Pattern Detail
Bearish Engulfing
Two-candle bearish reversal: an up candle swallowed by a larger down candle whose body engulfs the prior one.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random short entry (+5.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.16×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.3% of the time vs 41.6% for a random short entry — a 5.7-point gap, wider than the ±0.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.3% | 41.6% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.2% | 28.2% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.8% | 20.1% | -1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.0% | 57.1% | -6.1 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 1.3% | +0.4 |
77,041 occurrences · 5,120,720 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random short entry (+6.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.2% of the time vs 40.4% for a random short entry — a 6.8-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.2% | 40.4% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.5% | 27.4% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.5% | 19.8% | -1.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.6% | 58.1% | -7.4 |
| Went sideways | 2.2% | 1.5% | +0.7 |
21,593 occurrences · 1,146,594 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (+7.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.8% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry — a 7.2-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.8% | 39.6% | +7.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.1% | 26.9% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.4% | 19.6% | -1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.4% | 58.5% | -8.0 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 1.9% | +0.8 |
8,316 occurrences · 392,491 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.1% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry — a 7.3-point gap, wider than the ±1.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.1% | 38.9% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.5% | 26.4% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.9% | 19.4% | -0.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.7% | 58.7% | -9.1 |
| Went sideways | 4.2% | 2.4% | +1.8 |
4,239 occurrences · 197,303 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random short entry (+7.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.0% of the time vs 38.3% for a random short entry — a 7.7-point gap, wider than the ±2.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.0% | 38.3% | +7.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.4% | 26.4% | +1.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.0% | 19.5% | -1.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.8% | 60.0% | -9.2 |
| Went sideways | 3.3% | 1.7% | +1.6 |
2,202 occurrences · 98,132 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.6% for a random short entry (+11.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.98R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.2% of the time vs 36.6% for a random short entry — a 11.7-point gap, wider than the ±4.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.2% | 36.6% | +11.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.1% | 25.8% | +6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 23.0% | 19.7% | +3.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.0% | 62.5% | -11.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.7% | 0.9% | -0.2 |
535 occurrences · 22,441 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (86). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 33.9% for a random short entry (+12.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.92R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.5% of the time vs 33.9% for a random short entry — a 12.7-point gap, wider than the ±10.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.5% | 33.9% | +12.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.9% | 23.7% | +11.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.9% | 17.3% | +3.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.5% | 65.6% | -12.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.5% | -0.5 |
86 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.8% for a random short entry (+7.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.34×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.89R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.0% of the time vs 37.8% for a random short entry — a 7.2-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.0% | 37.8% | +7.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.7% | 23.7% | +3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.8% | 15.7% | +1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.4% | 61.0% | -7.5 |
| Went sideways | 1.6% | 1.3% | +0.3 |
54,900 occurrences · 4,948,951 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (+7.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.96R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.5% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry — a 7.1-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.5% | 38.5% | +7.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.2% | 25.2% | +2.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.2% | 17.5% | -0.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.4% | 60.1% | -7.7 |
| Went sideways | 2.1% | 1.4% | +0.7 |
18,443 occurrences · 1,157,568 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.4% for a random short entry (+7.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.8% of the time vs 38.4% for a random short entry — a 7.4-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.8% | 38.4% | +7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.3% | 25.6% | +2.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.4% | 18.2% | +0.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.4% | 59.7% | -8.3 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 1.9% | +1.0 |
7,497 occurrences · 404,347 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.1% for a random short entry (+8.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.19R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.1% of the time vs 38.1% for a random short entry — a 8.0-point gap, wider than the ±1.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.1% | 38.1% | +8.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.4% | 25.5% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.6% | 18.4% | +0.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.4% | 59.7% | -9.3 |
| Went sideways | 3.5% | 2.2% | +1.3 |
4,142 occurrences · 205,030 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.0% for a random short entry (+10.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.2% of the time vs 38.0% for a random short entry — a 10.2-point gap, wider than the ±2.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.2% | 38.0% | +10.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.6% | 25.7% | +4.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.7% | 18.6% | +1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.1% | 60.3% | -11.3 |
| Went sideways | 2.7% | 1.7% | +1.0 |
2,233 occurrences · 102,439 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.8% for a random short entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.91×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.1% of the time vs 36.8% for a random short entry — a 7.3-point gap, wider than the ±4.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.1% | 36.8% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.3% | 26.1% | +3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.2% | 19.8% | +1.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.8% | 62.4% | -7.6 |
| Went sideways | 1.1% | 0.9% | +0.2 |
546 occurrences · 23,231 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (83). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
42.2%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 34.9% for a random short entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.93R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 42.2% of the time vs 34.9% for a random short entry. The 7.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 83 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 42.2% | 34.9% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.5% | 24.0% | +2.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.1% | 17.7% | +0.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.8% | 64.6% | -6.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.6% | -0.6 |
83 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.6%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+5.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.14×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.6% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry — a 5.3-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.6% | 40.3% | +5.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.5% | 26.9% | +0.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.5% | 18.9% | -1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.0% | 58.2% | -6.2 |
| Went sideways | 2.4% | 1.5% | +0.9 |
70,571 occurrences · 5,259,552 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+6.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.4% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry — a 6.8-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.4% | 40.7% | +6.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.6% | 27.3% | +1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.1% | 19.4% | -1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.8% | 57.8% | -8.0 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 1.6% | +1.2 |
21,594 occurrences · 1,200,551 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+7.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.8% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry — a 7.1-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.8% | 40.7% | +7.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.7% | 27.4% | +1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.6% | 19.6% | -1.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.1% | 57.4% | -8.3 |
| Went sideways | 3.1% | 1.9% | +1.2 |
8,122 occurrences · 412,684 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.0% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry — a 7.3-point gap, wider than the ±1.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.0% | 40.7% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.8% | 27.5% | +1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.0% | 19.8% | -0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.0% | 57.0% | -9.0 |
| Went sideways | 4.0% | 2.3% | +1.7 |
4,347 occurrences · 207,345 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random short entry (+5.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.1% of the time vs 41.0% for a random short entry — a 5.1-point gap, wider than the ±2.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.1% | 41.0% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.6% | 28.0% | +0.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.0% | 20.4% | -1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.2% | 57.1% | -6.8 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 1.9% | +1.7 |
2,241 occurrences · 102,946 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random short entry (+4.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.0% of the time vs 40.5% for a random short entry — a 4.5-point gap, wider than the ±4.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.0% | 40.5% | +4.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.1% | 28.2% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.1% | 20.7% | -1.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.7% | 58.2% | -5.5 |
| Went sideways | 2.3% | 1.3% | +1.0 |
524 occurrences · 23,320 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
51.8%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.1% for a random short entry (+13.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.32R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
The 13.6-point gap over the 38.1% random-entry rate clears the ±8.9-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 51.8% | 38.1% | +13.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.8% | 25.2% | +4.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.2% | 17.9% | +2.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 45.6% | 60.3% | -14.7 |
| Went sideways | 2.6% | 1.5% | +1.1 |
114 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (+5.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.25×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.2% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry — a 5.6-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.2% | 39.6% | +5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.3% | 26.1% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.6% | 18.4% | -0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.6% | 58.9% | -6.3 |
| Went sideways | 2.2% | 1.6% | +0.6 |
64,945 occurrences · 5,086,185 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random short entry (+6.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.4% of the time vs 40.2% for a random short entry — a 6.2-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.4% | 40.2% | +6.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.1% | 27.1% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.3% | 19.3% | -1.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.9% | 58.0% | -7.1 |
| Went sideways | 2.6% | 1.7% | +0.9 |
20,135 occurrences · 1,173,784 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+6.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.8% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry — a 6.6-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.8% | 40.3% | +6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.5% | 27.3% | +1.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.5% | 19.7% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.7% | 57.7% | -7.9 |
| Went sideways | 3.4% | 2.1% | +1.4 |
7,901 occurrences · 404,433 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+6.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.7% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry — a 6.5-point gap, wider than the ±1.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 40.3% | +6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.7% | 27.4% | +1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.9% | 19.8% | -0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.5% | 57.1% | -8.5 |
| Went sideways | 4.7% | 2.7% | +2.1 |
4,157 occurrences · 203,442 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random short entry (+7.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.9% of the time vs 40.8% for a random short entry — a 7.1-point gap, wider than the ±2.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.9% | 40.8% | +7.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.2% | 28.1% | +2.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.7% | 20.5% | -0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.2% | 57.4% | -8.1 |
| Went sideways | 2.9% | 1.8% | +1.1 |
2,049 occurrences · 101,072 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (+6.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.7% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry — a 6.0-point gap, wider than the ±4.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.7% | 39.7% | +6.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.2% | 27.8% | -1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.6% | 20.4% | -3.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.7% | 59.1% | -6.3 |
| Went sideways | 1.6% | 1.3% | +0.3 |
512 occurrences · 23,097 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.1%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (+13.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.33R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
The 13.2-point gap over the 38.9% random-entry rate clears the ±8.8-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.1% | 38.9% | +13.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.3% | 26.6% | +3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.3% | 19.5% | -0.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.2% | 59.8% | -13.5 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 1.4% | +0.3 |
119 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
43.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random short entry (+5.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.37×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 43.8% of the time vs 38.7% for a random short entry — a 5.0-point gap, wider than the ±0.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 43.8% | 38.7% | +5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.0% | 25.6% | +1.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.4% | 18.0% | -0.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.3% | 59.3% | -6.0 |
| Went sideways | 2.9% | 2.0% | +0.9 |
35,061 occurrences · 3,516,512 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (+5.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.12×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.0% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry — a 5.1-point gap, wider than the ±0.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.0% | 39.9% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.2% | 26.9% | +0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.3% | 19.1% | -1.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.9% | 58.1% | -6.2 |
| Went sideways | 3.1% | 2.0% | +1.1 |
13,881 occurrences · 898,027 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+5.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.19R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.9% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry — a 5.6-point gap, wider than the ±1.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.9% | 40.3% | +5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.9% | 27.1% | +0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.3% | 19.4% | -1.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.6% | 57.4% | -6.8 |
| Went sideways | 3.4% | 2.3% | +1.1 |
5,550 occurrences · 316,487 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random short entry (+5.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.22R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.3% of the time vs 40.4% for a random short entry — a 5.9-point gap, wider than the ±1.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.3% | 40.4% | +5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.2% | 27.2% | +1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.1% | 19.5% | -0.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.5% | 57.0% | -7.5 |
| Went sideways | 4.3% | 2.6% | +1.6 |
2,939 occurrences · 160,394 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random short entry (+7.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.28R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.1% of the time vs 41.0% for a random short entry — a 7.1-point gap, wider than the ±2.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.1% | 41.0% | +7.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.3% | 28.3% | +3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.5% | 20.6% | -0.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.4% | 57.3% | -7.9 |
| Went sideways | 2.5% | 1.7% | +0.8 |
1,574 occurrences · 80,057 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (+5.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.4% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry — a 5.5-point gap, wider than the ±4.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.4% | 39.9% | +5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.6% | 27.4% | -0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.0% | 20.2% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.5% | 58.8% | -7.3 |
| Went sideways | 3.0% | 1.3% | +1.8 |
394 occurrences · 18,552 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (78). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (+7.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.97×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.4% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry. The 7.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 78 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.4% | 39.6% | +7.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.9% | 26.0% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 10.3% | 18.0% | -7.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.6% | 59.3% | -6.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.1% | -1.1 |
78 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bearish engulfing is the bullish engulfing flipped. An up candle is followed by a larger down candle whose body completely covers the body of the one before it. The read is a fast handoff from buyers to sellers: whatever ground the up candle gained, the next candle takes back and then some.
Steve Nison ranks the engulfing pattern among the major reversal signals in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), the work that brought candlestick analysis to Western markets.
How to spot it
- The market is rising into the pattern.
- The first candle is an up (green) candle that fits the advance.
- The second candle opens at or above the first candle’s close, then closes below the first candle’s open. Its body swallows the prior body.
- The larger the second candle relative to the first, the stronger the signal traders read into it.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the two candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.
The psychology
Price has been rising, and as the first candle closes the buyers are still in control and comfortable. The next candle opens higher, right where they want it, and then everything turns. Instead of carrying on up, price reverses and closes below where the entire prior candle began. In a single bar the buyers’ last push has been met and erased.
That is the story traders read into it: the people lifting the market have run out of demand, and sellers have stepped in with enough size to take back a full candle of buying and then some. Anyone who bought near the highs is now offside, and some of them will have to sell to get out, which adds fuel to the turn. The larger the engulfing candle, the more decisive that handover of control looks, and the more attention it draws.
Whether that shift in mood actually leads anywhere is a separate question, and it is the one the data below answers.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:58 PM CDT | 21.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:40 PM CDT | 13.25 | 1.60R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:01 PM CDT | 13.5 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:19 PM CDT | 18.5 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 28 | 2.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:52 PM CDT | 12.25 | 0.98R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:34 PM CDT | 14.75 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:18 AM CDT | 13 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:01 AM CDT | 18.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:21 AM CDT | 11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:57 AM CDT | 9.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:46 AM CDT | 8 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:58 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:38 AM CDT | 9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:38 AM CDT | 5.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:14 AM CDT | 7.5 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:02 AM CDT | 11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:31 AM CDT | 5.5 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:15 PM CDT | 2.25 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:52 PM CDT | 3.75 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 54 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:10 AM CDT | 26.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:45 AM CDT | 23.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 10.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 18.5 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:25 AM CDT | 18 | 2.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:50 AM CDT | 65 | 2.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 40.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:05 AM CDT | 33.75 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:45 PM CDT | 7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:45 PM CDT | 11 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:50 PM CDT | 15.75 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:15 PM CDT | 25.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:50 AM CDT | 14.25 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:55 AM CDT | 10.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:05 PM CDT | 14.5 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 9.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 10:35 AM CDT | 30.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 8:20 AM CDT | 24.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 4:50 AM CDT | 17 | 0.26R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 65.25 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:15 AM CDT | 66.5 | 2.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 12.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:45 PM CDT | 21.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:45 PM CDT | 14.5 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 20.75 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 35 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:15 AM CDT | 27 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:45 PM CDT | 26.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:45 PM CDT | 121.75 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:45 AM CDT | 40.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:15 AM CDT | 28 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT | 15.25 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 4:45 AM CDT | 37.5 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 20 | 2.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:31 PM CDT | 198.75 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:16 PM CDT | 51.5 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:01 AM CDT | 31.75 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 2:15 PM CDT | 14.75 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 77.25 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 34.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 26 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 46.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 23.75 | 0.84R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 10:30 AM CDT | 72.25 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 23.25 | 0.78R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 33 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 73 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 47.25 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 59.5 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 18.5 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 32.25 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 94.5 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 38.25 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 31.25 | 0.81R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 74.5 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 187.75 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 39 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 40 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 60.75 | 1.32R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 44.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 81 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 22.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 54.5 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 42 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 190 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 32.75 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 60 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 18.75 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 128.5 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 34.5 | 1.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 77.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 219.25 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 81.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 90.5 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 308.5 | 0.61R | Flat |
| Mar 19, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 38.75 | 0.99R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 48.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 61.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 34.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 98.75 | — | Open |
| Apr 13, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 45 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 188.75 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 110.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 19, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 199.75 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 134.75 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 78 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 157.25 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Jan 2, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 508.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 26, 2025, 5:02 AM CST | 92.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 175.5 | 2.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 188.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 116.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 4, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 48.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 54 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 12, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 236.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 85 | 2.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 171.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 16, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 314 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 46.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2026 | 137 | — | Open |
| Feb 12, 2026 | 643.25 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026 | 284.25 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Jul 1, 2025 | 243 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2025 | 208.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2024 | 130.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 30, 2024 | 281.5 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2024 | 267.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 22, 2024 | 413 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 20, 2024 | 317.5 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 17, 2024 | 173.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 7, 2023 | 359 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2023 | 137 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 31, 2022 | 229.75 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| May 5, 2022 | 658.25 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 2, 2022 | 396.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2022 | 507.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2021 | 369 | 2.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 22, 2021 | 159.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 27, 2021 | 227.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:31 PM CDT | 4 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:25 PM CDT | 6.25 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:40 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:02 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:53 PM CDT | 2 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:19 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:34 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:11 PM CDT | 2 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:03 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:37 AM CDT | 2.25 | 2.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:26 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:38 AM CDT | 3.25 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:14 AM CDT | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:04 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:47 AM CDT | 2.5 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:58 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:51 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:40 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:16 PM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:09 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:26 PM CDT | 6.75 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:36 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:26 PM CDT | 1.25 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:46 PM CDT | 5 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:15 PM CDT | 2 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:25 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:50 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:15 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:20 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:55 AM CDT | 1.5 | 2.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 11:40 PM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:05 PM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:20 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:20 PM CDT | 1.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:05 PM CDT | 5.25 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 9.5 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.29R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:30 PM CDT | 3.25 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 4:15 AM CDT | 2.25 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 8.25 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:45 PM CDT | 24 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:30 AM CDT | 8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 7.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 47.75 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:45 AM CDT | 2.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 4:45 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:15 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 8:15 PM CDT | 2.5 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 9:45 PM CDT | 3.75 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 19.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 13 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 11:30 PM CDT | 1.25 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 12:45 PM CDT | 3.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 4:15 AM CDT | 5 | 1.85R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 6.75 | 0.44R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 8.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:30 AM CDT | 12.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 10:30 AM CDT | 9.25 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 6.25 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 38 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:30 AM CDT | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 2.75 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 25.25 | 2.99R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 13 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 2:30 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 11.5 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 6:30 AM CDT | 6.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 7.5 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 23.25 | 0.20R | Flat |
| Apr 9, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 17.5 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.54R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:01 AM CDT | 7.5 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:01 PM CDT | 7 | — | Open |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 9.75 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 16 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 21.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 13 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 10.25 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 4 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 26.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 6 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 20.75 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 48.75 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 20.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 47.5 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 53.75 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 19.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 45.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 98 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 26.5 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 8, 2026, 9:00 PM CST | 24.75 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 16 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 15.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 8.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 18.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 24.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 35 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 30, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 44.75 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Nov 23, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 12, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 20.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 15 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 33.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 29, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 17 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 20, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 0.74R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2026 | 37 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2025 | 40.5 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Oct 16, 2025 | 107.5 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Jan 31, 2025 | 82.25 | 1.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 1, 2024 | 64.25 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Aug 22, 2024 | 66.75 | 0.01R | Stopped |
| Feb 26, 2024 | 46 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Dec 20, 2023 | 77.5 | 0.03R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2023 | 42 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2023 | 22.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 7, 2023 | 31.5 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jan 25, 2023 | 18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 13, 2022 | 221.25 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 8, 2022 | 47.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 18, 2022 | 181 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| May 5, 2022 | 152 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2021 | 27.25 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Nov 26, 2021 | 138 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Sep 27, 2021 | 42.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 26, 2021 | 28 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:23 PM CDT | 2.3 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:16 PM CDT | 4.5 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:34 PM CDT | 3.6 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:18 AM CDT | 3.4 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:02 AM CDT | 3.8 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 7.9 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:59 AM CDT | 4.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:38 AM CDT | 2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:33 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:06 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:59 AM CDT | 3.9 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:31 AM CDT | 1.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:17 AM CDT | 2.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:48 AM CDT | 0.7 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:04 PM CDT | 3 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:20 PM CDT | 1.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:42 PM CDT | 2.7 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:38 PM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:15 PM CDT | 2.4 | 2.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:03 AM CDT | 4.9 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:27 PM CDT | 7.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:17 PM CDT | 4.2 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:07 AM CDT | 2.6 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:46 AM CDT | 3.7 | 2.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:46 AM CDT | 3.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:26 AM CDT | 4.1 | 2.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 9:01 PM CDT | 6.9 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:06 PM CDT | 4.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 7:16 AM CDT | 4.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:26 PM CDT | 5 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:50 AM CDT | 7.8 | 1.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 7.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 3.5 | 2.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:10 PM CDT | 3.1 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:40 AM CDT | 3.7 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 9:20 AM CDT | 5.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 9:20 PM CDT | 2.8 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:25 PM CDT | 3.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:05 PM CDT | 9.5 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 3.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:47 AM CDT | 10.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:17 PM CDT | 8.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:01 PM CDT | 4.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:46 AM CDT | 5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:16 PM CDT | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:01 AM CDT | 8.1 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 18.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 10 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 6.2 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:30 AM CDT | 12.2 | 2.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:15 PM CDT | 11.1 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 5.9 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 2:30 AM CDT | 8.6 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 4:22 AM CDT | 2.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:22 AM CDT | 6.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 12:16 AM CDT | 6.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 7.9 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 4:17 AM CDT | 13.2 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 2:17 AM CDT | 24 | 0.96R | Flat |
| Apr 13, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 9.3 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:01 PM CDT | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 7:31 AM CDT | 11.3 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 17.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 9:30 AM CDT | 23 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 6:35 PM CDT | 9.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 14.3 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 3:02 PM CDT | 5.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 8:30 PM CDT | 15.6 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 1:30 AM CDT | 6.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 8.9 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:00 PM CDT | 33.7 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 22.8 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 1:32 PM CDT | 24.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 12:02 AM CDT | 35.4 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 4:31 AM CDT | 12.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 12:30 AM CDT | 25.9 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 28.6 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 18.1 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2026, 2:31 PM CDT | 12.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 8:01 AM CDT | 24 | 0.31R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:02 PM CDT | 15.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 20.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 10.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 12.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 16.2 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 10:01 AM CDT | 35.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 29.4 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 12:02 AM CDT | 24.5 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 6:01 PM CDT | 18 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 19.6 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 40.6 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 150.9 | 0.39R | Flat |
| Mar 19, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 41.4 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 10:05 AM CDT | 28.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 21 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 17.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 14.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 3:00 PM CST | 25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 5:02 AM CST | 22 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 1:02 AM CST | 18.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026, 1:01 AM CST | 36.5 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 60.4 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 19, 2026, 9:04 AM CST | 40.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 5:02 AM CST | 61.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 56.3 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 111.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 28, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 47.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 23, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 52.6 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Nov 26, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 32.3 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 22.2 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 15, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 36.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 7, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 21.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 33.1 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 9.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 9.3 | 1.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 29, 2025, 5:02 AM CDT | 11.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 16 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Jul 1, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 18.5 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2025, 5:01 AM CDT | 32.3 | 2.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 6, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 65.5 | 2.62R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2025 | 233.8 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2025 | 60.9 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2025 | 101.8 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2025 | 89.9 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Oct 2, 2025 | 42.5 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Jul 23, 2025 | 54.2 | 1.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 5, 2025 | 51.6 | 1.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2025 | 36.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2025 | 63.5 | 2.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 14, 2025 | 70.4 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Dec 27, 2024 | 19.2 | 1.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2024 | 47.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 27, 2024 | 27.9 | 2.22R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 21, 2024 | 47.9 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2024 | 31.6 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Dec 28, 2023 | 22.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2023 | 18.5 | 0.78R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2023 | 9.2 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 5, 2023 | 20.2 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2023 | 45.7 | 0.81R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:51 PM CDT | 0.16 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:34 PM CDT | 0.22 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:10 PM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:55 PM CDT | 0.19 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:43 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:14 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:59 AM CDT | 0.13 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:20 AM CDT | 0.07 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:58 AM CDT | 0.22 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:53 AM CDT | 0.2 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:44 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:33 AM CDT | 0.2 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:14 AM CDT | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:01 AM CDT | 0.11 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:35 AM CDT | 0.24 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:31 AM CDT | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:44 AM CDT | 0.22 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:17 AM CDT | 0.08 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:23 AM CDT | 0.23 | 2.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:53 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.38R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:49 PM CDT | 0.44 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:59 AM CDT | 0.72 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:24 AM CDT | 0.21 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:59 AM CDT | 0.17 | 0.65R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:19 AM CDT | 0.09 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:01 PM CDT | 0.26 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:18 AM CDT | 0.66 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:38 AM CDT | 0.26 | 0.96R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:23 AM CDT | 0.3 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:48 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:13 AM CDT | 0.35 | 1.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:58 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:08 PM CDT | 0.22 | 1.23R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:45 PM CDT | 0.14 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:25 AM CDT | 0.61 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 0.49 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:45 AM CDT | 0.29 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 10:15 PM CDT | 0.1 | 1.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:39 PM CDT | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:34 PM CDT | 0.38 | 0.61R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:34 AM CDT | 0.34 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:53 AM CDT | 0.33 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 11:49 AM CDT | 0.88 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 9:08 AM CDT | 1.09 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:23 AM CDT | 0.37 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 0.7 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:15 AM CDT | 0.23 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:35 AM CDT | 0.7 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 10:48 PM CDT | 0.18 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 6:30 AM CDT | 0.54 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 8:15 PM CDT | 0.16 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 12:35 PM CDT | 0.24 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 8:05 AM CDT | 0.34 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.53 | 0.87R | Flat |
| Apr 13, 2026, 10:53 AM CDT | 0.41 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 3:52 AM CDT | 0.52 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 3:15 AM CDT | 0.17 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 0.12 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT | 0.39 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 11:45 AM CDT | 1 | 0.36R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:04 PM CDT | 1.3 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:34 AM CDT | 1.1 | — | Open |
| Apr 26, 2026, 7:30 PM CDT | 0.46 | 2.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:04 PM CDT | 0.33 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 0.71 | 0.97R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 1.14 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 10:30 PM CDT | 0.42 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 1.34 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 12:35 PM CDT | 2.03 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:05 AM CDT | 0.61 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 9:02 PM CDT | 0.28 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 9:35 AM CDT | 0.63 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 3:35 AM CDT | 0.65 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 12:34 AM CDT | 0.51 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 1.29 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 0.72 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | 1.77 | 1.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 11:30 PM CDT | 1.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 2.03 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 1.28 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 10:04 AM CDT | 2.32 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 5:04 AM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 1.11 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 12:05 PM CDT | 2.03 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 0.65 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 5:05 AM CDT | 1.09 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 6:07 AM CDT | 1.17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 0.63 | 1.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 1.43 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 0.36 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 2.4 | 2.63R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 1.23 | 2.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 1.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 0.44 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 1.21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 2:00 PM CST | 2.36 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 10:00 AM CST | 1.68 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 6:00 AM CST | 1.65 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2026, 2:02 AM CST | 1.17 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 1.39 | — | Open |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 6.37 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 3.28 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 1:02 AM CST | 1.04 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 1:03 AM CST | 0.52 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 1:02 AM CST | 0.79 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 21, 2026, 9:06 PM CST | 0.19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2025, 9:26 AM CST | 0.51 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 0.71 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2025, 5:12 AM CST | 1.34 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Nov 3, 2025, 1:11 AM CST | 0.53 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 23, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.82 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Oct 21, 2025, 5:38 AM CDT | 1.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2025, 9:08 AM CDT | 1.42 | 2.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2025, 5:43 AM CDT | 0.53 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 5:07 AM CDT | 0.51 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2025, 1:30 AM CDT | 0.31 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 15, 2025, 10:08 PM CDT | 0.52 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2025, 1:14 AM CDT | 0.41 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2025, 5:10 AM CDT | 1.09 | 0.12R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026 | 5.3 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026 | 6.72 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Dec 8, 2025 | 1.65 | 2.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 12, 2025 | 2.8 | 0.49R | Flat |
| Oct 9, 2025 | 1.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 11, 2025 | 1.84 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2025 | 1.79 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Aug 19, 2025 | 1.01 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2025 | 1.54 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2025 | 2.59 | 2.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2025 | 1.92 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Feb 21, 2025 | 2.89 | 1.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2025 | 2.27 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2025 | 1.97 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2024 | 2.45 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2024 | 4.56 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 5, 2024 | 1.08 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 21, 2024 | 1.2 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2024 | 1.76 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2024 | 1.68 | 0.68R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:31 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:31 AM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:19 AM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:30 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:42 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:33 AM CDT | 0.007 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:20 AM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:45 AM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:28 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:17 AM CDT | 0.001 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:37 AM CDT | 0.003 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:33 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:12 PM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:02 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.38R | Flat |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:15 AM CDT | 0.008 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:59 AM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:28 AM CDT | 0.007 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:16 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 4:44 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:37 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.67R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:59 AM CDT | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:14 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:29 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:16 PM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:17 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:57 AM CDT | 0.008 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:17 AM CDT | 0.007 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 4:52 AM CDT | 0.004 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 10:06 AM CDT | 0.011 | 2.27R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:50 AM CDT | 0.004 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 4:10 AM CDT | 0.003 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:33 AM CDT | 0.004 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:31 PM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:14 AM CDT | 0.009 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:54 AM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:15 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:52 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2026, 5:15 PM CDT | 0.007 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 1:48 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:29 PM CDT | 0.01 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:55 PM CDT | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:54 AM CDT | 0.024 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:17 AM CDT | 0.014 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:41 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:47 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 2:42 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:49 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:58 PM CDT | 0.01 | 2.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 10:43 AM CDT | 0.014 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 7:13 AM CDT | 0.033 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:01 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 2:06 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 4:55 AM CDT | 0.006 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 8:07 AM CDT | 0.021 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 2:18 PM CDT | 0.006 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:33 AM CDT | 0.027 | 2.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 5:18 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 10:54 AM CDT | 0.014 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 11:27 AM CDT | 0.053 | 0.28R | Flat |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 3:19 PM CDT | 0.016 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:19 AM CDT | 0.015 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:19 AM CDT | 0.018 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 10:06 AM CDT | 0.036 | 0.22R | Flat |
| Apr 13, 2026, 7:29 AM CDT | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:14 PM CDT | 0.008 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 7:11 AM CDT | 0.016 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 12:26 AM CDT | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 6:08 AM CDT | 0.035 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 11:56 AM CDT | 0.016 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 11:57 PM CDT | 0.015 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 6:47 PM CDT | 0.014 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 12:13 PM CDT | 0.025 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 9:15 AM CDT | 0.065 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 8:07 PM CDT | 0.027 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 3:04 AM CDT | 0.034 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 8:34 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2026, 2:11 PM CDT | 0.016 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 9:16 AM CDT | 0.045 | 1.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 0.056 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:23 AM CDT | 0.013 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:24 AM CDT | 0.034 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:58 AM CDT | 0.067 | 2.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:19 AM CDT | 0.02 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 6:53 AM CDT | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:28 PM CDT | 0.033 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 7:10 PM CDT | 0.014 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 12:06 PM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 6:59 AM CDT | 0.021 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 8:03 AM CDT | 0.058 | 0.48R | Flat |
| Apr 6, 2026, 12:38 PM CDT | 0.034 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 1:07 AM CDT | 0.011 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2026, 7:30 AM CDT | 0.03 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 4:15 AM CDT | 0.058 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 11:43 PM CDT | 0.017 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 3:17 AM CDT | 0.032 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 10:30 PM CDT | 0.018 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 4:15 AM CDT | 0.076 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 10:09 PM CDT | 0.084 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Mar 16, 2026, 7:30 PM CDT | 0.015 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:48 AM CDT | 0.048 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 6:53 AM CDT | 0.037 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.108 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 3:13 AM CDT | 0.055 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 9:09 PM CDT | 0.101 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2026, 5:29 AM CST | 0.059 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 5:00 PM CST | 0.056 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2026, 9:04 PM CST | 0.103 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2026, 1:32 AM CST | 0.115 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2026, 6:14 AM CST | 0.164 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.05 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2025, 6:18 AM CST | 0.051 | 2.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 19, 2025, 5:00 PM CST | 0.071 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2025, 9:55 PM CST | 0.091 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 7, 2025, 2:20 AM CST | 0.093 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Oct 16, 2025, 3:32 AM CDT | 0.064 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 8, 2025, 6:42 AM CDT | 0.203 | 1.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 30, 2025, 3:59 AM CDT | 0.125 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2025, 6:27 AM CDT | 0.053 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2025, 2:51 AM CDT | 0.049 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bearish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2025 | 0.159 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 5, 2025 | 0.157 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2024 | 0.254 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Oct 30, 2024 | 0.105 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2024 | 0.092 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 28, 2023 | 0.203 | 2.73R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 16, 2023 | 0.222 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 10, 2023 | 0.233 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 12, 2022 | 0.519 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 6, 2022 | 1.015 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2022 | 0.809 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 6, 2021 | 0.071 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 6, 2021 | 0.152 | 0.99R | Stopped |
| May 18, 2021 | 0.141 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2021 | 0.083 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2021 | 0.067 | 2.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2021 | 0.251 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 29, 2021 | 0.153 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2021 | 0.093 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2020 | 0.072 | 0.06R | Stopped |
Sample backtest
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.