish Doji Star
Two-candle bearish reversal: an up candle followed by a doji that gaps higher and stalls, a sign the rally is losing steam.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
Limited sample (87). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+5.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.0% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry. The 5.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 87 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.0% | 40.7% | +5.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.5% | 27.7% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.3% | 19.8% | +5.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.0% | 58.3% | -4.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.0% | -1.0 |
87 occurrences · 1,706,892 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (-6.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.12×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry. The 6.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 39.7% | -6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.8% | 27.2% | -3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.0% | 19.7% | -0.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 59.0% | +7.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
21 occurrences · 354,524 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
21.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.2% for a random short entry (-17.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.32×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.72R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 21.4% of the time vs 39.2% for a random short entry. The 17.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±25.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 14 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 21.4% | 39.2% | -17.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 21.4% | 27.2% | -5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.4% | 20.3% | +1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 78.6% | 59.3% | +19.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.6% | -1.6 |
14 occurrences · 119,349 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (-0.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.90×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.86R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.5% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 0.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±26.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 13 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 13 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.5% | 38.9% | -0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.1% | 27.5% | -4.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.8% | -20.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.5% | 59.9% | +1.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.1% | -1.1 |
13 occurrences · 59,789 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
55.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.4% for a random short entry (+17.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.77×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.77R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 55.6% of the time vs 38.4% for a random short entry. The 17.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±31.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 9 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 9 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 55.6% | 38.4% | +17.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 55.6% | 27.5% | +28.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 55.6% | 21.2% | +34.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 44.4% | 60.7% | -16.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.9% | -0.9 |
9 occurrences · 27,675 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
7.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.2% for a random short entry (-31.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.62×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 7.1% of the time vs 38.2% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 7.1% | 38.2% | -31.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 7.1% | 29.2% | -22.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 23.1% | -23.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 92.9% | 61.6% | +31.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.2% | -0.2 |
14 occurrences · 4,539 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
28.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.5% for a random short entry (-7.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.74×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.57R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 28.6% of the time vs 36.5% for a random short entry. The 7.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±25.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 14 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 28.6% | 36.5% | -7.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 7.1% | 26.8% | -19.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.1% | 21.0% | -13.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 71.4% | 63.1% | +8.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
14 occurrences · 4,681 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
34.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (-3.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.94×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.88R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.95R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 34.9% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry. The 3.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 281 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 34.9% | 38.5% | -3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.0% | 25.2% | +1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.9% | 17.2% | +2.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 65.1% | 60.5% | +4.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.1% | -1.1 |
281 occurrences · 1,599,351 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (82). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random short entry (+4.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.52×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.7% of the time vs 38.7% for a random short entry. The 4.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 82 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.7% | 38.7% | +4.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.9% | 26.0% | +6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.4% | 18.6% | +5.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.3% | 60.1% | -2.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
82 occurrences · 344,822 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (+9.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.1% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry. The 9.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.1% | 38.5% | +9.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.6% | 26.4% | +3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.5% | 19.5% | -0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.9% | 60.0% | -8.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.4% | -1.4 |
27 occurrences · 117,604 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (-5.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.90R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 5.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 24 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 24 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 38.9% | -5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 27.3% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.7% | 20.4% | -3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 60.1% | +6.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.0% | -1.0 |
24 occurrences · 59,279 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.2% for a random short entry (-1.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.78×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.1% of the time vs 39.2% for a random short entry. The 1.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.1% | 39.2% | -1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.8% | 28.2% | -4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.8% | 21.6% | +2.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.9% | 60.1% | +1.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.7% | -0.7 |
21 occurrences · 27,486 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.9%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.1% for a random short entry (+13.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.78×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.42R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 52.9% of the time vs 39.1% for a random short entry. The 13.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 17 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.9% | 39.1% | +13.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 41.2% | 30.1% | +11.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 35.3% | 24.5% | +10.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.1% | 60.5% | -13.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
17 occurrences · 4,520 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.6% for a random short entry (-2.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.63×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.02R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.3% of the time vs 37.6% for a random short entry. The 2.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 17 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.3% | 37.6% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.5% | 28.5% | -4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.6% | 21.9% | -4.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.7% | 61.9% | +2.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
17 occurrences · 4,671 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bearish doji star is a two-candle warning at the top. An up candle runs with the trend, then a doji gaps higher and stalls right at the highs, with the open and close in almost the same spot. The gap shows buyers still pushing, but the doji shows they could not finish the job. That sudden balance after a strong candle is the first hint of a turn.
The doji star appears in Steve Nison’s Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991) as an early two-candle warning of indecision after a trend.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- The first candle is an up (green) candle that fits the advance.
- The second candle is a doji that gaps above the first.
- The doji’s open and close sit at nearly the same price, a standoff.
- The stall right after the gap is the signal, not a fresh push down yet.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the 2 candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.
The psychology
The up candle is the rally still running, buyers closing the market higher and looking comfortable. Then the doji gaps above it, so on the open the buyers seem to press their advantage once more. By the close, though, the open and close sit in almost the same spot. The gap proves buyers still wanted higher prices, but the flat body proves they could not deliver them. Sellers showed up at the new highs and held the line.
That sudden balance after a strong candle is the first sign the buying is tiring. The market has gone from one-way to a standoff in a single bar, right where the trend should be strongest. Nothing has reversed yet, and there is no down candle to act on. This is a warning, not a verdict: the rally has lost its grip on the wheel, but no one has taken it from them.
Whether that loss of steam turns into a real reversal is what the numbers below test.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2020, 11:42 AM CDT | 8 | 1.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2020, 10:03 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 1, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.5 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2015, 11:35 AM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 12, 2012, 1:41 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| May 24, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2012, 9:20 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2011, 1:04 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2011, 1:34 PM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2011, 12:00 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2011, 10:53 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2011, 2:14 PM CDT | 1.25 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 13, 2011, 2:30 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2011, 2:41 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2011, 2:20 PM CDT | 0.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 25, 2011, 2:07 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2011, 10:36 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2010, 9:57 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Nov 25, 2010, 9:30 AM CST | — | — | Open |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 11.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 7.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 1, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.75 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2011, 2:45 PM CST | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 6, 2011, 1:15 PM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 27, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 1, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2009, 11:45 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2009, 9:10 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2009, 12:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2009, 11:25 AM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 26, 2009, 9:10 AM CST | 3 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2009, 12:40 PM CST | 1.5 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2009, 9:45 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 29, 2008, 2:35 PM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2008, 2:10 PM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2008, 1:15 PM CST | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2008, 2:10 PM CST | 2 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 28, 2008, 2:30 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (14)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026, 8:30 AM CST | 19.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 15, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2020, 1:15 PM CDT | 33 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 17.25 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| May 30, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2015, 1:00 PM CST | 20 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Nov 27, 2014, 8:30 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 29, 2011, 9:15 AM CST | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2009, 11:00 AM CDT | 4.25 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2009, 9:45 AM CST | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 3, 2008, 2:15 PM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 22, 2008, 12:15 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (13)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 23.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 36.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 2, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 26 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 46.75 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 32.25 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 1, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 43.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 28, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 10 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 15.5 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 40.5 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 24, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 3.25 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2011, 1:00 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jan 2, 2009, 10:00 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (9)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 23.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 9.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 13, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 8.25 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Jul 4, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 29, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2008, 8:30 AM CST | 15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (14)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 82.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 28.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 18.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 23.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2014, 8:30 AM CST | 25.25 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Sep 6, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 30, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 9 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 13, 2012, 8:30 AM CST | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2011, 8:30 AM CST | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 13, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 10.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (14)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2025 | 74.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2024 | 27 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 3, 2023 | 33 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2023 | 33.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2021 | 83.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 3, 2019 | 47 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 10, 2017 | 10.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2016 | 12.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2014 | 8.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 15, 2012 | 6 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2012 | 17.5 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Oct 11, 2010 | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2009 | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2009 | 12.5 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 25, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Aug 2, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 2, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 30, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2011, 12:02 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2011, 12:48 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2011, 2:02 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2011, 11:50 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2011, 10:46 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 29, 2011, 9:42 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2011, 11:52 AM CST | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2011, 8:41 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2011, 1:47 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2011, 2:07 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Nov 3, 2011, 10:20 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 4.25 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 11, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 30, 2011, 1:25 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 30, 2011, 9:50 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2011, 10:40 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2011, 12:10 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 15, 2011, 1:15 PM CDT | 1.75 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 3, 2011, 11:40 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2010, 12:10 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2010, 1:35 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2010, 11:00 AM CST | 1.75 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2010, 9:15 AM CST | 0.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 25, 2010, 8:45 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2010, 11:50 AM CDT | 0.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 20, 2010, 1:45 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2010, 1:05 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 10, 2010, 9:20 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.25 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 3, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2015, 1:00 PM CST | 9.25 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2012, 8:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2011, 9:00 AM CST | 1.25 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2011, 1:45 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 14, 2010, 11:15 AM CST | 0.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 5, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2010, 11:15 AM CDT | 1.25 | 2.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 6, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 24, 2010, 2:00 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2010, 2:45 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2010, 10:00 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2010, 1:45 PM CST | 0.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 6, 2010, 1:45 PM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2009, 11:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2009, 1:45 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 15.75 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.5 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 20, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 13, 2015, 9:00 AM CST | 1 | 2.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 5, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2011, 8:30 AM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 11, 2011, 10:00 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2010, 10:00 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 18, 2010, 2:30 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 13, 2010, 10:00 AM CDT | 2 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 10, 2010, 1:30 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 26, 2010, 10:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2010, 10:00 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2010, 11:30 AM CST | 2 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Jan 4, 2010, 11:00 AM CST | 1 | 0.25R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.75 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 14, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 28, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 14.75 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.5 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 4.75 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2014, 8:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 11, 2011, 8:30 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2010, 9:30 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Nov 9, 2010, 8:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 5, 2010, 12:30 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2009, 12:30 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2009, 12:30 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2009, 12:30 PM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (17)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 12.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 25, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 8, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 10.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 10, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.75 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 24, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 10.75 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 13, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 6, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Doji Star Firings (17)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2025 | 19.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2025 | 13.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 24, 2025 | 16.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2023 | 13.75 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 14, 2023 | 20 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2021 | 6.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2019 | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2019 | 11.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2018 | 10.5 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2016 | 3 | 2.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2015 | 5.5 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2014 | 6.5 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2014 | 5 | 1.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2013 | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2012 | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2009 | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 4, 2008 | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.