Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bearish Thrusting Line
Two-candle pattern: a down candle gaps up and pushes into the prior up candle but stalls below its midpoint, a weak bounce.
Shown only on the markets where this pattern occurs.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+12.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.36R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 52.8% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry — a 12.1-point gap, wider than the ±8.6-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.8% | 40.7% | +12.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 35.2% | 27.7% | +7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.4% | 19.8% | +6.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.4% | 58.3% | -11.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.8% | 1.0% | -0.2 |
125 occurrences · 1,706,892 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (54). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (+1.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.7% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry. The 1.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 54 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.7% | 39.7% | +1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 22.2% | 27.2% | -5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.7% | 19.7% | -3.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 59.3% | 59.0% | +0.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.3% | -1.3 |
54 occurrences · 354,524 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (38). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.2% for a random short entry (-2.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.59×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.94R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.8% of the time vs 39.2% for a random short entry. The 2.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±15.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 38 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.8% | 39.2% | -2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 21.1% | 27.2% | -6.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.5% | 20.3% | -9.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.5% | 59.3% | +1.2 |
| Went sideways | 2.6% | 1.6% | +1.1 |
38 occurrences · 119,349 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.7%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (+1.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.29×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.7% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 1.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.7% | 38.9% | +1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 27.5% | +5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.8% | 20.8% | -5.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 55.6% | 59.9% | -4.4 |
| Went sideways | 3.7% | 1.1% | +2.6 |
27 occurrences · 59,789 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
31.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.4% for a random short entry (-7.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.25×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.13R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 31.3% of the time vs 38.4% for a random short entry. The 7.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 16 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 16 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 31.3% | 38.4% | -7.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.3% | 27.5% | +3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 21.2% | +3.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 68.8% | 60.7% | +8.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.9% | -0.9 |
16 occurrences · 27,675 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (35). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
51.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.2% for a random short entry (+13.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 51.4% of the time vs 38.2% for a random short entry. The 13.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 35 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 51.4% | 38.2% | +13.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.7% | 29.2% | -3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.9% | 23.1% | -0.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.6% | 61.6% | -13.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.2% | -0.2 |
35 occurrences · 4,539 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (41). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.5% for a random short entry (+7.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.89×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.9% of the time vs 36.5% for a random short entry. The 7.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 41 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.9% | 36.5% | +7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.1% | 26.8% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.4% | 21.0% | +3.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.1% | 63.1% | -7.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
41 occurrences · 4,681 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (+3.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.11R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.95R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.2% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry. The 3.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 166 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.2% | 38.5% | +3.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.3% | 25.2% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.9% | 17.2% | +5.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.2% | 60.5% | -3.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.6% | 1.1% | -0.5 |
166 occurrences · 1,599,351 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random short entry (+5.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.06×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.8% of the time vs 38.7% for a random short entry. The 5.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 112 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.8% | 38.7% | +5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.8% | 26.0% | +0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.6% | 18.6% | +1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.3% | 60.1% | -3.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
112 occurrences · 344,822 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (56). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (+7.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.58×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.4% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry. The 7.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 56 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.4% | 38.5% | +7.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.1% | 26.4% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.8% | 19.5% | +7.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.6% | 60.0% | -6.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.4% | -1.4 |
56 occurrences · 117,604 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (44). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (-2.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.09×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.4% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 2.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 44 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.4% | 38.9% | -2.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.8% | 27.3% | +4.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 27.3% | 20.4% | +6.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.6% | 60.1% | +3.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.0% | -1.0 |
44 occurrences · 59,279 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.2% for a random short entry (+13.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.26×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.48R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 52.2% of the time vs 39.2% for a random short entry. The 13.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 23 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 23 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.2% | 39.2% | +13.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 43.5% | 28.2% | +15.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 39.1% | 21.6% | +17.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.8% | 60.1% | -12.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.7% | -0.7 |
23 occurrences · 27,486 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
56.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.1% for a random short entry (+17.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.47R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 56.3% of the time vs 39.1% for a random short entry. The 17.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 16 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
Only 16 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 56.3% | 39.1% | +17.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 37.5% | 30.1% | +7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 37.5% | 24.5% | +13.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 43.8% | 60.5% | -16.8 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.4% | -0.4 |
16 occurrences · 4,520 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (37). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.6% for a random short entry (+5.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.85×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 43.2% of the time vs 37.6% for a random short entry. The 5.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±15.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 37 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.2% | 37.6% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 35.1% | 28.5% | +6.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.3% | 21.9% | +2.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 56.8% | 61.9% | -5.2 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
37 occurrences · 4,671 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bearish thrusting line is a two-candle pause near the top. An up candle runs with the trend, then the next session gaps higher but sellers drag the close back down into the first candle’s body. The push stalls below the midpoint of that body, so the bounce never reaches halfway. A thrust that falls short like this hints the buyers are losing the upper hand.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- The first candle is an up (green) candle.
- The second candle gaps open above the first.
- The second candle is a down (red) candle that pushes back down into the first candle’s body.
- It stalls below the midpoint of the first candle’s body, falling short of the middle.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the 2 candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.
The psychology
The up candle runs with the trend and hands the session to the buyers. The next bar gaps higher, opening above the prior close, and at that moment the buyers look like they are extending the advance. Then the session turns and sellers drag the close back down into the first candle’s body. The push that started with a gap up ends as a red bar.
What matters is how far that selling reached. It pushed back into the prior body but stalled below the midpoint, so the retracement never even got halfway. Sellers showed up, but they could not undo the buyers’ gain, and the close still sits in the upper part of the prior range. In an uptrend, that failed thrust reads more like a brief check than a turn: the dominant buyers absorbed a probe from the other side and held the higher ground, ready to press on. Still, a thrust that falls short like this hints the buyers’ grip is not as firm as it was.
How often that small wobble actually slows the trend is what the figures below set out to test.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026, 8:30 AM CST | 47.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.5 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Jul 6, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 34 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2020, 2:02 PM CDT | 27.25 | 2.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2020, 2:56 PM CDT | 17.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2020, 12:53 PM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2020, 11:11 AM CDT | 15 | 1.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 28, 2020, 1:31 PM CST | 45 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 5 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2012, 8:55 AM CST | 2.75 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2011, 9:40 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 13, 2011, 2:58 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2011, 11:31 AM CDT | 1.5 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2011, 9:30 AM CDT | 2.25 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 11, 2010, 10:52 AM CDT | 1.25 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 7, 2010, 10:46 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2009, 10:32 AM CDT | 1.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2009, 2:54 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2009, 2:24 PM CDT | 1.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2009, 9:02 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 49.5 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 31 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2020, 1:45 PM CDT | 28.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2020, 1:58 PM CDT | 62 | 1.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2020, 9:20 AM CDT | 42 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2020, 10:24 AM CDT | 34.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2020, 2:05 PM CDT | 35 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 10, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.25 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2015, 11:35 AM CST | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 2, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.5 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2011, 12:15 PM CDT | 2.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2011, 9:35 AM CDT | 3 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Aug 9, 2011, 9:05 AM CDT | 8.5 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Aug 5, 2011, 11:50 AM CDT | 13.25 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 7, 2010, 10:20 AM CDT | 17 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 5, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2009, 9:25 AM CDT | 4.25 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2009, 1:10 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2009, 9:05 AM CDT | 3.5 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2009, 11:40 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.10R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 70.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 6, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 175.25 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Nov 7, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 79.25 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 91.25 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2020, 9:15 AM CDT | 50.75 | 2.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2020, 11:15 AM CDT | 70 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 78.75 | 1.02R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 26, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 12.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 18.5 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Oct 16, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 12.25 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.91R | Flat |
| Dec 9, 2011, 11:45 AM CST | 2 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2011, 9:00 AM CST | 6.5 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2011, 9:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 4, 2011, 9:02 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2011, 1:16 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 18, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2009, 2:15 PM CDT | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2009, 1:00 PM CST | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 62.25 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 275.75 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 3, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 188.25 | 0.79R | Flat |
| Nov 7, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 85.25 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Sep 14, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 92 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 54.5 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Jan 31, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 54.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 10, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 14.75 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2018, 8:30 AM CDT | 19.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.5 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 3, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 13 | 2.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 19, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.25 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 26, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 9.5 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 4.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 19, 2012, 8:30 AM CST | 10 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 20, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 14.25 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2009, 11:00 AM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2009, 10:00 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (16)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 84.25 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 65 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 62.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 24, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 44.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 102 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 30, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 14.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 22, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.5 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 22 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2014, 8:30 AM CST | 28.5 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Feb 9, 2012, 8:30 AM CST | 14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 15, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.5 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2010, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.75 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2009, 10:30 AM CST | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2008, 10:30 AM CST | 13.75 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 26, 2008, 12:30 PM CST | 9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 17, 2008, 8:30 AM CDT | 19.25 | 0.73R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 91.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 5, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 162.5 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Jan 24, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 143.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 28, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 223 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 11, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 157.75 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 6, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 103.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 213 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 230.75 | 0.98R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 159.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 21, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 253.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2021, 8:30 AM CST | 111 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 155 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 95.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 13, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 78 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 19, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 132.75 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Jun 2, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 12, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 78.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 21.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 41 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 15, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 52.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2025 | 76.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 18, 2025 | 83.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2025 | 98.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2024 | 72.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 7, 2024 | 69.5 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 19, 2023 | 105.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2023 | 154.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2023 | 200.75 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 30, 2023 | 162.25 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2023 | 70.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 8, 2022 | 237.75 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2021 | 113.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2020 | 65.5 | 2.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 19, 2020 | 118.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2019 | 40.25 | 2.52R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 6, 2019 | 30.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2019 | 33.25 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 31, 2017 | 23.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2017 | 23.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2017 | 14.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.87R | Flat |
| Jul 6, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 11, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 16, 2017, 8:30 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2011, 11:52 AM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 29, 2011, 1:05 PM CST | 1 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 25, 2011, 10:33 AM CST | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2011, 9:37 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2011, 2:56 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2011, 9:10 AM CDT | 0.5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 26, 2011, 10:04 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2011, 11:59 AM CDT | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2011, 9:14 AM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 18, 2011, 10:39 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2011, 2:26 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2011, 9:33 AM CDT | 1.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2011, 1:44 PM CDT | 1.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2011, 10:04 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 14, 2011, 10:55 AM CDT | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2011, 1:44 PM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 8 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.25 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 5 | 2.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2011, 10:30 AM CST | 1.5 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2011, 1:20 PM CST | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 29, 2011, 1:35 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2011, 12:40 PM CST | 1 | 2.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 20, 2011, 10:40 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 20, 2011, 9:15 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 5, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.72R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2011, 2:40 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 15, 2011, 2:05 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 26, 2011, 11:10 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 24, 2011, 9:05 AM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2011, 1:35 PM CDT | 2 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2011, 2:35 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 9, 2011, 9:05 AM CDT | 5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2011, 11:15 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2010, 9:35 AM CST | 0.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 19.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 16.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 3, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 13.25 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Sep 14, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2020, 8:30 AM CST | 23.5 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2016, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 4.75 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Dec 16, 2011, 9:15 AM CST | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2011, 9:00 AM CST | 3.5 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2011, 10:45 AM CST | 2.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2011, 10:00 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 1, 2011, 9:30 AM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 14, 2011, 11:45 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2011, 10:00 AM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 31, 2011, 9:15 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2011, 11:00 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2010, 2:45 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2010, 8:45 AM CST | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 29, 2010, 2:30 PM CST | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 45.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 6, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 10.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 22.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 12.25 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 9, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 10 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 12 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.25 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 4.75 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 16, 2014, 8:30 AM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 4 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2012, 9:00 AM CST | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 24, 2012, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2011, 10:00 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 26, 2011, 2:30 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2011, 8:30 AM CST | 6.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2010, 11:00 AM CST | 0.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2010, 2:00 PM CST | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2010, 2:00 PM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 15, 2010, 11:00 AM CST | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 20.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 4, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 9.25 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Aug 9, 2023, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2022, 8:30 AM CST | 50 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 42 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2015, 8:30 AM CST | 14.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 19, 2011, 9:30 AM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 20, 2011, 10:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 15, 2011, 8:30 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2010, 1:30 PM CST | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2010, 1:30 PM CDT | 3.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 9, 2010, 11:30 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 9, 2010, 10:30 AM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2010, 12:30 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 31, 2009, 8:30 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Nov 23, 2009, 9:30 AM CST | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 14, 2009, 10:30 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2009, 1:30 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 22, 2009, 11:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 9, 2009, 8:30 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.56R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (16)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2025, 8:30 AM CDT | 17.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2024, 8:30 AM CST | 23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 6, 2023, 8:30 AM CST | 19.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 8, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 40.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 21, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 51.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2021, 8:30 AM CDT | 16.25 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2020, 8:30 AM CDT | 46.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2019, 8:30 AM CST | 8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2019, 8:30 AM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 16, 2017, 8:30 AM CST | 8.5 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2016, 8:30 AM CST | 10.5 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2015, 8:30 AM CDT | 15.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 11, 2014, 8:30 AM CST | 5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2013, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2013, 8:30 AM CST | 4.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Thrusting Line Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | 27.5 | — | Open |
| Aug 11, 2025 | 31.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 7, 2025 | 47 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2025 | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2024 | 17.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2023 | 21.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2023 | 37.75 | 2.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2022 | 46.5 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2021 | 18 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| May 25, 2021 | 24.25 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2021 | 21.5 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| May 28, 2020 | 39 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2019 | 9.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2019 | 8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2019 | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 21, 2018 | 12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 7, 2018 | 9.75 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2018 | 26.25 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 24, 2018 | 16 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2017 | 8.25 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.