Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bearish Three Black Crows
Three consecutive long bearish candles, each opening inside the prior body and closing lower, after an uptrend.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
30.5%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random short entry (-12.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.84×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.82R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 30.5% of the time vs 42.6% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 30.5% | 42.6% | -12.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 12.4% | 27.5% | -15.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 4.3% | 18.9% | -14.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 39.0% | 54.8% | -15.7 |
| Went sideways | 30.5% | 2.6% | +27.9 |
210 occurrences · 5,340,354 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random short entry (+6.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.3% of the time vs 41.5% for a random short entry. The 6.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 29 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 29 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.3% | 41.5% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 13.8% | 27.0% | -13.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 3.4% | 18.8% | -15.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 37.9% | 55.6% | -17.6 |
| Went sideways | 13.8% | 2.9% | +10.9 |
29 occurrences · 1,162,047 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
20.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.6% for a random short entry (-20.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.57×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 20.0% of the time vs 40.6% for a random short entry. The 20.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 20.0% | 40.6% | -20.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 26.5% | -6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 18.7% | +1.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 55.9% | +4.1 |
| Went sideways | 20.0% | 3.5% | +16.5 |
5 occurrences · 395,123 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random short entry (+60.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 39.8% for a random short entry. The 60.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 39.8% | +60.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.1% | -26.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.6% | -18.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 56.1% | -56.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.1% | -4.1 |
2 occurrences · 198,092 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.5% for a random short entry (-1.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.09×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.86R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.92R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.2% of the time vs 39.5% for a random short entry. The 1.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 102 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.2% | 39.5% | -1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 10.8% | 23.6% | -12.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 2.0% | 15.0% | -13.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.3% | 58.0% | -21.7 |
| Went sideways | 25.5% | 2.5% | +23.0 |
102 occurrences · 5,220,587 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
30.8%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (-9.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.83R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 30.8% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 9.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±26.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 13 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 13 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 30.8% | 39.9% | -9.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 7.7% | 25.0% | -17.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.7% | 16.7% | -9.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 38.5% | 57.3% | -18.8 |
| Went sideways | 30.8% | 2.8% | +28.0 |
13 occurrences · 1,183,939 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
66.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (+27.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.71×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry. The 27.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 66.7% | 39.7% | +27.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 25.4% | -25.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.4% | -17.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 33.3% | 56.9% | -23.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.4% | -3.4 |
3 occurrences · 409,191 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.3% for a random short entry (-39.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.47×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 39.3% for a random short entry. The 39.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±95.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 39.3% | -39.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 25.3% | -25.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.7% | -17.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 56.8% | +43.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.9% | -3.9 |
1 occurrences · 206,590 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random short entry (-1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.97R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.8% of the time vs 41.4% for a random short entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 186 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.8% | 41.4% | -1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 15.1% | 26.3% | -11.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 4.3% | 17.8% | -13.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.6% | 55.7% | -19.1 |
| Went sideways | 23.7% | 2.9% | +20.7 |
186 occurrences · 5,523,555 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
32.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (-9.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.24×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.91R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 32.0% of the time vs 41.8% for a random short entry. The 9.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 25 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 25 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 32.0% | 41.8% | -9.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 26.8% | -6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 8.0% | 18.4% | -10.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 55.1% | -15.1 |
| Went sideways | 28.0% | 3.1% | +24.9 |
25 occurrences · 1,219,764 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
60.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (+18.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.36×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 41.8% for a random short entry. The 18.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 60.0% | 41.8% | +18.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 26.9% | -6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.6% | -18.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 54.6% | -14.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.6% | -3.6 |
5 occurrences · 415,713 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
34.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random short entry (-6.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 34.1% of the time vs 40.8% for a random short entry. The 6.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 138 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 34.1% | 40.8% | -6.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 8.7% | 25.7% | -17.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 4.3% | 17.4% | -13.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.2% | 56.2% | -20.0 |
| Went sideways | 29.7% | 3.0% | +26.7 |
138 occurrences · 5,363,181 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.9%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-3.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.85R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.9% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 3.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 29 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 29 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.9% | 41.3% | -3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 6.9% | 26.6% | -19.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 3.4% | 18.3% | -14.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 37.9% | 55.4% | -17.5 |
| Went sideways | 24.1% | 3.3% | +20.9 |
29 occurrences · 1,194,142 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-1.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.83R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 1.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 41.3% | -1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.8% | -26.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.7% | -18.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 54.9% | -14.9 |
| Went sideways | 20.0% | 3.8% | +16.2 |
5 occurrences · 407,609 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random short entry (-42.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.69×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.69R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.0% for a random short entry. The 42.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.0% | -42.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.8% | -27.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.6% | -19.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 54.8% | +45.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.2% | -3.2 |
1 occurrences · 101,374 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random short entry (-4.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.49×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.85R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.5% of the time vs 39.8% for a random short entry. The 4.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 138 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.5% | 39.8% | -4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 10.9% | 25.2% | -14.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 3.6% | 17.1% | -13.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 39.9% | 56.7% | -16.8 |
| Went sideways | 24.6% | 3.5% | +21.1 |
138 occurrences · 3,860,692 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (30). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.1% for a random short entry (-4.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.92R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.7% of the time vs 41.1% for a random short entry. The 4.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 30 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.7% | 41.1% | -4.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 26.4% | -9.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.0% | 18.1% | -8.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.3% | 55.3% | -12.0 |
| Went sideways | 20.0% | 3.6% | +16.4 |
30 occurrences · 923,352 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-41.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.56×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 41.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 41.3% | -41.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.6% | -26.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.4% | -18.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 54.5% | -4.5 |
| Went sideways | 50.0% | 4.1% | +45.9 |
2 occurrences · 320,654 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-8.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.44×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.70R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 8.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 41.3% | -8.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 26.8% | +6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.6% | -18.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 54.1% | +12.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.7% | -4.7 |
3 occurrences · 161,646 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.1% for a random short entry (+57.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.75×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.47R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 42.1% for a random short entry. The 57.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 42.1% | +57.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.8% | +22.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 19.5% | +30.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 54.7% | -54.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.2% | -3.2 |
2 occurrences · 80,431 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (-40.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 40.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 40.3% | -40.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 24.7% | -24.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 16.0% | -16.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 57.1% | -57.1 |
| Went sideways | 100.0% | 2.6% | +97.4 |
1 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A three black crows is a three-candle bearish reversal. After an uptrend, three long down candles appear in a row, each opening inside the body of the one before it and closing lower than the last. The read is a steady, repeated handover from buyers to sellers, with no real bounce in between.
Steve Nison describes three black crows in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), the bearish mirror of three white soldiers.
How to spot it
- The market has been rising into the pattern.
- Three long bearish (red) candles appear back to back, each with a body bigger than the recent average.
- Each candle opens inside the prior candle’s body, not on a gap, then closes near its low.
- Each close is lower than the one before, so the three step steadily down.
- Little or no lower wick, which shows sellers held control all the way into each close.
The psychology
Price has been climbing, and the buyers who carried it up are still holding their gains as the top forms. Then a long down candle prints, and the next one opens back up inside its body, the spot where buyers try to resume, before sellers take over again and close it lower. That same thing happens a third time. Three sessions in a row, every attempt to bounce is met and pushed under the prior close.
What traders read into it is conviction on the sell side and none on the buy side. There is no long lower wick to show buyers fighting back, just one steady step down after another. The buyers who are still long from higher up watch three straight sessions go against them, and some begin to give up and sell, which feeds the move. The orderly, repetitive nature of it is the point: this is not a single violent bar that might be a fluke, it is selling that keeps showing up.
Whether that steady pressure carries through is the question the data below takes up.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. This is a strict shape, so on many markets and timeframes it fires rarely or not at all. Treat thin or empty samples as a reason to wait, not a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Notes
This page is a draft. The strict definition, long bodies with each candle opening inside the prior body, makes the pattern rare, and on some instruments it does not appear at all in the sample. Where the count is zero or very low, the numbers are not yet something to lean on, and the predicate may be loosened to match how the pattern is commonly drawn before this page is published.
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026, 9:14 PM CDT | 21.25 | 0.52R | Flat |
| Mar 2, 2026, 8:18 PM CST | 31.75 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2026, 1:40 AM CST | 15.25 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Jan 19, 2026, 3:25 AM CST | 45.5 | 0.64R | Flat |
| Jan 6, 2026, 12:37 AM CST | 6.75 | 0.44R | Flat |
| Dec 18, 2025, 7:01 PM CST | 22.25 | 0.63R | Flat |
| Nov 6, 2025, 12:05 PM CST | 64 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Oct 13, 2025, 8:11 AM CDT | 29.75 | 1.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2025, 7:43 AM CDT | 21.25 | 0.40R | Flat |
| Sep 25, 2025, 12:20 PM CDT | 36.75 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 1, 2025, 10:53 AM CDT | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 19, 2025, 12:52 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Aug 15, 2025, 12:48 AM CDT | 2 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2025, 7:24 PM CDT | 5.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 19, 2025, 6:24 PM CDT | 16 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT | 8.75 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 4, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 1, 2025, 11:42 PM CDT | 6.75 | 0.96R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2025, 9:21 PM CDT | 13.25 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2025, 9:44 AM CDT | 46 | 0.70R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 83.5 | 0.72R | Flat |
| Jan 8, 2026, 6:55 PM CST | 27.75 | 1.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 25, 2023, 12:25 AM CDT | 15.25 | 1.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 28, 2023, 7:45 AM CDT | 87 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2023, 3:20 PM CDT | 12.5 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 27, 2022, 3:00 AM CST | 30.25 | 0.77R | Flat |
| Sep 13, 2022, 6:10 PM CDT | 26.25 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2022, 11:05 PM CDT | 14.5 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2022, 6:15 AM CDT | 65.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2022, 6:55 PM CDT | 35 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2020, 10:05 PM CDT | 38 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2019, 6:11 AM CST | 11 | 2.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 2, 2019, 10:20 AM CDT | 42.25 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2018, 6:23 AM CDT | 6.25 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 26, 2018, 4:37 AM CDT | 14 | 0.71R | Flat |
| Oct 24, 2017, 11:55 PM CDT | 5.25 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 26, 2016, 12:45 AM CDT | 4.75 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Jan 2, 2015, 1:38 AM CST | 4.75 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2014, 10:23 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2014, 1:08 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2015, 1:50 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Jun 28, 2012, 3:53 PM CDT | 7.25 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2010, 8:04 PM CST | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2009, 9:40 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.77R | Flat |
| Oct 23, 2008, 7:24 PM CDT | 7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT | 224.75 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2011, 8:15 PM CDT | 7.25 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2026, 12:28 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2025, 4:24 AM CST | 8.75 | 0.57R | Flat |
| Nov 20, 2025, 1:36 AM CST | 5.25 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2025, 6:57 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.86R | Flat |
| Sep 30, 2025, 11:48 AM CDT | 4.75 | 1.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2025, 10:03 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 3, 2025, 10:13 AM CDT | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 24, 2025, 12:56 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| May 27, 2025, 5:47 AM CDT | 3.5 | 2.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 14, 2025, 5:13 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.44R | Flat |
| Jan 6, 2025, 12:49 AM CST | 1 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 26, 2024, 3:49 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.33R | Flat |
| Jul 3, 2024, 1:16 AM CDT | 2 | 0.25R | Flat |
| Jun 20, 2024, 2:55 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| May 8, 2024, 11:50 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2024, 3:25 PM CDT | 1 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Dec 27, 2023, 1:00 PM CST | 8.25 | 0.67R | Flat |
| Dec 18, 2023, 12:03 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2023, 1:16 PM CST | 2.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2023, 8:07 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (13)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2024, 1:03 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Sep 1, 2023, 1:22 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Aug 29, 2023, 2:50 AM CDT | 10.25 | 0.39R | Flat |
| Dec 22, 2021, 5:35 AM CST | 3.25 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2019, 7:31 PM CST | 1.75 | 0.14R | Flat |
| Oct 13, 2019, 11:30 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 13, 2015, 6:58 AM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 15, 2015, 1:34 PM CDT | 4 | 1.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2012, 12:55 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2010, 5:17 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Nov 5, 2008, 3:50 PM CST | 7.5 | 0.87R | Flat |
| Aug 21, 2008, 4:32 AM CDT | 1.75 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 12, 2008, 12:07 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.57R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026, 5:15 PM CST | 8.75 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2024, 9:00 AM CDT | 66.5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Jan 1, 2019, 8:00 PM CST | 19.5 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2013, 1:27 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.18R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:09 AM CDT | 6.8 | 0.62R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:21 AM CDT | 6.7 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:51 AM CDT | 2.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 6:44 PM CDT | 4.7 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 2:31 PM CDT | 11.4 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 12:55 PM CDT | 3.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2026, 10:18 PM CST | 3.8 | 0.39R | Flat |
| Feb 10, 2026, 6:06 AM CST | 7.8 | 0.78R | Flat |
| Feb 6, 2026, 3:35 PM CST | 2.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 21, 2025, 12:13 PM CST | 4.6 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2025, 3:22 AM CST | 7.7 | 0.55R | Flat |
| Nov 18, 2025, 4:13 AM CST | 4.7 | 0.47R | Flat |
| Nov 7, 2025, 4:16 AM CST | 4.5 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2025, 11:23 PM CST | 4.3 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2025, 3:53 PM CDT | 3.4 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2025, 3:53 PM CDT | 2 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 30, 2025, 3:29 AM CDT | 9.2 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 4, 2025, 1:51 PM CDT | 0.7 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2025, 6:31 PM CDT | 1.4 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2025, 12:35 AM CDT | 1.4 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2025, 1:21 PM CST | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 28, 2025, 3:45 PM CDT | 6.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2025, 8:40 AM CDT | 34.2 | 0.12R | Flat |
| Jan 20, 2025, 1:11 AM CST | 5 | 0.44R | Flat |
| Mar 27, 2024, 12:07 AM CDT | 2.3 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2023, 3:23 PM CST | 1.7 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 30, 2021, 4:13 AM CDT | 2.7 | 2.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 30, 2021, 12:45 AM CDT | 2.8 | 0.93R | Flat |
| Nov 12, 2018, 1:36 PM CST | 1.3 | 0.54R | Flat |
| Dec 11, 2017, 1:36 AM CST | 1.2 | 0.83R | Flat |
| Jun 27, 2017, 3:02 PM CDT | 1.1 | 2.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 30, 2014, 10:05 PM CDT | 1.7 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2012, 3:19 PM CDT | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 24, 2012, 3:36 PM CDT | 1.3 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2012, 6:46 PM CDT | 1.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2010, 9:19 PM CST | 10.3 | 0.00R | Flat |
| Sep 13, 2010, 4:06 AM CDT | 1.1 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 27, 2010, 5:50 PM CDT | 2.7 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Dec 29, 2009, 1:04 AM CST | 2.2 | 0.82R | Flat |
| Jun 11, 2009, 7:24 PM CDT | 1.2 | 0.17R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2022, 5:16 AM CDT | 6.1 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 11, 2019, 1:39 AM CDT | 4.1 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2012, 4:00 AM CDT | 4.6 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Jul 9, 2009, 5:45 AM CDT | 2.2 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2008, 10:15 PM CST | 6 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026, 9:39 AM CST | 0.15 | 0.67R | Flat |
| Oct 31, 2025, 2:16 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 19, 2025, 7:06 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Sep 9, 2025, 7:35 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Aug 1, 2025, 5:02 AM CDT | 0.2 | 0.10R | Flat |
| Feb 14, 2025, 2:07 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.33R | Flat |
| Feb 12, 2025, 2:44 AM CST | 0.17 | 0.29R | Flat |
| Oct 1, 2024, 9:06 PM CDT | 0.11 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 13, 2024, 4:58 AM CDT | 0.07 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2024, 4:15 AM CDT | 0.15 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 4, 2024, 3:53 PM CDT | 0.08 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2024, 3:36 AM CDT | 0.27 | 0.11R | Flat |
| Mar 6, 2024, 3:11 AM CST | 0.19 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2023, 11:34 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2023, 7:56 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.94R | Flat |
| Sep 1, 2023, 12:58 AM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 6, 2023, 8:28 PM CDT | 0.09 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 27, 2023, 1:36 PM CDT | 0.23 | 0.48R | Flat |
| May 12, 2023, 7:29 AM CDT | 0.31 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Apr 18, 2023, 3:20 AM CDT | 0.17 | 0.53R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024, 12:16 AM CDT | 0.08 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Oct 4, 2023, 6:40 PM CDT | 0.21 | 0.62R | Flat |
| Oct 18, 2022, 12:52 PM CDT | 0.84 | 0.74R | Flat |
| Aug 22, 2022, 8:00 AM CDT | 1.46 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 23, 2022, 2:05 AM CDT | 0.96 | 0.40R | Flat |
| Jul 30, 2021, 3:23 PM CDT | 0.11 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Jul 18, 2019, 8:56 AM CDT | 0.73 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 14, 2019, 6:20 PM CST | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 20, 2016, 4:51 AM CDT | 0.21 | 0.24R | Flat |
| Jul 15, 2016, 12:59 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.56R | Flat |
| Jul 11, 2016, 2:51 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2016, 9:23 AM CDT | 0.55 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2014, 8:04 AM CDT | 0.31 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2014, 1:53 AM CST | 0.15 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 26, 2013, 4:59 AM CDT | 0.24 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2012, 10:11 PM CDT | 0.17 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 28, 2011, 6:13 PM CST | 0.39 | 0.56R | Flat |
| May 25, 2011, 6:44 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2011, 11:04 PM CST | 0.37 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2010, 8:19 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.04R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2022, 2:50 AM CDT | 1.02 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2016, 2:10 PM CDT | 0.28 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Aug 27, 2012, 8:03 AM CDT | 1.48 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 16, 2010, 3:07 AM CDT | 0.24 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2008, 8:45 PM CDT | 0.28 | 0.07R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2008, 1:03 AM CDT | 2.04 | 0.69R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026, 8:10 PM CDT | 0.017 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 1:05 AM CDT | 0.006 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 1:19 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 1:54 PM CST | 0.007 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 10:35 AM CST | 0.08 | 0.69R | Flat |
| Jan 19, 2026, 11:39 PM CST | 0.009 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2025, 1:50 PM CDT | 0.005 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 20, 2025, 1:27 PM CDT | 0.012 | 0.08R | Flat |
| Feb 20, 2025, 9:45 AM CST | 0.033 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2025, 1:20 AM CST | 0.011 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 16, 2024, 10:13 AM CDT | 0.005 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 6, 2024, 5:08 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2024, 9:40 AM CDT | 0.045 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2024, 8:33 AM CDT | 0.015 | 0.40R | Flat |
| Nov 16, 2023, 5:43 AM CST | 0.009 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2023, 6:04 AM CST | 0.035 | 0.54R | Flat |
| Nov 3, 2023, 5:58 AM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 31, 2023, 11:02 AM CDT | 0.023 | 0.43R | Flat |
| Jul 9, 2023, 10:32 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.56R | Flat |
| Jun 29, 2023, 9:19 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.10R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2024, 8:40 PM CST | 0.016 | 2.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2024, 6:55 PM CST | 0.011 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2023, 8:56 PM CDT | 0.015 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2023, 7:45 AM CST | 0.049 | 0.94R | Flat |
| Jun 23, 2022, 8:26 PM CDT | 0.022 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 25, 2022, 8:10 PM CDT | 0.021 | 1.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2022, 2:35 PM CST | 0.042 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Oct 18, 2021, 9:10 PM CDT | 0.017 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 27, 2021, 11:00 PM CDT | 0.006 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2021, 2:02 PM CDT | 0.006 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2020, 1:45 PM CST | 0.021 | 0.05R | Flat |
| Sep 8, 2016, 12:37 PM CDT | 0.016 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Sep 15, 2015, 12:25 AM CDT | 0.009 | 0.11R | Flat |
| Mar 30, 2015, 12:36 PM CDT | 0.018 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2014, 4:09 PM CDT | 0.013 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2014, 9:51 PM CST | 0.024 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Sep 2, 2013, 7:31 AM CDT | 0.013 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2013, 12:16 PM CST | 0.016 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2013, 6:06 AM CST | 0.019 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 6, 2012, 12:38 AM CST | 0.009 | 0.67R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010, 8:53 PM CDT | 0.025 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Jun 17, 2009, 8:17 PM CDT | 0.065 | 0.31R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2014, 8:00 PM CST | 0.097 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2010, 7:29 AM CDT | 0.108 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2010, 4:13 AM CDT | 0.023 | 0.09R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2015, 12:33 AM CDT | 0.028 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2011, 5:40 AM CST | 0.063 | 1.94R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Three Black Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2012 | 0.469 | 0.07R | Flat |
Sample backtest
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.