Pattern Detail
Bullish Deliberation Block
Three down candles where the third is small and gaps lower, read as sellers hesitating after a long slide.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.7% for a random long entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
3.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 42.7% for a random long entry. The 7.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 42.7% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.1% | +22.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.2% | -18.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 54.4% | -4.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
2 occurrences · 1,733,079 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random long entry (-42.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.19R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.6% for a random long entry. The 42.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.6% | -42.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 27.0% | -27.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.3% | -18.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 53.6% | +46.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.8% | -3.8 |
1 occurrences · 356,990 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (-43.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
4.34×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry. The 43.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.3% | -43.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 28.4% | -28.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.1% | -20.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 52.5% | +47.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 4.2% | -4.2 |
1 occurrences · 119,910 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.5% for a random long entry (-19.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.56×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.35R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.18R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 44.5% for a random long entry. The 19.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 44.5% | -19.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 29.6% | -29.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 21.2% | -21.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 51.9% | +23.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.6% | -3.6 |
4 occurrences · 60,046 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.9% for a random long entry (+4.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.57×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.70R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.23R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 45.9% for a random long entry. The 4.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±69.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 45.9% | +4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 31.4% | -31.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 22.8% | -22.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 51.1% | -1.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
2 occurrences · 27,736 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
20.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 50.6% for a random long entry (-30.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.58R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.32R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 20.0% of the time vs 50.6% for a random long entry. The 30.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 20.0% | 50.6% | -30.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 35.2% | -15.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 24.4% | -24.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 80.0% | 47.5% | +32.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
5 occurrences · 4,547 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
75.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+34.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
5.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.85R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 75.0% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry. The 34.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 75.0% | 41.0% | +34.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 25.1% | +24.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 16.2% | +33.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 25.0% | 56.3% | -31.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.8% | -2.8 |
4 occurrences · 1,648,163 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random long entry (-42.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.36×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.0% for a random long entry. The 42.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.0% | -42.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 26.1% | -26.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 17.4% | -17.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 54.5% | +45.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.5% | -3.5 |
2 occurrences · 350,702 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (+7.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.30×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.50R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry. The 7.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 42.8% | +7.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 27.7% | +22.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 19.3% | +30.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 53.3% | -3.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.9% | -3.9 |
2 occurrences · 119,005 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.9% for a random long entry (-43.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.62×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.16R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.9% for a random long entry. The 43.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.9% | -43.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 29.1% | -29.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.6% | -20.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 52.6% | +47.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.6% | -3.6 |
2 occurrences · 59,836 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.2% for a random long entry (+4.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.53×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.50R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.20R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 45.2% for a random long entry. The 4.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±69.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 45.2% | +4.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 30.8% | +19.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 21.9% | +28.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 51.9% | -1.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
2 occurrences · 27,713 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
This pattern did not fire often enough on this market and timeframe to measure. Try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
66.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.9% for a random long entry (+18.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.34R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.23R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 47.9% for a random long entry. The 18.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 66.7% | 47.9% | +18.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 30.7% | +2.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 20.5% | +12.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 33.3% | 49.1% | -15.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.0% | -3.0 |
3 occurrences · 4,689 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A deliberation block is a three-candle shape that hints sellers are losing conviction. The first two are down candles, the second opening inside the first and closing lower, more of the same fall. Then the third candle is small and gaps below the second instead of pushing hard lower. That little gapped candle is the deliberation: the selling pauses to think, and the loss of momentum often comes before a bounce.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first two candles are down (red) candles, with the second opening inside the first body and closing lower.
- The third candle is small.
- That third candle is a down candle that gaps below the second.
- The momentum visibly fades: two real down candles, then one small, gapped hesitation.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The first two candles are the decline doing what it has been doing. The second opens inside the first and closes lower, so sellers are still in charge and still finding willing supply to push into. Nothing about those two bars suggests a turn. Then the third candle changes the texture. It gaps below the second, which keeps the direction down, but instead of another long bar it prints small.
That small body is the deliberation traders watch for. Sellers had the gap in their favor and could not make much of it. The selling did not reverse, but it ran out of force right at the point where momentum should have carried it furthest. After a steady fall, a sudden loss of range looks like the people pressing the market lower starting to hesitate, and hesitation at the lows is often where a decline loses its grip before buyers test the other side.
A stall is not yet a turn, and the figures below measure how often this one leads to one.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 15.5 | 2.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2008, 11:51 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 37 | 0.19R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 22.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 32.75 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 3, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.37R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 47.25 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Dec 24, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 69.5 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 153.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 141.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 55.5 | 2.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 3, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 38.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 27, 2009, 12:52 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2008, 2:56 PM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2008, 2:43 PM CST | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2011, 9:40 AM CDT | 3.75 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2008, 8:30 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011, 11:00 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 16, 2010, 2:00 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 41 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 19, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Deliberation Block Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2022 | 20.75 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2014 | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2008 | 58.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |