Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Squeeze Alert
Three-candle bottom: each candle's range tucked inside the last, a tightening coil read as a wind-up before a bounce.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.2% for a random long entry (+4.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.29×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.1% of the time vs 43.2% for a random long entry — a 4.9-point gap, wider than the ±1.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.1% | 43.2% | +4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.8% | 27.6% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.1% | 18.7% | +2.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.3% | 53.8% | -3.5 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 3.0% | -1.3 |
3,159 occurrences · 5,355,470 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (+3.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.5% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry — a 3.7-point gap, wider than the ±3.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.5% | 42.8% | +3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.2% | 27.3% | +3.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.1% | 18.5% | +2.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.1% | 53.6% | -2.5 |
| Went sideways | 2.4% | 3.6% | -1.2 |
940 occurrences · 1,165,570 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
51.5%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.6% for a random long entry (+8.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.31R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 8.9-point gap over the 42.6% random-entry rate clears the ±4.8-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 51.5% | 42.6% | +8.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.5% | 27.2% | +5.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 18.7% | +0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 44.8% | 52.8% | -8.0 |
| Went sideways | 3.7% | 4.6% | -0.9 |
406 occurrences · 396,076 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (+6.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 49.2% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry — a 6.8-point gap, wider than the ±6.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.2% | 42.4% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.7% | 27.2% | +2.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 18.8% | +0.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.2% | 51.9% | -4.8 |
| Went sideways | 3.7% | 5.7% | -2.0 |
246 occurrences · 198,429 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
54.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (+10.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.39R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 54.2% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry — a 10.9-point gap, wider than the ±7.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 54.2% | 43.3% | +10.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 37.4% | 28.1% | +9.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.6% | 19.6% | +3.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 44.5% | 52.4% | -7.9 |
| Went sideways | 1.3% | 4.3% | -3.0 |
155 occurrences · 98,520 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (37). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
59.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.2% for a random long entry (+15.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.32R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.15R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 59.5% of the time vs 44.2% for a random long entry. The 15.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 37 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 59.5% | 44.2% | +15.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.0% | 28.2% | -1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.9% | 19.1% | -0.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.5% | 52.4% | -11.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.3% | -3.3 |
37 occurrences · 22,501 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
60.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 46.7% for a random long entry (+13.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.59R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.17R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 46.7% for a random long entry. The 13.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 60.0% | 46.7% | +13.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.0% | 27.8% | +12.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 40.0% | 17.6% | +22.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 50.3% | -10.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.0% | -3.0 |
5 occurrences · 4,707 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.0% for a random long entry (+8.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.93R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.1% of the time vs 40.0% for a random long entry — a 8.1-point gap, wider than the ±3.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.1% | 40.0% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.4% | 23.7% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.3% | 14.9% | +4.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.0% | 57.1% | -8.1 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 2.8% | +0.0 |
667 occurrences · 5,247,372 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+8.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.61×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 49.2% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry — a 8.1-point gap, wider than the ±5.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.2% | 41.0% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.2% | 25.2% | +6.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.2% | 16.5% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.8% | 55.6% | -7.8 |
| Went sideways | 3.0% | 3.4% | -0.4 |
362 occurrences · 1,189,766 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+8.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 49.3% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry — a 8.0-point gap, wider than the ±6.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.3% | 41.3% | +8.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.6% | 25.8% | +4.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.3% | 17.2% | +1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.8% | 54.4% | -10.6 |
| Went sideways | 6.8% | 4.3% | +2.6 |
219 occurrences · 411,225 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.8% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry. The 7.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 160 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.8% | 41.4% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.6% | 25.9% | -0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.4% | 17.6% | -3.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.5% | 53.4% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 3.8% | 5.2% | -1.5 |
160 occurrences · 207,386 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (99). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (+8.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.22×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.30R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.5% of the time vs 42.4% for a random long entry. The 8.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 99 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.5% | 42.4% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.3% | 26.8% | +3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.2% | 18.2% | +4.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.5% | 53.3% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 2.0% | 4.2% | -2.2 |
99 occurrences · 103,338 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (30). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.7% for a random long entry (+6.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.14×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.36R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 43.7% for a random long entry. The 6.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 30 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 43.7% | +6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 28.0% | +5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 30.0% | 18.7% | +11.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 52.9% | -2.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.4% | -3.4 |
30 occurrences · 23,340 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
66.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.9% for a random long entry (+21.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.78×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.74R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 44.9% for a random long entry. The 21.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±56.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 3 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 3 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 66.7% | 44.9% | +21.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 66.7% | 26.2% | +40.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 15.8% | +17.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 33.3% | 51.3% | -17.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 3.8% | -3.8 |
3 occurrences · 4,709 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+6.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.62×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.2% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry — a 6.9-point gap, wider than the ±2.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.2% | 41.3% | +6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.0% | 26.0% | +4.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.3% | 17.4% | +0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.0% | 55.6% | -8.5 |
| Went sideways | 4.8% | 3.2% | +1.6 |
2,141 occurrences · 5,537,711 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.6%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+5.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.32×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.6% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry — a 5.8-point gap, wider than the ±3.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.6% | 41.8% | +5.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.4% | 26.4% | +2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.3% | 17.9% | +1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.7% | 54.7% | -7.0 |
| Went sideways | 4.7% | 3.5% | +1.2 |
975 occurrences · 1,222,042 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.1%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.2% for a random long entry (+6.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.26×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.27R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 6.9-point gap over the 42.2% random-entry rate clears the ±4.3-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.1% | 42.2% | +6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.6% | 26.8% | +4.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.2% | 18.3% | +1.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.8% | 53.7% | -7.0 |
| Went sideways | 4.1% | 4.1% | +0.1 |
509 occurrences · 416,275 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.7%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.4% for a random long entry (+6.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 6.3-point gap over the 42.4% random-entry rate clears the ±5.4-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.7% | 42.4% | +6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.1% | 27.1% | +2.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.7% | 18.7% | -0.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 44.6% | 53.0% | -8.3 |
| Went sideways | 6.6% | 4.6% | +2.1 |
316 occurrences · 208,504 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.3% for a random long entry (+3.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.09×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.7% of the time vs 43.3% for a random long entry. The 3.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 214 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 43.3% | +3.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.1% | 28.1% | -1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.7% | 19.4% | -0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.9% | 52.9% | -1.1 |
| Went sideways | 1.4% | 3.7% | -2.3 |
214 occurrences · 103,337 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (69). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.0% for a random long entry (+0.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.09×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.17R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.9% of the time vs 44.0% for a random long entry. The 0.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 69 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.9% | 44.0% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.1% | 29.2% | -3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.5% | 20.6% | -6.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 55.1% | 53.1% | +2.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
69 occurrences · 23,350 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
57.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.3% for a random long entry (+9.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.15×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.79R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.25R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 57.1% of the time vs 47.3% for a random long entry. The 9.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±37.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 7 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 7 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 57.1% | 47.3% | +9.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 32.1% | +10.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 42.9% | 22.5% | +20.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 50.0% | -7.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.7% | -2.7 |
7 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (+6.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.62×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.7% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry — a 6.7-point gap, wider than the ±2.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.7% | 40.9% | +6.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.9% | 25.7% | +4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.8% | 17.3% | +3.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.1% | 55.9% | -5.8 |
| Went sideways | 2.3% | 3.2% | -0.9 |
1,804 occurrences · 5,363,489 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+6.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.42×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.5% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry — a 6.8-point gap, wider than the ±3.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.5% | 41.7% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.7% | 26.6% | +2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.9% | 18.1% | +0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.7% | 54.8% | -7.1 |
| Went sideways | 3.7% | 3.5% | +0.3 |
855 occurrences · 1,195,070 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
51.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random long entry (+9.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.32R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 51.2% of the time vs 41.9% for a random long entry — a 9.3-point gap, wider than the ±5.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 51.2% | 41.9% | +9.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.0% | 26.9% | +6.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.6% | 18.5% | +3.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.0% | 53.9% | -7.9 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 4.2% | -1.4 |
361 occurrences · 408,147 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
55.4%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+13.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.37R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 13.7-point gap over the 41.7% random-entry rate clears the ±5.6-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 55.4% | 41.7% | +13.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.4% | 26.7% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.9% | 18.5% | +2.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.2% | 53.2% | -13.0 |
| Went sideways | 4.4% | 5.1% | -0.7 |
296 occurrences · 204,708 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+10.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.37R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 52.9% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry — a 10.6-point gap, wider than the ±7.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.9% | 42.3% | +10.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 35.1% | 27.4% | +7.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.1% | 19.1% | +5.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 44.3% | 54.1% | -9.8 |
| Went sideways | 2.9% | 3.7% | -0.8 |
174 occurrences · 101,426 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (61). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
34.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.8% for a random long entry (-8.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.91R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 34.4% of the time vs 42.8% for a random long entry. The 8.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 61 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 34.4% | 42.8% | -8.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 18.0% | 27.8% | -9.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.8% | 18.9% | -4.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.9% | 54.8% | +9.2 |
| Went sideways | 1.6% | 2.4% | -0.8 |
61 occurrences · 23,144 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.1% for a random long entry (+5.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.29R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 44.1% for a random long entry. The 5.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 44.1% | +5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 28.3% | +5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 18.7% | +14.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 53.3% | -3.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.6% | -2.6 |
6 occurrences · 4,698 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random long entry (+5.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.64×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.8% of the time vs 40.1% for a random long entry — a 5.7-point gap, wider than the ±2.6-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.8% | 40.1% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.7% | 25.3% | +4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.4% | 17.2% | +1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.9% | 56.5% | -6.6 |
| Went sideways | 4.3% | 3.5% | +0.8 |
1,395 occurrences · 3,872,511 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random long entry (+6.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.5% of the time vs 41.2% for a random long entry — a 6.3-point gap, wider than the ±3.9-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.5% | 41.2% | +6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.2% | 26.5% | +3.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 18.2% | +1.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.5% | 55.2% | -6.7 |
| Went sideways | 4.0% | 3.6% | +0.4 |
625 occurrences · 925,705 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+9.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.09×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 50.8% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry — a 9.5-point gap, wider than the ±5.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.8% | 41.3% | +9.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.1% | 26.6% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.6% | 18.6% | +0.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.7% | 54.6% | -7.9 |
| Went sideways | 2.5% | 4.1% | -1.6 |
317 occurrences · 321,213 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.2% for a random long entry (+6.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.5% of the time vs 41.2% for a random long entry. The 6.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 217 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.5% | 41.2% | +6.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.8% | 26.8% | -1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.4% | 18.9% | -0.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.7% | 54.3% | -3.6 |
| Went sideways | 1.8% | 4.4% | -2.6 |
217 occurrences · 161,929 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+4.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.30R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.2% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 4.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 145 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.2% | 41.7% | +4.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.5% | 27.6% | +6.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.9% | 19.6% | +7.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.1% | 55.3% | -2.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.7% | 3.1% | -2.4 |
145 occurrences · 80,459 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (40). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+3.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 45.0% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 3.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±15.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 40 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.0% | 41.7% | +3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 35.0% | 28.0% | +7.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.0% | 19.8% | +0.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.5% | 56.2% | -3.7 |
| Went sideways | 2.5% | 2.1% | +0.4 |
40 occurrences · 18,581 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 3 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (-42.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.72×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry. The 42.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±48.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 4 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 4 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 42.5% | -42.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 28.7% | -28.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.2% | -20.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 55.8% | +44.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
4 occurrences · 4,692 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A squeeze alert is a three-candle bottom built on a tightening range. After a fall, each candle prints a higher low and a lower high than the one before, so the second fits inside the first and the third fits inside the second. The range coils down to a point. That squeeze is the wind-up: the fight between buyers and sellers is narrowing, pressure is building, and the break out of the coil often runs to the upside.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle’s high and low both sit inside the first candle’s range.
- The third candle’s high and low both sit inside the second candle’s range.
- Each bar is narrower than the last, the range coiling tighter toward a point.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the three candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
Price has been falling, and the first down candle carries that selling in. But each bar that follows is narrower than the last, tucked fully inside the range before it. A higher low says sellers can no longer drag price down to fresh lows, and a lower high says buyers cannot yet lift it back up. Neither side wins ground, and the range coils tighter toward a point.
That squeeze is a market holding its breath. The longer this goes on, the less the earlier selling looks like a one-way trend and the more it looks like an even fight that has run out of space to move. Pressure builds as the range narrows, and a coil that tight rarely stays quiet. When it finally breaks, the side that was being held back is released all at once. After a fall, that release often comes to the upside as the sellers, who could no longer make new lows, give way.
A coil tells you a move is coming but not which way it runs, and the numbers below test how often it breaks higher.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the three candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:07 PM CDT | 32.25 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:03 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:43 PM CDT | 7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:37 PM CDT | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 9:04 PM CDT | 2.25 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 8:35 AM CDT | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:11 AM CDT | 23.5 | 0.80R | Flat |
| Apr 21, 2026, 12:33 AM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 10:21 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 3:09 AM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 9:52 PM CDT | 3.5 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 10:44 AM CDT | 23.75 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 9:23 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 4:12 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 5:21 PM CDT | 9.5 | 1.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 12:24 PM CDT | 11.75 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 2:17 AM CDT | 9.75 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 8:59 PM CDT | 1.75 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 3:07 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 12:29 PM CDT | 10.75 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:35 PM CDT | 20.25 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 8.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:55 AM CDT | 52.5 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 7:55 PM CDT | 20.25 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 8:40 AM CDT | 76 | 1.98R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 11:15 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:10 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 5:35 PM CDT | 11.5 | 0.78R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 36 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 4:25 AM CDT | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 8:11 AM CDT | 18 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 7:15 AM CDT | 17.75 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 8, 2026, 9:05 PM CDT | 25.75 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 8:15 AM CST | 15.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 5:50 AM CST | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2026, 2:45 PM CST | 34.25 | 1.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 10, 2026, 1:50 PM CST | 8.25 | 2.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 1, 2026, 8:05 PM CST | 26.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 8:20 AM CST | 16.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2026, 8:55 PM CST | 14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:15 AM CDT | 58 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:45 PM CDT | 34.75 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2026, 3:46 AM CDT | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 9:45 AM CST | 94.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 1:30 AM CST | 44 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2026, 6:45 PM CST | 31.75 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 4:30 AM CST | 43.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2026, 3:15 PM CST | 33 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Feb 5, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 36.25 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Jan 18, 2026, 10:15 PM CST | 25.75 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2026, 3:30 PM CST | 12 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2026, 5:30 PM CST | 35.75 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026, 9:15 PM CST | 10.25 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026, 3:00 PM CST | 13 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 7, 2026, 1:45 PM CST | 12.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2025, 8:00 PM CST | 8.25 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 1:15 PM CST | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2025, 9:30 PM CST | 92.25 | 0.73R | Flat |
| Nov 21, 2025, 3:15 PM CST | 35.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 14.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 47.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 6:30 PM CST | 26.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 4:30 AM CST | 22.75 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2026, 10:00 AM CST | 26.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 8:30 PM CST | 37.25 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 70.5 | 2.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 3, 2025, 1:30 PM CDT | 85.75 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 1, 2025, 2:30 AM CDT | 38.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 14, 2025, 5:30 PM CDT | 25.5 | 2.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 7, 2025, 2:00 PM CDT | 66.25 | 2.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 31, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT | 55.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 18.5 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 30, 2025, 9:30 AM CDT | 27 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 25, 2025, 6:30 AM CDT | 37.25 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 41.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | 26.25 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 108.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2025, 10:30 AM CST | 56.25 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2025, 8:30 PM CST | 37.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2026, 7:00 PM CST | 43.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 18, 2026, 8:00 PM CST | 44.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2026, 3:00 PM CST | 28.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2025, 4:00 AM CST | 14 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2025, 11:00 PM CST | 131 | 2.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 27, 2025, 4:00 AM CST | 24.5 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 33.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 25, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | 27.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 79 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 57 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | 58.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2025, 7:00 PM CST | 21.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2025, 7:00 PM CST | 131.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2024, 11:00 PM CST | 23 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2024, 3:00 PM CST | 41 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2024, 3:00 PM CDT | 60.5 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT | 18.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2023, 11:00 PM CDT | 13.75 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 46.25 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 414 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jul 20, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 99 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 152.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT | 67.75 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 125 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2024, 9:00 PM CST | 42.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 21, 2023, 9:00 PM CST | 40.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 17, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 45.5 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 138 | 2.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 23.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2022, 9:00 PM CST | 86.5 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2022, 9:00 PM CDT | 39.75 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 7, 2022, 1:00 AM CST | 63.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2021, 9:00 PM CST | 96.5 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Jun 15, 2021, 9:01 PM CDT | 10.75 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2021, 9:00 PM CDT | 103 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Jul 8, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 9.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 11, 2019, 9:01 PM CDT | 13.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2018, 9:00 PM CDT | 87.5 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2018, 9:00 PM CDT | 61.75 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2022 | 203 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2019 | 76.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 3, 2016 | 39.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 28, 2012 | 28.75 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 24, 2008 | 11.5 | 0.87R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:27 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:37 AM CDT | 2 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:37 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:46 AM CDT | 4.5 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 5:11 AM CDT | 15.5 | 0.47R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2026, 1:06 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 4:42 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 6:54 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 12:38 AM CDT | 2.5 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 9:10 AM CDT | 2.5 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 10:19 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2026, 5:15 AM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 11:13 AM CDT | 2.75 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 3:16 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 9:56 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 8:17 PM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 2:18 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 11:49 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 9:53 PM CDT | 1.75 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:20 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 11:10 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:15 PM CDT | 1.75 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:55 AM CDT | 15.75 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:15 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 4:25 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 5:05 PM CDT | 5.75 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2026, 1:15 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2026, 6:40 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 6:15 PM CDT | 9.25 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2026, 5:50 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2026, 8:05 PM CST | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 3:40 AM CST | 5.75 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Dec 31, 2025, 3:05 PM CST | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2025, 1:40 PM CST | 4.5 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 9:25 PM CST | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2025, 12:45 AM CST | 4.75 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT | 10 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2025, 3:55 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2025, 9:10 AM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 3.75 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 9:45 AM CST | 23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2026, 1:30 AM CST | 11.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2026, 8:00 AM CST | 11.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2026, 6:45 PM CST | 5 | 2.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 4:30 AM CST | 8.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 7.5 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2026, 3:15 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2026, 3:30 PM CST | 3.5 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Jan 4, 2026, 5:30 PM CST | 3.5 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 8.25 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Nov 30, 2025, 7:30 PM CST | 11.5 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Nov 21, 2025, 3:15 PM CST | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 30, 2025, 3:01 AM CDT | 6.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 23, 2025, 1:01 PM CDT | 5.5 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2025, 9:15 AM CDT | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 18, 2025, 12:45 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 18, 2025, 5:45 AM CDT | 2 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 2, 2025, 7:45 PM CDT | 2 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2026, 4:30 AM CST | 7.25 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 5, 2026, 3:30 PM CST | 3.5 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 8:30 PM CST | 8 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Oct 26, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 6 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 14, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 19 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 3, 2025, 1:30 PM CDT | 17.5 | 0.91R | Flat |
| Oct 1, 2025, 2:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 3.75 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 31, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2025, 5:30 PM CDT | 18.75 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 7, 2025, 2:00 PM CDT | 12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 4.25 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 7, 2025, 12:00 PM CDT | 9.5 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 10, 2025, 9:30 PM CDT | 2.5 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 5, 2025, 3:00 PM CDT | 20 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 2, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 10.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2025, 6:30 AM CDT | 11.5 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2025, 6:30 AM CST | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 6.75 | 1.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 16, 2025, 3:00 PM CDT | 27.25 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Jul 4, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | 8.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 25, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2025, 11:00 AM CST | 12.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2025, 7:00 PM CST | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2025, 7:00 PM CST | 19.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 29, 2024, 8:00 PM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 29, 2024, 7:00 PM CST | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2024, 6:00 PM CST | 17.75 | 2.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 5, 2024, 7:00 PM CST | 3.75 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2024, 5:00 AM CST | 14.5 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Oct 16, 2024, 5:00 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Oct 7, 2024, 3:00 PM CDT | 15.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2024, 6:00 PM CDT | 16.25 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Jul 3, 2024, 12:00 AM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2023, 10:00 AM CST | 12.5 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2023, 11:00 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Mar 28, 2023, 11:00 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2023, 4:00 AM CST | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2024, 9:00 PM CST | 25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 20.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT | 17.75 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 22.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 17, 2023, 9:01 PM CDT | 8.75 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2023, 9:00 PM CDT | 14.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2023, 9:00 PM CST | 24 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2022, 9:00 PM CST | 32 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 33.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 9.75 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2021, 9:00 PM CDT | 25.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 26, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 47 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Dec 30, 2019, 9:01 PM CST | 10 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Feb 7, 2019, 9:00 PM CST | 9.5 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2018, 9:00 PM CST | 19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2018, 9:00 PM CDT | 21.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 8, 2018, 9:02 PM CDT | 13.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2018, 9:00 PM CDT | 13.25 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Oct 11, 2016, 9:00 PM CDT | 10.5 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Nov 29, 2015, 9:02 PM CST | 4.75 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (3)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2020 | 20.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2018 | 34.75 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 24, 2008 | 12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:34 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:54 AM CDT | 0.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:41 PM CDT | 1.3 | 2.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:28 PM CDT | 1.3 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:02 PM CDT | 3.2 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 12:07 PM CDT | 2.8 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 2.5 | 2.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:42 AM CDT | 8.1 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:11 AM CDT | 6.5 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 3:46 PM CDT | 0.9 | 2.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:34 AM CDT | 1.8 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 1:14 AM CDT | 0.9 | 2.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 5:32 PM CDT | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 3:53 PM CDT | 0.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 3:07 AM CDT | 3 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:51 AM CDT | 1.6 | 2.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 8:02 PM CDT | 4.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 5:07 AM CDT | 0.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 5:08 AM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 3:49 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:07 PM CDT | 1.9 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:51 PM CDT | 4.5 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 7:55 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 11:15 PM CDT | 3.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 3:36 AM CDT | 10.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 5:45 AM CDT | 19.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 11:08 PM CDT | 1.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 11:03 PM CDT | 2.1 | 1.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 5.8 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 11:30 AM CST | 17.3 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 3:35 AM CST | 41.5 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2026, 10:45 PM CST | 8.5 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 5:10 PM CST | 17 | 1.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 23, 2026, 6:10 PM CST | 11.9 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Feb 9, 2026, 6:55 PM CST | 11.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 1:20 PM CST | 11.8 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 1:45 AM CST | 7.3 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 12:45 PM CST | 11.5 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2026, 1:35 PM CST | 6.2 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Jan 20, 2026, 6:10 AM CST | 2.1 | 0.10R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 19.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 9:16 AM CDT | 16.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 53.8 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 5:15 AM CDT | 9.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 6.4 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 12:30 AM CST | 30.4 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2026, 7:45 PM CST | 23 | 2.85R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2026, 11:30 PM CST | 4.6 | 0.96R | Stopped |
| Feb 15, 2026, 10:34 PM CST | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 15, 2026, 6:30 PM CST | 13 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 13, 2026, 12:16 AM CST | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 6:30 PM CST | 10.1 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 12:46 PM CST | 5.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 9:45 AM CST | 86.9 | 2.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 1:45 AM CST | 12.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 6:15 PM CST | 5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 18, 2025, 6:45 AM CST | 4.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2025, 3:30 PM CST | 7.1 | 2.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2025, 1:30 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2025, 9:45 PM CST | 3.7 | 2.76R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 5.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 10:30 AM CST | 18.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 9:00 PM CST | 84.3 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2025, 1:30 PM CST | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 15.8 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Sep 17, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT | 5.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 13, 2025, 10:30 PM CDT | 3.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 8.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 20, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | 3.7 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT | 24 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2025, 10:00 AM CDT | 14.4 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Apr 30, 2025, 9:30 PM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 10.5 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Mar 28, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2025, 10:42 AM CDT | 4.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2025, 9:31 AM CST | 6.6 | 2.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2025, 10:01 PM CST | 4.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2025, 6:09 PM CST | 5.9 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2024, 1:30 PM CST | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:02 AM CDT | 12.2 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:02 AM CDT | 20 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2025, 3:00 PM CST | 10.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 5.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 33.3 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Sep 18, 2025, 10:00 AM CDT | 14 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2025, 3:00 PM CDT | 13.2 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2025, 2:02 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | 7.1 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 5, 2025, 12:03 PM CDT | 13.9 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 26, 2025, 5:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 19.1 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 7.5 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2025, 10:00 PM CST | 8.1 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 3, 2025, 12:01 PM CST | 3.1 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2024, 3:00 PM CST | 3.6 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Apr 30, 2024, 11:03 AM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2024, 6:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2024, 9:00 AM CST | 10.3 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2023, 10:03 AM CST | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 68.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 29, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT | 14.1 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Dec 4, 2023, 9:00 PM CST | 13.1 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 10.7 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 7.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 23, 2023, 9:00 PM CST | 6.4 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Feb 7, 2023, 9:01 PM CST | 10.9 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2022, 9:00 PM CST | 9.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2022, 9:01 AM CST | 6.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 15, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 7.7 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 6.2 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Jan 27, 2022, 9:00 PM CST | 5.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2022, 5:00 PM CST | 6.1 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2021, 5:00 PM CST | 7 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 9.5 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Aug 9, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 18.1 | 0.99R | Stopped |
| May 5, 2020, 9:02 AM CDT | 16.9 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2020, 9:02 PM CDT | 9.9 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 1, 2020, 9:00 PM CST | 39.2 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2020, 5:00 AM CST | 18.3 | 0.40R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (7)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2025 | 52.8 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| May 22, 2023 | 19.3 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2020 | 36.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 18, 2016 | 8.7 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2014 | 3.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2013 | 11.5 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 10, 2009 | 7.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:06 AM CDT | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 10:47 AM CDT | 0.74 | 0.64R | Flat |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:03 PM CDT | 0.65 | 0.74R | Flat |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:20 AM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:48 AM CDT | 0.11 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:54 PM CDT | 0.04 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:34 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:55 AM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 2:48 AM CDT | 0.09 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:58 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:10 AM CDT | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2026, 11:18 PM CDT | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 5:47 PM CDT | 0.11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 11:15 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 6:56 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 2:27 AM CDT | 0.14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:32 AM CDT | 0.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 4:54 AM CDT | 0.08 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 3:32 PM CDT | 0.46 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 10:57 AM CDT | 0.62 | 0.13R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026, 7:31 AM CDT | 0.54 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 6:54 AM CDT | 0.49 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 6:41 PM CDT | 1.67 | 0.97R | Flat |
| Apr 10, 2026, 7:25 AM CDT | 0.59 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 10:55 PM CDT | 0.21 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 10:35 AM CDT | 0.44 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 4:40 AM CDT | 0.44 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 0.3 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 12:55 AM CDT | 0.26 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2026, 11:35 PM CDT | 0.2 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 8:21 AM CDT | 0.43 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 11:31 AM CDT | 0.63 | 1.52R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 1:10 PM CDT | 0.71 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 8:47 AM CDT | 0.86 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT | 0.94 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 12:45 PM CST | 0.64 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 3:07 PM CST | 0.26 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2026, 11:53 AM CST | 0.12 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 13, 2026, 5:52 AM CST | 0.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:49 AM CDT | 1 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 0.27 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 3:31 PM CDT | 4.12 | 0.14R | Flat |
| Mar 9, 2026, 8:32 PM CDT | 1.44 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 9:45 PM CST | 0.45 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2026, 12:11 PM CST | 0.12 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 10:50 PM CST | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2026, 9:16 PM CST | 0.16 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 1, 2026, 9:30 PM CST | 0.07 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2026, 5:45 PM CST | 0.19 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 1, 2026, 5:30 PM CST | 0.36 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 26, 2026, 8:15 PM CST | 0.13 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Nov 26, 2025, 5:42 PM CST | 0.03 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2025, 5:17 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 27, 2025, 4:20 AM CDT | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2025, 11:24 AM CDT | 0.22 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2025, 9:03 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2025, 2:57 AM CDT | 0.1 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2025, 5:59 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2025, 9:30 AM CDT | 0.6 | 1.72R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2026, 9:34 PM CST | 0.32 | 2.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2026, 6:11 AM CST | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 31, 2025, 2:12 PM CST | 0.26 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 29, 2025, 6:04 PM CST | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2025, 1:11 AM CST | 0.07 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2025, 10:35 AM CST | 0.4 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Nov 4, 2025, 8:05 PM CST | 0.14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2025, 3:20 AM CST | 0.21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 3, 2025, 1:41 PM CST | 0.24 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Aug 6, 2025, 2:38 PM CDT | 0.39 | 2.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2025, 4:47 AM CDT | 0.11 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2025, 11:09 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Jun 19, 2025, 10:30 PM CDT | 0.16 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 2, 2025, 9:47 AM CDT | 0.62 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2025, 1:09 AM CST | 0.14 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2024, 11:32 PM CDT | 0.21 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2024, 7:47 PM CDT | 0.07 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 3, 2024, 9:13 PM CDT | 0.07 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 31, 2024, 2:18 PM CDT | 0.2 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 21, 2024, 9:08 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.29R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 5.67 | 0.20R | Flat |
| Mar 9, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 5.95 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 10:04 PM CST | 0.28 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 0.69 | 2.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2025, 5:20 AM CST | 0.23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 19, 2025, 10:03 PM CDT | 0.18 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2025, 2:24 PM CDT | 0.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2025, 9:14 AM CDT | 0.31 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Aug 29, 2025, 12:43 PM CDT | 0.12 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Aug 1, 2025, 12:34 PM CDT | 0.05 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 25, 2025, 1:44 PM CDT | 0.14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2025, 10:38 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 14, 2025, 7:10 PM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2025, 2:04 PM CST | 0.4 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Dec 26, 2024, 2:28 PM CST | 0.26 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2024, 12:01 PM CST | 0.27 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2024, 11:02 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2024, 12:14 PM CDT | 0.18 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Jul 11, 2024, 5:33 AM CDT | 0.21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 21, 2024, 2:41 PM CDT | 0.27 | 0.33R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 0.29 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 14, 2025, 9:54 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 18, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.02 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Aug 14, 2024, 9:18 PM CDT | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2024, 9:02 PM CST | 0.34 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 0.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 26, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 1.44 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 26, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.92 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2023, 9:01 PM CST | 0.71 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 16, 2022, 9:09 PM CDT | 1.14 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2022, 9:04 AM CDT | 0.88 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2022, 9:03 PM CDT | 1.35 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2022, 9:00 PM CST | 6.59 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2022, 9:00 PM CST | 0.52 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 5, 2021, 9:00 PM CDT | 1.65 | 0.98R | Flat |
| Mar 30, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.78 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Mar 15, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.58 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2020, 9:01 AM CST | 0.42 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 8, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 0.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 0.81 | 0.15R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2025 | 0.31 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2020 | 0.87 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 15, 2018 | 1.88 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2017 | 1.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 25, 2012 | 1.44 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 24, 2010 | 1.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026, 6:55 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 7:47 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 12:05 PM CDT | 0.007 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 11:06 AM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 7:40 PM CDT | 0.007 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2026, 5:12 PM CDT | 0.015 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 5:35 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 5:02 PM CDT | 0.005 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 1:58 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 8:59 AM CDT | 0.007 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 2:45 AM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 6:44 AM CDT | 0.005 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 9:05 AM CST | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2026, 6:26 PM CST | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 4, 2026, 11:56 PM CST | 0.008 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2026, 9:32 AM CST | 0.022 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2026, 10:58 AM CST | 0.007 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 3:22 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2026, 10:09 AM CST | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 12, 2026, 9:32 AM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026, 5:10 PM CDT | 0.004 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 8:53 AM CDT | 0.004 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 5, 2026, 11:16 PM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2026, 6:10 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 7:06 PM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 8:19 AM CST | 0.013 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 15, 2026, 5:10 PM CST | 0.01 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 11:35 AM CST | 0.011 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2026, 7:03 AM CST | 0.032 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 9, 2026, 1:35 PM CST | 0.008 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2025, 12:49 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2025, 4:37 AM CST | 0.007 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2025, 10:41 AM CST | 0.008 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 7, 2025, 6:35 PM CST | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 5, 2025, 2:28 PM CST | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2025, 10:38 AM CST | 0.008 | 2.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2025, 5:18 AM CST | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2025, 2:11 PM CST | 0.018 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2025, 11:40 AM CDT | 0.008 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2025, 8:12 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.75R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2026, 3:30 PM CDT | 0.033 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 6:06 AM CDT | 0.011 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 12:29 PM CDT | 0.016 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 1:27 PM CST | 0.021 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 2:27 PM CST | 0.019 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2026, 3:31 PM CST | 0.069 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 22, 2026, 7:16 AM CST | 0.147 | 2.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2026, 1:12 PM CST | 0.02 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2025, 12:42 AM CST | 0.017 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2025, 11:15 PM CST | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2025, 1:12 AM CST | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2025, 1:37 PM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2025, 9:05 PM CST | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2025, 12:54 AM CST | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 29, 2025, 3:13 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 18, 2025, 12:02 PM CDT | 0.008 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2025, 10:17 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 17, 2025, 11:46 AM CDT | 0.005 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2025, 3:15 PM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 31, 2025, 5:36 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.75R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026, 9:03 PM CDT | 0.017 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 9:22 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2026, 1:34 PM CST | 0.026 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2026, 12:20 PM CST | 0.015 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2025, 9:40 PM CST | 0.021 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2025, 5:34 PM CST | 0.01 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2025, 3:03 PM CST | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2025, 8:50 AM CDT | 0.026 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2025, 10:25 AM CDT | 0.025 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2025, 12:08 PM CDT | 0.011 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2025, 12:34 PM CDT | 0.011 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 27, 2025, 10:40 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2025, 1:16 PM CDT | 0.025 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Jun 4, 2025, 2:33 AM CDT | 0.011 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 19, 2025, 8:29 AM CDT | 0.021 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2025, 1:59 PM CDT | 0.014 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 12, 2025, 9:33 AM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2025, 5:32 PM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 30, 2025, 2:12 PM CST | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 14, 2025, 1:22 AM CST | 0.022 | 0.68R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026, 1:12 PM CDT | 0.025 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Jan 28, 2026, 1:57 AM CST | 0.025 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2026, 6:09 PM CST | 0.158 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Jan 5, 2026, 9:20 AM CST | 0.063 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2025, 2:18 PM CST | 0.025 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2025, 1:32 PM CDT | 0.012 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2025, 2:55 AM CDT | 0.032 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2025, 3:02 AM CDT | 0.046 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 18, 2025, 10:31 PM CDT | 0.01 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 16, 2025, 2:17 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 6, 2025, 11:06 AM CST | 0.043 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2025, 8:46 AM CST | 0.033 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 3, 2025, 11:17 AM CST | 0.023 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2024, 3:25 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 11, 2024, 2:16 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 1, 2024, 2:55 PM CDT | 0.012 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2024, 11:23 AM CDT | 0.009 | 1.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 14, 2024, 2:11 PM CDT | 0.023 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2023, 9:40 AM CST | 0.031 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 3, 2023, 9:31 PM CST | 0.005 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.089 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.036 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Jul 8, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 1, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.133 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.068 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Oct 16, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.05 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2023, 10:31 PM CDT | 0.083 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 27, 2023, 10:38 PM CDT | 0.059 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 3, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.024 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.016 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 1, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.01 | 2.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 10, 2023, 5:00 PM CST | 0.062 | 2.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 14, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.323 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 30, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.072 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2021, 11:11 PM CDT | 0.024 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2020, 5:00 PM CST | 0.084 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2020, 9:22 PM CDT | 0.06 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Jul 27, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.021 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2020, 9:36 PM CDT | 0.046 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Squeeze Alert Firings (4)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2025 | 0.088 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 22, 2020 | 0.082 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Aug 18, 2010 | 0.056 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2008 | 0.372 | 0.07R | Stopped |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.