Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Inverted Hammer
Two-candle bullish reversal after a fall: a bar with a long upper wick and little or no lower wick, following a down candle.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+1.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.84×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 43.5% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry — a 1.2-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.5% | 42.3% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.4% | 28.5% | +4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.1% | 20.1% | +6.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.3% | 56.3% | +0.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 1.5% | -1.3 |
18,171 occurrences · 5,134,668 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+0.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.83×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.5% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 0.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1,900 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.5% | 41.8% | +0.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 28.1% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 27.1% | 19.9% | +7.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.4% | 56.3% | +1.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.1% | 1.8% | -1.7 |
1,900 occurrences · 1,150,038 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+0.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.0% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 0.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 388 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.0% | 41.7% | +0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.2% | 28.0% | +5.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.3% | 20.0% | +5.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.0% | 55.8% | +2.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.5% | -2.5 |
388 occurrences · 393,544 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (-3.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.6% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 3.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 140 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.6% | 41.8% | -3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.3% | 28.1% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 27.9% | 20.1% | +7.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.4% | 55.0% | +6.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.3% | -3.3 |
140 occurrences · 197,665 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (47). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (-2.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.25×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.4% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry. The 2.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 47 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.4% | 42.5% | -2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.9% | 28.9% | +3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 31.9% | 20.9% | +11.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 55.3% | 55.0% | +0.3 |
| Went sideways | 4.3% | 2.4% | +1.8 |
47 occurrences · 98,258 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.0% for a random long entry (-9.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.82×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.74R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 43.0% for a random long entry. The 9.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 43.0% | -9.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 29.4% | -29.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 21.0% | -21.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 55.4% | +11.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.6% | -1.6 |
3 occurrences · 22,487 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.1% for a random long entry (-11.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.30×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.18R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 45.1% for a random long entry. The 11.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 45.1% | -11.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 30.4% | +2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 20.6% | +12.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 53.5% | +13.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.4% | -1.4 |
3 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random long entry (+2.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.99R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.90R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 41.0% of the time vs 38.3% for a random long entry — a 2.7-point gap, wider than the ±1.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.0% | 38.3% | +2.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.5% | 23.9% | +6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.7% | 15.7% | +7.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.0% | 60.3% | -1.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.1% | 1.4% | -1.4 |
9,634 occurrences · 4,973,170 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random long entry (-0.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.94×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.5% of the time vs 39.7% for a random long entry. The 0.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1,727 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.5% | 39.7% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.8% | 25.8% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.2% | 17.5% | +6.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.5% | 58.6% | +1.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
1,727 occurrences · 1,163,478 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random long entry (-3.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.96R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.8% of the time vs 40.2% for a random long entry. The 3.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 421 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.8% | 40.2% | -3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.0% | 26.4% | +2.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.3% | 18.3% | +5.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.2% | 57.5% | +5.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.3% | -2.3 |
421 occurrences · 406,561 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random long entry (-2.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.06R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.1% of the time vs 40.5% for a random long entry. The 2.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 168 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.1% | 40.5% | -2.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.0% | 26.7% | +4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.6% | 18.7% | +6.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.9% | 56.5% | +5.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.0% | -3.0 |
168 occurrences · 205,912 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (71). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (-1.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.4% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry. The 1.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 71 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.4% | 41.4% | -1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.6% | 27.4% | +2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.7% | 19.4% | +0.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.6% | 56.2% | +4.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.4% | -2.4 |
71 occurrences · 102,855 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+7.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.53R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 7.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 42.3% | +7.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 28.9% | +21.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 20.6% | +12.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 56.1% | -6.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
6 occurrences · 23,296 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.9% for a random long entry (-43.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 43.9% for a random long entry. The 43.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 43.9% | -43.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 28.3% | -28.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 18.6% | -18.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 54.4% | +45.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
1 occurrences · 4,710 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random long entry (+1.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 41.7% of the time vs 40.2% for a random long entry — a 1.4-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.7% | 40.2% | +1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.3% | 26.6% | +4.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.1% | 18.6% | +5.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.0% | 58.1% | -0.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 1.6% | -1.3 |
18,477 occurrences · 5,273,492 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random long entry (-1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.0% of the time vs 40.8% for a random long entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2,247 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.0% | 40.8% | -1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.9% | 27.1% | +2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.2% | 19.1% | +4.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.9% | 57.4% | +3.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.1% | 1.8% | -1.6 |
2,247 occurrences · 1,202,903 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (-0.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.6% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 0.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 478 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.6% | 41.3% | -0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.2% | 27.5% | +3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.3% | 19.5% | +5.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.2% | 56.5% | +2.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 2.2% | -2.0 |
478 occurrences · 413,296 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random long entry (-2.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 39.5% of the time vs 41.6% for a random long entry. The 2.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 147 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.5% | 41.6% | -2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.9% | 27.8% | +2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.4% | 19.8% | +2.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.5% | 55.8% | +4.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.6% | -2.6 |
147 occurrences · 207,610 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (48). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (-8.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.95R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 8.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 48 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 42.3% | -8.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.2% | 28.6% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.9% | 20.7% | +2.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 55.6% | +11.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.1% | -2.1 |
48 occurrences · 103,079 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
14.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.7% for a random long entry (-28.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.37×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.54R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 14.3% of the time vs 42.7% for a random long entry. The 28.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±36.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 7 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 14.3% | 42.7% | -28.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.3% | 29.7% | -15.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.3% | 21.8% | -7.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 85.7% | 55.8% | +29.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.5% | -1.5 |
7 occurrences · 23,332 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 46.2% for a random long entry (+53.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.41R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.22R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 46.2% for a random long entry. The 53.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±97.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 46.2% | +53.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 32.2% | -32.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 23.6% | -23.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 52.6% | -52.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
1 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random long entry (+2.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 41.9% of the time vs 39.7% for a random long entry — a 2.1-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.9% | 39.7% | +2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.1% | 26.2% | +4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.0% | 18.3% | +5.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.8% | 58.6% | -0.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 1.7% | -1.3 |
17,824 occurrences · 5,085,799 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.6% for a random long entry (-0.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.5% of the time vs 40.6% for a random long entry. The 0.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±2.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2,243 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.5% | 40.6% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.3% | 27.3% | +4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.2% | 19.3% | +5.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.4% | 57.5% | +1.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.8% | -1.8 |
2,243 occurrences · 1,174,599 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (+1.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.83×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.0% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry. The 1.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 488 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.0% | 40.9% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.7% | 27.5% | +3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.4% | 19.7% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.6% | 56.7% | +0.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 2.3% | -1.9 |
488 occurrences · 404,950 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+3.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.0% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry. The 3.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 159 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.0% | 41.0% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.0% | 27.5% | +6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.9% | 19.7% | +9.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.0% | 56.1% | -0.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
159 occurrences · 203,708 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (71). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random long entry (+0.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.3% of the time vs 41.5% for a random long entry. The 0.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 71 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.3% | 41.5% | +0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.6% | 28.1% | +1.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.5% | 20.3% | +2.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.7% | 56.5% | +1.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.0% | -2.0 |
71 occurrences · 101,155 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (+3.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.25×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.4% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry. The 3.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±32.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 9 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 9 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.4% | 40.9% | +3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.2% | 28.2% | -6.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 11.1% | 20.4% | -9.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 55.6% | 57.8% | -2.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
9 occurrences · 23,115 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (-42.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.67×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry. The 42.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±96.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 1 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 1 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.5% | -42.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 29.0% | -29.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.5% | -20.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 56.3% | +43.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
1 occurrences · 4,699 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.0% for a random long entry (+3.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 42.1% of the time vs 39.0% for a random long entry — a 3.1-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.1% | 39.0% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.8% | 25.8% | +5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.5% | 18.1% | +5.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.3% | 59.1% | -1.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.6% | 1.9% | -1.3 |
18,522 occurrences · 3,527,527 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random long entry (+2.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.13R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 42.7% of the time vs 40.1% for a random long entry — a 2.6-point gap, wider than the ±2.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.7% | 40.1% | +2.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.7% | 27.0% | +6.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.0% | 19.2% | +6.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.8% | 58.0% | -1.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 1.9% | -1.5 |
2,370 occurrences · 900,514 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random long entry (+0.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.07R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.9% of the time vs 40.4% for a random long entry. The 0.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 558 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.9% | 40.4% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.5% | 27.2% | +3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.0% | 19.6% | +4.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.8% | 57.4% | +1.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 2.2% | -1.9 |
558 occurrences · 317,082 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.2%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random long entry (-7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.88×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.90R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 33.2% of the time vs 40.5% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.2% | 40.5% | -7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 24.1% | 27.2% | -3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.1% | 19.9% | -0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 65.8% | 57.0% | +8.8 |
| Went sideways | 1.0% | 2.5% | -1.5 |
199 occurrences · 160,707 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (80). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
23.8%
Backwards
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random long entry (-16.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.67R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room only 23.8% of the time vs 40.7% for a random long entry — it offers LESS room than chance here. On this market and timeframe the structure works against you.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 23.8% | 40.7% | -16.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.8% | 28.0% | -9.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.3% | 20.5% | -4.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 76.3% | 57.7% | +18.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.6% | -1.6 |
80 occurrences · 80,124 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random long entry (-6.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 39.8% for a random long entry. The 6.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 39.8% | -6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 28.0% | +5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 20.8% | +12.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 59.0% | +7.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
6 occurrences · 18,549 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
100.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+58.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.79×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
3.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 100.0% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 58.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 100.0% | 41.3% | +58.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 100.0% | 29.1% | +70.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 100.0% | 21.3% | +78.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 0.0% | 58.1% | -58.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.6% | -0.6 |
2 occurrences · 4,690 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish inverted hammer is a bottom signal with a long upper wick. After a down candle that fits the fall, the next bar pushes well above its open before settling back near the low, leaving a tall wick overhead and almost no tail below. Buyers tried to lift price and got knocked back, but the attempt itself shows demand waking up at these lows.
The inverted hammer is among the major reversal shapes Steve Nison documents in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), the bottoming counterpart to the shooting star.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle has a small body sitting near the low of its range.
- Its upper wick is long, at least twice the height of the body.
- There is little or no lower wick.
- The body can be red or green. The shape matters more than the color.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the two candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The first candle keeps the slide going, so sellers walk into the second bar still holding the upper hand. Then something new happens. Buyers lift price well above the open and stretch the bar high before sellers fade it back down toward the low. The close lands near the bottom again, which on the surface looks like the buyers failed.
What matters is that they showed up at all. For most of this decline nobody was willing to bid these levels, and now a wave of buying is strong enough to drive a tall spike inside a single bar. Sellers had to work to push it back, and the long wick overhead is the print of that fight. The almost missing lower tail says price never sank below its open, so the bears could not extend the damage. Control has not flipped yet, but the one-sided pressure that drove the fall has met its first real resistance.
The attempt is visible in the wick. Whether that first show of demand tends to grow into a turn is what the figures below sort out.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:09 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:58 PM CDT | 2 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:56 PM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:46 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:16 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:11 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:23 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:21 PM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:49 PM CDT | 3 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 9:42 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:53 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:17 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:07 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:28 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 2:17 PM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:56 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:53 AM CDT | 2 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 8:57 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:38 PM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 3:57 PM CDT | 6.75 | 0.48R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2026, 11:15 PM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 3:05 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:35 PM CDT | 5 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 2:05 AM CDT | 10 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 11:55 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 10:50 PM CDT | 17.25 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:45 AM CDT | 16.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 9:25 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 11:45 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 2:15 AM CST | 17.5 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2026, 3:35 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Feb 27, 2026, 3:55 AM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 4:10 AM CST | 12.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2026, 8:05 PM CST | 6.75 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 3:20 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2026, 9:40 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 9, 2026, 5:10 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 24, 2025, 4:38 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2025, 2:10 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Dec 21, 2025, 11:25 PM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026, 2:15 AM CST | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2026, 8:00 AM CST | 12.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2025, 3:45 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 7.25 | 2.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 31, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 41.25 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2025, 7:30 AM CDT | 29 | 1.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 9, 2025, 12:32 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2025, 3:15 PM CDT | 12.5 | 2.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 12, 2025, 11:45 PM CDT | 21.25 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2024, 10:00 PM CST | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2024, 6:30 AM CDT | 16.75 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 26, 2024, 8:45 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2024, 2:00 PM CDT | 25.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2024, 3:30 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2024, 6:45 PM CST | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2023, 4:30 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Nov 19, 2023, 11:15 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Oct 20, 2023, 3:45 PM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2023, 2:33 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2023, 7:48 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 11, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT | 19.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2025, 10:00 AM CST | 37.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2023, 1:30 AM CST | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 17, 2023, 11:00 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2023, 2:02 AM CDT | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 15, 2023, 11:30 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 12, 2022, 6:30 PM CDT | 11.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2021, 11:30 PM CDT | 5.25 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 9, 2021, 7:00 PM CDT | 4.5 | 1.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 25, 2021, 11:00 PM CST | 26 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 30, 2020, 10:00 AM CDT | 25.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2020, 6:00 AM CDT | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2020, 6:00 AM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2020, 12:43 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 6, 2020, 5:30 AM CST | 22.75 | 1.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2020, 2:00 AM CST | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2020, 5:00 AM CST | 10.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2019, 6:44 AM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2025, 6:00 AM CDT | 37.25 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 5, 2023, 3:00 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2022, 3:00 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2021, 12:00 PM CST | 25.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2020, 2:00 PM CDT | 54.5 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2020, 8:00 PM CDT | 31.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 8, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 17, 2019, 11:00 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2019, 7:00 AM CST | 11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2019, 7:00 AM CST | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2018, 10:01 AM CDT | 29.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 30, 2018, 7:03 AM CDT | 15.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 20, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 49.75 | 0.71R | Flat |
| Aug 22, 2017, 11:02 PM CDT | 4.5 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 15, 2017, 8:05 PM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 14, 2016, 12:07 PM CST | 23.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 8, 2016, 11:00 PM CST | 9.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 25, 2016, 6:01 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2016, 3:29 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2016, 7:09 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2023, 5:01 AM CDT | 52.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 8, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Aug 9, 2013, 10:45 AM CDT | 8.5 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2008, 5:00 PM CDT | 6.5 | 1.92R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2022 | 260.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2015 | 117.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2011 | 17.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:44 PM CDT | 0.5 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:21 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:24 AM CDT | 0.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:06 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:46 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:58 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:51 PM CDT | 1 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 10:18 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:15 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:55 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:56 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 10:12 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:59 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:41 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 21, 2026, 4:04 AM CDT | 1 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:58 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:55 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 8:57 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 20, 2026, 6:49 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 20, 2026, 3:57 PM CDT | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:55 PM CDT | 0.75 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:10 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 22, 2026, 3:10 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:35 PM CDT | 1.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:55 PM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 10:35 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 30, 2026, 10:50 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 11:35 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 10:45 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2026, 6:50 AM CST | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 1:15 AM CST | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2026, 8:45 PM CST | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2026, 5:15 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Feb 10, 2026, 8:05 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Feb 9, 2026, 8:05 PM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 4.25 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2026, 6:55 PM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2026, 4:45 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 13, 2026, 7:50 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:15 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:45 PM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 6:15 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 1:45 AM CST | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 28, 2025, 11:45 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 26, 2025, 12:31 PM CST | 5.75 | 1.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2025, 1:31 AM CST | 2 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 8:30 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Oct 21, 2025, 12:30 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Sep 21, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Sep 7, 2025, 9:30 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 3, 2025, 5:30 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Sep 2, 2025, 9:45 PM CDT | 1.75 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 14, 2025, 5:30 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 30, 2025, 7:46 AM CDT | 3 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2025, 2:15 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 30, 2025, 1:45 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| May 28, 2025, 10:15 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 22, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| May 19, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 3:00 AM CST | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2026, 8:30 PM CST | 3.75 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2025, 10:01 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 31, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 11.25 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| May 21, 2025, 2:30 PM CDT | 11.5 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2025, 8:00 PM CST | 15.5 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2024, 4:31 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2024, 7:33 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| May 30, 2024, 5:30 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| May 15, 2024, 1:03 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2024, 2:30 PM CDT | 9.25 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2024, 6:30 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2024, 5:30 PM CST | 2.25 | 0.78R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2024, 5:01 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2023, 11:30 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 12, 2023, 1:01 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 11, 2023, 8:01 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 21, 2024, 10:00 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 4, 2024, 1:00 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 18, 2024, 2:00 PM CDT | 9.75 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2024, 8:00 PM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2024, 8:00 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2023, 10:00 AM CDT | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2023, 10:00 PM CDT | 1.75 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 5, 2023, 3:00 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2022, 11:01 AM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2021, 5:00 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2021, 8:00 PM CDT | 1.25 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2021, 12:00 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 23, 2021, 12:01 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2020, 1:00 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2020, 12:00 AM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2020, 6:12 PM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2020, 1:07 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 8, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Jan 20, 2020, 3:15 AM CST | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (8)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2025, 9:01 AM CDT | 18 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 23, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.25 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Aug 30, 2016, 9:12 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2015, 9:19 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2012, 9:17 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 26, 2012, 1:01 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 24, 2008, 2:18 AM CST | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2024 | 29.25 | 0.98R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:45 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:34 AM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:51 PM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:52 PM CDT | 1 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:25 PM CDT | 0.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:20 PM CDT | 0.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:54 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:46 PM CDT | 0.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:31 PM CDT | 0.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:03 AM CDT | 0.9 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:44 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:18 AM CDT | 1 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 7:23 PM CDT | 1.4 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:02 PM CDT | 3.8 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:27 PM CDT | 0.6 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:10 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 11:06 AM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:39 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:01 PM CDT | 0.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:16 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:20 PM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:35 PM CDT | 4.2 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:20 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 12, 2026, 5:05 PM CDT | 62.5 | 0.30R | Flat |
| Apr 2, 2026, 3:25 PM CDT | 3.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 2.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 29, 2026, 11:15 PM CDT | 2.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 3:06 AM CDT | 1.7 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 12:40 AM CDT | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 5:18 AM CDT | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 11:03 PM CDT | 1.5 | 2.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 11:25 PM CDT | 0.9 | 2.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2026, 4:17 AM CDT | 2.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 9:56 AM CST | 6.7 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2026, 9:03 AM CST | 12.7 | 2.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2026, 6:30 PM CST | 5.6 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 12:17 PM CST | 7.9 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 10, 2026, 5:45 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 19, 2026, 8:00 PM CST | 4 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2026, 7:05 AM CST | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:16 PM CDT | 4.9 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2026, 6:45 PM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 20, 2025, 8:15 AM CST | 7.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2025, 11:45 PM CST | 1.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2025, 8:15 PM CST | 5.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2025, 5:15 PM CDT | 2.7 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2025, 9:35 PM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 5, 2025, 8:32 PM CDT | 3.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2025, 9:02 AM CDT | 0.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2025, 8:31 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 4, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| May 12, 2025, 12:15 PM CDT | 2.6 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2025, 5:30 PM CDT | 4.8 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 1.9 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2025, 6:45 PM CDT | 2.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2025, 12:16 AM CDT | 1.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 7, 2025, 10:03 PM CST | 1 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Dec 26, 2024, 8:15 PM CST | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2024, 7:32 AM CST | 3.7 | 0.89R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2026, 4:30 AM CST | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2026, 6:30 PM CST | 1.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2025, 11:34 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 23, 2025, 9:31 AM CDT | 1.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 11, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2025, 6:30 AM CDT | 4.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 5, 2025, 11:30 AM CDT | 4.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2024, 1:00 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Oct 14, 2024, 11:35 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Oct 14, 2024, 4:00 AM CDT | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 26, 2024, 9:33 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 23, 2024, 3:02 AM CDT | 2.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 10, 2024, 1:36 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 9, 2024, 3:04 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2023, 8:02 PM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 15, 2023, 1:41 AM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 14, 2023, 6:38 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Jul 31, 2023, 5:31 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 14, 2023, 9:01 PM CDT | 1.5 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 29, 2023, 11:30 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 16.7 | 2.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 2, 2026, 1:00 PM CST | 8.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2024, 9:05 PM CST | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2023, 11:01 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2023, 2:13 PM CDT | 0.6 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 14, 2023, 6:07 PM CDT | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2023, 12:09 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 11, 2023, 12:05 AM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2023, 9:02 PM CDT | 2.4 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2022, 6:01 PM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2022, 4:02 AM CDT | 1.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2022, 6:00 AM CST | 2.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 16, 2021, 1:02 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2021, 7:00 AM CDT | 2.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2020, 8:01 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Aug 11, 2020, 4:00 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 29, 2020, 6:00 PM CDT | 7.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2019, 6:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Nov 23, 2018, 6:11 AM CST | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (7)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2024, 9:03 PM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2017, 5:04 AM CDT | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2014, 9:04 PM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 2, 2013, 9:15 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2008, 9:08 PM CDT | 11.6 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2008, 1:58 AM CDT | 2.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2015 | 13.7 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:04 AM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:05 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:17 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:04 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:58 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:36 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:22 PM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:37 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:54 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:18 PM CDT | 0.03 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:41 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:40 AM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:46 AM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:19 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:46 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 5:55 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:59 PM CDT | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:55 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 8:07 AM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 5:19 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:55 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:10 AM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 6:26 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:22 PM CDT | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 9:53 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 4:40 AM CDT | 0.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 7:10 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 2:44 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 12:43 AM CST | 0.04 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 23, 2026, 11:01 AM CST | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 1:52 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2026, 1:17 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Feb 12, 2026, 10:41 AM CST | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 9, 2026, 5:30 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 11:16 PM CST | — | — | Open |
| Jan 28, 2026, 11:07 AM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 2:51 PM CST | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2026, 1:56 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2026, 10:30 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2026, 9:23 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2026, 1:23 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 2:22 AM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 15, 2026, 6:02 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 11:11 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2026, 9:31 PM CST | 0.07 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 1, 2026, 9:15 PM CST | 0.09 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 2:48 AM CST | 0.19 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2026, 10:25 AM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2025, 7:45 AM CST | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 7:06 PM CST | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2025, 5:42 AM CST | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2025, 11:41 AM CST | 0.13 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2025, 3:21 AM CDT | 0.06 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2025, 6:47 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2025, 11:58 AM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2025, 1:44 PM CDT | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2025, 8:26 PM CDT | 0.03 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 25, 2025, 6:44 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2025, 2:16 PM CDT | 0.05 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026, 5:43 AM CST | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2026, 10:30 PM CST | 0.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2026, 1:02 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 5:31 AM CST | 0.32 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 10:02 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2025, 5:02 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 5, 2025, 1:44 PM CST | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 29, 2025, 6:09 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2025, 6:14 AM CDT | 0.11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 19, 2025, 10:52 PM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 18, 2025, 10:02 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2025, 10:17 AM CDT | 0.24 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 6, 2025, 2:08 PM CDT | 0.31 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 17, 2025, 8:30 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2024, 5:31 PM CDT | 0.1 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 5, 2024, 1:30 AM CDT | 0.42 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 18, 2024, 4:49 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 12, 2024, 2:23 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Jul 12, 2024, 6:53 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2024, 5:31 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 0.56 | 1.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 1, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 20, 2025, 10:24 PM CDT | 0.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 19, 2025, 6:40 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2025, 8:18 AM CDT | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2025, 9:04 PM CST | 0.07 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 14, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Jul 8, 2024, 6:05 PM CDT | 0.06 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 19, 2024, 6:06 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 30, 2024, 8:05 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2024, 12:30 PM CDT | 0.17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2023, 10:11 AM CDT | 0.58 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 10, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.14 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2023, 11:09 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2023, 8:01 AM CST | 0.17 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2023, 9:05 AM CST | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2022, 2:05 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 30, 2021, 8:02 AM CDT | 0.29 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Apr 4, 2021, 6:00 PM CDT | 0.41 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2020, 5:00 PM CST | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (9)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2022, 1:00 AM CDT | 1.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2020, 1:00 AM CST | 0.23 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2015, 9:08 AM CST | 0.33 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 21, 2013, 9:14 AM CST | 0.33 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 23, 2012, 9:19 AM CDT | 0.83 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 9, 2011, 9:40 AM CST | 1.39 | 2.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 1, 2011, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.74 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2009, 11:54 AM CST | 1.46 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 29, 2008, 5:01 PM CDT | 0.56 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (1)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2010 | 0.63 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:14 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:27 AM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:53 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:16 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:11 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:21 AM CDT | 0.001 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:34 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:04 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:58 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:06 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:01 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:13 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:22 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:43 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 26, 2026, 5:53 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 24, 2026, 9:38 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:59 AM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:40 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:39 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:41 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:11 PM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:43 AM CDT | 0.001 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:23 AM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:03 AM CDT | 0.005 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:34 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 20, 2026, 7:14 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 12:04 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:21 PM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:01 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 5:23 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 10:05 PM CDT | 0.001 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 6:08 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 11:34 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 5:15 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 1:48 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 6:13 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 11:09 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 29, 2026, 7:26 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 25, 2026, 10:29 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 24, 2026, 6:42 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:29 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:14 PM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:43 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 12:48 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 3:42 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 18, 2026, 5:51 AM CDT | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 10:40 PM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 8:51 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 9:53 AM CST | 0.009 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 11:06 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 12:34 AM CST | 0.011 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2026, 10:21 PM CST | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 7:40 AM CST | 0.026 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 1, 2026, 10:35 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2026, 11:38 PM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2026, 11:51 PM CST | 0.018 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2025, 9:15 PM CST | 0.004 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2025, 5:15 PM CST | 0.009 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 2:50 PM CST | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2025, 1:48 PM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:26 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 0.005 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:18 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 9:22 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 2:33 AM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2026, 2:04 AM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 12:34 AM CST | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2025, 1:24 AM CST | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2025, 1:25 PM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 4:59 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2025, 12:58 AM CDT | 0.011 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 10, 2025, 1:59 PM CDT | 0.005 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 24, 2025, 5:31 PM CDT | 0.009 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 18, 2025, 3:16 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2025, 11:08 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2025, 1:05 AM CDT | 0.007 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2025, 4:09 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2025, 3:19 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Mar 20, 2025, 2:09 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2025, 2:58 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2026, 9:14 PM CST | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2026, 8:01 AM CST | 0.024 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2025, 6:08 AM CDT | 0.022 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2025, 11:11 PM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2025, 3:40 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 15, 2025, 6:28 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 14, 2025, 1:56 PM CDT | 0.026 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 4, 2025, 9:48 AM CDT | 0.034 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2024, 1:34 PM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2024, 6:30 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 24, 2024, 10:05 AM CDT | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2024, 10:39 AM CST | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 28, 2024, 7:37 PM CST | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2023, 12:17 AM CST | — | — | Open |
| Oct 19, 2023, 1:56 PM CDT | 0.017 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Jun 28, 2023, 11:21 AM CDT | 0.014 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 4, 2023, 11:15 AM CDT | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2023, 11:22 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Oct 7, 2022, 4:22 AM CDT | 0.014 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2021, 11:09 PM CDT | 0.03 | 2.40R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2021, 7:21 AM CDT | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 2, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 30, 2016, 1:04 AM CDT | 0.018 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2016, 2:56 AM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2010, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.051 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Mar 8, 2009, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.025 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Inverted Hammer Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2017 | 0.032 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 23, 2011 | 0.031 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample backtest
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.