Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Thrusting Line
Two-candle pattern: a down candle, then an up candle that gaps lower and closes up into the first body but stays below its midpoint.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.96×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.5% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 108 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.5% | 41.8% | +1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.4% | 28.1% | +4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.1% | 19.7% | +3.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.5% | 57.0% | -0.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
108 occurrences · 1,710,005 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (66). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+3.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.62×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 45.5% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 3.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 66 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.5% | 41.8% | +3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 28.0% | +5.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.2% | 19.9% | +4.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.5% | 56.4% | -1.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.8% | -1.8 |
66 occurrences · 355,242 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
60.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+18.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.58×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.38R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 18.4-point gap over the 42.3% random-entry rate clears the ±18.3-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 28 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 60.7% | 42.3% | +18.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.6% | 29.2% | -0.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.9% | 21.3% | -3.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 39.3% | 55.4% | -16.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.2% | -2.2 |
28 occurrences · 119,637 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
56.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.7% for a random long entry (+12.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.26×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.42R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.17R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 56.3% of the time vs 43.7% for a random long entry. The 12.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 16 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 16 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 56.3% | 43.7% | +12.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 30.7% | -5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.8% | 22.8% | -4.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 37.5% | 54.6% | -17.1 |
| Went sideways | 6.3% | 1.7% | +4.5 |
16 occurrences · 59,963 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
57.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.0% for a random long entry (+12.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.37×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.37R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.22R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 57.1% of the time vs 45.0% for a random long entry. The 12.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±26.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 14 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 57.1% | 45.0% | +12.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 32.6% | +10.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.4% | 24.8% | -3.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 53.7% | -10.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
14 occurrences · 27,712 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
63.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 50.0% for a random long entry (+13.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.74R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.35R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 63.2% of the time vs 50.0% for a random long entry. The 13.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 19 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 19 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 63.2% | 50.0% | +13.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 52.6% | 37.7% | +14.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 52.6% | 28.8% | +23.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 36.8% | 49.5% | -12.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
19 occurrences · 4,548 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
53.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.9% for a random long entry (+5.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.09×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.45R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.27R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 53.6% of the time vs 47.9% for a random long entry. The 5.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 28 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 28 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 53.6% | 47.9% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 39.3% | 34.7% | +4.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.6% | 25.9% | +2.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 51.4% | -8.5 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 0.8% | +2.8 |
28 occurrences · 4,697 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.6%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.4% for a random long entry (+8.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
3.06×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.97R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.6% of the time vs 39.4% for a random long entry — a 8.2-point gap, wider than the ±7.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.6% | 39.4% | +8.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.5% | 25.5% | +9.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.4% | 17.1% | +7.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.4% | 59.3% | -6.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
168 occurrences · 1,607,385 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (93). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random long entry (+7.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.65×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.4% of the time vs 40.8% for a random long entry. The 7.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 93 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.4% | 40.8% | +7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.1% | 26.9% | +3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.7% | 18.7% | +5.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.6% | 57.5% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
93 occurrences · 346,986 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (52). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.9% for a random long entry (+0.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.65×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.3% of the time vs 41.9% for a random long entry. The 0.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 52 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.3% | 41.9% | +0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.8% | 28.4% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.2% | 20.5% | +0.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.7% | 56.2% | +1.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
52 occurrences · 118,396 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (31). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.2% for a random long entry (+1.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 45.2% of the time vs 43.2% for a random long entry. The 1.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 31 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.2% | 43.2% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.3% | 30.0% | +2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.4% | 22.1% | -2.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.6% | 55.1% | -3.4 |
| Went sideways | 3.2% | 1.7% | +1.5 |
31 occurrences · 59,643 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 44.6% for a random long entry (-3.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.34×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.02R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.20R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.7% of the time vs 44.6% for a random long entry. The 3.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.7% | 44.6% | -3.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.9% | 32.3% | -6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.2% | 24.3% | -2.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.3% | 54.1% | +5.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
27 occurrences · 27,664 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 50.1% for a random long entry (+2.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.18×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.46R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.33R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 52.4% of the time vs 50.1% for a random long entry. The 2.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.4% | 50.1% | +2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 37.0% | +5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 27.8% | +5.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.6% | 49.1% | -1.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.9% | -0.9 |
21 occurrences · 4,544 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 47.0% for a random long entry (+5.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.59R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.24R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 52.4% of the time vs 47.0% for a random long entry. The 5.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.4% | 47.0% | +5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 33.1% | +0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 28.6% | 24.4% | +4.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 52.0% | -9.1 |
| Went sideways | 4.8% | 1.0% | +3.8 |
21 occurrences · 4,689 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish thrusting line is a half-hearted version of the piercing line. A long down candle comes first. The next candle gaps lower, then rallies up into the first candle’s body, but it stops short of the midpoint. Buyers pushed back into the prior loss but ran out of steam before reclaiming half of it. The thrust is real but weak, which is why this one often fails to turn the trend.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle opens lower, gapping below the first candle’s close.
- It closes up (green), pushing into the first candle’s body.
- That close stays below the midpoint of the first candle’s body.
- The closer to the midpoint it gets, the stronger the thrust.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the two candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The first candle keeps the decline going, and the next one gaps lower, so sellers look firmly in charge. Then buyers wake up. Price rallies back up into the prior candle’s body, undoing part of the loss in a single bar. For a moment it reads like the start of a real fightback.
But the rally stalls before it reaches the midpoint of that down candle. Buyers found some demand, enough to lift price off the lows, yet not enough to reclaim half of what the sellers took. That shortfall is the whole story: the side trying to turn the market ran out of strength before doing real damage, and sellers still hold most of the ground they won. A push that stops halfway tends to leave the downtrend intact rather than break it.
How often that weak thrust manages to turn anything is the question the numbers below settle.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025, 9:15 AM CDT | 19.25 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2020, 12:26 PM CDT | 8.5 | 2.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2020, 8:31 AM CDT | 22.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2020, 8:42 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2020, 8:34 AM CDT | 32 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2020, 1:11 PM CDT | 10 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2020, 11:34 AM CDT | 10.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2020, 10:57 AM CDT | 13.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2020, 12:38 PM CDT | 15.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2020, 10:52 AM CDT | 15.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 28, 2020, 2:23 PM CST | 11.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.75 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Dec 24, 2018, 12:00 PM CST | 9.5 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Jun 1, 2012, 12:32 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2011, 1:23 PM CST | 4.25 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2011, 8:59 AM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 5, 2011, 1:09 PM CST | 1.75 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2011, 8:41 AM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2011, 11:20 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Sep 27, 2011, 2:49 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 50.75 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.25 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 26, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 39.5 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 25.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 17, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 46 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2020, 2:50 PM CDT | 63.25 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2020, 10:35 AM CDT | 21.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2020, 1:13 PM CDT | 26.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2020, 10:23 AM CDT | 37.25 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Jun 28, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 16 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2012, 8:30 AM CST | 9 | 2.94R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 12, 2012, 11:55 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2012, 9:00 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2011, 2:37 PM CST | 4.75 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2011, 9:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2011, 12:05 PM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2011, 9:00 AM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 9, 2011, 12:40 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2011, 11:10 AM CST | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 21, 2011, 9:40 AM CST | 6 | 0.33R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 148 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 22, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 84 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 18, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 51.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 114 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Mar 8, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 125 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 153.25 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 128 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 42 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 27 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2011, 10:15 AM CST | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 25, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.5 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 24, 2009, 9:00 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 15, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2009, 2:45 PM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2009, 10:45 AM CDT | 2.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2009, 12:15 PM CDT | 2.75 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2009, 10:00 AM CST | 7.25 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2009, 2:15 PM CST | 4.75 | 1.47R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 26, 2009, 12:15 PM CST | 5.5 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2009, 12:00 PM CST | 2.5 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (16)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 55.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 29, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 123.75 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Sep 24, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 130.75 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 1, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 36.5 | 2.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 6, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 173 | 0.99R | Flat |
| Sep 10, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 14, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 18.25 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 7, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.25 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2011, 12:30 PM CST | 7.75 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2009, 11:00 AM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2009, 11:00 AM CST | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2009, 1:00 PM CST | 9 | 1.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2009, 11:30 AM CST | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2009, 9:30 AM CST | 6 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2008, 11:30 AM CST | 5.5 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2008, 8:30 AM CST | 27.5 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (14)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 52.75 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Feb 14, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 90.75 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 6, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 43.25 | 2.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 29.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 21, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 24.5 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2011, 12:30 PM CST | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 25, 2009, 1:30 PM CDT | 15.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2009, 1:30 PM CST | 10.5 | 2.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2009, 9:30 AM CST | 9.25 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 12, 2008, 11:30 AM CST | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2008, 1:30 PM CDT | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2008, 8:30 AM CST | 8.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (19)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 277.5 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 129 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 237 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 202.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 74 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 18, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 59.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 115.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 7, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 48 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 6, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 24.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 13.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 9, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 47.25 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 28 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 32 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2012, 8:30 AM CST | 14.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 9, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 15.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 29, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 16.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 42 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 20 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025 | 200.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 28, 2025 | 459.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 2, 2024 | 192 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 23, 2023 | 191.75 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2023 | 126.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 24, 2022 | 794.25 | 0.85R | Flat |
| Jan 10, 2022 | 451.5 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2020 | 222 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2019 | 89.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2018 | 149.75 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 30, 2018 | 237.5 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 28, 2018 | 84 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2018 | 84.5 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Dec 5, 2017 | 28.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2015 | 78.75 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2012 | 17.25 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 22, 2012 | 21.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2011 | 29.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 20, 2011 | 17.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 9, 2011 | 10.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2018, 1:25 PM CST | 2.25 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Aug 28, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2012, 8:30 AM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2011, 2:40 PM CST | 0.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2011, 10:43 AM CST | 0.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2011, 9:15 AM CST | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2011, 9:15 AM CST | 0.75 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2011, 1:50 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Nov 9, 2011, 8:43 AM CST | 1.25 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2011, 1:53 PM CDT | 0.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2011, 1:11 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2011, 12:02 PM CDT | 3 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2011, 9:26 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2011, 9:17 AM CDT | 0.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2011, 11:42 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2011, 9:10 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 4, 2011, 12:21 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2011, 12:30 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2011, 2:19 PM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2011, 10:21 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 7 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 12.5 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 23, 2011, 8:45 AM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 25, 2011, 2:25 PM CDT | 1.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 25, 2011, 10:20 AM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 5, 2011, 11:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2011, 9:15 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2011, 12:45 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2011, 9:15 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 10, 2011, 11:40 AM CDT | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 1, 2010, 11:55 AM CDT | 1 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 19, 2010, 1:05 PM CDT | 2 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2010, 9:05 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 7, 2010, 10:50 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2010, 9:05 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2010, 1:30 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 24, 2010, 2:05 PM CDT | 0.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 14, 2010, 8:45 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 26, 2010, 2:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 17, 2010, 12:55 PM CDT | 1 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.75 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 21.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 7 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2015, 9:00 AM CDT | 4 | 2.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 13, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2011, 9:30 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2011, 10:00 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2011, 12:45 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2011, 9:45 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Aug 18, 2011, 12:15 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2010, 1:30 PM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2010, 1:45 PM CDT | 0.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 1, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 30, 2010, 2:30 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2010, 11:00 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 20, 2010, 8:45 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Aug 16, 2010, 1:15 PM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 12, 2010, 1:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2010, 2:15 PM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 20.75 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Oct 11, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 25.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 71.75 | 0.92R | Flat |
| Dec 6, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 4 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.5 | 2.96R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2015, 9:00 AM CST | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 23, 2011, 10:30 AM CST | 3.5 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2011, 10:00 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 13, 2011, 9:00 AM CDT | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2010, 2:30 PM CST | 3.5 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Sep 28, 2010, 9:00 AM CDT | 5.75 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2010, 10:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 12, 2010, 10:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 21, 2010, 2:30 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.96R | Stopped |
| Jun 18, 2010, 11:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 3, 2010, 10:30 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2010, 10:30 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2010, 9:30 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2009, 11:30 AM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 26, 2009, 10:00 AM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 57 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 26 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 2, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 52.5 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 47 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 8, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 1, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 44 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.75 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 22, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2011, 10:30 AM CST | 4 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2010, 9:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2010, 10:30 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2010, 10:30 AM CST | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2009, 8:30 AM CST | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2009, 9:30 AM CDT | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2009, 12:30 PM CDT | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2009, 11:30 AM CST | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2009, 10:30 AM CST | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2009, 1:30 PM CST | 4.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2008, 8:30 AM CST | 16.75 | 0.81R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 33.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 32 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 36.75 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 24.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 11, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 56.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 7, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 57.75 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 65.25 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 49 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 46.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 22, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 35.25 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 77.25 | 2.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 15, 2018, 8:30 AM CST | 48.25 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 6.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 12.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 6, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 10.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 9, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.5 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 16, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 17.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2011, 8:30 AM CST | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 30, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.75 | 0.15R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2025 | 122.5 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Feb 21, 2024 | 36.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 18, 2023 | 34.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 20, 2022 | 27 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 24, 2022 | 192 | 0.94R | Flat |
| Jun 22, 2020 | 39.75 | 0.98R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2020 | 24 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2019 | 29 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 10, 2018 | 54.5 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Apr 25, 2018 | 27.5 | 1.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 2, 2017 | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2016 | 12 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Dec 14, 2015 | 30.75 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2015 | 15.75 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2011 | 13 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Oct 29, 2010 | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 25, 2010 | 34.75 | 1.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 6, 2009 | 12.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 15, 2009 | 28.25 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2008 | 32.5 | 1.95R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.