Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Hammer
Single-candle reversal trigger after a downtrend, with a small body and a long lower wick.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.6%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.1% for a random long entry (+4.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 43.6% of the time vs 39.1% for a random long entry — a 4.5-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.6% | 39.1% | +4.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.4% | 28.4% | +2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.0% | 21.4% | +0.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.2% | 60.6% | -4.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 0.4% | -0.1 |
45,592 occurrences · 4,597,496 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random long entry (+6.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.78×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.9% of the time vs 38.5% for a random long entry — a 6.4-point gap, wider than the ±1.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.9% | 38.5% | +6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.9% | 28.0% | +2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.5% | 21.1% | +1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.7% | 61.0% | -6.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 0.5% | -0.1 |
6,760 occurrences · 1,111,823 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random long entry (+7.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.2% of the time vs 38.5% for a random long entry — a 7.7-point gap, wider than the ±2.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.2% | 38.5% | +7.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.7% | 27.9% | +1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.6% | 21.1% | -0.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.4% | 60.7% | -7.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 0.8% | -0.4 |
1,253 occurrences · 387,556 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random long entry (+10.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 49.1% of the time vs 38.7% for a random long entry — a 10.4-point gap, wider than the ±4.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.1% | 38.7% | +10.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.0% | 28.0% | +3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.1% | 21.1% | +0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.4% | 60.2% | -10.9 |
| Went sideways | 1.5% | 1.1% | +0.4 |
462 occurrences · 195,777 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
51.5%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.3% for a random long entry (+12.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.35R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 12.2-point gap over the 39.3% random-entry rate clears the ±8.3-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 51.5% | 39.3% | +12.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.1% | 28.6% | +5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.5% | 21.8% | +4.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.2% | 59.9% | -13.7 |
| Went sideways | 2.3% | 0.8% | +1.5 |
132 occurrences · 97,670 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.5% for a random long entry (+1.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.42×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.2% of the time vs 39.5% for a random long entry. The 1.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 17 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.2% | 39.5% | +1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 35.3% | 29.4% | +5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 29.4% | 22.6% | +6.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.8% | 60.2% | -1.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.3% | -0.3 |
17 occurrences · 22,415 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+9.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.56×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.81R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry. The 9.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 41.0% | +9.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 30.2% | -30.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 23.2% | -23.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 58.6% | -8.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
2 occurrences · 4,703 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 34.1% for a random long entry (+2.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.85R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.81R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 36.3% of the time vs 34.1% for a random long entry — a 2.2-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.3% | 34.1% | +2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 23.5% | 23.1% | +0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.8% | 16.2% | -0.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.5% | 65.5% | -2.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.2% | 0.4% | -0.2 |
44,668 occurrences · 4,380,249 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 35.6% for a random long entry (+3.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.82×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.97R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.90R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 39.1% of the time vs 35.6% for a random long entry — a 3.6-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.1% | 35.6% | +3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.7% | 25.0% | +0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.6% | 18.2% | -0.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.6% | 63.9% | -3.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 0.5% | -0.2 |
7,572 occurrences · 1,105,353 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.6% for a random long entry (+8.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.94R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.7% of the time vs 36.6% for a random long entry — a 8.1-point gap, wider than the ±2.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.7% | 36.6% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.3% | 26.0% | +3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.4% | 19.1% | +1.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.8% | 62.7% | -8.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 0.7% | -0.2 |
1,763 occurrences · 395,627 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.1% for a random long entry (+7.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.83×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.96R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.2% of the time vs 37.1% for a random long entry — a 7.0-point gap, wider than the ±3.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.2% | 37.1% | +7.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.2% | 26.3% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.1% | 19.4% | +0.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.8% | 61.9% | -7.1 |
| Went sideways | 1.0% | 1.0% | +0.0 |
611 occurrences · 202,342 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.9% for a random long entry (+8.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.4% of the time vs 37.9% for a random long entry — a 8.5-point gap, wider than the ±6.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.4% | 37.9% | +8.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.9% | 27.1% | +2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.2% | 20.3% | +2.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.6% | 61.4% | -7.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.8% | -0.8 |
194 occurrences · 101,684 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (30). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random long entry (+11.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.32R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 38.9% for a random long entry. The 11.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 30 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 38.9% | +11.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.0% | 29.0% | +11.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 30.0% | 22.3% | +7.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 60.7% | -10.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
30 occurrences · 23,174 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
75.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random long entry (+35.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.92R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 75.0% of the time vs 39.8% for a random long entry. The 35.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 75.0% | 39.8% | +35.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 28.9% | +21.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 21.5% | +3.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 25.0% | 59.7% | -34.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
4 occurrences · 4,705 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.0% for a random long entry (+1.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.99R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.96R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 38.7% of the time vs 37.0% for a random long entry — a 1.7-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.7% | 37.0% | +1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.5% | 26.4% | +0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.9% | 19.5% | -0.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.8% | 62.5% | -1.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 0.5% | +0.0 |
61,170 occurrences · 4,633,531 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.4% for a random long entry (+7.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.88×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.98R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.4% of the time vs 37.4% for a random long entry — a 7.0-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.4% | 37.4% | +7.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.0% | 26.8% | +2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.1% | 20.0% | +0.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.8% | 62.2% | -7.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.8% | 0.5% | +0.3 |
7,882 occurrences · 1,155,933 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.9% for a random long entry (+6.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.5% of the time vs 37.9% for a random long entry — a 6.6-point gap, wider than the ±2.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.5% | 37.9% | +6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.2% | 27.1% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.0% | 20.3% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.7% | 61.5% | -6.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.8% | 0.6% | +0.2 |
1,491 occurrences · 405,654 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random long entry (+12.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.31R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 50.5% of the time vs 38.3% for a random long entry — a 12.2-point gap, wider than the ±4.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.5% | 38.3% | +12.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.6% | 27.5% | +5.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.0% | 20.7% | +2.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.1% | 60.9% | -11.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 0.8% | -0.4 |
487 occurrences · 205,346 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.8% for a random long entry (+5.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.8% of the time vs 38.8% for a random long entry. The 5.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 162 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.8% | 38.8% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.9% | 28.1% | -2.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.1% | 21.3% | -2.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.2% | 60.5% | -4.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.7% | -0.7 |
162 occurrences · 102,369 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.9%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.3% for a random long entry (-0.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.85R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.9% of the time vs 39.3% for a random long entry. The 0.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 18 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 18 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.9% | 39.3% | -0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 11.1% | 29.4% | -18.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 5.6% | 22.6% | -17.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 55.6% | 60.2% | -4.7 |
| Went sideways | 5.6% | 0.4% | +5.1 |
18 occurrences · 23,287 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.0% for a random long entry (+8.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.50R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 42.0% for a random long entry. The 8.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±68.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 42.0% | +8.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 32.3% | +17.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 25.0% | +25.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 57.6% | -7.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.3% | -0.3 |
2 occurrences · 4,705 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
39.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.3% for a random long entry (+2.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.94R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 39.2% of the time vs 36.3% for a random long entry — a 2.9-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 39.2% | 36.3% | +2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.9% | 25.7% | +1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 19.0% | +0.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.5% | 63.2% | -2.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 0.5% | -0.2 |
52,483 occurrences · 4,420,716 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.6%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.1% for a random long entry (+4.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.98R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 41.6% of the time vs 37.1% for a random long entry — a 4.5-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.6% | 37.1% | +4.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.8% | 26.8% | +1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 20.1% | -0.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.1% | 62.3% | -4.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 0.6% | -0.2 |
7,905 occurrences · 1,124,663 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.6% for a random long entry (+7.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.84×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.19R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.0% of the time vs 37.6% for a random long entry — a 7.4-point gap, wider than the ±2.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.0% | 37.6% | +7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.6% | 27.1% | +3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.4% | 20.4% | +1.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.6% | 61.7% | -7.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 0.7% | -0.4 |
1,413 occurrences · 396,881 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.8% for a random long entry (+11.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.32R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 49.3% of the time vs 37.8% for a random long entry — a 11.5-point gap, wider than the ±4.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.3% | 37.8% | +11.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.5% | 27.3% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.4% | 20.6% | +4.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.1% | 61.2% | -11.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.6% | 1.0% | -0.4 |
469 occurrences · 201,180 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random long entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 45.6% of the time vs 38.3% for a random long entry. The 7.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 160 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.6% | 38.3% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.1% | 27.8% | +5.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.9% | 21.2% | +0.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.8% | 61.1% | -7.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.6% | 0.7% | -0.0 |
160 occurrences · 100,442 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
56.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.2% for a random long entry (+19.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.47R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 56.3% of the time vs 37.2% for a random long entry. The 19.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 16 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 16 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 56.3% | 37.2% | +19.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 37.5% | 27.8% | +9.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 37.5% | 21.5% | +16.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.8% | 62.5% | -18.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.3% | -0.3 |
16 occurrences · 23,050 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.3% for a random long entry (+10.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.80×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 39.3% for a random long entry. The 10.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 39.3% | +10.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 50.0% | 29.0% | +21.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 50.0% | 21.8% | +28.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 60.6% | -10.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.1% | -0.1 |
2 occurrences · 4,699 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.2% for a random long entry (+1.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.14×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.94R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 38.2% of the time vs 36.2% for a random long entry — a 1.9-point gap, wider than the ±0.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.2% | 36.2% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.7% | 25.6% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.4% | 19.0% | +0.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.3% | 63.1% | -1.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 0.7% | -0.2 |
38,652 occurrences · 2,714,859 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.6% for a random long entry (+1.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.96R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.6% of the time vs 36.6% for a random long entry. The 1.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±1.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 8,566 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.6% | 36.6% | +1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.0% | 26.4% | -0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.3% | 19.9% | -1.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.9% | 62.7% | -0.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 0.6% | -0.1 |
8,566 occurrences · 838,962 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.0% for a random long entry (+5.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.98R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 42.2% of the time vs 37.0% for a random long entry — a 5.2-point gap, wider than the ±2.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.2% | 37.0% | +5.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.7% | 26.8% | +2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 20.2% | -0.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.5% | 62.2% | -4.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.3% | 0.7% | -0.4 |
1,862 occurrences · 307,162 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.3% for a random long entry (+3.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.94×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.1% of the time vs 37.3% for a random long entry. The 3.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 560 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.1% | 37.3% | +3.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.4% | 27.0% | +1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.4% | 20.5% | -0.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.9% | 61.9% | -3.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.8% | -0.8 |
560 occurrences · 157,505 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.6% for a random long entry (+9.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.9% of the time vs 37.6% for a random long entry — a 9.3-point gap, wider than the ±6.6-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.9% | 37.6% | +9.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.9% | 27.5% | +5.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.2% | 21.3% | +1.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.7% | 62.0% | -9.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.5% | 0.5% | -0.0 |
207 occurrences · 79,179 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
54.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.4% for a random long entry (+18.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.77×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.61R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 54.5% of the time vs 36.4% for a random long entry. The 18.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 22 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 22 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 54.5% | 36.4% | +18.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 45.5% | 27.5% | +18.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 31.8% | 21.5% | +10.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 45.5% | 63.2% | -17.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
22 occurrences · 18,449 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 1 bar that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.2% for a random long entry (+2.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.21×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 37.2% for a random long entry. The 2.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±42.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 37.2% | +2.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.0% | 27.9% | -7.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 21.6% | -1.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 62.7% | -2.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.1% | -0.1 |
5 occurrences · 4,678 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish hammer is a single candle that often marks the end of a slide. It has a small body near the top of its range and a long lower wick, at least twice the height of the body. Sellers drove price down inside the bar, then buyers pushed it all the way back, leaving that long tail as the footprint of the rejection.
The hammer is one of the major reversal signals Steve Nison brought to Western markets in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), where a long lower shadow after a decline is read as a classic bottoming clue.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the bar.
- The body is small and sits in the upper part of the candle’s range.
- The lower wick is long, at least twice the height of the body.
- There is little or no upper wick.
- The body can be red or green. The shape matters more than the color.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the hammer on a real occurrence, with the decline before it and the move after.
The psychology
Price is falling into the bar and sellers expect more of the same. Early in the candle they get it: price drops hard, carving out that low. Then it turns. Buyers step in down at the low and lift price all the way back to the top of the range, so the candle closes near where it opened. The long lower wick is the record of that fight, a deep dip that got bought back in full.
What traders read here is a first refusal. Sellers had the room to press lower and could not hold the ground they took. The low has been tested and rejected inside a single bar, which is the earliest hint that the people in control may be losing it. Because the body sits high and the tail hangs long, the rejection looks clean rather than hesitant.
A wick like that catches the eye, but a single rejected low is only a hint. Whether it tends to lead anywhere is what the figures below sort out.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the candle itself. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:12 AM CDT | 9.25 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:54 AM CDT | 19.75 | 2.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:24 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:12 AM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:08 AM CDT | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:59 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:58 AM CDT | 7.25 | 2.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:13 AM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:13 AM CDT | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:57 PM CDT | 2.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:48 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:34 PM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:41 AM CDT | 9.75 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 9:27 PM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:04 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 5:49 PM CDT | 1.25 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:37 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:28 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 9:23 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:51 PM CDT | 16 | 0.69R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:40 AM CDT | 18.5 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:45 PM CDT | 13.5 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:55 AM CDT | 10.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2026, 6:45 PM CDT | 13.5 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 6:25 AM CDT | 13.25 | 2.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:35 PM CDT | 9.25 | 2.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2026, 11:45 PM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 9:55 AM CDT | 66.5 | 1.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 10:05 AM CDT | 25.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 5:40 AM CDT | 14.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 9:15 PM CDT | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 11:15 AM CDT | 49.5 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 4:20 AM CDT | 21.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2026, 3:45 AM CDT | 21 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 12:10 AM CDT | 13.75 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 11:32 PM CDT | 10.75 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 9:15 PM CDT | 11.75 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 4:55 AM CST | 17 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 5:35 PM CST | 18.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 11:55 PM CST | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 38.5 | 2.47R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 28.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 1:45 AM CST | 32 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2026, 9:30 PM CST | 33 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2026, 11:30 AM CST | 31.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026, 7:30 PM CST | 13.75 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2025, 10:00 PM CST | 8.25 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2025, 5:30 AM CST | 54.25 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2025, 10:45 AM CDT | 57 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2025, 1:00 PM CDT | 79 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2025, 8:15 PM CDT | 8.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2025, 12:45 AM CDT | 9.5 | 1.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 20, 2025, 10:15 PM CDT | 11 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2025, 11:15 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 27, 2025, 12:45 PM CDT | 40 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Jun 19, 2025, 1:45 AM CDT | 34.5 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2025, 4:32 AM CDT | 13.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2025, 9:20 AM CDT | 47.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 5, 2025, 7:45 PM CDT | 27.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 82 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:30 AM CDT | 49 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 46.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 3:03 AM CDT | 45.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 7:30 AM CDT | 33 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 54.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 11, 2026, 11:30 PM CST | 22.5 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2025, 3:30 AM CST | 28.75 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2025, 7:30 AM CST | 68.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 155.25 | 2.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2025, 5:30 AM CDT | 13.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 22, 2025, 1:31 AM CDT | 73.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 6, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT | 73 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2025, 8:00 AM CDT | 48.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2025, 7:30 PM CDT | 34 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2025, 6:32 PM CDT | 51.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 23.5 | 2.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 10, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 155 | 0.95R | Flat |
| Dec 30, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 31.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2024, 8:00 PM CST | 20.25 | 0.12R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025, 10:00 PM CST | 123.25 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 96 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 15, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 25.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2025, 10:00 AM CST | 123 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2025, 6:01 AM CST | 24 | 1.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 2, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 172 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 58.5 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2024, 1:00 PM CST | 49.25 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2024, 8:00 AM CST | 118.25 | 0.81R | Flat |
| Oct 31, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT | 57.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2024, 10:00 AM CDT | 87.5 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| May 30, 2024, 12:00 AM CDT | 15.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT | 34.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2024, 6:00 PM CST | 22.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2023, 10:00 AM CST | 54.75 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 9, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 36.75 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2023, 3:00 AM CDT | 92.5 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2023, 8:00 PM CST | 16.5 | 2.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 10.5 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2022, 2:00 AM CST | 51.5 | 2.32R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (17)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 525.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 27, 2024, 9:00 AM CST | 135.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 61.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2020, 9:00 AM CDT | 87.5 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2020, 9:26 PM CDT | 296.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2019, 9:00 AM CST | 44 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2019, 5:00 AM CDT | 27.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 12, 2017, 1:39 AM CDT | 31.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2014, 9:02 PM CDT | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 31, 2014, 3:15 AM CDT | 16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 21, 2013, 7:43 AM CDT | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2012, 9:53 PM CDT | 13 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2011, 2:56 AM CDT | 12.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 21, 2010, 10:12 PM CDT | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2010, 9:21 PM CST | 13.5 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2009, 11:07 PM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2009, 2:01 AM CST | 9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023 | 194.75 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2014 | 95 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:55 PM CDT | 1.75 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:38 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:34 AM CDT | 3 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:22 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:56 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:57 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:43 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:07 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:11 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:35 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:42 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:23 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:38 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:04 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:39 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:28 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:50 PM CDT | 2.5 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:35 AM CDT | 2 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:06 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:13 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:51 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:10 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:35 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:05 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:35 PM CDT | 2.5 | 2.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 4:45 AM CDT | 3 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:35 PM CDT | 1.5 | 2.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:40 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 2:15 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 5:35 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 3:25 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 3:05 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:35 PM CDT | 1.75 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 9:40 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 10:35 PM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 8:30 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 5.75 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 3:20 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 5:25 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2026, 4:50 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 3.75 | 0.93R | Flat |
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 9.75 | 2.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2026, 11:30 PM CST | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2025, 8:45 PM CST | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2025, 12:16 PM CST | 4.5 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2025, 11:15 PM CST | 1.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2025, 10:00 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2025, 7:15 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 7:30 AM CST | 4.75 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2025, 10:30 AM CST | 15.25 | 2.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2025, 11:15 AM CST | 19.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2025, 7:15 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 25, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2025, 6:16 AM CDT | 2.75 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2025, 11:15 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2025, 6:45 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2025, 5:15 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.96R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2025, 10:15 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.56R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026, 6:30 AM CST | 11 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 6:30 PM CST | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2026, 11:30 PM CST | 4.25 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2025, 3:30 AM CST | 4.75 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 1.75 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2025, 10:30 AM CST | 14.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 7:30 AM CST | 13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 3:02 PM CDT | 2 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2025, 12:30 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 3, 2025, 12:30 AM CDT | 3.75 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 2, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 17 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 14, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2025, 10:30 PM CDT | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 3, 2025, 5:30 AM CST | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 23, 2024, 7:00 PM CST | 4 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2024, 1:34 AM CST | 3 | 0.17R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 39 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 22.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 2, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 4.5 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2025, 1:00 PM CDT | 16 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 7, 2025, 12:00 AM CST | 6.25 | 1.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 9.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 1, 2024, 11:02 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Jun 20, 2024, 9:07 AM CDT | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT | 1.75 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2024, 5:05 AM CST | 4.75 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Feb 7, 2024, 12:00 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2024, 7:00 PM CST | 2 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 18, 2023, 7:00 PM CST | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2023, 8:00 PM CDT | 4 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Aug 1, 2023, 4:00 AM CDT | 3.5 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 9, 2023, 1:02 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 1.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2023, 1:00 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 155.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2024, 9:01 AM CDT | 20.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 28, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT | 15.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2022, 9:00 AM CST | 105.25 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 16, 2021, 9:00 AM CDT | 27.25 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2021, 9:02 AM CDT | 18.75 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2020, 5:00 AM CST | 17.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 27, 2018, 9:00 PM CST | 6.75 | 2.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 7, 2017, 5:05 AM CST | 5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 12, 2017, 5:33 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2017, 1:12 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2017, 9:01 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 9, 2017, 9:02 PM CST | 2.75 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 16, 2016, 9:01 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 3, 2016, 9:03 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 26, 2014, 5:00 PM CST | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2013, 9:06 PM CST | 8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2013, 5:16 AM CST | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2012, 9:17 PM CST | 3.75 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2012, 9:02 PM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | 75.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2023 | 73.5 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 6, 2018 | 73.75 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2017 | 9.25 | 1.92R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:43 PM CDT | 0.8 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:54 AM CDT | 4.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:07 AM CDT | 2.6 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:21 AM CDT | 1.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:53 AM CDT | 2 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:35 AM CDT | 2.3 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:01 AM CDT | 0.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:26 PM CDT | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:36 PM CDT | 2.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:23 PM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:21 PM CDT | 1.2 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:40 PM CDT | 2.6 | 2.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:06 PM CDT | 2.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:52 PM CDT | 2.1 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:12 PM CDT | 0.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:51 PM CDT | 1.1 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:54 PM CDT | 2.1 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:45 PM CDT | 0.9 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:17 PM CDT | 0.9 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:36 AM CDT | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:46 PM CDT | 2.2 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 8:16 PM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:11 AM CDT | 4 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 5.2 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 3.3 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 10:37 PM CDT | 1.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 10:27 PM CDT | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 3:11 PM CDT | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 11:31 AM CDT | 8.9 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 3:11 PM CDT | 2 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 12:51 PM CDT | 4.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 10:31 AM CDT | 12.4 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:26 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 10:15 PM CDT | 3.4 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 4:35 AM CDT | 5.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 8:17 AM CDT | 4.8 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 2:11 AM CDT | 5.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 3:20 PM CDT | 2.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2026, 12:10 PM CDT | 5.8 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 7:35 PM CDT | 6.5 | 0.83R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:02 AM CDT | 7.6 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2026, 6:45 PM CDT | 19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 11:16 PM CDT | 3.6 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 8:15 PM CDT | 16.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 10.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 1:09 PM CDT | 8.7 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 12:23 AM CDT | 10.5 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2026, 7:00 PM CST | 25.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 9:16 PM CST | 8.4 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2026, 12:19 PM CST | 6.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 4:48 AM CST | 11.2 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 16, 2026, 7:37 AM CST | 8.1 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2026, 11:00 AM CST | 10.3 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2025, 11:00 PM CST | 5.4 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2025, 5:45 AM CST | 7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 3.4 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2025, 2:30 PM CST | 5.1 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Nov 20, 2025, 5:15 AM CST | 5.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2025, 1:00 PM CST | 8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2025, 12:00 PM CDT | 8.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:01 AM CDT | 15.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 1:39 AM CDT | 7.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2026, 11:00 PM CST | 10.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2026, 2:30 PM CST | 16.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 6:00 AM CST | 13.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2025, 10:30 AM CST | 26.8 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2025, 7:00 PM CST | 30.9 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Oct 31, 2025, 2:30 PM CDT | 6.2 | 0.97R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2025, 8:37 PM CDT | 6.5 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 26, 2024, 1:30 AM CST | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2024, 8:30 PM CST | 5.7 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2024, 7:35 PM CDT | 1.2 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2024, 3:05 PM CDT | 1.4 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2024, 5:30 AM CDT | 5 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 12, 2024, 2:06 AM CDT | 3.7 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 18, 2024, 12:04 AM CDT | 2.1 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 29, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 15, 2024, 1:32 PM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 12.6 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 7.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 2:45 PM CST | 24.6 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 21, 2026, 11:00 AM CST | 24.4 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2025, 7:00 PM CST | 36.1 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2025, 6:00 PM CST | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT | 67.4 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 21, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2024, 11:05 PM CDT | 4.2 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 22, 2024, 9:02 AM CDT | 12.8 | 1.47R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 26, 2024, 1:10 AM CDT | 5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 12, 2024, 2:06 AM CDT | 5.2 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2024, 10:00 PM CDT | 9.1 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Feb 29, 2024, 6:00 PM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2024, 2:00 PM CST | 1.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 17, 2024, 12:03 PM CST | 4.4 | 2.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 5, 2023, 11:01 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2023, 11:00 PM CST | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2022, 5:00 AM CST | 3.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (18)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2025, 1:01 AM CDT | 15.8 | 1.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 13, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 3.8 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2022, 9:00 PM CST | 6.2 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2022, 9:04 PM CDT | 4.9 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2022, 9:01 PM CDT | 3.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 58.5 | 0.40R | Flat |
| Aug 27, 2020, 9:00 AM CDT | 22.6 | 2.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2019, 1:01 AM CDT | 3.3 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2016, 1:00 AM CST | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2015, 1:19 AM CST | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2015, 9:10 AM CST | 7 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 21, 2015, 5:00 PM CST | 3.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2014, 5:04 AM CDT | 7.9 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 17, 2013, 1:14 AM CDT | 10.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 26, 2012, 5:00 PM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 21, 2010, 5:00 PM CDT | 3.1 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Jun 14, 2009, 5:00 PM CDT | 3.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2009, 2:16 AM CDT | 5.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2022 | 15.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2017 | 11.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:29 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:55 AM CDT | 0.07 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:14 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:02 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:59 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:27 PM CDT | 0.04 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:03 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:34 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:20 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:11 PM CDT | 0.05 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:10 PM CDT | 0.07 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:26 AM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:17 AM CDT | 0.04 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:34 PM CDT | 0.03 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:13 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:12 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:52 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:35 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:18 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:14 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:13 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:18 PM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:28 AM CDT | 0.2 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:08 AM CDT | 0.22 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:50 PM CDT | 0.15 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 10:30 PM CDT | 0.1 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:51 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 0.18 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 6:15 PM CDT | 0.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:49 PM CDT | 0.22 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 7:51 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 7:07 AM CDT | 0.22 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 2:12 AM CDT | 0.35 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 12:52 AM CDT | 0.09 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 7:37 PM CDT | 0.11 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:43 PM CDT | 0.25 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 6:20 PM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 2:45 PM CDT | 2.98 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:10 PM CDT | 0.11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:20 AM CDT | 0.32 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:38 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:36 PM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 6:46 AM CDT | 0.27 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 6:15 PM CDT | 0.23 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.6 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2026, 4:17 AM CST | 0.2 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2026, 6:00 PM CST | 0.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2026, 11:28 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 8:41 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 7:56 PM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 11:11 AM CST | 0.27 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 11:29 PM CST | 0.08 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2026, 7:17 PM CST | 0.14 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2026, 7:02 PM CST | 0.28 | 0.75R | Flat |
| Jan 26, 2026, 8:50 AM CST | 0.3 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 11:11 PM CST | 0.06 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2026, 10:07 PM CST | 0.07 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2026, 4:18 AM CST | 0.11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2026, 12:15 AM CST | 0.06 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 6, 2026, 2:10 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026, 6:13 AM CST | 0.38 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 5:01 AM CST | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 21, 2026, 5:32 PM CST | 0.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 14, 2026, 12:51 AM CST | 0.15 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2025, 1:16 AM CST | 0.08 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 11, 2025, 1:17 AM CST | 0.14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 20, 2025, 10:35 PM CST | 0.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.07 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2025, 7:47 PM CST | 0.14 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2025, 5:33 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Oct 30, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 7:04 PM CDT | 0.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2025, 6:37 AM CDT | 0.34 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 3, 2025, 7:27 AM CDT | 0.22 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 2, 2025, 11:13 AM CDT | 0.23 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Sep 25, 2025, 10:50 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2025, 9:30 PM CDT | 0.04 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 10, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Sep 4, 2025, 3:01 PM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 2, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.12 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 5.41 | 0.34R | Flat |
| Mar 29, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 0.39 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 29, 2025, 6:04 PM CST | 0.17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2025, 12:11 AM CST | 0.11 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2025, 8:17 PM CST | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 30, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2025, 12:14 PM CDT | 0.16 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2025, 1:41 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2025, 7:54 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 4, 2025, 6:27 PM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 1.44 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2025, 8:38 PM CDT | 0.15 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2025, 10:03 PM CDT | 0.16 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 27, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2025, 10:13 PM CST | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2025, 10:47 PM CST | 0.07 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2024, 2:49 PM CST | 0.18 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 27, 2024, 11:00 PM CDT | 0.15 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2024, 12:21 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.27 | 0.37R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (16)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.27 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 26, 2023, 5:07 AM CDT | 1.5 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 28, 2019, 1:03 AM CST | 0.26 | 1.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2019, 9:03 AM CDT | 0.51 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 30, 2019, 9:01 PM CDT | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 4, 2018, 9:00 PM CDT | 0.19 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 6, 2018, 9:04 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2018, 9:00 AM CDT | 0.5 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2017, 9:05 AM CST | 0.46 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2014, 9:19 PM CST | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 22, 2013, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.32 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2011, 4:21 AM CDT | 0.83 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2010, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.27 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 20, 2009, 9:56 PM CDT | 0.53 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 27, 2008, 11:26 PM CST | 0.48 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2008, 7:24 AM CST | 1.38 | 0.97R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025 | 1.87 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2009 | 1.17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:58 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:06 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:07 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:23 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:47 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:22 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:08 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:03 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:59 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:33 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:26 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:09 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:49 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:17 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:59 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:37 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:10 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:34 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:17 PM CDT | — | — | Open |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:24 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:02 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:44 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:41 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:19 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:12 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:12 PM CDT | 0.001 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:07 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 10:11 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 8:42 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:43 AM CDT | — | — | Open |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:09 PM CDT | 0.004 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:38 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:53 PM CDT | 0.011 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:48 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:18 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:58 AM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:58 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:14 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:29 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:26 AM CDT | 0.015 | 1.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:49 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:18 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:51 AM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:32 AM CDT | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 12:19 PM CDT | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2026, 7:59 PM CDT | 0.005 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2026, 8:03 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 3:26 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 2:41 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 12:03 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 8:17 PM CDT | 0.026 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 4:44 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2026, 9:50 PM CST | 0.007 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 6:53 PM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2026, 9:04 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 15, 2026, 10:37 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Feb 9, 2026, 7:36 PM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 8:12 PM CST | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2026, 9:19 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.30R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:28 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:12 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 1:14 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 5:41 AM CDT | 0.018 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 4:23 AM CST | 0.027 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 9:02 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 7:06 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2026, 7:48 PM CST | 0.013 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Nov 16, 2025, 7:02 PM CST | 0.015 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2025, 2:02 AM CST | 0.009 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 24, 2025, 12:26 PM CDT | 0.012 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2025, 2:08 PM CDT | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 4, 2025, 9:34 AM CDT | 0.031 | 2.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 3, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.012 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 1, 2025, 1:54 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2025, 6:39 AM CDT | 0.017 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 15, 2025, 11:36 AM CDT | 0.027 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Aug 1, 2025, 4:16 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2025, 12:17 PM CDT | 0.011 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jul 18, 2025, 11:02 AM CDT | 0.034 | 0.35R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026, 2:51 PM CDT | 0.009 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 12:32 AM CDT | 0.019 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2026, 6:07 PM CST | 0.027 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2026, 8:04 PM CST | 0.009 | 1.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2025, 1:36 AM CDT | 0.016 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2025, 1:32 PM CDT | 0.009 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2025, 1:01 PM CDT | 0.02 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 3, 2025, 8:36 PM CDT | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 24, 2025, 3:02 AM CDT | 0.013 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2025, 8:58 AM CST | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2024, 12:13 AM CST | 0.019 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 26, 2024, 7:26 PM CST | 0.018 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2024, 8:50 PM CST | 0.011 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Nov 3, 2024, 6:02 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2024, 7:05 PM CDT | 0.009 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2024, 6:34 AM CDT | 0.024 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2024, 10:11 AM CDT | 0.016 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2024, 1:29 AM CDT | 0.01 | 2.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 21, 2024, 11:09 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.011 | 2.09R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026, 11:38 PM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 3, 2025, 11:19 PM CDT | 0.031 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2020, 5:00 PM CST | 0.036 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 27, 2020, 9:04 PM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 28, 2020, 1:29 AM CST | 0.056 | 2.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2019, 12:39 AM CDT | 0.016 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2019, 1:16 AM CST | 0.017 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 29, 2017, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.025 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2016, 5:00 PM CST | 0.032 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Aug 14, 2015, 2:08 AM CDT | 0.026 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Jun 7, 2015, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.013 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2015, 5:00 PM CST | 0.037 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2014, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.018 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2013, 4:08 AM CST | 0.024 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Jun 11, 2013, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.012 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2013, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.045 | 1.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 19, 2012, 5:58 AM CST | 0.049 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2012, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2011, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.031 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2010, 10:49 AM CDT | 0.052 | 0.81R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Hammer Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2023 | 0.149 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2020 | 0.11 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Mar 8, 2010 | 0.116 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2009 | 0.104 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2008 | 0.119 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample backtest
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.