Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Engulfing
Two-candle reversal trigger: a bearish candle followed by a bullish candle whose body engulfs the prior bar's body.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.7%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+5.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.21×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.7% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry — a 5.4-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.7% | 42.3% | +5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.8% | 28.5% | +0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.9% | 20.1% | -2.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.3% | 56.3% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 2.0% | 1.5% | +0.5 |
75,152 occurrences · 5,134,668 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.6%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+5.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.6% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry — a 5.8-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.6% | 41.8% | +5.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.5% | 28.1% | +0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.6% | 19.9% | -2.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.8% | 56.3% | -6.5 |
| Went sideways | 2.6% | 1.8% | +0.8 |
20,276 occurrences · 1,150,038 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+6.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.9% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry — a 6.2-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.9% | 41.7% | +6.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.5% | 28.0% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.1% | 20.0% | -2.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.4% | 55.8% | -7.4 |
| Went sideways | 3.7% | 2.5% | +1.2 |
7,342 occurrences · 393,544 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+5.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.07×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.4% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry — a 5.6-point gap, wider than the ±1.6-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.4% | 41.8% | +5.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.0% | 28.1% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.3% | 20.1% | -1.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.2% | 55.0% | -7.8 |
| Went sideways | 5.4% | 3.3% | +2.2 |
3,661 occurrences · 197,665 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (+6.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.04×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 49.2% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry — a 6.6-point gap, wider than the ±2.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.2% | 42.5% | +6.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.2% | 28.9% | +0.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.7% | 20.9% | -2.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.6% | 55.0% | -8.4 |
| Went sideways | 4.3% | 2.4% | +1.8 |
1,810 occurrences · 98,258 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.0% for a random long entry (+5.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.4% of the time vs 43.0% for a random long entry — a 5.4-point gap, wider than the ±5.0-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.4% | 43.0% | +5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.3% | 29.4% | -0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.4% | 21.0% | -2.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.5% | 55.4% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 2.1% | 1.6% | +0.5 |
376 occurrences · 22,487 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (72). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
61.1%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.1% for a random long entry (+16.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.41R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.18R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 16.0-point gap over the 45.1% random-entry rate clears the ±11.5-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 61.1% | 45.1% | +16.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 30.6% | 30.4% | +0.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 13.9% | 20.6% | -6.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 34.7% | 53.5% | -18.8 |
| Went sideways | 4.2% | 1.4% | +2.7 |
72 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random long entry (+7.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.43×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.09R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.90R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.3% of the time vs 38.3% for a random long entry — a 7.0-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.3% | 38.3% | +7.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.3% | 23.9% | +2.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.6% | 15.7% | -0.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.0% | 60.3% | -7.3 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 1.4% | +0.3 |
53,954 occurrences · 4,973,170 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random long entry (+7.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.22×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.0% of the time vs 39.7% for a random long entry — a 7.4-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.0% | 39.7% | +7.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.5% | 25.8% | +1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.6% | 17.5% | -0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.6% | 58.6% | -8.0 |
| Went sideways | 2.4% | 1.7% | +0.6 |
17,387 occurrences · 1,163,478 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random long entry (+7.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.15×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.5% of the time vs 40.2% for a random long entry — a 7.3-point gap, wider than the ±1.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.5% | 40.2% | +7.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.0% | 26.4% | +1.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.6% | 18.3% | -0.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.8% | 57.5% | -8.6 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 2.3% | +1.3 |
6,887 occurrences · 406,561 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random long entry (+6.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.19R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.5% of the time vs 40.5% for a random long entry — a 6.0-point gap, wider than the ±1.6-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.5% | 40.5% | +6.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.9% | 26.7% | +0.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.9% | 18.7% | -1.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.4% | 56.5% | -8.1 |
| Went sideways | 5.1% | 3.0% | +2.1 |
3,617 occurrences · 205,912 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (+6.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 48.1% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry — a 6.7-point gap, wider than the ±2.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.1% | 41.4% | +6.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.0% | 27.4% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 19.4% | +0.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.0% | 56.2% | -8.2 |
| Went sideways | 3.9% | 2.4% | +1.4 |
1,807 occurrences · 102,855 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+5.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.3% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry — a 5.0-point gap, wider than the ±4.6-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.3% | 42.3% | +5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.5% | 28.9% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.9% | 20.6% | -1.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.9% | 56.1% | -5.1 |
| Went sideways | 1.8% | 1.7% | +0.2 |
438 occurrences · 23,296 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (84). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
53.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.9% for a random long entry (+9.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.06×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.39R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 53.6% of the time vs 43.9% for a random long entry. The 9.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 84 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 53.6% | 43.9% | +9.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.1% | 28.3% | +3.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.4% | 18.6% | +2.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 54.4% | -11.6 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 1.7% | +1.9 |
84 occurrences · 4,710 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.8%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random long entry (+4.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.13R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.8% of the time vs 40.2% for a random long entry — a 4.5-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.8% | 40.2% | +4.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.2% | 26.6% | -0.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.1% | 18.6% | -2.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.5% | 58.1% | -5.7 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 1.6% | +1.1 |
71,073 occurrences · 5,273,492 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random long entry (+6.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.2% of the time vs 40.8% for a random long entry — a 6.4-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.2% | 40.8% | +6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.9% | 27.1% | +0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.2% | 19.1% | -1.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 57.4% | -7.5 |
| Went sideways | 2.9% | 1.8% | +1.1 |
21,149 occurrences · 1,202,903 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+6.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.4% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry — a 6.1-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.4% | 41.3% | +6.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.0% | 27.5% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.0% | 19.5% | -1.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.0% | 56.5% | -7.5 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 2.2% | +1.4 |
7,859 occurrences · 413,296 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random long entry (+6.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.25R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.9% of the time vs 41.6% for a random long entry — a 6.3-point gap, wider than the ±1.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.9% | 41.6% | +6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.7% | 27.8% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.1% | 19.8% | -1.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.5% | 55.8% | -8.4 |
| Went sideways | 4.7% | 2.6% | +2.1 |
4,094 occurrences · 207,610 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.2%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+3.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 3.9-point gap over the 42.3% random-entry rate clears the ±2.2-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.2% | 42.3% | +3.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.1% | 28.6% | -1.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.9% | 20.7% | -2.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.7% | 55.6% | -5.9 |
| Went sideways | 4.2% | 2.1% | +2.0 |
1,989 occurrences · 103,079 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.7% for a random long entry (+8.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.98×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.33R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 50.9% of the time vs 42.7% for a random long entry — a 8.3-point gap, wider than the ±4.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.9% | 42.7% | +8.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.6% | 29.7% | +3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.6% | 21.8% | -0.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.8% | 55.8% | -9.0 |
| Went sideways | 2.3% | 1.5% | +0.8 |
481 occurrences · 23,332 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (67). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 46.2% for a random long entry (+1.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.90×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.29R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.22R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.8% of the time vs 46.2% for a random long entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 67 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.8% | 46.2% | +1.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.4% | 32.2% | -3.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.4% | 23.6% | -4.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.3% | 52.6% | -3.3 |
| Went sideways | 3.0% | 1.2% | +1.8 |
67 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.3%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random long entry (+5.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.28×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.3% of the time vs 39.7% for a random long entry — a 5.5-point gap, wider than the ±0.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.3% | 39.7% | +5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.1% | 26.2% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.9% | 18.3% | -1.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.5% | 58.6% | -6.1 |
| Went sideways | 2.3% | 1.7% | +0.6 |
64,974 occurrences · 5,085,799 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.6% for a random long entry (+5.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.10×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.5% of the time vs 40.6% for a random long entry — a 5.9-point gap, wider than the ±0.7-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.5% | 40.6% | +5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.8% | 27.3% | +0.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.6% | 19.3% | -1.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.6% | 57.5% | -6.9 |
| Went sideways | 2.9% | 1.8% | +1.0 |
20,121 occurrences · 1,174,599 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (+5.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.9% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry — a 5.9-point gap, wider than the ±1.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.9% | 40.9% | +5.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.2% | 27.5% | -0.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.1% | 19.7% | -2.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.5% | 56.7% | -7.2 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 2.3% | +1.3 |
7,769 occurrences · 404,950 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+6.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.02×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.2% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry — a 6.3-point gap, wider than the ±1.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.2% | 41.0% | +6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.4% | 27.5% | +0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.2% | 19.7% | -1.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.5% | 56.1% | -8.6 |
| Went sideways | 5.2% | 2.9% | +2.3 |
3,998 occurrences · 203,708 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.2%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random long entry (+5.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.24R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.2% of the time vs 41.5% for a random long entry — a 5.7-point gap, wider than the ±2.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.2% | 41.5% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.1% | 28.1% | +0.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.6% | 20.3% | -1.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.2% | 56.5% | -7.3 |
| Went sideways | 3.6% | 2.0% | +1.6 |
2,001 occurrences · 101,155 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.4%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (+5.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.95×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.4% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry — a 5.5-point gap, wider than the ±4.2-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.4% | 40.9% | +5.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.4% | 28.2% | +0.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.2% | 20.4% | -1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.8% | 57.8% | -8.0 |
| Went sideways | 3.8% | 1.2% | +2.5 |
532 occurrences · 23,115 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (69). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
59.4%
Fragile
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (+16.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.38R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
The 16.9-point gap over the 42.5% random-entry rate clears the ±11.7-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 59.4% | 42.5% | +16.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 34.8% | 29.0% | +5.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.4% | 20.5% | -3.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.6% | 56.3% | -15.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
69 occurrences · 4,699 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.0% for a random long entry (+5.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.37×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.1% of the time vs 39.0% for a random long entry — a 5.1-point gap, wider than the ±0.5-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.1% | 39.0% | +5.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.9% | 25.8% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.2% | 18.1% | -1.0 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.1% | 59.1% | -6.0 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 1.9% | +0.9 |
34,597 occurrences · 3,527,527 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.1%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random long entry (+5.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.11×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 45.1% of the time vs 40.1% for a random long entry — a 5.0-point gap, wider than the ±0.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.1% | 40.1% | +5.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.8% | 27.0% | +0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.6% | 19.2% | -1.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.8% | 58.0% | -6.2 |
| Went sideways | 3.1% | 1.9% | +1.2 |
13,762 occurrences · 900,514 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random long entry (+6.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.05×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 46.9% of the time vs 40.4% for a random long entry — a 6.5-point gap, wider than the ±1.3-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.9% | 40.4% | +6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.0% | 27.2% | +0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 17.8% | 19.6% | -1.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.4% | 57.4% | -8.0 |
| Went sideways | 3.7% | 2.2% | +1.5 |
5,624 occurrences · 317,082 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.0%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random long entry (+6.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.99×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.0% of the time vs 40.5% for a random long entry — a 6.5-point gap, wider than the ±1.8-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.0% | 40.5% | +6.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.8% | 27.2% | +1.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 19.9% | -0.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 48.6% | 57.0% | -8.4 |
| Went sideways | 4.4% | 2.5% | +1.9 |
2,917 occurrences · 160,707 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.9%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random long entry (+4.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.00×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 44.9% of the time vs 40.7% for a random long entry — a 4.3-point gap, wider than the ±2.4-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.9% | 40.7% | +4.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.1% | 28.0% | -0.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.6% | 20.5% | -1.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.7% | 57.7% | -5.0 |
| Went sideways | 2.3% | 1.6% | +0.7 |
1,589 occurrences · 80,124 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.5%
Reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random long entry (+7.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.03×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered at least 1R of room 47.5% of the time vs 39.8% for a random long entry — a 7.7-point gap, wider than the ±4.9-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.5% | 39.8% | +7.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 29.8% | 28.0% | +1.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 22.2% | 20.8% | +1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.2% | 59.0% | -7.9 |
| Went sideways | 1.3% | 1.2% | +0.1 |
383 occurrences · 18,549 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (86). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.8%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+7.6 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.93×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.14R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.8% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 7.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 86 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.8% | 41.3% | +7.6 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 24.4% | 29.1% | -4.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.1% | 21.3% | -6.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.2% | 58.1% | -6.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.6% | -0.6 |
86 occurrences · 4,690 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish engulfing is a two-candle reversal. A down candle is followed by a larger up candle whose body completely covers the body of the one before it. The read is a fast handoff from sellers to buyers: whatever ground the down candle gave up, the next candle takes back and then some.
Steve Nison treats the engulfing pattern as one of the major reversal signals in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991), the book that introduced candlestick analysis to Western traders.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle opens at or below the first candle’s close, then closes above the first candle’s open. Its body swallows the prior body.
- The larger the second candle relative to the first, the stronger the signal traders read into it.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the two candles on a real occurrence. The bars on either side are there for context: the decline before, and what price did after.
The psychology
Price has been falling, and as the first candle closes the sellers are still in control and comfortable. The next candle opens lower, right where they want it, and then everything turns. Instead of carrying on down, price reverses and closes above where the entire prior candle began. In a single bar the sellers’ last push has been met and erased.
That is the story traders read into it: the people pressing the market lower have run out of supply, and buyers have stepped in with enough size to take back a full candle of selling and then some. Anyone who sold into the lows is now offside, and some of them will have to buy back to cover, which adds fuel to the turn. The larger the engulfing candle, the more decisive that handover of control looks, and the more attention it draws.
Whether that shift in mood actually leads anywhere is a separate question, and it is the one the data below answers.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the engulfing offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes the pattern fires thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the engulfing candle.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the engulfing candle.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:45 PM CDT | 16.5 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:23 PM CDT | 8.75 | 2.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:28 PM CDT | 11.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:07 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:35 AM CDT | 27 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:05 AM CDT | 7.5 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:26 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:39 AM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:43 AM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 11.25 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 9.25 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:43 PM CDT | 3.75 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:56 PM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:43 PM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:32 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:25 PM CDT | 9.75 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:14 PM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:06 PM CDT | 19.75 | 0.99R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:59 PM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:20 PM CDT | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:25 AM CDT | 18.25 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:25 PM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:45 AM CDT | 31.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:50 AM CDT | 29.25 | 2.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:10 AM CDT | 36 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:05 PM CDT | 8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:05 PM CDT | 16.75 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:20 PM CDT | 9.75 | 2.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:05 PM CDT | 24.5 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:20 AM CDT | 14.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:15 PM CDT | 8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 21.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 9:35 AM CDT | 64.25 | 2.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 7:05 AM CDT | 17 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 17 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:20 PM CDT | 9.25 | 0.97R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:50 PM CDT | 154 | 0.95R | Flat |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:55 AM CDT | 32 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:50 AM CDT | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:25 AM CDT | 12.5 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 32.75 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 39.5 | 2.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:45 AM CDT | 44 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 19.5 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 7.75 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:45 PM CDT | 198.75 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 7:45 PM CDT | 24.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:45 AM CDT | 27.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:30 PM CDT | 24.25 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 20.5 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2026, 7:45 PM CDT | 16.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 11:45 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:15 AM CDT | 15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 96.75 | 2.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 25.25 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 7:30 PM CDT | 26.25 | 0.22R | Flat |
| Apr 13, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 27.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 19 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 19.5 | 1.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT | 38.5 | 0.68R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 60.25 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 44.5 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | 52.75 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 62.25 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:31 AM CDT | 118.75 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 37 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 1:30 AM CDT | 20.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 10:30 PM CDT | 20.75 | 0.07R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 38.75 | 2.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 51.25 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 1:30 AM CDT | 39.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 3, 2026, 6:06 AM CDT | 36.25 | 2.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 20 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 55.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 114.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 110 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 7:30 PM CDT | 240.75 | 0.84R | Flat |
| Mar 26, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 87.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 2:30 PM CDT | 59.75 | 0.36R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 116 | 0.12R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 52 | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 83 | 1.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 52.75 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 91 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 65.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 56.25 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 24.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 121.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 3:00 PM CDT | 215.25 | 0.63R | Flat |
| Mar 23, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 159.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 111.25 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 132 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 127.5 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 61.5 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 64.5 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 106 | 2.66R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 236 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 158 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 6:00 PM CST | 77.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 118.5 | 1.46R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 116 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 395.75 | 0.74R | Flat |
| Feb 13, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 361 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 255.25 | 2.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 292 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Nov 3, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 121.25 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 14, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 478.5 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 98.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 18, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 41 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 111.75 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Jul 1, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 93.75 | 0.10R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 144 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 278 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 119.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 628.5 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Mar 3, 2025, 9:00 PM CST | 93.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 108.25 | 0.87R | Stopped |
| Jan 10, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 82 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 83.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 107.25 | 0.35R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | 381 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2025 | 520.25 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2025 | 691.75 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2025 | 659 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2025 | 2,618.5 | 0.38R | Flat |
| Jan 15, 2025 | 603.25 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2024 | 193.25 | 1.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 7, 2023 | 227 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2023 | 479.5 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2023 | 255 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2023 | 219.75 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2022 | 212.75 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Aug 10, 2022 | 417.75 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Jul 27, 2022 | 508.25 | 2.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 14, 2022 | 328 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 4, 2022 | 434.5 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2022 | 670.75 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2022 | 278.25 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2021 | 201.75 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2021 | 508 | 1.31R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:16 PM CDT | 6 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:06 PM CDT | 12.25 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:59 PM CDT | 11.5 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:47 PM CDT | 7.5 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:32 PM CDT | 3.75 | 2.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:04 PM CDT | 3.25 | 1.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:32 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:20 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:55 AM CDT | 6.75 | 1.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:39 AM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:15 AM CDT | 3.5 | 1.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 3 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:51 AM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:35 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.95R | Flat |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:44 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:32 AM CDT | 1 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:59 AM CDT | 1.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:43 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:32 PM CDT | 1.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:25 PM CDT | 2 | 0.25R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:36 AM CDT | 9 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:46 AM CDT | 7.5 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:51 AM CDT | 4 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:01 AM CDT | 5 | 1.90R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:41 AM CDT | 7 | 0.57R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:16 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.80R | Flat |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:26 AM CDT | 3.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:56 PM CDT | 2 | 1.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:41 PM CDT | 1.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:45 AM CDT | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:05 AM CDT | 10.25 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:40 AM CDT | 7.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:20 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:50 PM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:05 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.82R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:10 PM CDT | 2.25 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:10 PM CDT | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:35 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:15 AM CDT | 1.25 | 0.80R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:46 AM CDT | 8.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 10:15 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 8 | 0.78R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:45 PM CDT | 3.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:15 PM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 12:45 PM CDT | 44.25 | 0.68R | Flat |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 5.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 10:45 PM CDT | 8.5 | 2.56R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 7:45 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 7.75 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 10:15 AM CDT | 9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:45 AM CDT | 6.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:30 PM CDT | 4.5 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 5.5 | 2.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 27.25 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:45 AM CDT | 20.5 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 10:45 PM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 2 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 10:15 AM CDT | 21.5 | 0.30R | Flat |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:01 AM CDT | 13.25 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:30 AM CDT | 22 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | 7.25 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 8.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:30 PM CDT | 7.5 | 1.97R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 12 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 20.5 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 12.5 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 8.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 12 | 2.98R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 26.25 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 9.5 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 10:30 AM CDT | 15.75 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Apr 5, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 9.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 10:00 PM CDT | 4.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT | 26.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 10.5 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 38 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 10:30 AM CDT | 15.25 | 0.67R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:01 AM CDT | 10 | — | Open |
| Apr 27, 2026, 3:00 AM CDT | 7.25 | 1.34R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 16.5 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 9.5 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 10, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 12.25 | 2.06R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 33.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 27 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 11.75 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 15.75 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 9.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 64.25 | 0.35R | Flat |
| Mar 3, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 31 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2026, 2:00 PM CST | 33.25 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Feb 27, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 35.75 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 54.5 | 0.84R | Flat |
| Feb 24, 2026, 3:00 AM CST | 17.75 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Feb 23, 2026, 2:05 PM CST | 20 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2026, 11:00 PM CST | 6.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2026, 8:00 AM CST | 31.5 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 19.25 | — | Open |
| Apr 9, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 24.25 | 2.94R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 43.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 31.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 117.5 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 84.25 | 0.67R | Flat |
| Feb 13, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 72.5 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 28 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 1:00 AM CST | 52.75 | 2.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 12, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 49.75 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 9, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 18.25 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 50.25 | 2.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 50.25 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Nov 4, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 50.25 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Oct 14, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 122 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 19.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 21, 2025, 1:01 AM CDT | 12.75 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 21.5 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | 93.75 | 0.63R | Stopped |
| Oct 15, 2025 | 120.25 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2025 | 187.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2025 | 641.75 | 0.35R | Flat |
| Jan 30, 2025 | 51 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2024 | 33.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 7, 2023 | 37 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 30, 2023 | 27 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 24, 2023 | 57 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2023 | 103 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Jul 10, 2023 | 34 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2023 | 24 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2022 | 71.75 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2022 | 68.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 19, 2022 | 76.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 7, 2022 | 95 | 1.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 27, 2022 | 107.25 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 15, 2022 | 120.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 15, 2021 | 51.25 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| May 20, 2021 | 96.5 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:06 PM CDT | 4.3 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:44 PM CDT | 1.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:36 PM CDT | 2.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:24 PM CDT | 2.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:29 PM CDT | 3.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:04 PM CDT | 2.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:27 AM CDT | 1.4 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 11:10 AM CDT | 2.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:31 AM CDT | 2.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:31 AM CDT | 5.4 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:39 AM CDT | 4.8 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:27 AM CDT | 4.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:11 AM CDT | 2.8 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:44 AM CDT | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:07 AM CDT | 4.9 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:46 AM CDT | 2.1 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 4:11 AM CDT | 1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:27 AM CDT | 5.7 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 5.1 | 0.65R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:47 PM CDT | 5.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:12 AM CDT | 13.7 | 2.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:57 AM CDT | 4.8 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:32 AM CDT | 7.4 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:57 AM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:47 PM CDT | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:37 PM CDT | 5.3 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:42 PM CDT | 3.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:22 PM CDT | 6.5 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:22 AM CDT | 9.2 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:52 AM CDT | 10.9 | 1.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:17 AM CDT | 10.7 | 0.24R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:02 AM CDT | 16.3 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 4:42 AM CDT | 5.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:52 AM CDT | 4.4 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:22 AM CDT | 3.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:11 PM CDT | 2 | 1.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:06 PM CDT | 3.6 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 11:56 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 8:26 PM CDT | 4.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:47 PM CDT | 15.6 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:32 AM CDT | 18.1 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:02 AM CDT | 29.4 | 0.57R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:17 AM CDT | 17.4 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:02 AM CDT | 12.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:01 AM CDT | 8.9 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:01 AM CDT | 5.2 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 6:46 PM CDT | 4.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:15 AM CDT | 7.6 | 1.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 8:15 AM CDT | 14.1 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 1:45 AM CDT | 4.3 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 10.6 | 1.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 7.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:01 PM CDT | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 11:01 AM CDT | 6.6 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:31 AM CDT | 12.4 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 10:30 AM CDT | 10.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 15 | 1.85R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 3.5 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 9:02 AM CDT | 26.6 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:32 AM CDT | 17.6 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:32 PM CDT | 18 | 0.79R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:31 PM CDT | 19.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 5.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 13.8 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:00 AM CDT | 14.3 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT | 9.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 11.4 | 1.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 6:07 AM CDT | 12.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 1:31 PM CDT | 6.2 | 0.97R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 4:31 AM CDT | 9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:31 AM CDT | 8.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 3:01 AM CDT | 7.3 | 1.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 7:31 PM CDT | 9.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT | 29 | 2.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 11:31 AM CDT | 18.3 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 8:30 PM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 10:02 AM CDT | 29.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 6:32 AM CDT | 30 | 0.41R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2026, 7:01 PM CDT | 27.4 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:01 PM CDT | 19.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 14.1 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Apr 16, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 4.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 16.8 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 3:01 AM CDT | 13.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 8:02 AM CDT | 42.1 | 1.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 20.7 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 4:01 AM CDT | 22.6 | 1.98R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 32.6 | 2.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 28.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 8:01 AM CDT | 25.6 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 24.5 | 1.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 53.8 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 11:08 AM CDT | 28.9 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 12:08 AM CDT | 18.3 | 0.95R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 24.5 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 11, 2026, 8:02 AM CDT | 36.9 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 19.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 5:01 AM CDT | 45.8 | — | Open |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 42 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 41.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 43.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 16, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 55.1 | 1.98R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 9, 2025, 1:00 AM CST | 35.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 40.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 25, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 24.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2025, 5:00 AM CST | 55.2 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 65.2 | 0.54R | Stopped |
| Oct 3, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT | 26.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 18, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 21.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 27, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 25.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 18, 2025, 9:02 PM CDT | 10.7 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Jul 31, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 17 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 9, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 18.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 18, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 17.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 14.9 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 32.3 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 11.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | 26 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 11, 2025 | 54.7 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 5, 2025 | 114 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Oct 10, 2024 | 28.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2024 | 48.6 | 2.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 23, 2024 | 25.4 | 0.88R | Stopped |
| Jun 27, 2024 | 34 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 25, 2024 | 28.2 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Feb 15, 2024 | 19.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 6, 2023 | 23.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 21, 2023 | 10.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2023 | 34.4 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2023 | 28.9 | 1.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 15, 2023 | 15.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 2, 2023 | 40.1 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 20, 2022 | 34.5 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jun 22, 2022 | 15.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 19, 2022 | 36 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Dec 3, 2021 | 21.7 | 0.48R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2021 | 40.8 | 0.98R | Flat |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:05 PM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:40 PM CDT | 0.15 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:35 PM CDT | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:12 PM CDT | 0.17 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:08 PM CDT | 0.21 | 1.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:03 AM CDT | 0.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:14 AM CDT | 0.12 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 6:05 AM CDT | 0.14 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:34 AM CDT | 0.11 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:13 AM CDT | 0.16 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:58 PM CDT | 0.08 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 9:11 PM CDT | 0.11 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:27 PM CDT | 0.12 | 2.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:54 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:28 PM CDT | 0.09 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:43 PM CDT | 0.06 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:21 PM CDT | 0.11 | 0.45R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:56 AM CDT | 0.16 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:27 AM CDT | 0.27 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:01 AM CDT | 0.34 | 0.26R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:29 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:59 PM CDT | 0.35 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:09 AM CDT | 0.19 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 1:28 PM CDT | 0.83 | 0.18R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:58 AM CDT | 0.48 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:43 AM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:58 PM CDT | 0.36 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:45 PM CDT | 0.33 | 1.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 6:30 AM CDT | 0.32 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 4:50 AM CDT | 0.16 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 10:35 PM CDT | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 26, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 0.18 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 10:54 AM CDT | 0.63 | 1.32R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 8:19 AM CDT | 0.66 | 0.44R | Flat |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:19 PM CDT | 0.33 | 1.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:57 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:08 PM CDT | 0.68 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:38 AM CDT | 0.42 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 9:38 AM CDT | 0.43 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 8:58 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.08R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:38 PM CDT | 0.13 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:38 AM CDT | 0.45 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:53 AM CDT | 1.12 | 0.54R | Flat |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:23 PM CDT | 0.16 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 0.81 | 0.12R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:34 PM CDT | 0.64 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 1:38 PM CDT | 0.74 | 2.01R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:38 AM CDT | 1.27 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:53 PM CDT | 0.47 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:00 AM CDT | 0.42 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 7:30 PM CDT | 0.74 | 0.47R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:30 PM CDT | 0.36 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:50 AM CDT | 0.56 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 7:30 AM CDT | 0.43 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 19, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT | 0.43 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 11:16 AM CDT | 0.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:16 AM CDT | 0.62 | 0.68R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 1:49 AM CDT | 0.68 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 1:07 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 1:23 PM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026, 1:04 PM CDT | 1.82 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 10:34 PM CDT | 0.62 | 0.02R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:38 AM CDT | 0.98 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 3:30 PM CDT | 0.46 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:35 AM CDT | 0.63 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 5:35 AM CDT | 0.79 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 12:35 AM CDT | 0.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 12:01 PM CDT | 1.47 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2026, 10:01 AM CDT | 2.77 | 2.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 7:05 AM CDT | 0.48 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 2:34 PM CDT | 0.36 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2026, 12:07 AM CDT | 0.68 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Apr 13, 2026, 2:07 AM CDT | 0.73 | 1.47R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 6:30 AM CDT | 0.68 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 2:00 AM CDT | 0.68 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 1.86 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 1:30 AM CDT | 1.32 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT | 0.83 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 5.37 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 0.85 | 0.72R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:04 AM CDT | 1.94 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:08 PM CDT | 1.03 | 0.23R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 0.42 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 7:02 PM CDT | 0.46 | 0.46R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 3.16 | 0.64R | Flat |
| Apr 1, 2026, 8:00 PM CDT | 6.67 | 1.70R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 1:00 AM CDT | 1.17 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Mar 26, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 1.34 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 1.98 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT | 2.09 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT | 2.62 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 5:02 AM CDT | 3.03 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2026, 12:04 AM CST | 0.31 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2026, 1:13 PM CST | 0.36 | 1.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 23, 2026, 1:07 PM CST | 0.32 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2026, 7:09 PM CST | 0.19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2026, 11:52 AM CST | 0.48 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 12, 2026, 12:41 PM CST | 0.62 | 0.39R | Stopped |
| Feb 10, 2026, 1:16 PM CST | 0.38 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 8, 2026, 6:00 PM CST | 0.49 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:05 AM CDT | 1.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 3.47 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT | 4.99 | 0.88R | Flat |
| Mar 9, 2026, 9:02 PM CDT | 4.35 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026, 1:02 AM CST | 0.69 | 0.52R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2025, 9:26 PM CST | 0.55 | 2.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2025, 9:05 AM CST | 0.54 | 1.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 17, 2025, 1:27 AM CST | 0.72 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2025, 5:03 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Oct 13, 2025, 1:11 AM CDT | 0.32 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 29, 2025, 9:25 PM CDT | 0.26 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.58 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2025, 1:41 AM CDT | 1.07 | 1.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2025, 1:24 AM CDT | 0.99 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2025, 9:37 PM CDT | 0.29 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 30, 2025, 5:14 AM CDT | 1.08 | 0.91R | Stopped |
| Jul 21, 2025, 9:32 AM CDT | 0.77 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2025, 2:56 AM CDT | 0.65 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2025, 1:44 AM CDT | 0.79 | 1.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2025, 1:17 AM CDT | 0.77 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | 1.45 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 17, 2025 | 1.93 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2025 | 2.07 | 1.42R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 7, 2024 | 3.27 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 5, 2024 | 1.81 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2024 | 2.33 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Jan 3, 2024 | 3.74 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2023 | 2.26 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 12, 2023 | 2.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 11, 2023 | 2.09 | 0.99R | Stopped |
| Jan 9, 2023 | 1.63 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 22, 2022 | 5.83 | 0.15R | Stopped |
| May 4, 2022 | 5.45 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2021 | 4.94 | 2.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 8, 2021 | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 1, 2021 | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 25, 2020 | 1.17 | 0.32R | Stopped |
| Jul 14, 2020 | 1.59 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 29, 2020 | 2.13 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2020 | 1.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 1:10 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:38 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:19 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:12 AM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 3:56 AM CDT | 0.004 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 2:18 AM CDT | 0.001 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:01 PM CDT | 0.001 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:39 PM CDT | 0.002 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 11:21 AM CDT | 0.002 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:38 AM CDT | 0.005 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:53 AM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:29 PM CDT | 0.002 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 1:41 PM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:56 PM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:31 PM CDT | 0.002 | 1.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:16 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:59 AM CDT | 0.005 | 2.20R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:48 AM CDT | 0.004 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 8:31 AM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:34 PM CDT | 0.003 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:24 AM CDT | 0.009 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 29, 2026, 7:24 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Apr 29, 2026, 5:34 AM CDT | 0.002 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:59 PM CDT | 0.003 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:44 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:14 AM CDT | 0.021 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 3:11 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 10:25 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 7:48 PM CDT | 0.004 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 2:22 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:57 PM CDT | 0.006 | 1.83R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:07 PM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 9:37 AM CDT | 0.018 | 0.22R | Stopped |
| Apr 26, 2026, 7:01 PM CDT | 0.004 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 3:46 AM CDT | 0.003 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:59 PM CDT | 0.004 | 0.75R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:38 PM CDT | 0.003 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:14 PM CDT | 0.006 | 1.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 5:38 AM CDT | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 12:29 PM CDT | 0.008 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 10:44 AM CDT | 0.007 | — | Open |
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:14 AM CDT | 0.035 | 0.66R | Flat |
| Apr 28, 2026, 7:59 PM CDT | 0.006 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Apr 28, 2026, 2:05 AM CDT | 0.005 | 1.40R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 28, 2026, 12:32 AM CDT | 0.007 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 9:11 AM CDT | 0.016 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 24, 2026, 4:41 AM CDT | 0.008 | 1.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 6:03 AM CDT | 0.006 | 1.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2026, 12:22 AM CDT | 0.011 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2026, 1:32 AM CDT | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 20, 2026, 2:24 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2026, 8:53 AM CDT | 0.018 | 1.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 19, 2026, 8:25 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2026, 5:28 AM CDT | 0.008 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 11:19 AM CDT | 0.015 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 8:04 AM CDT | 0.011 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2026, 7:26 PM CDT | 0.005 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2026, 10:51 AM CDT | 0.021 | 0.90R | Flat |
| Apr 15, 2026, 5:51 AM CDT | 0.01 | 0.20R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 8:54 AM CDT | 0.032 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Apr 27, 2026, 12:12 AM CDT | 0.006 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2026, 7:19 PM CDT | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 3:29 PM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 21, 2026, 8:26 PM CDT | 0.007 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 1:19 AM CDT | 0.005 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 12, 2026, 11:53 PM CDT | 0.005 | 1.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 4:37 AM CDT | 0.011 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 9, 2026, 7:46 AM CDT | 0.025 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 7:26 AM CDT | 0.024 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2026, 2:36 AM CDT | 0.027 | 0.26R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 4:11 AM CDT | 0.02 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 3:03 PM CDT | 0.009 | 2.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 10:03 AM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 8:58 PM CDT | 0.01 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 12:38 AM CDT | 0.013 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 8:19 PM CDT | 0.013 | 2.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 6:16 AM CDT | 0.011 | 2.45R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 1:53 PM CDT | 0.029 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 2:33 AM CDT | 0.018 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 10:43 PM CDT | 0.007 | — | Open |
| Apr 28, 2026, 5:24 AM CDT | 0.03 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2026, 6:56 AM CDT | 0.039 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2026, 11:58 AM CDT | 0.023 | 1.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 11:59 AM CDT | 0.033 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2026, 1:43 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2026, 4:41 AM CDT | 0.042 | 2.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 6, 2026, 2:38 AM CDT | 0.034 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 7:09 AM CDT | 0.017 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 11:33 AM CDT | 0.018 | 1.72R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2026, 4:33 AM CDT | 0.029 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 0.026 | 1.54R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 7:46 AM CDT | 0.039 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 9:01 AM CDT | 0.052 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2026, 1:06 PM CDT | 0.097 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 2:03 AM CDT | 0.019 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 10:56 PM CDT | 0.015 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.068 | 0.85R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT | 0.076 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT | 0.088 | 0.09R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2026, 4:14 AM CDT | 0.03 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 10:59 AM CDT | 0.036 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 6:12 AM CDT | 0.083 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 2:58 AM CDT | 0.048 | 0.90R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2026, 10:20 PM CDT | 0.075 | 0.35R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2026, 11:51 AM CST | 0.099 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 11, 2026, 6:45 AM CST | 0.122 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2026, 5:09 AM CST | 0.091 | 0.25R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 9:10 PM CST | 0.099 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 5:57 AM CST | 0.29 | 1.76R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 27, 2026, 9:27 AM CST | 0.166 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 14, 2026, 9:37 PM CST | 0.083 | 0.55R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 9:27 PM CST | 0.036 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2025, 10:30 PM CST | 0.051 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2025, 2:37 AM CDT | 0.045 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 9, 2025, 2:22 AM CDT | 0.071 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2025, 11:41 PM CDT | 0.042 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.107 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 12, 2025, 3:54 AM CDT | 0.046 | 2.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 9, 2025, 11:11 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Engulfing Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2026 | 0.115 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2026 | 0.117 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026 | 0.238 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025 | 0.261 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 0.363 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 27, 2025 | 0.342 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 12, 2025 | 0.084 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 20, 2025 | 0.322 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2025 | 0.423 | 1.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 18, 2024 | 0.144 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Jul 18, 2023 | 0.134 | 1.28R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2023 | 0.283 | 2.59R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2023 | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 13, 2022 | 0.348 | 0.16R | Stopped |
| Aug 3, 2022 | 0.752 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2021 | 0.401 | 0.04R | Stopped |
| Sep 23, 2021 | 0.292 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2021 | 0.096 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 22, 2021 | 0.125 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 2, 2021 | 0.126 | 0.29R | Stopped |
Sample backtests (3)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.
GC 1D · Bullish Engulfing · 2020-2024
- Win rate
- 50.00%
- Profit factor
- 1.65
- Max drawdown
- 19.07%
NQ 1D · Bullish Engulfing · 2020-2024
- Win rate
- 47.06%
- Profit factor
- 0.94
- Max drawdown
- 51.40%
ES 1D · Bullish Engulfing · 2020-2024
- Win rate
- 52.63%
- Profit factor
- 0.65
- Max drawdown
- 36.86%