Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bearish Identical Three Crows
Three-candle bearish reversal after a rally: three long down candles in a row, each opening right at the prior candle's close.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.7%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random short entry (-3.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.76×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.92R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 38.7% of the time vs 42.6% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.7% | 42.6% | -3.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.6% | 27.5% | -11.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.8% | 18.9% | -11.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 41.2% | 54.8% | -13.6 |
| Went sideways | 20.1% | 2.6% | +17.5 |
2,667 occurrences · 5,340,354 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random short entry (-0.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.88×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.99R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.2% of the time vs 41.5% for a random short entry. The 0.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 245 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.2% | 41.5% | -0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 13.5% | 27.0% | -13.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.9% | 18.8% | -11.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 30.6% | 55.6% | -25.0 |
| Went sideways | 28.2% | 2.9% | +25.2 |
245 occurrences · 1,162,047 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (44). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
22.7%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.6% for a random short entry (-17.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.81R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 22.7% of the time vs 40.6% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 22.7% | 40.6% | -17.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 9.1% | 26.5% | -17.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.8% | 18.7% | -11.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.4% | 55.9% | -19.5 |
| Went sideways | 40.9% | 3.5% | +37.4 |
44 occurrences · 395,123 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
69.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random short entry (+29.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.14×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
The 29.5-point gap over the 39.8% random-entry rate clears the ±26.6-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 13 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 69.2% | 39.8% | +29.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 15.4% | 26.1% | -10.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.7% | 18.6% | -10.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 7.7% | 56.1% | -48.4 |
| Went sideways | 23.1% | 4.1% | +18.9 |
13 occurrences · 198,092 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.4% for a random short entry (-14.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.20×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.62R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 39.4% for a random short entry. The 14.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±33.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 8 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 8 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 39.4% | -14.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.1% | -26.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.8% | -18.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 37.5% | 57.7% | -20.2 |
| Went sideways | 37.5% | 2.9% | +34.6 |
8 occurrences · 98,375 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
34.6%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.5% for a random short entry (-4.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.78×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.80R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.92R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 34.6% of the time vs 39.5% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 34.6% | 39.5% | -4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 13.2% | 23.6% | -10.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.7% | 15.0% | -9.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.2% | 58.0% | -10.8 |
| Went sideways | 18.2% | 2.5% | +15.7 |
1,524 occurrences · 5,220,587 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
34.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (-5.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 34.4% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 5.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 131 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 34.4% | 39.9% | -5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 13.7% | 25.0% | -11.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 6.1% | 16.7% | -10.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.5% | 57.3% | -16.8 |
| Went sideways | 25.2% | 2.8% | +22.4 |
131 occurrences · 1,183,939 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
27.8%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (-11.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.61×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.81R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 27.8% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry. The 11.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 18 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 18 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 27.8% | 39.7% | -11.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 5.6% | 25.4% | -19.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.6% | 17.4% | -11.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 56.9% | -6.9 |
| Went sideways | 22.2% | 3.4% | +18.8 |
18 occurrences · 409,191 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
22.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.3% for a random short entry (-17.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.73×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.67R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 22.2% of the time vs 39.3% for a random short entry. The 17.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±31.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 9 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 9 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 22.2% | 39.3% | -17.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 11.1% | 25.3% | -14.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.7% | -17.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 33.3% | 56.8% | -23.4 |
| Went sideways | 44.4% | 3.9% | +40.6 |
9 occurrences · 206,590 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.3% for a random short entry (+10.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 39.3% for a random short entry. The 10.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 39.3% | +10.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 25.5% | -8.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.7% | 18.1% | -1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 16.7% | 57.8% | -41.1 |
| Went sideways | 33.3% | 2.9% | +30.4 |
6 occurrences · 102,966 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (-38.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.71×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.52R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 38.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±95.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 38.9% | -38.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.6% | -26.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.5% | -19.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 59.4% | -59.4 |
| Went sideways | 100.0% | 1.7% | +98.3 |
1 occurrences · 23,284 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.5%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random short entry (-3.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.83×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.93R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 37.5% of the time vs 41.4% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.5% | 41.4% | -3.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.8% | 26.3% | -9.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.9% | 17.8% | -9.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.8% | 55.7% | -11.9 |
| Went sideways | 18.6% | 2.9% | +15.7 |
3,232 occurrences · 5,523,555 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
30.6%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (-11.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.80R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 30.6% of the time vs 41.8% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 30.6% | 41.8% | -11.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 11.2% | 26.8% | -15.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 3.0% | 18.4% | -15.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 38.1% | 55.1% | -17.1 |
| Went sideways | 31.3% | 3.1% | +28.3 |
134 occurrences · 1,219,764 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (-6.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.72×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.93R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.0% of the time vs 41.8% for a random short entry. The 6.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 20 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 20 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.0% | 41.8% | -6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 26.9% | -6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.0% | 18.6% | -13.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 35.0% | 54.6% | -19.6 |
| Went sideways | 30.0% | 3.6% | +26.4 |
20 occurrences · 415,713 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
14.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random short entry (-27.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.47×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 14.3% of the time vs 41.8% for a random short entry. The 27.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±36.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 7 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 14.3% | 41.8% | -27.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.3% | 27.1% | -12.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.9% | -18.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 54.2% | -11.4 |
| Went sideways | 42.9% | 4.0% | +38.9 |
7 occurrences · 208,216 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
66.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.2% for a random short entry (+24.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
3.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 42.2% for a random short entry. The 24.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 66.7% | 42.2% | +24.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 27.8% | +5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.7% | -19.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 33.3% | 54.5% | -21.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.3% | -3.3 |
3 occurrences · 103,214 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random short entry (+8.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.86×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.74R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 41.9% for a random short entry. The 8.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 41.9% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.8% | -27.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.5% | -19.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 55.6% | -55.6 |
| Went sideways | 50.0% | 2.5% | +47.5 |
2 occurrences · 23,339 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.7%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random short entry (-5.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.70×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.89R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 35.7% of the time vs 40.8% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.7% | 40.8% | -5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.9% | 25.7% | -10.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.3% | 17.4% | -10.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.7% | 56.2% | -12.5 |
| Went sideways | 20.5% | 3.0% | +17.5 |
2,221 occurrences · 5,363,181 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
31.7%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-9.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.79×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.82R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 31.7% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 31.7% | 41.3% | -9.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 9.5% | 26.6% | -17.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 4.8% | 18.3% | -13.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 31.7% | 55.4% | -23.7 |
| Went sideways | 36.5% | 3.3% | +33.2 |
126 occurrences · 1,194,142 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (33). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-4.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.79R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.4% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 4.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 33 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.4% | 41.3% | -4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 3.0% | 26.8% | -23.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.7% | -18.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 27.3% | 54.9% | -27.6 |
| Went sideways | 36.4% | 3.8% | +32.6 |
33 occurrences · 407,609 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-1.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.22×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 1.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±30.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 10 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 10 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 41.3% | -1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 26.9% | -6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.0% | 18.9% | -8.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 10.0% | 54.1% | -44.1 |
| Went sideways | 50.0% | 4.6% | +45.4 |
10 occurrences · 204,489 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random short entry (-8.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.54×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.99R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 42.0% for a random short entry. The 8.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±55.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 42.0% | -8.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.8% | -27.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.6% | -19.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 54.8% | +11.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.2% | -3.2 |
3 occurrences · 101,374 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random short entry (-3.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.92R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.5% of the time vs 39.8% for a random short entry. The 3.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 573 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.5% | 39.8% | -3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.2% | 25.2% | -9.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 7.0% | 17.1% | -10.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 41.0% | 56.7% | -15.7 |
| Went sideways | 22.5% | 3.5% | +19.0 |
573 occurrences · 3,860,692 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (57). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.1% for a random short entry (+1.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.1% of the time vs 41.1% for a random short entry. The 1.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 57 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.1% | 41.1% | +1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.8% | 26.4% | -3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 8.8% | 18.1% | -9.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.8% | 55.3% | -18.5 |
| Went sideways | 21.1% | 3.6% | +17.5 |
57 occurrences · 923,352 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
12.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-28.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.31R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 12.5% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 28.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±34.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 8 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 8 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 12.5% | 41.3% | -28.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.6% | -26.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.4% | -18.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.5% | 54.5% | +8.0 |
| Went sideways | 25.0% | 4.1% | +20.9 |
8 occurrences · 320,654 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random short entry (-41.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.21×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.61R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 41.3% for a random short entry. The 41.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 41.3% | -41.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.8% | -26.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.6% | -18.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 54.1% | -4.1 |
| Went sideways | 50.0% | 4.7% | +45.3 |
4 occurrences · 161,646 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.1% for a random short entry (-42.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.73×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.31R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.1% for a random short entry. The 42.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.1% | -42.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.8% | -27.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 19.5% | -19.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 54.7% | +45.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.2% | -3.2 |
1 occurrences · 80,431 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random short entry (+58.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.71×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 41.4% for a random short entry. The 58.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 41.4% | +58.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.5% | -26.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.6% | -18.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 56.0% | -56.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.7% | -2.7 |
1 occurrences · 18,587 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
An identical three crows is a steady, heavy slide off a top. Three long down candles fall in a row, and each one opens right at the close of the candle before it. There is no bounce between them, just sellers stepping back in at the same level over and over. The even, stair-step decline shows control has flipped firmly to the downside.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- All three candles are long down (red) candles.
- Each candle opens at, or very near, the prior candle’s close, so there is no gap between them.
- Each closes lower than the one before, building a clean stair step down.
- The more even and uninterrupted the three steps, the more textbook the shape.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.
The psychology
After a rally, the first long red candle says sellers have arrived with force. What makes this shape distinctive is what happens at the open of each bar that follows. There is no bounce, no gap, no overnight relief. Each candle opens right at the prior close and then sellers drive it lower again from that exact level.
That is the story: every time the decline pauses, sellers step back in at the same price rather than letting buyers lift it. Buyers get no foothold between the bars, so the move comes down in an even stair-step instead of a jagged fight. Control has flipped from the buyers who ran the rally to sellers who now reset the floor three bars running, calmly and without giving an inch back.
A heavy, uninterrupted slide off a top looks decisive. How much room that decisiveness tends to offer is what the numbers below lay out.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:43 PM CDT | 140 | 0.21R | Flat |
| Apr 14, 2026, 5:20 PM CDT | 9.5 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2026, 3:53 AM CDT | 4.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 3:25 PM CDT | 16.25 | 0.49R | Flat |
| Mar 13, 2026, 1:19 PM CDT | 29 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 5:53 AM CDT | 22 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 9:14 PM CDT | 21.25 | 0.52R | Flat |
| Mar 5, 2026, 3:39 AM CST | 48.5 | 0.26R | Flat |
| Mar 2, 2026, 8:18 PM CST | 31.75 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2026, 11:12 AM CST | 54.25 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2026, 7:30 PM CST | 28.25 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 12:45 AM CST | 13.5 | 0.31R | Flat |
| Feb 24, 2026, 12:21 AM CST | 19.5 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Feb 19, 2026, 1:40 AM CST | 15.25 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Feb 18, 2026, 7:40 AM CST | 32 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 9:19 PM CST | 10 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 8:26 PM CST | 10.25 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 1:57 AM CST | 36.75 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 5:56 PM CST | 46.5 | 0.28R | Flat |
| Feb 4, 2026, 12:45 PM CST | 59.5 | 0.66R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 83.5 | 0.72R | Flat |
| Jan 8, 2026, 6:55 PM CST | 27.75 | 1.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 4, 2025, 5:25 AM CDT | 29.25 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Sep 2, 2025, 12:05 AM CDT | 33 | 0.20R | Flat |
| Aug 27, 2025, 7:30 AM CDT | 39.75 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2025, 12:45 AM CDT | 33.25 | 0.90R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2025, 6:20 AM CDT | 107.25 | 0.12R | Flat |
| Apr 4, 2025, 1:15 PM CDT | 183.25 | 0.98R | Flat |
| Oct 15, 2024, 1:00 AM CDT | 14.75 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2024, 9:15 AM CDT | 175 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 14, 2024, 4:34 AM CDT | 36.5 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 28, 2024, 6:50 PM CDT | 14.5 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2024, 12:20 PM CDT | 113.75 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2024, 3:20 AM CST | 45.75 | 0.12R | Flat |
| Oct 25, 2023, 12:25 AM CDT | 15.25 | 1.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 28, 2023, 7:45 AM CDT | 87 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Sep 14, 2023, 2:25 PM CDT | 30.5 | 0.44R | Flat |
| Jul 21, 2023, 2:00 PM CDT | 47 | 0.82R | Flat |
| Jul 6, 2023, 3:25 PM CDT | 14.5 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 28, 2023, 7:30 PM CDT | 25.75 | 0.80R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2025, 1:15 AM CDT | 73.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2025, 1:45 AM CDT | 96 | 0.78R | Flat |
| May 18, 2025, 7:30 PM CDT | 110 | 0.70R | Flat |
| Nov 19, 2024, 7:45 AM CST | 180.25 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2023, 12:30 PM CDT | 92 | 0.72R | Flat |
| Jan 24, 2023, 5:15 PM CST | 147.25 | 0.30R | Flat |
| Nov 28, 2022, 1:00 PM CST | 78.5 | 0.36R | Flat |
| Apr 5, 2022, 7:45 PM CDT | 57.5 | 0.22R | Flat |
| Nov 22, 2021, 2:45 PM CST | 200.25 | 0.32R | Flat |
| Aug 8, 2018, 6:52 AM CDT | 16.25 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 19, 2018, 8:00 PM CDT | 28.75 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Jun 17, 2018, 7:15 PM CDT | 32 | 0.93R | Flat |
| Apr 25, 2018, 3:31 AM CDT | 33.75 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Sep 18, 2017, 1:30 PM CDT | 39.75 | 0.02R | Flat |
| May 11, 2017, 5:08 AM CDT | 6.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2017, 7:07 AM CDT | 8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2017, 4:33 AM CST | 8 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2017, 4:00 AM CST | 7.75 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2016, 4:43 AM CDT | 12.75 | 0.92R | Flat |
| Aug 11, 2016, 2:06 AM CDT | 9 | 0.58R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (13)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT | 224.75 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 13, 2022, 1:30 PM CDT | 121.75 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 28, 2021, 2:00 AM CDT | 176.25 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 23, 2021, 3:00 AM CST | 220 | 1.52R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2016, 4:48 AM CDT | 41 | 0.27R | Flat |
| Sep 22, 2015, 2:41 AM CDT | 44.25 | 1.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 28, 2013, 6:08 AM CDT | 7 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 12, 2013, 2:17 AM CDT | 11 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2012, 1:42 AM CDT | 11.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 12, 2010, 7:20 AM CDT | 19.25 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2010, 8:27 PM CST | 7 | 1.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 24, 2009, 5:00 PM CDT | 15.25 | 0.21R | Flat |
| May 14, 2008, 2:32 PM CDT | 34.5 | 0.11R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (8)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2024, 9:00 AM CST | 302.75 | 0.52R | Flat |
| May 4, 2022, 9:00 AM CDT | 207 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Dec 26, 2017, 5:47 AM CST | 28.75 | 0.63R | Flat |
| Apr 18, 2017, 3:34 AM CDT | 15.75 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2016, 9:00 PM CST | 250.75 | 0.11R | Flat |
| Jun 7, 2016, 7:21 AM CDT | 16.5 | 1.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 12, 2013, 3:17 AM CDT | 22 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2012, 6:19 AM CST | 35.5 | 1.44R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:09 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.91R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:54 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:38 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.90R | Flat |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:17 AM CDT | 2.25 | 1.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 2:35 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.33R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2026, 6:36 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 3, 2026, 4:23 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 9:22 PM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 12:28 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 7:05 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.77R | Flat |
| Mar 9, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 9.25 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 3:39 AM CST | 11.75 | 0.23R | Flat |
| Feb 26, 2026, 7:30 PM CST | 5 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 8:14 AM CST | 3.25 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 7:40 AM CST | 6 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 4, 2026, 5:56 PM CST | 8.25 | 0.33R | Flat |
| Feb 4, 2026, 12:45 PM CST | 11.75 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2026, 5:26 PM CST | 4 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Jan 23, 2026, 2:14 AM CST | 5.75 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 3:25 AM CST | 9 | 0.94R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 18.75 | 0.53R | Flat |
| Jan 9, 2026, 5:55 AM CST | 5 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2025, 9:40 AM CST | 36 | 0.61R | Flat |
| Nov 3, 2025, 8:40 AM CST | 27 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2025, 12:05 AM CDT | 6 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2025, 7:31 AM CDT | 7.5 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2025, 12:45 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.80R | Flat |
| May 29, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 15.5 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2025, 6:20 AM CDT | 26 | 0.17R | Flat |
| Apr 4, 2025, 1:15 PM CDT | 47 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2025, 12:55 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2025, 7:10 PM CST | 3.5 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 5, 2024, 1:03 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| May 29, 2024, 7:31 AM CDT | 8 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2024, 7:00 AM CDT | 5.25 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2024, 7:39 PM CDT | 4 | 0.25R | Flat |
| Dec 8, 2023, 9:35 AM CST | 15.5 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Dec 5, 2023, 4:48 AM CST | 8 | 0.31R | Flat |
| Sep 20, 2023, 1:45 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Sep 1, 2023, 1:22 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (18)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2025, 9:15 PM CDT | 10.25 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2024, 9:00 AM CDT | 66.5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Jul 25, 2024, 1:00 AM CDT | 21.75 | 0.48R | Flat |
| Sep 22, 2023, 12:30 PM CDT | 21.25 | 0.66R | Flat |
| Sep 22, 2023, 12:15 PM CDT | 16.25 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2023, 6:30 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2023, 2:45 AM CST | 14 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2020, 8:45 PM CST | 26.5 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2020, 9:45 AM CDT | 60.75 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Jan 1, 2019, 8:00 PM CST | 19.5 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 29, 2017, 7:38 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2017, 7:06 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2016, 2:01 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2016, 1:16 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2015, 2:53 AM CDT | 15.5 | 0.15R | Flat |
| May 31, 2011, 7:01 PM CDT | 3 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Aug 15, 2010, 6:55 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2008, 4:32 AM CDT | 10.25 | 0.32R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (9)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2024, 10:00 PM CDT | 9.75 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 4, 2024, 1:01 PM CDT | 65.25 | 0.73R | Flat |
| Jan 5, 2024, 11:02 AM CST | 31 | 0.31R | Flat |
| Sep 28, 2023, 7:00 PM CDT | 9 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2022, 2:01 PM CDT | 41.5 | 0.55R | Flat |
| Sep 13, 2022, 1:31 PM CDT | 37.75 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 15, 2018, 12:37 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Jan 3, 2014, 3:32 PM CST | 7.75 | 0.06R | Flat |
| Sep 5, 2013, 1:27 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.18R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2025, 1:00 PM CST | 53.5 | 0.79R | Flat |
| May 31, 2024, 10:00 AM CDT | 51.5 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Jun 21, 2023, 8:03 AM CDT | 26.5 | 0.53R | Flat |
| Aug 17, 2022, 3:00 AM CDT | 23.5 | 1.52R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2022, 11:00 AM CDT | 68 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2011, 12:01 AM CST | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2012, 9:06 AM CDT | 28 | 0.52R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:09 AM CDT | 6.8 | 0.62R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:25 PM CDT | 1.3 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:21 AM CDT | 6.7 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:45 PM CDT | 2.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:35 PM CDT | 1.7 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:45 AM CDT | 10 | 0.78R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2026, 10:55 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.46R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:51 AM CDT | 2.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 12:57 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 7:48 AM CDT | 1.7 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 3:25 PM CDT | 1.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:07 PM CDT | 11.6 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 3:49 PM CDT | 4.2 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 12:57 AM CDT | 11.7 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 3:23 PM CDT | 7.3 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 7:20 AM CDT | 13.5 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 6:36 AM CDT | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 11:34 PM CDT | 2 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2026, 5:15 PM CDT | 7.2 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 12:16 PM CDT | 7.1 | 0.45R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2026, 2:00 AM CST | 18.9 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Nov 27, 2025, 1:21 PM CST | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2025, 8:00 PM CST | 24.4 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 20, 2025, 5:05 AM CDT | 16.5 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Aug 6, 2025, 3:03 AM CDT | 7.6 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2025, 9:45 PM CDT | 11.6 | 0.45R | Flat |
| Jul 3, 2025, 8:35 PM CDT | 5.4 | 0.56R | Flat |
| Jun 18, 2025, 12:40 PM CDT | 3.7 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| May 28, 2025, 3:45 PM CDT | 6.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2025, 8:40 AM CDT | 34.2 | 0.12R | Flat |
| Jan 20, 2025, 1:11 AM CST | 5 | 0.44R | Flat |
| Jan 3, 2025, 10:16 AM CST | 5.1 | 0.65R | Flat |
| Dec 16, 2024, 9:47 PM CST | 2.5 | 2.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 6, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 11.7 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2024, 6:49 AM CDT | 5.1 | 1.96R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2024, 7:42 PM CDT | 1.9 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2024, 1:15 PM CDT | 4 | 0.35R | Flat |
| Sep 3, 2024, 12:59 PM CDT | 4.4 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Jul 26, 2024, 6:00 AM CDT | 3.9 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Jul 2, 2024, 6:23 PM CDT | 1.1 | 0.36R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2024, 6:06 AM CST | 5.8 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2024, 5:47 PM CDT | 2.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2023, 3:31 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2022, 11:45 AM CDT | 5.2 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 1, 2022, 5:16 AM CDT | 6.1 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 10, 2021, 11:30 AM CDT | 5.2 | 0.58R | Flat |
| Mar 17, 2021, 6:17 AM CDT | 8.7 | 0.46R | Flat |
| Jun 11, 2019, 1:39 AM CDT | 4.1 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 10, 2019, 7:45 AM CST | 4.1 | 0.88R | Flat |
| Mar 15, 2018, 1:32 PM CDT | 3 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Jul 5, 2017, 7:00 PM CDT | 3 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Oct 15, 2015, 2:22 PM CDT | 3.9 | 0.79R | Flat |
| Jul 24, 2012, 6:19 PM CDT | 3.3 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Jun 3, 2012, 8:00 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Mar 29, 2012, 4:00 AM CDT | 4.6 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| May 20, 2010, 12:17 AM CDT | 4.7 | 2.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2010, 10:05 PM CST | 3.1 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Sep 2, 2009, 3:30 PM CDT | 3 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 27, 2009, 3:46 PM CDT | 1.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 3, 2009, 12:23 AM CDT | 1.4 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (7)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2025, 11:37 PM CDT | 15.7 | 2.99R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2025, 4:12 AM CDT | 12 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2023, 10:37 AM CDT | 9.4 | 0.34R | Flat |
| Jul 14, 2023, 2:31 PM CDT | 6.3 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Mar 29, 2012, 4:15 AM CDT | 8 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2010, 4:36 AM CDT | 16.9 | 0.93R | Flat |
| Nov 23, 2008, 7:36 PM CST | 9.1 | 0.91R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2024, 12:04 PM CDT | 23.9 | 2.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 14, 2022, 8:01 PM CST | 14.8 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 17, 2008, 10:00 PM CDT | 33.4 | 0.16R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2023, 5:01 AM CDT | 50.7 | 0.05R | Flat |
| May 8, 2012, 5:39 AM CDT | 34.3 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026, 10:37 PM CDT | 0.11 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:45 PM CDT | 0.18 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:40 AM CDT | 0.19 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2026, 12:27 PM CDT | 0.57 | 0.98R | Flat |
| Feb 24, 2026, 6:10 AM CST | 0.14 | 0.71R | Flat |
| Feb 17, 2026, 7:50 AM CST | 0.79 | 0.53R | Flat |
| Feb 16, 2026, 9:15 AM CST | 0.06 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 16, 2026, 7:34 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2026, 9:39 AM CST | 0.15 | 0.67R | Flat |
| Feb 10, 2026, 9:32 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2026, 10:49 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 11:05 PM CST | 0.05 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 7:10 PM CST | 0.19 | 0.11R | Flat |
| Jan 28, 2026, 6:27 PM CST | 0.06 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 11:13 AM CST | 0.19 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 3:12 AM CST | 0.14 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 6:09 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2026, 8:27 PM CST | 0.02 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2026, 6:41 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 6:45 PM CST | 0.01 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2025, 5:48 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 3, 2025, 5:11 AM CST | 0.52 | 0.13R | Flat |
| Oct 27, 2025, 3:55 AM CDT | 0.49 | 0.08R | Flat |
| Oct 20, 2025, 9:26 AM CDT | 0.34 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2025, 10:59 AM CDT | 0.67 | 0.04R | Flat |
| Aug 11, 2025, 9:17 AM CDT | 0.51 | 0.49R | Flat |
| Jul 30, 2025, 3:39 AM CDT | 0.46 | 0.85R | Flat |
| May 28, 2025, 1:26 PM CDT | 0.28 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 7, 2025, 3:07 PM CDT | 0.16 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 21, 2025, 1:29 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2025, 2:12 AM CST | 0.26 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2025, 9:46 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 9, 2025, 11:40 AM CST | 0.3 | 0.13R | Flat |
| Nov 13, 2024, 5:34 AM CST | 0.27 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2024, 10:12 PM CDT | 0.19 | 0.21R | Flat |
| Sep 10, 2024, 10:03 PM CDT | 0.15 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 16, 2024, 3:18 AM CDT | 0.38 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 7, 2024, 12:41 AM CDT | 0.31 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2024, 1:49 AM CDT | 0.2 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 9, 2024, 11:02 AM CDT | 0.54 | 0.13R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025, 8:49 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.65R | Flat |
| May 29, 2025, 5:41 AM CDT | 0.85 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 19, 2025, 11:25 PM CDT | 0.15 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2025, 10:49 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Jul 23, 2024, 11:14 PM CDT | 0.23 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2023, 6:45 PM CST | 0.38 | 0.76R | Flat |
| Aug 10, 2023, 4:36 AM CDT | 0.49 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2023, 4:21 AM CDT | 1.27 | 0.71R | Flat |
| Jan 5, 2023, 8:00 AM CST | 1.36 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Jun 1, 2022, 1:06 PM CDT | 1.91 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 12, 2021, 9:20 PM CDT | 0.72 | 0.24R | Flat |
| May 9, 2021, 9:15 PM CDT | 0.38 | 0.82R | Flat |
| May 24, 2019, 8:45 AM CDT | 0.85 | 0.72R | Flat |
| Apr 11, 2017, 9:34 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2016, 10:48 AM CDT | 0.76 | 0.17R | Flat |
| Jun 12, 2013, 8:55 PM CDT | 0.32 | 0.75R | Flat |
| May 1, 2013, 1:57 AM CDT | 0.39 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 27, 2012, 8:03 AM CDT | 1.48 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 23, 2012, 7:19 AM CDT | 0.93 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| May 9, 2012, 9:56 PM CDT | 0.44 | 0.39R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (10)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2025, 4:10 AM CDT | 1.12 | 0.33R | Flat |
| May 7, 2025, 4:02 AM CDT | 0.7 | 2.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 26, 2024, 2:06 PM CDT | 0.64 | 0.17R | Flat |
| Apr 17, 2024, 11:02 AM CDT | 2.15 | 0.02R | Flat |
| Dec 12, 2023, 9:33 PM CST | 0.44 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 6, 2022, 4:01 AM CDT | 2.3 | 0.37R | Flat |
| Nov 26, 2021, 9:00 AM CST | 2.82 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 30, 2019, 12:33 AM CDT | 0.26 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 26, 2009, 10:34 AM CDT | 2.87 | 0.18R | Flat |
| Aug 26, 2008, 4:03 AM CDT | 1.93 | 0.51R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2014, 11:01 AM CST | 2.05 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 28, 2010, 1:11 AM CDT | 0.47 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2008, 1:03 AM CDT | 2.04 | 0.69R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:13 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:55 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.40R | Flat |
| Apr 24, 2026, 10:07 AM CDT | 0.006 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 1:58 AM CDT | 0.003 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 12:25 AM CDT | 0.005 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 3:18 PM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 6:01 AM CST | 0.021 | 0.81R | Flat |
| Feb 5, 2026, 3:02 AM CST | 0.009 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 11:19 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2025, 11:29 PM CST | 0.005 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2025, 8:55 PM CST | 0.007 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2025, 1:12 AM CST | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2025, 9:17 PM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2025, 3:38 PM CST | 0.006 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 24, 2025, 4:07 AM CST | 0.01 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 12:23 PM CST | 0.044 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 30, 2025, 1:06 PM CDT | 0.011 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2025, 7:33 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 13, 2025, 12:38 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Oct 7, 2025, 3:41 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.80R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2026, 10:53 PM CST | 0.025 | 0.84R | Flat |
| Nov 17, 2025, 5:43 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 15, 2025, 12:19 AM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2025, 1:21 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.50R | Flat |
| Jul 17, 2024, 3:37 AM CDT | 0.006 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2024, 11:39 AM CDT | 0.016 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Jun 11, 2024, 9:08 PM CDT | 0.013 | 0.69R | Flat |
| Apr 29, 2024, 3:46 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2024, 3:49 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2024, 7:14 AM CST | 0.037 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 2, 2023, 12:09 PM CDT | 0.026 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 15, 2023, 5:58 AM CDT | 0.031 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2023, 3:18 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Jul 23, 2023, 6:49 PM CDT | 0.012 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 5, 2023, 1:20 PM CDT | 0.021 | 0.48R | Flat |
| Jul 5, 2022, 4:36 AM CDT | 0.106 | 0.61R | Flat |
| May 30, 2022, 5:17 AM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2021, 7:08 AM CST | 0.156 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Jul 12, 2021, 12:10 AM CDT | 0.005 | 2.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 18, 2021, 11:42 PM CDT | 0.003 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (8)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2021, 11:29 AM CDT | 0.029 | 0.97R | Flat |
| Oct 18, 2013, 4:06 AM CDT | 0.053 | 0.02R | Flat |
| Aug 8, 2011, 1:02 AM CDT | 0.014 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2010, 4:52 AM CST | 0.024 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2010, 2:07 AM CST | 0.069 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2010, 5:19 AM CST | 0.056 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2009, 8:03 PM CDT | 0.043 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2009, 2:09 AM CST | 0.033 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2014, 7:41 PM CDT | 0.015 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Aug 31, 2011, 3:29 AM CDT | 0.041 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Jun 22, 2010, 5:46 AM CDT | 0.111 | 0.68R | Flat |
| Sep 2, 2008, 3:00 AM CDT | 0.219 | 0.62R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2012, 2:32 AM CST | 0.049 | 0.31R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Identical Three Crows Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2015, 7:14 AM CDT | 0.106 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.