Pattern Detail
Bullish Three White Soldiers
Three-candle bullish reversal: three rising up candles in a row, each opening inside the prior body and closing higher.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.2% for a random long entry (-1.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.33×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.1% of the time vs 43.2% for a random long entry. The 1.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±1.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7,834 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.1% | 43.2% | -1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.0% | 27.6% | -9.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.9% | 18.7% | -10.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.7% | 53.8% | -11.1 |
| Went sideways | 15.2% | 3.0% | +12.2 |
7,834 occurrences · 5,355,470 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (-1.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.06R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.6% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry. The 1.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2,276 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.6% | 42.8% | -1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.9% | 27.3% | -8.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.1% | 18.5% | -9.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.1% | 53.6% | -10.6 |
| Went sideways | 15.3% | 3.6% | +11.7 |
2,276 occurrences · 1,165,570 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random long entry (-0.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.9% of the time vs 42.6% for a random long entry. The 0.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 829 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.9% | 42.6% | -0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.4% | 27.2% | -4.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 12.7% | 18.7% | -6.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 41.9% | 52.8% | -11.0 |
| Went sideways | 16.3% | 4.6% | +11.7 |
829 occurrences · 396,076 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (+2.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.14×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.19R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 45.2% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 2.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 438 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.2% | 42.4% | +2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 24.9% | 27.2% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.2% | 18.8% | -4.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 39.3% | 51.9% | -12.7 |
| Went sideways | 15.5% | 5.7% | +9.9 |
438 occurrences · 198,429 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (-1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.7% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 211 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.7% | 43.3% | -1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 21.8% | 28.1% | -6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 13.3% | 19.6% | -6.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.0% | 52.4% | -6.4 |
| Went sideways | 12.3% | 4.3% | +8.0 |
211 occurrences · 98,520 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (45). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.2% for a random long entry (+2.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.06R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.15R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.7% of the time vs 44.2% for a random long entry. The 2.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 45 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 44.2% | +2.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 17.8% | 28.2% | -10.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.7% | 19.1% | -12.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.2% | 52.4% | -10.2 |
| Went sideways | 11.1% | 3.3% | +7.8 |
45 occurrences · 22,501 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 46.7% for a random long entry (+1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.17R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.3% of the time vs 46.7% for a random long entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 29 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 29 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.3% | 46.7% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 17.2% | 27.8% | -10.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 3.4% | 17.6% | -14.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 34.5% | 50.3% | -15.8 |
| Went sideways | 17.2% | 3.0% | +14.2 |
29 occurrences · 4,707 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.0% for a random long entry (-0.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.82×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.96R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.93R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.6% of the time vs 40.0% for a random long entry. The 0.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1,763 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.6% | 40.0% | -0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 15.0% | 23.7% | -8.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.0% | 14.9% | -8.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.3% | 57.1% | -13.8 |
| Went sideways | 17.0% | 2.8% | +14.2 |
1,763 occurrences · 5,247,372 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+0.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.33×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.2% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry. The 0.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 660 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.2% | 41.0% | +0.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 15.8% | 25.2% | -9.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.3% | 16.5% | -9.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.8% | 55.6% | -14.8 |
| Went sideways | 18.0% | 3.4% | +14.6 |
660 occurrences · 1,189,766 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-3.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.95R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.8% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 3.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 249 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.8% | 41.3% | -3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 15.3% | 25.8% | -10.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.8% | 17.2% | -10.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 41.4% | 54.4% | -13.1 |
| Went sideways | 20.9% | 4.3% | +16.6 |
249 occurrences · 411,225 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (+1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.12×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.0% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 135 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.0% | 41.4% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.7% | 25.9% | -2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.1% | 17.6% | -3.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.7% | 53.4% | -12.6 |
| Went sideways | 16.3% | 5.2% | +11.1 |
135 occurrences · 207,386 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (86). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (+1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.2% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 86 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.2% | 42.4% | +1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.9% | 26.8% | -5.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.5% | 18.2% | -7.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.0% | 53.3% | -17.3 |
| Went sideways | 19.8% | 4.2% | +15.5 |
86 occurrences · 103,338 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
23.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.7% for a random long entry (-20.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.86×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.76R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 23.5% of the time vs 43.7% for a random long entry. The 20.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 17 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 23.5% | 43.7% | -20.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 5.9% | 28.0% | -22.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.7% | -18.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.9% | 52.9% | +0.0 |
| Went sideways | 23.5% | 3.4% | +20.1 |
17 occurrences · 23,340 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.9% for a random long entry (-1.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.74×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.99R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.5% of the time vs 44.9% for a random long entry. The 1.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 23 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 23 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.5% | 44.9% | -1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 4.3% | 26.2% | -21.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 15.8% | -15.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 26.1% | 51.3% | -25.2 |
| Went sideways | 30.4% | 3.8% | +26.6 |
23 occurrences · 4,709 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-1.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.56×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.7% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 1.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±1.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3,795 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.7% | 41.3% | -1.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 26.0% | -9.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.2% | 17.4% | -10.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.1% | 55.6% | -13.5 |
| Went sideways | 18.2% | 3.2% | +15.0 |
3,795 occurrences · 5,537,711 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.6%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (-3.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 38.6% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.6% | 41.8% | -3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 17.5% | 26.4% | -9.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.0% | 17.9% | -8.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 45.9% | 54.7% | -8.9 |
| Went sideways | 15.6% | 3.5% | +12.1 |
1,581 occurrences · 1,222,042 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.2% for a random long entry (-1.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.7% of the time vs 42.2% for a random long entry. The 1.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 639 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.7% | 42.2% | -1.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 17.8% | 26.8% | -9.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 8.9% | 18.3% | -9.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.3% | 53.7% | -10.4 |
| Went sideways | 16.0% | 4.1% | +11.9 |
639 occurrences · 416,275 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (-4.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.21×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.0% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 4.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 326 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.0% | 42.4% | -4.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 19.9% | 27.1% | -7.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.5% | 18.7% | -9.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 53.0% | -10.0 |
| Went sideways | 19.0% | 4.6% | +14.4 |
326 occurrences · 208,504 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (-2.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.18×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.1% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry. The 2.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 146 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.1% | 43.3% | -2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 21.2% | 28.1% | -6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 13.7% | 19.4% | -5.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 41.8% | 52.9% | -11.1 |
| Went sideways | 17.1% | 3.7% | +13.4 |
146 occurrences · 103,337 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (38). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.0% for a random long entry (+3.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.06R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.17R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.4% of the time vs 44.0% for a random long entry. The 3.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±15.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 38 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.4% | 44.0% | +3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.7% | 29.2% | -5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.3% | 20.6% | -15.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 39.5% | 53.1% | -13.6 |
| Went sideways | 13.2% | 2.9% | +10.2 |
38 occurrences · 23,350 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
68.8%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.3% for a random long entry (+21.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.25R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 68.8% of the time vs 47.3% for a random long entry. The 21.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 16 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 16 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 68.8% | 47.3% | +21.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 12.5% | 32.1% | -19.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.3% | 22.5% | -16.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 25.0% | 50.0% | -25.0 |
| Went sideways | 6.3% | 2.7% | +3.6 |
16 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (-0.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.75×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.9% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry. The 0.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±1.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2,837 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.9% | 40.9% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.2% | 25.7% | -7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 8.2% | 17.3% | -9.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.3% | 55.9% | -13.6 |
| Went sideways | 16.8% | 3.2% | +13.6 |
2,837 occurrences · 5,363,489 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (-0.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.30×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.6% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 0.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1,219 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.6% | 41.7% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.4% | 26.6% | -6.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.9% | 18.1% | -8.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.4% | 54.8% | -11.4 |
| Went sideways | 15.0% | 3.5% | +11.5 |
1,219 occurrences · 1,195,070 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random long entry (+1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.14×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.5% of the time vs 41.9% for a random long entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 462 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.5% | 41.9% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 21.4% | 26.9% | -5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.7% | 18.5% | -8.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 41.1% | 53.9% | -12.8 |
| Went sideways | 15.4% | 4.2% | +11.2 |
462 occurrences · 408,147 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+1.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.20×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.6% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 1.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 257 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.6% | 41.7% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.6% | 26.7% | -6.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.9% | 18.5% | -7.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 37.4% | 53.2% | -15.8 |
| Went sideways | 19.1% | 5.1% | +14.0 |
257 occurrences · 204,708 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+0.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.25×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.5% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 0.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 120 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.5% | 42.3% | +0.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 27.4% | -10.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.0% | 19.1% | -9.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.5% | 54.1% | -11.6 |
| Went sideways | 15.0% | 3.7% | +11.3 |
120 occurrences · 101,426 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (31). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (+5.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.4% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry. The 5.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 31 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.4% | 42.8% | +5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 9.7% | 27.8% | -18.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.7% | 18.9% | -9.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.6% | 54.8% | -3.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.4% | -2.4 |
31 occurrences · 23,144 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.1% for a random long entry (-2.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.12×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.7% of the time vs 44.1% for a random long entry. The 2.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 24 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 24 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.7% | 44.1% | -2.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.8% | 28.3% | -7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 12.5% | 18.7% | -6.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 45.8% | 53.3% | -7.5 |
| Went sideways | 12.5% | 2.6% | +9.9 |
24 occurrences · 4,698 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random long entry (+0.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.4% of the time vs 40.1% for a random long entry. The 0.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1,613 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.4% | 40.1% | +0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.0% | 25.3% | -7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 8.2% | 17.2% | -8.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 56.5% | -13.6 |
| Went sideways | 16.7% | 3.5% | +13.2 |
1,613 occurrences · 3,872,511 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random long entry (+0.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.43×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.7% of the time vs 41.2% for a random long entry. The 0.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 812 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.7% | 41.2% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 19.0% | 26.5% | -7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 8.0% | 18.2% | -10.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 44.1% | 55.2% | -11.1 |
| Went sideways | 14.2% | 3.6% | +10.6 |
812 occurrences · 925,705 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-0.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.20×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.02R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.6% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 0.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 384 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.6% | 41.3% | -0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.5% | 26.6% | -8.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.7% | 18.6% | -7.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 44.0% | 54.6% | -10.6 |
| Went sideways | 15.4% | 4.1% | +11.3 |
384 occurrences · 321,213 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random long entry (+1.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.15×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.9% of the time vs 41.2% for a random long entry. The 1.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 191 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.9% | 41.2% | +1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.0% | 26.8% | -3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.2% | 18.9% | -2.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 45.0% | 54.3% | -9.3 |
| Went sideways | 12.0% | 4.4% | +7.6 |
191 occurrences · 161,929 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+7.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.31×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 49.1% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 7.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 112 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.1% | 41.7% | +7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.5% | 27.6% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.8% | 19.6% | -0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 39.3% | 55.3% | -16.0 |
| Went sideways | 11.6% | 3.1% | +8.6 |
112 occurrences · 80,459 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
63.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+21.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.64R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 21.9-point gap over the 41.7% random-entry rate clears the ±20.6-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 22 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 63.6% | 41.7% | +21.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.9% | 28.0% | +12.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 27.3% | 19.8% | +7.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.4% | 56.2% | -19.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.1% | -2.1 |
22 occurrences · 18,581 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (-9.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry. The 9.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±28.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 12 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 12 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 42.5% | -9.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 28.7% | +4.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 20.2% | +4.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.3% | 55.8% | +2.6 |
| Went sideways | 8.3% | 1.7% | +6.6 |
12 occurrences · 4,692 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Three white soldiers is a three-candle reversal that shows steady buying after a fall. Three up candles appear back to back, each a real-sized bar rather than a tiny one. Every candle opens inside the body of the one before it and closes higher than the last. The march of higher closes shows buyers taking the lead day after day and the trend turning up.
Three white soldiers is one of the classical continuation-and-reversal patterns Steve Nison documents in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991).
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- Three up (green) candles appear in a row, none of them small.
- Each candle opens inside the body of the candle before it.
- Each candle closes higher than the one before it.
- The steadier and more even the three bodies, the stronger the signal.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
After a fall, the first strong up candle says buyers have shown up with real size. The next candle opens back inside that body, which gives sellers a chance to fade the bounce, and they fail: it closes higher still. The third does the same. Three times in a row buyers absorb the dip at the open and finish the bar near the top.
That repetition is the whole story. One up candle can be a reflex. Three in a row, each building on the last with full-sized bodies, looks like steady accumulation rather than a one-off pop. Control has changed hands from the sellers who ran the decline to buyers who now set the close every bar. When the three bodies are even and unhurried, the takeover reads as orderly rather than a panic that might snap back.
A calm, stair-stepping advance is convincing to look at. The numbers below show whether that look is matched by the room the move tends to give.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:11 AM CDT | 13.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:02 AM CDT | 16.5 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:56 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:17 PM CDT | 15.75 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:48 AM CDT | 41.5 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:56 AM CDT | 17.25 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:58 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:23 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:20 AM CDT | 11 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:52 PM CDT | 13.5 | 2.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:32 PM CDT | 15.75 | 1.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 9:06 AM CDT | 40.75 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:23 AM CDT | 61.5 | 0.60R | Flat |
| Apr 24, 2026, 5:43 AM CDT | 3.75 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 8.5 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:19 PM CDT | 25 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:03 PM CDT | 65 | 0.15R | Flat |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:44 AM CDT | 20.5 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:57 AM CDT | 9.25 | 2.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 9:34 PM CDT | 11.25 | 0.89R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:05 AM CDT | 37 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 28.25 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 200 | 0.38R | Flat |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:50 AM CDT | 81.25 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 4:20 AM CDT | 45 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT | 54.25 | 0.45R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:35 PM CDT | 27.75 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 40 | 0.39R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:01 PM CDT | 80.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 12:25 AM CDT | 25.75 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 7:40 PM CDT | 18 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 25 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 10:20 AM CDT | 52.5 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 8:45 PM CDT | 13 | 0.90R | Flat |
| Apr 10, 2026, 9:20 AM CDT | 72.75 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:20 PM CDT | 23.75 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:15 PM CDT | 22.75 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 10:55 AM CDT | 56.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 2:40 AM CDT | 28.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 10:45 AM CDT | 54.75 | 0.71R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 39 | 2.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 34.5 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:15 PM CDT | 54.5 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 6:15 AM CDT | 35 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 29.75 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 2:15 PM CDT | 85.5 | 0.62R | Flat |
| Apr 2, 2026, 1:45 AM CDT | 61.25 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 78 | 2.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2026, 7:15 PM CDT | 108.25 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 4:45 AM CDT | 115.5 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 10:45 PM CDT | 43.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 77.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 8:45 AM CST | 257 | 0.93R | Flat |
| Feb 18, 2026, 11:45 PM CST | 41.75 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 10, 2026, 1:30 AM CST | 30.25 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 114.75 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2026, 11:45 PM CST | 128.5 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 11:30 PM CST | 126.5 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 4, 2026, 4:15 AM CST | 75.5 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 3:45 AM CST | 81 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:30 PM CDT | 91 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 64.5 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 54.25 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 160.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 104.5 | 2.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 46.75 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 124.5 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 11:00 AM CST | 268.25 | 0.54R | Flat |
| Feb 23, 2026, 3:05 PM CST | 106.5 | 0.97R | Flat |
| Feb 19, 2026, 12:30 AM CST | 45.5 | 0.78R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 58 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Feb 9, 2026, 10:30 PM CST | 57.25 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 166 | 2.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 2, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 47.75 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2026, 3:00 AM CST | 130 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 2:30 PM CST | 69.5 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Dec 19, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 268 | 0.51R | Flat |
| Dec 19, 2025, 8:00 AM CST | 88.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 11, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 174.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2025, 10:30 PM CST | 28.75 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 509 | 0.16R | Flat |
| Mar 19, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 199 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 4:00 AM CST | 180.75 | 2.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 1:00 PM CST | 140.25 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 11:00 PM CST | 72.25 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2026, 7:00 PM CST | 111.25 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2026, 3:00 AM CST | 199.5 | 0.21R | Flat |
| Jan 20, 2026, 6:00 AM CST | 147.25 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2026, 7:00 PM CST | 65.25 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2025, 3:00 AM CST | 60.75 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2025, 3:00 AM CST | 85.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2025, 3:00 AM CST | 114 | 2.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 121 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2025, 12:00 AM CST | 47 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2025, 8:00 AM CST | 237.75 | 0.77R | Flat |
| Sep 1, 2025, 10:00 AM CDT | 53.5 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 65.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 54.5 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | 57.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 27, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 97.75 | 2.51R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 356 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 260 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 222.75 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 1,194 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2024, 9:00 PM CST | 499.75 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Oct 8, 2024, 9:00 AM CDT | 289.5 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 27, 2024, 1:00 AM CDT | 110.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2024, 5:00 AM CDT | 251.75 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT | 59 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2024, 9:00 AM CST | 437.75 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Nov 20, 2023, 9:00 AM CST | 226.25 | 0.45R | Flat |
| Aug 10, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT | 80.5 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 3, 2023, 5:01 AM CDT | 62 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 7, 2022, 5:00 AM CDT | 141.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 6, 2022, 5:01 AM CDT | 181 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2022, 9:00 PM CDT | 166.25 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 277.25 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2022, 1:00 AM CDT | 265.75 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2021, 1:00 AM CST | 135.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 31, 2020, 1:00 AM CST | 20.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2023 | 452.25 | 2.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 13, 2023 | 590.25 | 0.61R | Flat |
| Jan 24, 2023 | 605 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2022 | 785.25 | 0.97R | Flat |
| May 30, 2022 | 961.75 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Aug 24, 2021 | 512.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Aug 23, 2021 | 617.75 | 0.62R | Flat |
| Jan 21, 2021 | 586.25 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Oct 11, 2019 | 275.25 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 206 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2018 | 264 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 23, 2017 | 88.75 | 2.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2017 | 48.25 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 7, 2016 | 143.75 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 10, 2016 | 125 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 19, 2015 | 120.5 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2015 | 175 | 0.94R | Flat |
| Dec 19, 2014 | 197.5 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Jun 27, 2014 | 48.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 1, 2014 | 61.5 | 0.21R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:06 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:01 AM CDT | 5.25 | 1.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:03 AM CDT | 2.75 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 2:50 AM CDT | 2 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:21 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 2:27 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 6:30 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 10:10 AM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:13 AM CDT | 4.25 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 4:37 AM CDT | 4.75 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 3:47 AM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 5:49 PM CDT | 10.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 2:56 PM CDT | 8.75 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 6:05 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 3:45 AM CDT | 4.25 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 3:44 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 3:22 AM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2026, 7:32 PM CDT | 2.25 | 2.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 1:15 PM CDT | 7.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:05 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 45.25 | 0.49R | Flat |
| Apr 20, 2026, 11:25 PM CDT | 2 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 6.25 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 12:40 PM CDT | 7.5 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:20 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:15 PM CDT | 6.25 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 28.5 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 29.25 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:55 AM CDT | 6.5 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2026, 7:05 AM CDT | 14 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 8:55 PM CDT | 8 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2026, 8:10 PM CDT | 15.5 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 12:50 PM CDT | 15.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 6:15 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 2:55 PM CDT | 9.5 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 9:50 PM CDT | 4.25 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 2:00 PM CST | 15.25 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2026, 7:05 AM CST | 10 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 6:40 AM CST | 13 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026, 6:45 PM CDT | 20.75 | 0.25R | Flat |
| Mar 8, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 19 | 2.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2026, 11:15 AM CST | 20.75 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Feb 18, 2026, 7:00 PM CST | 13.5 | 0.20R | Flat |
| Feb 16, 2026, 12:45 AM CST | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 10:00 AM CST | 33 | 0.36R | Flat |
| Jan 27, 2026, 6:30 PM CST | 13.5 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Jan 26, 2026, 4:30 AM CST | 8.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 4:15 AM CST | 9.5 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 8:00 AM CST | 7 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2025, 6:30 AM CST | 6.75 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2025, 11:45 AM CST | 19 | 0.51R | Flat |
| Nov 17, 2025, 11:00 PM CST | 18.5 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2025, 11:15 AM CDT | 12 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2025, 5:45 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Sep 7, 2025, 10:15 PM CDT | 3.75 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Aug 24, 2025, 10:45 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2025, 4:30 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Jul 30, 2025, 11:01 AM CDT | 12.75 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | 31.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2026, 2:00 PM CST | 35.5 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 11:00 AM CST | 62.5 | 0.67R | Flat |
| Dec 19, 2025, 2:00 AM CST | 14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2025, 7:30 PM CST | 19.5 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | 21 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2025, 2:30 PM CDT | 22.25 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jun 2, 2025, 6:00 AM CDT | 14.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 14, 2025, 7:30 PM CDT | 7.25 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 139 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT | 7.75 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 18.5 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2025, 6:30 AM CST | 23 | 2.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2025, 12:00 PM CST | 41.25 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 1, 2025, 8:00 PM CST | 19.5 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2024, 1:00 AM CST | 5.25 | 2.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2024, 9:30 PM CST | 5.25 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Nov 21, 2024, 4:30 AM CST | 17.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2024, 9:00 AM CDT | 27.75 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Aug 22, 2024, 5:30 PM CDT | 10.5 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026, 4:00 AM CST | 50.25 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2026, 3:00 AM CST | 38.25 | 0.42R | Flat |
| Jan 15, 2026, 7:00 PM CST | 10.75 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 19, 2025, 3:00 AM CST | 25.5 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2025, 1:00 PM CST | 87.75 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2025, 12:01 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 15 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 19.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 24.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 29, 2024, 10:00 AM CST | 34.5 | 0.33R | Flat |
| Nov 6, 2024, 12:00 PM CST | 40 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT | 74.25 | 0.69R | Flat |
| Jul 29, 2024, 11:01 PM CDT | 19 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 9, 2024, 7:00 AM CDT | 12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2024, 9:00 AM CDT | 11.5 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 21, 2024, 8:00 AM CDT | 12 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2023, 3:00 AM CDT | 25.25 | 0.91R | Flat |
| Dec 1, 2022, 7:00 AM CST | 20 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Oct 7, 2022, 4:00 AM CDT | 21.25 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2022, 2:01 AM CDT | 23.75 | 0.17R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (17)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025, 5:02 AM CDT | 71.5 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2024, 9:00 PM CST | 120.25 | 0.64R | Flat |
| Nov 7, 2023, 9:00 AM CST | 33.75 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Aug 3, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 37 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 38 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Jun 19, 2019, 9:00 PM CDT | 29.5 | 0.83R | Flat |
| May 24, 2019, 1:00 AM CDT | 17.25 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Apr 18, 2019, 9:01 AM CDT | 19.75 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2016, 5:03 AM CST | 14 | 0.59R | Flat |
| May 7, 2015, 9:04 PM CDT | 17.5 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2014, 5:07 AM CDT | 12.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2014, 9:11 AM CST | 17 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2013, 5:38 AM CDT | 11.25 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 23, 2012, 9:02 PM CDT | 12.75 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2011, 5:00 AM CDT | 21.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2010, 5:00 PM CST | 10.5 | 0.95R | Flat |
| Jan 8, 2008, 2:07 AM CST | 10 | 0.78R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2025 | 70.75 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2024 | 271.5 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Mar 17, 2022 | 254.75 | 0.97R | Flat |
| Dec 23, 2021 | 151 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2021 | 146.5 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 24, 2021 | 112 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2021 | 118.25 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Jul 12, 2019 | 43 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2019 | 48.25 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2019 | 78.75 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 23, 2017 | 36.5 | 1.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2017 | 20.5 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2016 | 57.5 | 0.73R | Flat |
| Mar 3, 2016 | 70.75 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 19, 2015 | 42.25 | 1.96R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 30, 2015 | 40.75 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2015 | 58 | 0.41R | Flat |
| Jun 19, 2014 | 25.75 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2014 | 48.25 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Jun 27, 2013 | 48.25 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:43 PM CDT | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:25 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:42 AM CDT | 3.7 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:28 AM CDT | 4.3 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 4:24 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:32 PM CDT | 3.7 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:09 PM CDT | 1.3 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 9:33 AM CDT | 5.8 | 0.59R | Flat |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:07 PM CDT | 5 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 5.4 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:31 AM CDT | 8.8 | 0.34R | Flat |
| Apr 22, 2026, 8:41 PM CDT | 5.3 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 2.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 10:23 PM CDT | 2.8 | 1.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:02 PM CDT | 5.4 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:32 AM CDT | 6.6 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:07 AM CDT | 2.2 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 7:56 PM CDT | 2.4 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:06 PM CDT | 9.2 | 0.42R | Flat |
| Apr 20, 2026, 1:02 PM CDT | 3.3 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:47 AM CDT | 15.5 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:42 AM CDT | 17.2 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:01 AM CDT | 6.8 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 8:36 PM CDT | 5.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:51 PM CDT | 5.9 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 11:26 AM CDT | 5.9 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:55 PM CDT | 45.5 | 0.29R | Flat |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:45 AM CDT | 4.4 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 9:20 AM CDT | 19.2 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2026, 10:25 PM CDT | 6.8 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2026, 7:25 PM CDT | 14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:01 AM CDT | 6.1 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 10:25 PM CDT | 6.3 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 7:55 PM CDT | 17.7 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 9:40 PM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 8:10 PM CDT | 21.1 | 0.62R | Flat |
| Apr 8, 2026, 1:25 AM CDT | 11.3 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 10:17 AM CDT | 22.5 | 0.88R | Flat |
| Apr 2, 2026, 4:20 AM CDT | 11.7 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 10:20 PM CDT | 17.2 | 0.08R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:17 AM CDT | 25.8 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:16 AM CDT | 35.2 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Apr 22, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 8.9 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:30 AM CDT | 15.5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 10:15 PM CDT | 12.4 | 0.81R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2026, 9:47 PM CDT | 26.1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 10:15 PM CDT | 17.8 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:15 AM CDT | 25.9 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 8:34 PM CDT | 22.7 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 4:47 AM CDT | 16.2 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 7:46 PM CDT | 21.2 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 7:45 PM CST | 59.1 | 0.13R | Flat |
| Mar 5, 2026, 12:46 AM CST | 41.9 | 0.42R | Flat |
| Mar 4, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 35.8 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 6:15 AM CST | 84.3 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 8:45 PM CST | 21.6 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 26.9 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2026, 6:31 AM CST | 28.8 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 4:00 AM CST | 8.3 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 7:02 AM CST | 17.5 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:31 AM CDT | 8.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 7:07 AM CDT | 37 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 8:31 PM CDT | 19.8 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 16.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 29.7 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 18.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 9:30 AM CDT | 65.9 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 1:30 AM CDT | 81.7 | 0.48R | Flat |
| Mar 9, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 40.6 | 2.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 6:30 AM CST | 153.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 12:30 AM CST | 39.6 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2026, 12:04 AM CST | 19.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2026, 1:32 PM CST | 18.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2026, 9:00 PM CST | 55.8 | 0.40R | Flat |
| Jan 30, 2026, 1:30 PM CST | 254.5 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 6:00 AM CST | 69.8 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2026, 10:01 AM CST | 47.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 21, 2026, 3:00 PM CST | 61.1 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 12:30 PM CST | 48.6 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2026, 12:00 PM CST | 13.8 | 0.17R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 24.4 | 2.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 20.8 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 36.6 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 2:02 AM CST | 41.8 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 18.2 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Jan 9, 2026, 3:00 PM CST | 16.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2025, 7:00 AM CST | 41.3 | 0.75R | Flat |
| Nov 25, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 20.1 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2025, 12:00 PM CST | 28.2 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 19.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2025, 10:00 AM CDT | 35.8 | 0.48R | Flat |
| Sep 24, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 11.9 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Sep 24, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 23 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Sep 18, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 37.6 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 10.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 18, 2025, 8:00 AM CDT | 13.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 20.1 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2025, 2:01 AM CDT | 23.1 | 0.87R | Flat |
| Jun 5, 2025, 2:03 PM CDT | 9.3 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 5, 2025, 1:03 PM CDT | 15 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 155.8 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 229.9 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 74.9 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 34 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2025, 1:01 AM CDT | 19 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 7, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 25.7 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 36.3 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2024, 1:00 AM CST | 16.1 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2024, 9:00 AM CST | 40.1 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Oct 3, 2024, 9:06 PM CDT | 27.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 24, 2024, 9:03 AM CDT | 32.9 | 0.87R | Flat |
| Jul 26, 2024, 1:10 AM CDT | 64.1 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2023, 9:00 AM CST | 26.3 | 0.33R | Flat |
| Feb 3, 2022, 9:01 PM CST | 17.8 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 29, 2021, 1:00 AM CDT | 9.9 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Jun 21, 2021, 1:00 AM CDT | 19.9 | 0.58R | Flat |
| Jan 14, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 15.6 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Nov 28, 2018, 9:04 PM CST | 14.1 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 3, 2018, 5:01 AM CDT | 14.2 | 0.98R | Flat |
| Jun 20, 2017, 1:01 AM CDT | 3.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (16)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | 276.4 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026 | 261.5 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 88.4 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 9, 2025 | 49.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 23, 2024 | 78.1 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 12, 2024 | 93.2 | 0.61R | Flat |
| Nov 3, 2020 | 47.2 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 16, 2017 | 22.6 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 6, 2016 | 32.3 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 13, 2015 | 30.5 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2015 | 36.8 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 9, 2013 | 41.7 | 2.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2013 | 44.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2012 | 29.8 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2009 | 56.7 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 8, 2008 | 37.1 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:52 AM CDT | 0.23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:29 PM CDT | 0.25 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:06 AM CDT | 0.36 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 0.31 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:13 PM CDT | 0.29 | 1.52R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:14 PM CDT | 1.07 | 0.95R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:02 AM CDT | 0.17 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Apr 20, 2026, 1:33 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.65R | Flat |
| Apr 20, 2026, 10:46 AM CDT | 0.18 | 2.94R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2026, 10:33 PM CDT | 0.11 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 0.68 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 3:58 PM CDT | 0.19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:01 PM CDT | 0.29 | 2.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 11:23 AM CDT | 0.27 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 7:17 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 6:58 AM CDT | 0.16 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 4:45 AM CDT | 0.43 | 0.21R | Flat |
| Apr 17, 2026, 2:17 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 10:55 AM CDT | 0.24 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:41 AM CDT | 0.31 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:03 AM CDT | 0.3 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:44 PM CDT | 0.64 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 0.44 | 0.68R | Flat |
| Apr 19, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 0.28 | 2.96R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:31 AM CDT | 0.43 | 0.65R | Flat |
| Apr 16, 2026, 7:20 AM CDT | 0.23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 4:04 AM CDT | 0.39 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 6:40 PM CDT | 2.64 | 0.95R | Flat |
| Apr 7, 2026, 1:40 PM CDT | 1.58 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 2:05 PM CDT | 0.63 | 0.92R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2026, 3:15 AM CDT | 1.01 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2026, 9:40 PM CDT | 0.89 | 0.97R | Flat |
| Apr 1, 2026, 7:35 AM CDT | 1.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 1:35 PM CDT | 0.64 | 2.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2026, 6:15 PM CDT | 0.38 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:20 PM CDT | 0.92 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 9:36 AM CDT | 0.41 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2026, 4:21 AM CDT | 0.85 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 2:05 AM CDT | 0.65 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 10:45 AM CDT | 3.58 | 0.17R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 0.28 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:23 PM CDT | 3.13 | 0.34R | Flat |
| Apr 20, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:15 PM CDT | 2.41 | 0.67R | Flat |
| Apr 2, 2026, 12:45 PM CDT | 1.67 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 3:15 PM CDT | 1.44 | 1.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:45 PM CDT | 1.22 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 4.11 | 0.27R | Flat |
| Mar 13, 2026, 2:45 PM CDT | 0.64 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 1.91 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 6:47 AM CDT | 1.67 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 8:16 PM CST | 0.67 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 26, 2026, 12:20 AM CST | 0.45 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 0.13 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 12:45 AM CST | 0.17 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2026, 9:45 AM CST | 0.77 | 0.00R | Flat |
| Jan 2, 2026, 4:05 AM CST | 0.37 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2025, 10:39 AM CST | 0.19 | 1.47R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2025, 9:26 PM CST | 0.18 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2025, 4:37 AM CST | 0.21 | 0.24R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026, 3:07 AM CDT | 1.09 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 2.79 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Apr 2, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 3.38 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 3.07 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 8:00 PM CST | 1.59 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 5:41 AM CST | 0.35 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 7:02 PM CST | 0.46 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 3:01 AM CST | 0.71 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 10:17 AM CST | 0.79 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2025, 6:20 AM CST | 0.17 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2025, 2:10 PM CDT | 0.31 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2025, 3:24 AM CDT | 1.45 | 0.95R | Flat |
| Mar 11, 2025, 3:36 AM CDT | 0.26 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2025, 12:18 AM CST | 0.26 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2025, 2:22 AM CST | 0.57 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2024, 1:32 AM CST | 0.62 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2024, 6:35 AM CDT | 0.4 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 16, 2024, 8:37 AM CDT | 1.03 | 0.28R | Flat |
| Sep 3, 2024, 2:38 PM CDT | 0.11 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026, 9:01 AM CDT | 2.05 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.65 | 2.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 3.78 | 0.88R | Flat |
| Feb 5, 2026, 9:01 PM CST | 1.06 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2026, 12:05 AM CST | 0.48 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 4:00 AM CST | 0.69 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2025, 7:05 PM CST | 1.34 | 0.19R | Flat |
| Nov 4, 2025, 7:20 AM CST | 0.39 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2025, 7:05 AM CDT | 1.01 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2025, 4:24 AM CDT | 2.77 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 2, 2025, 3:02 AM CDT | 0.56 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.31 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2024, 8:18 AM CST | 1.08 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2023, 7:01 PM CST | 0.54 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2023, 7:15 PM CDT | 0.44 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2023, 1:02 AM CDT | 0.71 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2023, 6:07 AM CDT | 1.21 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 11, 2023, 9:13 AM CDT | 1.38 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 19, 2022, 7:04 PM CST | 0.64 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Dec 5, 2022, 4:01 AM CST | 1.72 | 0.58R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 5.32 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 10.17 | 0.98R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2025, 9:45 AM CDT | 1.91 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 17, 2024, 9:12 AM CDT | 1.77 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2024, 5:36 AM CDT | 1.82 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2024, 5:18 AM CST | 1.65 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Nov 28, 2022, 5:00 PM CST | 3.85 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 7, 2022, 5:05 AM CDT | 6.18 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2022, 9:19 AM CDT | 5.13 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2022, 1:13 AM CDT | 4.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2021, 9:43 AM CDT | 1.22 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2020, 1:00 AM CST | 1.37 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2019, 1:00 AM CDT | 1.6 | 1.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 20, 2019, 1:00 AM CDT | 1.14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2019, 1:01 AM CDT | 0.78 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2017, 9:07 AM CST | 0.77 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 20, 2016, 9:05 PM CDT | 1.31 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2014, 6:02 AM CDT | 0.58 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2013, 2:40 AM CST | 1.11 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2013, 10:21 AM CDT | 1.48 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2025 | 3.37 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2025 | 1.9 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Nov 9, 2021 | 5.61 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2020 | 6.92 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 3, 2019 | 2.48 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 1, 2018 | 3.76 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2018 | 2.83 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Sep 4, 2017 | 1.79 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 27, 2017 | 2.77 | 0.46R | Flat |
| May 20, 2014 | 2.01 | 2.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2014 | 1.67 | 2.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2014 | 3.43 | 1.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 3, 2013 | 4.77 | 0.81R | Flat |
| Aug 13, 2013 | 2.91 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| May 20, 2013 | 3.37 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2012 | 6.22 | 0.78R | Flat |
| Aug 30, 2011 | 5.79 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Nov 3, 2010 | 3.71 | 0.97R | Stopped |
| Jul 9, 2010 | 5.01 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2010 | 4.44 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:56 AM CDT | 0.009 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 8:22 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:10 PM CDT | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 1:31 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 8:35 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 12:38 PM CDT | 0.013 | 0.46R | Flat |
| Mar 31, 2026, 7:23 AM CDT | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 8:05 AM CDT | 0.017 | 0.47R | Flat |
| Mar 24, 2026, 7:56 AM CDT | 0.013 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 2:34 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 12:58 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 1:17 PM CDT | 0.012 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 8:54 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 8:53 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Mar 15, 2026, 6:29 PM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 1:49 AM CDT | 0.011 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 12:49 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 10:50 AM CST | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2026, 1:30 AM CST | 0.014 | 0.36R | Flat |
| Mar 4, 2026, 12:30 AM CST | 0.007 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:19 AM CDT | 0.023 | 1.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:18 AM CDT | 0.009 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 2:04 AM CDT | 0.008 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2026, 5:40 PM CDT | 0.025 | 0.52R | Flat |
| Apr 2, 2026, 10:41 AM CDT | 0.014 | 0.79R | Flat |
| Mar 25, 2026, 1:48 PM CDT | 0.013 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 3:24 AM CDT | 0.015 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 0.017 | 0.53R | Flat |
| Mar 13, 2026, 6:09 AM CDT | 0.021 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 12:40 PM CDT | 0.041 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 10:04 AM CST | 0.031 | 0.94R | Flat |
| Mar 3, 2026, 5:54 AM CST | 0.049 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 2:44 AM CST | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 19, 2026, 10:06 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 4:25 AM CST | 0.022 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2026, 2:29 AM CST | 0.009 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 8:05 AM CST | 0.056 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2026, 1:54 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2026, 6:07 PM CST | 0.026 | 1.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 3:37 PM CST | 0.022 | 0.23R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:06 AM CDT | 0.011 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 10:48 AM CDT | 0.029 | 0.59R | Flat |
| Mar 26, 2026, 2:28 AM CDT | 0.021 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.93R | Flat |
| Feb 19, 2026, 9:15 PM CST | 0.014 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2026, 8:35 PM CST | 0.021 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 6:47 AM CST | 0.093 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2026, 9:43 AM CST | 0.115 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2026, 7:28 AM CST | 0.343 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Jan 22, 2026, 1:16 AM CST | 0.166 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 9:46 PM CST | 0.247 | 0.33R | Flat |
| Jan 21, 2026, 11:22 AM CST | 0.186 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026, 2:16 PM CST | 0.031 | 0.90R | Flat |
| Dec 30, 2025, 1:39 AM CST | 0.031 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2025, 4:21 AM CST | 0.027 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2025, 1:48 AM CST | 0.051 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 18, 2025, 11:34 PM CST | 0.045 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2025, 8:01 AM CST | 0.06 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 8:35 AM CDT | 0.065 | 0.72R | Flat |
| Oct 23, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT | 0.024 | 0.21R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026, 10:40 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 2:43 AM CDT | 0.025 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 1:24 AM CDT | 0.022 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2026, 6:23 PM CST | 0.06 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2026, 10:16 PM CST | 0.042 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2025, 9:25 AM CST | 0.065 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 28, 2025, 5:36 AM CDT | 0.029 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 2:30 PM CDT | 0.036 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2025, 5:03 AM CDT | 0.031 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2025, 11:20 PM CDT | 0.022 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 13, 2025, 7:59 AM CDT | 0.073 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2025, 7:01 PM CDT | 0.056 | 0.68R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2025, 6:31 PM CDT | 0.065 | 0.78R | Flat |
| Feb 21, 2025, 2:28 PM CST | 0.049 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2025, 12:52 PM CST | 0.101 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2025, 12:22 PM CST | 0.099 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2025, 6:00 PM CST | 0.042 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2025, 1:39 PM CST | 0.108 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2025, 2:46 PM CST | 0.028 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2024, 11:59 PM CST | 0.032 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:15 AM CDT | 0.013 | — | Open |
| Apr 6, 2026, 4:38 AM CDT | 0.073 | 0.36R | Flat |
| Mar 31, 2026, 6:12 AM CDT | 0.038 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 26, 2026, 1:06 AM CST | 0.098 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2026, 10:22 AM CST | 0.125 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2025, 7:37 AM CDT | 0.091 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Jul 31, 2025, 5:11 AM CDT | 0.025 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 18, 2025, 12:04 AM CDT | 0.026 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2025, 8:03 PM CDT | 0.074 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.039 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2025, 12:34 AM CST | 0.037 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 20, 2024, 11:15 AM CST | 0.195 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2024, 7:52 AM CDT | 0.067 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2024, 11:17 AM CDT | 0.09 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Aug 28, 2024, 10:17 AM CDT | 0.085 | 0.46R | Flat |
| Jul 12, 2024, 8:33 AM CDT | 0.066 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Jun 3, 2024, 12:58 PM CDT | 0.117 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2024, 9:30 AM CDT | 0.036 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2023, 2:12 AM CST | 0.069 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 1, 2023, 8:51 AM CDT | 0.111 | 0.02R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2025, 2:42 AM CDT | 0.116 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 26, 2025, 10:08 PM CDT | 0.173 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.193 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2023, 10:41 AM CDT | 0.099 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 7, 2022, 1:57 AM CST | 0.323 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 27, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 0.336 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Jun 7, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2021, 10:36 PM CDT | 0.055 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2021, 11:50 AM CDT | 0.082 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2020, 10:04 PM CST | 0.073 | 1.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2019, 5:00 PM CST | 0.042 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 23, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.037 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2017, 11:26 PM CDT | 0.037 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2017, 3:02 AM CST | 0.081 | 2.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2016, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.096 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 15, 2014, 4:31 AM CDT | 0.118 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2014, 7:46 AM CDT | 0.078 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2013, 5:27 AM CST | 0.111 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2013, 11:09 AM CST | 0.11 | 1.85R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 25, 2012, 6:28 AM CST | 0.182 | 0.50R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Three White Soldiers Firings (12)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2023 | 0.643 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2022 | 1.138 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| May 4, 2022 | 1.145 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2021 | 0.251 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 7, 2020 | 0.166 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2019 | 0.114 | 0.96R | Flat |
| Apr 15, 2015 | 0.119 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2013 | 0.137 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2012 | 0.153 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 20, 2012 | 0.315 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Dec 24, 2008 | 0.64 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2008 | 0.385 | 0.25R | Stopped |
Sample backtest
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.