Pattern Detail
Bearish Descending Hawk
Two-candle bearish reversal: two up candles where the second is small and held entirely inside the first, a fading rally.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.6%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random short entry (-0.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.06R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 40.6% of the time vs 41.6% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.6% | 41.6% | -0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.9% | 28.2% | +3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.8% | 20.1% | +4.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.2% | 57.1% | +2.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 1.3% | -1.1 |
13,002 occurrences · 5,120,720 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random short entry (-0.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.6% of the time vs 40.4% for a random short entry. The 0.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2,327 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.6% | 40.4% | -0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.8% | 27.4% | +3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.6% | 19.8% | +3.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.2% | 58.1% | +2.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 1.5% | -1.3 |
2,327 occurrences · 1,146,594 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (-1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.0% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 581 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.0% | 39.6% | -1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.1% | 26.9% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.2% | 19.6% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.0% | 58.5% | +3.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
581 occurrences · 392,491 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (+1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.86×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.7% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 268 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.7% | 38.9% | +1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.2% | 26.4% | +3.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.1% | 19.4% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.6% | 58.7% | -0.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.7% | 2.4% | -1.7 |
268 occurrences · 197,303 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random short entry (+5.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.8% of the time vs 38.3% for a random short entry. The 5.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 121 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.8% | 38.3% | +5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.8% | 26.4% | +3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.0% | 19.5% | +4.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.2% | 60.0% | -3.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
121 occurrences · 98,132 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (65). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.6% for a random short entry (+5.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.76×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.05R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.98R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.5% of the time vs 36.6% for a random short entry. The 5.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 65 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.5% | 36.6% | +5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 24.6% | 25.8% | -1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.5% | 19.7% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.5% | 62.5% | -4.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.9% | -0.9 |
65 occurrences · 22,441 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
25.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 33.9% for a random short entry (-8.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.66R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.92R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 25.0% of the time vs 33.9% for a random short entry. The 8.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±26.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 12 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 12 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 25.0% | 33.9% | -8.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 23.7% | -7.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 8.3% | 17.3% | -8.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 75.0% | 65.6% | +9.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
12 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.9%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.8% for a random short entry (-1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.88R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.89R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 35.9% of the time vs 37.8% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.9% | 37.8% | -1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.3% | 23.7% | +3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 15.7% | +4.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.0% | 61.0% | +3.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.2 |
8,058 occurrences · 4,948,951 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.2%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (-2.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.92R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.96R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 36.2% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.2% | 38.5% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.3% | 25.2% | +2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.8% | 17.5% | +3.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.7% | 60.1% | +3.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 1.4% | -1.3 |
1,987 occurrences · 1,157,568 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.4% for a random short entry (-3.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.86R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.4% of the time vs 38.4% for a random short entry. The 3.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 632 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.4% | 38.4% | -3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 24.8% | 25.6% | -0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.9% | 18.2% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.6% | 59.7% | +4.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
632 occurrences · 404,347 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.1% for a random short entry (+0.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.76×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.99R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.8% of the time vs 38.1% for a random short entry. The 0.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 278 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.8% | 38.1% | +0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.8% | 25.5% | +3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.9% | 18.4% | +3.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.8% | 59.7% | +1.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 2.2% | -1.9 |
278 occurrences · 205,030 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.0% for a random short entry (+0.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.75×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.1% of the time vs 38.0% for a random short entry. The 0.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 147 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.1% | 38.0% | +0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.6% | 25.7% | +2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.7% | 18.6% | +1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.2% | 60.3% | +0.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.7% | 1.7% | -1.0 |
147 occurrences · 102,439 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (41). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.8% for a random short entry (+4.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.78×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.5% of the time vs 36.8% for a random short entry. The 4.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 41 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.5% | 36.8% | +4.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 24.4% | 26.1% | -1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.6% | 19.8% | -5.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.5% | 62.4% | -3.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.9% | -0.9 |
41 occurrences · 23,231 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 34.9% for a random short entry (+5.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.93R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 34.9% for a random short entry. The 5.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±29.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 10 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 10 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 34.9% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.0% | 24.0% | +16.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 40.0% | 17.7% | +22.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 64.6% | -4.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.6% | -0.6 |
10 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.9%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (-2.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 37.9% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.9% | 40.3% | -2.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.1% | 26.9% | +2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.6% | 18.9% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.0% | 58.2% | +3.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.1% | 1.5% | -1.4 |
13,910 occurrences · 5,259,552 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.4%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (-2.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.02R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 38.4% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.4% | 40.7% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.0% | 27.3% | +1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.2% | 19.4% | +2.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.4% | 57.8% | +3.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 1.6% | -1.4 |
2,504 occurrences · 1,200,551 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (-1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.9% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 597 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.9% | 40.7% | -1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.3% | 27.4% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.3% | 19.6% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.1% | 57.4% | +3.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
597 occurrences · 412,684 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+3.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.13R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.2% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry. The 3.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 215 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.2% | 40.7% | +3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.0% | 27.5% | +5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.3% | 19.8% | +3.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 55.8% | 57.0% | -1.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.3% | -2.3 |
215 occurrences · 207,345 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (88). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
31.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random short entry (-9.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.81R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 31.8% of the time vs 41.0% for a random short entry. The 9.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 88 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 31.8% | 41.0% | -9.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 21.6% | 28.0% | -6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 12.5% | 20.4% | -7.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 68.2% | 57.1% | +11.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
88 occurrences · 102,946 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random short entry (-3.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.93R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.0% of the time vs 40.5% for a random short entry. The 3.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.0% | 40.5% | -3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.5% | 28.2% | -9.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.8% | 20.7% | -5.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.0% | 58.2% | +4.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
27 occurrences · 23,320 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.1% for a random short entry (+1.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 38.1% for a random short entry. The 1.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±42.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 38.1% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.0% | 25.2% | +14.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 40.0% | 17.9% | +22.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 60.3% | -0.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.5% | -1.5 |
5 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.2%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (-1.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 38.2% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.2% | 39.6% | -1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.2% | 26.1% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.7% | 18.4% | +4.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.7% | 58.9% | +2.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.1% | 1.6% | -1.4 |
11,658 occurrences · 5,086,185 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.9%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random short entry (-2.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.86×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 37.9% of the time vs 40.2% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.9% | 40.2% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.1% | 27.1% | +1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.6% | 19.3% | +2.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.0% | 58.0% | +3.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.1% | 1.7% | -1.6 |
2,426 occurrences · 1,173,784 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+0.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.2% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 0.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±3.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 629 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.2% | 40.3% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.5% | 27.3% | +3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.2% | 19.7% | +4.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.8% | 57.7% | +1.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.1% | -2.1 |
629 occurrences · 404,433 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
35.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (-5.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.91R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 35.1% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 5.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 222 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 35.1% | 40.3% | -5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.0% | 27.4% | -4.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.4% | 19.8% | -0.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 64.4% | 57.1% | +7.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 2.7% | -2.2 |
222 occurrences · 203,442 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
32.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random short entry (-8.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.86R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 32.0% of the time vs 40.8% for a random short entry. The 8.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 100 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 32.0% | 40.8% | -8.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.0% | 28.1% | -5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 20.5% | -0.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 68.0% | 57.4% | +10.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.8% | -1.8 |
100 occurrences · 101,072 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (41). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
31.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (-8.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.97R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 31.7% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry. The 8.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±15.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 41 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 31.7% | 39.7% | -8.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 24.4% | 27.8% | -3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 20.4% | -0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 68.3% | 59.1% | +9.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
41 occurrences · 23,097 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (+1.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.67×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 1.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±42.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 38.9% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.0% | 26.6% | +13.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 40.0% | 19.5% | +20.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 59.8% | +0.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.4% | -1.4 |
5 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random short entry (+2.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.32×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 40.9% of the time vs 38.7% for a random short entry — a 2.1-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.9% | 38.7% | +2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.7% | 25.6% | +6.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.9% | 18.0% | +6.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.0% | 59.3% | -0.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 2.0% | -1.8 |
7,438 occurrences · 3,516,512 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.5%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (-2.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 37.5% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.5% | 39.9% | -2.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.5% | 26.9% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.9% | 19.1% | +1.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 62.2% | 58.1% | +4.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 2.0% | -1.7 |
2,172 occurrences · 898,027 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (-1.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.06R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.3% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 1.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 591 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.3% | 40.3% | -1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.4% | 27.1% | +2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.0% | 19.4% | +3.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.2% | 57.4% | +2.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 2.3% | -1.8 |
591 occurrences · 316,487 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random short entry (+6.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.3% of the time vs 40.4% for a random short entry — a 6.9-point gap, wider than the ±6.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.3% | 40.4% | +6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 38.4% | 27.2% | +11.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 30.6% | 19.5% | +11.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.7% | 57.0% | -4.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.6% | -2.6 |
258 occurrences · 160,394 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random short entry (-1.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.96×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.3% of the time vs 41.0% for a random short entry. The 1.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 112 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.3% | 41.0% | -1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.5% | 28.3% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.3% | 20.6% | +1.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.7% | 57.3% | +3.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
112 occurrences · 80,057 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (42). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (-6.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.97R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 6.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 42 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 39.9% | -6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.2% | 27.4% | -1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.3% | 20.2% | -5.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 58.8% | +7.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
42 occurrences · 18,552 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
71.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (+31.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.33×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 71.4% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry. The 31.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±36.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 7 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 71.4% | 39.6% | +31.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 71.4% | 26.0% | +45.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 57.1% | 18.0% | +39.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 28.6% | 59.3% | -30.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.1% | -1.1 |
7 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bearish descending hawk is a two-candle stall built from two up candles. The first is a large up candle that runs with the trend, and the second is a smaller up candle whose whole range fits inside the first. Both bars are green, so it still looks bullish on the surface, but the shrinking second candle shows buyers losing reach. The narrowing after a strong push is the warning.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- The first candle is a large up (green) candle.
- The second candle is also an up (green) candle, but smaller.
- The second candle’s entire range sits inside the first candle’s range.
- The signal is the loss of momentum, not a down candle yet.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the 2 candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.
The psychology
Both candles are green, so the rally looks intact at a glance. The first is a large up bar that runs hard with the trend, exactly what a healthy advance should produce. The second is up as well, but small, and its whole range fits inside the first.
That shrinking is the catch. Buyers tried again on the second bar and could not extend the move. They held the ground but covered far less of it, which is the first sign that demand is thinning right when it should be strongest. Nobody is selling yet, there is no red candle to point to, but the loss of reach after a strong push says the side in control is running low on fuel. The narrowing, not a down bar, is the warning.
A rally that stalls while still green is a quiet kind of top. The figures below show how often that stall tends to turn into a real one.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:29 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:41 PM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:36 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:29 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:22 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:25 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:24 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:38 PM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:35 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:28 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:09 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:48 AM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:47 AM CDT | 1.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 11:26 PM CDT | 2.25 | 1.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 7:21 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:50 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:50 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:03 PM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:51 PM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:20 AM CDT | 3.75 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:55 AM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:10 AM CDT | 16.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 7:30 PM CDT | 23.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:35 AM CDT | 6.5 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:20 PM CDT | 7.5 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 9:15 PM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:40 PM CDT | 12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 6:50 PM CDT | 8.5 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 5:20 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 1:40 AM CDT | 6.75 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 8:10 AM CDT | 20.25 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 5:25 PM CDT | 15.5 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 6:10 AM CDT | 11.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2026, 8:40 PM CDT | 9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 15, 2026, 10:35 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 3:30 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 8:55 PM CDT | 6 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 3:20 AM CDT | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 1:10 AM CST | 16.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 8:05 PM CST | 14.5 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:15 PM CDT | 14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 1:45 AM CDT | 25.5 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2026, 6:15 AM CDT | 16.5 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 8:15 PM CDT | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2026, 1:30 AM CST | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2026, 3:30 AM CST | 11.5 | 1.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2026, 6:30 AM CST | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 5, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 1, 2026, 10:15 PM CST | 9 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 19, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 7.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2025, 1:30 AM CST | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 14, 2025, 6:15 PM CST | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2025, 1:15 AM CST | 7.75 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 12, 2025, 10:00 PM CST | 6.75 | 1.85R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2025, 8:30 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | 7.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2025, 6:45 PM CDT | 9 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 14.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:30 PM CDT | 24.5 | 0.99R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 18 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 2:30 AM CDT | 40.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2026, 7:00 PM CST | 16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2026, 5:30 AM CST | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 4:30 AM CST | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 11.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 2, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 5, 2025, 10:30 AM CDT | 15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 14, 2025, 12:00 AM CDT | 16.25 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Jan 31, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 12.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2024, 6:01 AM CST | 9.25 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 6, 2024, 3:00 AM CST | 32.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 6, 2024, 2:00 AM CST | 25.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 11, 2024, 5:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2024, 8:00 PM CDT | 11.75 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2024, 5:31 AM CDT | 4.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 10, 2024, 1:30 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 1, 2024, 7:30 AM CDT | 11.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 114.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 26, 2025, 2:00 PM CDT | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 29, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 10 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 2, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 17.75 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| May 21, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | 43.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 13, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 41 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 5, 2024, 7:00 AM CDT | 45.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 5, 2023, 12:00 PM CST | 24.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2023, 4:00 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2023, 10:00 PM CDT | 6.25 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 15, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 29, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2022, 10:00 AM CST | 18.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2021, 1:00 AM CDT | 29.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2021, 7:00 PM CDT | 9.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2021, 2:00 AM CST | 20.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 26, 2021, 8:00 AM CST | 31.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 16.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 21, 2020, 3:00 AM CDT | 14.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 126.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 149.5 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 2, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 62 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 71.75 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 22.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 7, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 44.25 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 14.5 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 7, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 38 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 14, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 17.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 2, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 30.25 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Apr 3, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT | 27.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 3, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 20.25 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2021, 9:00 PM CST | 25.5 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2021, 9:00 PM CDT | 36 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 18, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 12, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 61.5 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 11.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 21, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 13.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2018, 5:00 PM CST | 39.75 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2018, 5:00 PM CST | 17 | 0.10R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (13)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | 110.5 | — | Open |
| May 15, 2025 | 133.25 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2020 | 41.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 26, 2018 | 104 | 2.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 27, 2017 | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2015 | 13.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2015 | 14 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2014 | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2012 | 18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 25, 2011 | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2009 | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2009 | 15 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2009 | 11.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:09 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:02 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:40 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:11 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:47 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:49 AM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:25 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:12 AM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 11:26 PM CDT | 0.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:47 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:09 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:33 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:50 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:01 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 9:12 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:59 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:32 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:19 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 2:06 AM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:10 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:50 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 1:40 AM CDT | 1.25 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 0.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 8:45 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 8:35 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 3:35 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 10:05 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 3:40 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 6:20 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 1:10 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 9:55 AM CST | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 1:20 PM CST | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 7:50 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 7:40 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 7:05 AM CST | 1 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 19, 2026, 1:25 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2026, 10:00 AM CST | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 3:40 AM CST | 1.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 10, 2026, 5:05 PM CST | 2 | 0.88R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:15 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 11:45 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2026, 5:45 PM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 8:00 PM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 5, 2026, 7:30 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 1, 2026, 9:00 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 31, 2025, 6:00 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2025, 2:00 PM CST | 4.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2025, 8:45 AM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2025, 12:00 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2025, 1:15 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2025, 3:31 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2025, 5:45 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 17, 2025, 7:04 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2025, 3:45 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 24, 2025, 7:15 PM CDT | 1 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 18, 2025, 12:45 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2025, 7:45 PM CDT | 3 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2026, 3:30 AM CST | 4.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026, 6:30 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2025, 8:00 PM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2025, 9:30 PM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2025, 3:00 PM CST | 1.5 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 22, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 3.75 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2025, 10:30 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2025, 10:30 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2025, 2:00 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.75 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 30, 2025, 5:01 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 21, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| May 11, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT | 1.75 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT | 2 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 6.5 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Jan 31, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2024, 1:01 AM CST | 5.75 | 0.96R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2024, 8:00 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2024, 10:00 AM CDT | 7.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 13, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT | 7.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 2, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2025, 6:00 PM CST | 8.75 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 27, 2024, 9:00 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 4, 2024, 10:03 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 9, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2024, 4:11 AM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 2.5 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Nov 28, 2023, 10:00 PM CST | 1.25 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 14, 2023, 9:00 PM CST | 1.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 22, 2023, 5:00 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2022, 5:00 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2022, 8:00 PM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 18, 2022, 6:00 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 18, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 9.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 1, 2022, 7:00 PM CST | 2 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2021, 4:00 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 12.25 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 4, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 7, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 4.5 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Nov 27, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 6.5 | 2.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 2, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 3, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 5.25 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 18, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 7.25 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 11.5 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 18, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 17.25 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2019, 5:00 PM CST | 5.75 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 5.25 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Aug 29, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 10.5 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 14, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 30, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 6.25 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2018, 5:00 PM CST | 10.25 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (11)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | 33.75 | — | Open |
| Jul 22, 2025 | 26.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2025 | 33.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2021 | 17 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2020 | 12.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 29, 2019 | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 26, 2018 | 9.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 29, 2017 | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 9, 2014 | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 20, 2013 | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2009 | 18.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:38 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:50 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:24 AM CDT | 0.9 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:05 AM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:54 AM CDT | 1 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:34 PM CDT | 0.9 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:44 AM CDT | 1.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:29 AM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:24 PM CDT | 0.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:11 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:19 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:13 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:08 AM CDT | 1.2 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:34 AM CDT | 0.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:25 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:51 AM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:17 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:02 PM CDT | 1.2 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:14 PM CDT | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:36 PM CDT | 1.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:12 AM CDT | 2.4 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:12 PM CDT | 1.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:46 PM CDT | 1.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 9:41 PM CDT | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:10 PM CDT | 2.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:15 PM CDT | 5.7 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 5:10 AM CDT | 0.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 6:50 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT | 1.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 7:32 PM CDT | 1 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 4:16 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 7:55 PM CDT | 7.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 6:24 AM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 2:20 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 12:35 PM CDT | 12.5 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 10:15 PM CDT | 1.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 6:10 PM CDT | 2.3 | 2.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 10:52 AM CDT | 3.9 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 2:22 PM CDT | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 2:21 PM CDT | 4.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:01 AM CDT | 4.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:15 PM CDT | 2.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 6:52 AM CDT | 7.2 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 4:02 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 7.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 11:01 AM CDT | 2.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2026, 9:15 PM CST | 4.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 7:31 PM CST | 7.2 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 7:18 AM CST | 5.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 11:31 AM CST | 4.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 8, 2026, 9:30 PM CST | 6.9 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 7, 2026, 2:15 PM CST | 3.7 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 25, 2025, 11:00 PM CST | 2.6 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2025, 1:30 AM CST | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 14, 2025, 10:15 PM CST | 2.4 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 5, 2025, 4:15 AM CST | 3.6 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 26, 2025, 11:15 PM CST | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 24, 2025, 7:11 AM CST | 6.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 5:45 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2025, 3:15 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026, 1:38 AM CDT | 2.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 1:01 AM CDT | 4.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 4.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2025, 11:30 AM CST | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2025, 11:30 AM CST | 3.8 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2025, 4:30 AM CST | 2.4 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2025, 7:30 AM CST | 3.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 4.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 2.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2025, 11:31 PM CDT | 1.5 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2025, 3:01 PM CDT | 1.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 15, 2025, 7:32 PM CDT | 1.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2025, 5:30 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2025, 9:30 PM CST | 2.5 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2024, 2:36 PM CDT | 1.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2024, 6:03 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 30, 2024, 2:06 AM CDT | 1.8 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 28, 2024, 1:38 AM CDT | 1.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 30, 2024, 6:00 PM CDT | 2.2 | 0.64R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 10, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 11.1 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Jun 9, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 4.6 | 2.98R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 5, 2025, 6:00 AM CDT | 5.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2024, 5:00 AM CST | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2024, 4:01 AM CDT | 2.7 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Sep 24, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 5.8 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2024, 3:01 AM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 1.9 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2023, 12:01 AM CST | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 27, 2023, 1:05 PM CST | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2023, 2:06 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2023, 1:01 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2023, 11:03 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 1, 2023, 2:00 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2023, 6:01 AM CST | 1.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2022, 5:11 AM CDT | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 12.3 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 4.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2022, 5:00 PM CST | 4 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2021, 1:09 AM CDT | 2.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 5 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2020, 9:00 PM CST | 3.2 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2019, 9:01 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2018, 5:00 PM CST | 4.9 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 21, 2017, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.9 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2016, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 26, 2016, 5:00 PM CST | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2014, 9:24 PM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2014, 5:00 PM CDT | 4.9 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2013, 1:15 AM CDT | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 17, 2013, 5:00 PM CST | 9.3 | 1.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2012, 5:00 PM CST | 2 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2012, 9:01 PM CST | 3.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 30, 2012, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.6 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2012, 5:00 PM CDT | 5.6 | 0.29R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2019 | 3.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2016 | 12.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2012 | 6.4 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2010 | 8.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2008 | 4.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:19 PM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:29 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:42 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:33 AM CDT | 0.05 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:46 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:37 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:48 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:31 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:48 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:06 PM CDT | 0.04 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:12 AM CDT | 0.2 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:37 AM CDT | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:05 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:02 AM CDT | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:40 AM CDT | 0.09 | 2.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 7:05 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:24 PM CDT | 0.03 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:03 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:52 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:10 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:48 AM CDT | 0.15 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:05 AM CDT | 0.17 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2026, 10:25 PM CDT | 0.11 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2026, 6:35 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 2:29 AM CDT | 0.13 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:35 PM CDT | 0.4 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2026, 6:20 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 10:05 PM CDT | 0.14 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 10:46 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 7:35 PM CDT | 0.14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 2:45 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 0.17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 12:10 AM CDT | 0.16 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 0.41 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2026, 6:35 PM CDT | 0.66 | 2.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 1:40 PM CDT | 0.35 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2026, 3:55 AM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 3:55 PM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | — | — | Open |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 11:34 AM CDT | 0.41 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 2:37 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 6:16 AM CDT | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2026, 5:37 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 1:14 AM CST | 0.09 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 8:31 PM CST | 0.32 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 8:31 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2026, 1:05 AM CST | 0.14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 26, 2026, 12:50 AM CST | 0.14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2026, 12:33 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2026, 8:45 PM CST | 0.04 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 12:00 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2026, 3:25 AM CST | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2025, 2:42 PM CST | 0.03 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 18, 2025, 10:40 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2025, 2:26 PM CST | 0.08 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 2:27 AM CST | 0.11 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 21, 2025, 3:38 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.60R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2026, 10:01 PM CDT | 0.28 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2025, 2:59 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2025, 2:19 PM CST | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 22, 2025, 6:40 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 7, 2025, 10:04 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2025, 9:38 PM CDT | 0.09 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2025, 5:09 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 2, 2025, 10:41 AM CST | 0.13 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2024, 4:13 AM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2024, 2:06 PM CDT | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2024, 4:34 AM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2024, 11:13 PM CDT | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 30, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.1 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 1, 2024, 2:08 AM CDT | 0.08 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 23, 2024, 11:13 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 3, 2024, 3:04 AM CDT | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2024, 10:05 PM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2024, 12:06 PM CST | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 15, 2024, 11:53 AM CST | 0.09 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.59 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 16, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 3:31 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2025, 9:01 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Aug 3, 2025, 9:04 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2025, 7:01 PM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2024, 2:08 AM CST | 0.23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2024, 6:05 AM CDT | 0.28 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 24, 2024, 1:22 PM CDT | 0.12 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2024, 6:12 PM CDT | 0.09 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 15, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2024, 10:05 PM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 11, 2023, 11:09 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2023, 10:01 PM CST | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 19, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.23 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 14, 2023, 7:08 PM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 13, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 25, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 24, 2022, 10:02 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.26 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2025, 1:43 AM CDT | 0.27 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 0.45 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 29, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.52 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 22, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.53 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.36 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 5, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.19 | 2.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 26, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.48 | 0.98R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.53 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 0.48 | 2.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2021, 9:01 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 0.19 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2020, 5:00 PM CST | 0.66 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Sep 17, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.24 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.62 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.41 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2017, 5:00 PM CST | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2017, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2024 | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 2, 2018 | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2013 | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2011 | 2.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 4, 2010 | 0.53 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:57 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:56 PM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:04 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:39 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:56 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:29 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 26, 2026, 5:24 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:56 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:24 PM CDT | 0.001 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:54 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 22, 2026, 3:06 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:19 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:55 AM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:34 PM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:11 PM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 7:11 AM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 11:40 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 16, 2026, 3:15 AM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 7:06 AM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:14 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:07 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:57 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:51 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 2:26 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 9:24 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 9:14 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 8:58 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 8:46 PM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 2:25 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2026, 3:53 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 10:15 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 12:47 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 4:13 AM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 11:04 AM CDT | 0.004 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 9:51 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 5:15 AM CDT | 0.007 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 3:40 AM CDT | 0.014 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2026, 2:45 AM CST | 0.004 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2026, 6:54 AM CST | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026, 10:40 PM CDT | 0.006 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 6:15 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 9:58 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 9:51 PM CDT | 0.007 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 9:20 AM CST | 0.015 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 4:32 AM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 11:06 PM CST | 0.026 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 5:15 PM CST | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2025, 1:37 AM CST | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 5:31 PM CST | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2025, 1:14 AM CST | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 30, 2025, 7:30 PM CST | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2025, 1:25 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2025, 11:22 PM CDT | 0.004 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 20, 2025, 2:49 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2025, 1:58 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2025, 8:57 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 18, 2025, 3:11 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 15, 2025, 7:49 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2025, 2:21 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 0.024 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 0.032 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 19, 2025, 2:29 AM CST | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2025, 4:20 AM CDT | 0.008 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2025, 4:39 AM CDT | 0.022 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2025, 3:01 AM CDT | 0.006 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2025, 11:25 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 15, 2025, 7:36 AM CDT | 0.014 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 20, 2025, 3:16 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 20, 2025, 12:59 PM CDT | 0.027 | 2.96R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 12, 2025, 7:03 PM CDT | 0.007 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2025, 10:33 AM CDT | 0.013 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 11, 2025, 1:33 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2025, 2:12 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2024, 7:22 PM CST | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 4, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.012 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 30, 2024, 10:26 AM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 14, 2024, 9:42 AM CDT | 0.011 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2026, 8:03 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 0.014 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 10:06 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2025, 1:10 AM CST | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 27, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 12:38 AM CDT | 0.012 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2025, 12:32 AM CDT | 0.006 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 11, 2025, 3:23 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2025, 2:38 PM CST | 0.022 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2024, 9:34 AM CST | 0.031 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 23, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2024, 9:31 AM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2024, 3:30 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2024, 8:45 PM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 13, 2023, 3:36 AM CST | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2023, 7:49 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 27, 2023, 12:58 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2023, 2:30 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2023, 9:52 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 18, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.048 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.067 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 20, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2024, 11:50 AM CDT | 0.019 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| May 20, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.031 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.021 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 19, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.024 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Jan 9, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.194 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2023, 10:33 PM CST | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2023, 11:33 PM CST | 0.016 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2023, 2:32 AM CDT | 0.029 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 27, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.045 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Jul 18, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.022 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2023, 6:05 AM CST | 0.051 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.095 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.035 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.036 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 2, 2022, 5:00 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.95R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Descending Hawk Firings (7)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2025 | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 29, 2016 | 0.056 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2016 | 0.053 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2010 | 0.116 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2009 | 0.156 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 4, 2008 | 0.047 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2008 | 0.072 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample backtest
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.