Pattern Detail

Bearish Harami Cross

Two-candle bearish reversal: a doji held entirely inside the body of a large prior up candle, a sign the rally has stalled.

A real Bearish Harami Cross on NQ daily bars, Mar 16, 2017. Price then followed through 1.1% over the next 5 bars. The bright candles are the pattern; the dimmed bars are surrounding context.

How to read this

Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its highest high over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.

Room offered (≥ 1R)

48.8%

Reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random short entry (+7.2 pts).

Move size vs normal

2.11×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.26R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered at least 1R of room 48.8% of the time vs 41.6% for a random short entry — a 7.2-point gap, wider than the ±5.1-point margin of error from chance, and it holds across the sample. A real, if modest, tendency to offer more room than the market alone.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	48.8%	41.6%	+7.2
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	33.8%	28.2%	+5.6
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	22.7%	20.1%	+2.6
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	51.0%	57.1%	-6.1
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.3%	1.3%	-1.0

361 occurrences · 5,120,720 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

42.7%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random short entry (+2.2 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.42×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.18R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 42.7% of the time vs 40.4% for a random short entry. The 2.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±5.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 279 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	42.7%	40.4%	+2.2
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	31.5%	27.4%	+4.1
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	25.4%	19.8%	+5.7
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	57.3%	58.1%	-0.7
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.5%	-1.5

279 occurrences · 1,146,594 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

43.4%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (+3.8 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.29×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.11R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 43.4% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry. The 3.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±7.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 159 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	43.4%	39.6%	+3.8
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	28.3%	26.9%	+1.4
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	21.4%	19.6%	+1.8
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	56.6%	58.5%	-1.9
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.9%	-1.9

159 occurrences · 392,491 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (98). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

46.9%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (+8.1 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.01×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.25R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 46.9% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 8.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 98 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	46.9%	38.9%	+8.1
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	35.7%	26.4%	+9.3
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	25.5%	19.4%	+6.1
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	53.1%	58.7%	-5.7
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	2.4%	-2.4

98 occurrences · 197,303 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (76). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

40.8%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random short entry (+2.5 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.03×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.09R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 40.8% of the time vs 38.3% for a random short entry. The 2.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±10.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 76 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	40.8%	38.3%	+2.5
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	28.9%	26.4%	+2.5
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	26.3%	19.5%	+6.8
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	59.2%	60.0%	-0.8
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.7%	-1.7

76 occurrences · 98,132 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

35.0%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.6% for a random short entry (-1.6 pts).

Move size vs normal

0.80×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.

Typical room (20-bar)

0.93R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.98R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 35.0% of the time vs 36.6% for a random short entry. The 1.6-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 20 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 20 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	35.0%	36.6%	-1.6
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	20.0%	25.8%	-5.8
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	15.0%	19.7%	-4.7
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	65.0%	62.5%	+2.5
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	0.9%	-0.9

20 occurrences · 22,441 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

60.0%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 33.9% for a random short entry (+26.1 pts).

Move size vs normal

0.96×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.89R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.92R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 33.9% for a random short entry. The 26.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±41.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	60.0%	33.9%	+26.1
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	60.0%	23.7%	+36.3
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	40.0%	17.3%	+22.7
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	40.0%	65.6%	-25.6
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	0.5%	-0.5

5 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

60.0%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 37.8% for a random short entry (+22.2 pts).

Move size vs normal

7.34×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.47R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.89R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 37.8% for a random short entry. The 22.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±30.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 10 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 10 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	60.0%	37.8%	+22.2
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	40.0%	23.7%	+16.3
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	20.0%	15.7%	+4.3
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	40.0%	61.0%	-21.0
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.3%	-1.3

10 occurrences · 4,948,951 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

33.3%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.5% for a random short entry (-5.1 pts).

Move size vs normal

3.17×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

0.80R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.96R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 38.5% for a random short entry. The 5.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 15 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 15 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	33.3%	38.5%	-5.1
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	20.0%	25.2%	-5.2
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	13.3%	17.5%	-4.1
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	66.7%	60.1%	+6.5
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.4%	-1.4

15 occurrences · 1,157,568 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

47.4%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.4% for a random short entry (+8.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

2.51×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.31R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 47.4% of the time vs 38.4% for a random short entry. The 8.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 19 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 19 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	47.4%	38.4%	+8.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	36.8%	25.6%	+11.3
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	31.6%	18.2%	+13.4
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	52.6%	59.7%	-7.1
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.9%	-1.9

19 occurrences · 404,347 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

47.1%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.1% for a random short entry (+8.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.56×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.31R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 47.1% of the time vs 38.1% for a random short entry. The 8.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 17 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	47.1%	38.1%	+8.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	41.2%	25.5%	+15.6
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	29.4%	18.4%	+11.0
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	52.9%	59.7%	-6.7
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	2.2%	-2.2

17 occurrences · 205,030 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (31). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

35.5%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.0% for a random short entry (-2.5 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.20×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.11R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.00R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 35.5% of the time vs 38.0% for a random short entry. The 2.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 31 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	35.5%	38.0%	-2.5
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	35.5%	25.7%	+9.8
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	35.5%	18.6%	+16.9
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	64.5%	60.3%	+4.2
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.7%	-1.7

31 occurrences · 102,439 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

36.4%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 36.8% for a random short entry (-0.4 pts).

Move size vs normal

0.98×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.18R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 36.4% of the time vs 36.8% for a random short entry. The 0.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±28.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 11 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 11 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	36.4%	36.8%	-0.4
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	36.4%	26.1%	+10.2
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	36.4%	19.8%	+16.6
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	63.6%	62.4%	+1.3
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	0.9%	-0.9

11 occurrences · 23,231 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

0.0%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 34.9% for a random short entry (-34.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

0.83×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.

Typical room (20-bar)

0.00R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.93R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 34.9% for a random short entry. The 34.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±41.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	0.0%	34.9%	-34.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	0.0%	24.0%	-24.0
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	0.0%	17.7%	-17.7
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	100.0%	64.6%	+35.4
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	0.6%	-0.6

5 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (33). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

36.4%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (-3.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

3.94×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.07R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 36.4% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 3.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 33 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	36.4%	40.3%	-3.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	24.2%	26.9%	-2.6
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	21.2%	18.9%	+2.3
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	63.6%	58.2%	+5.4
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.5%	-1.5

33 occurrences · 5,259,552 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (51). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

52.9%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+12.3 pts).

Move size vs normal

2.15×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.27R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 52.9% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry. The 12.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 51 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	52.9%	40.7%	+12.3
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	33.3%	27.3%	+6.0
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	17.6%	19.4%	-1.8
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	47.1%	57.8%	-10.7
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.6%	-1.6

51 occurrences · 1,200,551 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (66). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

47.0%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+6.3 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.76×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.16R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 47.0% of the time vs 40.7% for a random short entry. The 6.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±11.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 66 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	47.0%	40.7%	+6.3
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	30.3%	27.4%	+2.9
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	22.7%	19.6%	+3.1
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	51.5%	57.4%	-5.8
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	1.5%	1.9%	-0.4

66 occurrences · 412,684 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (64). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

53.1%

Fragile

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random short entry (+12.4 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.41×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.26R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.

Summary

The 12.4-point gap over the 40.7% random-entry rate clears the ±12.0-point margin of error, but it has been fading over the sample. Treat with caution.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	53.1%	40.7%	+12.4
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	32.8%	27.5%	+5.3
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	23.4%	19.8%	+3.6
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	46.9%	57.0%	-10.1
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	2.3%	-2.3

64 occurrences · 207,345 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (52). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

51.9%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random short entry (+10.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.22×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.27R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 51.9% of the time vs 41.0% for a random short entry. The 10.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 52 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	51.9%	41.0%	+10.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	34.6%	28.0%	+6.6
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	21.2%	20.4%	+0.8
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	48.1%	57.1%	-9.0
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.9%	-1.9

52 occurrences · 102,946 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

41.7%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random short entry (+1.2 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.48×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.00R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 41.7% of the time vs 40.5% for a random short entry. The 1.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 24 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 24 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	41.7%	40.5%	+1.2
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	25.0%	28.2%	-3.2
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	20.8%	20.7%	+0.1
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	58.3%	58.2%	+0.2
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.3%	-1.3

24 occurrences · 23,320 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

20.0%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.1% for a random short entry (-18.1 pts).

Move size vs normal

0.81×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.

Typical room (20-bar)

0.64R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 20.0% of the time vs 38.1% for a random short entry. The 18.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±42.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	20.0%	38.1%	-18.1
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	0.0%	25.2%	-25.2
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	0.0%	17.9%	-17.9
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	80.0%	60.3%	+19.7
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.5%	-1.5

5 occurrences · 4,695 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

66.7%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (+27.1 pts).

Move size vs normal

3.34×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.56R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.01R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry. The 27.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	66.7%	39.6%	+27.1
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	50.0%	26.1%	+23.9
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	16.7%	18.4%	-1.7
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	33.3%	58.9%	-25.5
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.6%	-1.6

6 occurrences · 5,086,185 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (30). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

56.7%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random short entry (+16.4 pts).

Move size vs normal

2.63×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.44R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 56.7% of the time vs 40.2% for a random short entry. The 16.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 30 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	56.7%	40.2%	+16.4
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	36.7%	27.1%	+9.6
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	23.3%	19.3%	+4.0
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	36.7%	58.0%	-21.4
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	6.7%	1.7%	+4.9

30 occurrences · 1,173,784 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (46). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

52.2%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+11.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.61×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.40R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 52.2% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 11.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 46 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	52.2%	40.3%	+11.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	39.1%	27.3%	+11.9
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	37.0%	19.7%	+17.3
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	47.8%	57.7%	-9.8
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	2.1%	-2.1

46 occurrences · 404,433 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (47). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

53.2%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (+12.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.44×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.34R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 53.2% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 12.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 47 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	53.2%	40.3%	+12.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	38.3%	27.4%	+10.9
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	23.4%	19.8%	+3.6
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	44.7%	57.1%	-12.4
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	2.1%	2.7%	-0.5

47 occurrences · 203,442 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

Limited sample (43). Directional at best.

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

39.5%

Not reliable

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random short entry (-1.3 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.35×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.14R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 39.5% of the time vs 40.8% for a random short entry. The 1.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 43 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	39.5%	40.8%	-1.3
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	32.6%	28.1%	+4.5
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	25.6%	20.5%	+5.1
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	60.5%	57.4%	+3.1
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.8%	-1.8

43 occurrences · 101,072 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

42.1%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random short entry (+2.4 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.09×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.10R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 42.1% of the time vs 39.7% for a random short entry. The 2.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 19 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	42.1%	39.7%	+2.4
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	26.3%	27.8%	-1.5
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	26.3%	20.4%	+5.9
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	57.9%	59.1%	-1.2
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.3%	-1.3

19 occurrences · 23,097 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

33.3%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.9% for a random short entry (-5.5 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.05×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.

Typical room (20-bar)

0.86R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 38.9% for a random short entry. The 5.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	33.3%	38.9%	-5.5
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	16.7%	26.6%	-9.9
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	16.7%	19.5%	-2.8
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	66.7%	59.8%	+6.9
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.4%	-1.4

6 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

66.7%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.7% for a random short entry (+27.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

4.21×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.46R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 66.7% of the time vs 38.7% for a random short entry. The 27.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	66.7%	38.7%	+27.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	50.0%	25.6%	+24.4
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	16.7%	18.0%	-1.3
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	33.3%	59.3%	-26.0
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	2.0%	-2.0

6 occurrences · 3,516,512 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

58.8%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (+18.9 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.72×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.51R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 58.8% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 18.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	58.8%	39.9%	+18.9
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	35.3%	26.9%	+8.4
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	23.5%	19.1%	+4.4
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	41.2%	58.1%	-16.9
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	2.0%	-2.0

17 occurrences · 898,027 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

37.5%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.3% for a random short entry (-2.8 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.70×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.15R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 37.5% of the time vs 40.3% for a random short entry. The 2.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 24 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	37.5%	40.3%	-2.8
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	25.0%	27.1%	-2.1
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	16.7%	19.4%	-2.7
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	58.3%	57.4%	+1.0
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	4.2%	2.3%	+1.9

24 occurrences · 316,487 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

40.9%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random short entry (+0.5 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.64×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.08R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 40.9% of the time vs 40.4% for a random short entry. The 0.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 22 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 22 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	40.9%	40.4%	+0.5
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	27.3%	27.2%	+0.0
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	22.7%	19.5%	+3.2
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	59.1%	57.0%	+2.1
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	2.6%	-2.6

22 occurrences · 160,394 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

60.0%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random short entry (+19.0 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.22×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.

Typical room (20-bar)

1.48R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 41.0% for a random short entry. The 19.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 20 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	60.0%	41.0%	+19.0
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	40.0%	28.3%	+11.7
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	35.0%	20.6%	+14.4
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	40.0%	57.3%	-17.3
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.7%	-1.7

20 occurrences · 80,057 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

29.4%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.9% for a random short entry (-10.5 pts).

Move size vs normal

1.00×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.

Typical room (20-bar)

0.78R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 29.4% of the time vs 39.9% for a random short entry. The 10.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±23.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 17 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	29.4%	39.9%	-10.5
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	23.5%	27.4%	-3.9
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	23.5%	20.2%	+3.3
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	70.6%	58.8%	+11.8
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.3%	-1.3

17 occurrences · 18,552 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

How to read this

Room offered (≥ 1R)

50.0%

Too few to trust

Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.6% for a random short entry (+10.4 pts).

Move size vs normal

0.73×

Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.

Typical room (20-bar)

0.63R

Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.04R for a random short entry.

Summary

Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 39.6% for a random short entry. The 10.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±67.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.

Room offered, this setup vs a random short entry

Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.

Outcome	This setup	Random entry	Edge
Offered ≥ 1R Ran at least 1× its risk in favor before the stop	50.0%	39.6%	+10.4
Offered ≥ 2R Ran at least 2× its risk	0.0%	26.0%	-26.0
Offered ≥ 3R Ran the full 3× cap	0.0%	18.0%	-18.0
Stopped < 1R Hit the invalidation stop before offering 1R	50.0%	59.3%	-9.3
Went sideways Neither stopped nor offered 1R within 20 bars	0.0%	1.1%	-1.1

2 occurrences · 4,691 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon

A bearish harami cross is the bullish harami cross flipped. A large up candle runs with the trend, then the next session opens and closes in almost the same spot, a doji, tucked entirely inside the big candle’s body. After a strong push, that sudden balance says the buyers have run out of room. It is a sharper version of the bearish harami, where the small inside candle has barely any body at all.

Steve Nison notes the harami cross in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991) as a stronger form of the harami, with a doji as the inside candle.

How to spot it

The market is rising into the pattern.
The first candle is a large up (green) candle that fits the advance.
The second candle is a doji, with the open and close at nearly the same price.
The doji’s whole range sits inside the body of the first candle.
The stall right after a strong candle is the signal, not a fresh push down.

The dashed box on the chart above marks the 2 candles on a real occurrence, with the advance before and the move after.

The psychology

The large up candle is the rally still working. Price has been rising, and this bar pushes hard in the same direction, closing near its highs with buyers clearly in command. Anyone short is uncomfortable, and the momentum belongs to the people lifting the market.

Then the next session goes nowhere. It opens inside the prior range and closes at almost the same price it opened, a doji tucked inside the big up candle’s body. After a day of confident buying, that sudden balance is telling. The buyers who had been paying up freely can no longer find anyone to pay up against, and the sellers have arrived in just enough size to hold price flat. The advance has not turned over yet, but the eager demand that drove it has gone quiet right at the highs.

A stall at the top is a warning, not a verdict, and the figures below show how often it actually leads lower.

Does it actually work?

A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.

For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.

Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.

How we measured it

Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close up to the pattern’s invalidation point: the highest high of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.

What this page does not cover

Volume on the pattern’s candles.
Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful resistance level.
Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 27, 2026, 5:18 PM CDT	7.5	1.27R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 24, 2026, 8:41 AM CDT	9.25	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 14, 2026, 1:28 PM CDT	4.5	1.33R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 10, 2026, 9:59 AM CDT	5.5	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 9, 2026, 9:51 AM CDT	14.75	0.02R	Stopped
Apr 8, 2026, 12:46 PM CDT	8	2.06R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 6, 2026, 8:46 AM CDT	22.5	0.88R	Stopped
Apr 2, 2026, 9:56 AM CDT	18.25	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 2, 2026, 9:00 AM CDT	24.25	1.57R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 30, 2026, 8:28 PM CDT	5.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 27, 2026, 2:18 PM CDT	11	2.36R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 26, 2026, 5:16 PM CDT	3.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 25, 2026, 2:43 PM CDT	6.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 24, 2026, 7:39 PM CDT	11.75	2.94R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 24, 2026, 12:59 PM CDT	4.25	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 20, 2026, 2:28 PM CDT	10	1.20R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 19, 2026, 7:13 PM CDT	5.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 18, 2026, 1:27 PM CDT	2.25	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 17, 2026, 12:19 PM CDT	3.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 12, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT	13.75	0.22R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 24, 2026, 10:25 AM CDT	6.75	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 23, 2026, 1:20 AM CDT	5.5	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 22, 2026, 10:55 PM CDT	3	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 17, 2026, 1:40 PM CDT	7.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 16, 2026, 1:45 PM CDT	16.5	1.05R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 1, 2026, 1:35 AM CDT	14.5	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 1, 2026, 12:15 AM CDT	4	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 24, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT	13.75	0.51R	Stopped
Mar 19, 2026, 9:50 AM CDT	27.5	0.95R	Stopped
Mar 17, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT	10.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 9, 2026, 2:25 AM CDT	16.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 17, 2026, 2:10 AM CST	21.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 16, 2026, 5:50 PM CST	15.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 2, 2026, 5:40 AM CST	6.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 26, 2026, 2:35 PM CST	10.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 22, 2026, 10:30 AM CST	13.25	0.89R	Stopped
Jan 19, 2026, 8:50 PM CST	8.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 18, 2025, 8:20 AM CST	7.5	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 8, 2025, 3:45 PM CST	4	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 5, 2025, 4:00 AM CST	6.5	0.73R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 20, 2026, 12:45 PM CDT	19.5	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 14, 2026, 1:30 PM CST	19.25	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 16, 2025, 6:15 AM CST	10.75	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 14, 2025, 7:00 PM CST	8.75	0.89R	Stopped
Oct 29, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT	3.25	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 24, 2025, 8:45 AM CDT	29	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 23, 2025, 5:15 PM CDT	8.75	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 14, 2025, 5:30 PM CDT	9	0.72R	Stopped
Oct 14, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT	12.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 23, 2025, 1:30 PM CDT	25.5	1.04R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 6, 2025, 11:15 AM CDT	17	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 25, 2025, 5:15 AM CDT	5.5	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 10, 2025, 1:00 PM CDT	9.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 25, 2025, 7:00 AM CDT	8	1.19R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 12, 2025, 4:15 AM CDT	10.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 10, 2025, 5:15 PM CDT	10.5	0.90R	Stopped
Jun 4, 2025, 12:30 PM CDT	10.25	0.00R	Stopped
May 12, 2025, 12:15 AM CDT	6.75	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 11, 2025, 1:15 AM CDT	50	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 17, 2025, 6:15 AM CDT	17.75	2.24R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Mar 30, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT	59.5	1.86R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 26, 2026, 3:30 AM CST	23	1.45R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 13, 2026, 2:00 AM CST	31.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 26, 2026, 2:30 AM CST	14.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 25, 2026, 7:30 PM CST	19.25	2.82R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 21, 2026, 12:00 AM CST	11	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 18, 2025, 8:30 AM CST	52	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 23, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT	7.25	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 23, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT	24.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 26, 2025, 4:30 AM CDT	8	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 4, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT	50	0.76R	Stopped
May 26, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT	12.25	2.92R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 19, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT	10.5	2.12R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 13, 2025, 8:30 PM CDT	30	0.04R	Stopped
Mar 7, 2025, 2:30 PM CST	62.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 14, 2025, 7:00 AM CST	10.75	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 23, 2025, 10:30 AM CST	23.75	2.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 21, 2024, 5:30 AM CST	9.75	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 14, 2024, 12:30 PM CDT	16.25	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 9, 2024, 5:30 AM CDT	11.75	2.72R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Nov 5, 2025, 1:00 PM CST	16.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 5, 2025, 6:00 AM CDT	12.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 2, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT	22	1.05R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 29, 2025, 6:00 PM CDT	29.25	0.45R	Stopped
Jun 23, 2025, 3:00 PM CDT	20.75	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 2, 2025, 12:00 PM CDT	28.75	0.00R	Stopped
May 5, 2025, 10:00 AM CDT	22	0.00R	Stopped
May 5, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT	37	2.59R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 11, 2025, 1:00 AM CDT	45.5	1.57R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 23, 2025, 1:00 PM CST	31	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 20, 2025, 5:00 AM CST	12	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 14, 2024, 3:00 AM CDT	19.75	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 12, 2024, 12:00 AM CDT	13	2.67R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 3, 2024, 12:00 AM CDT	9.75	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 11, 2024, 12:00 AM CDT	8.5	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 9, 2024, 12:01 PM CST	21.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 19, 2023, 12:00 PM CST	11.75	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 10, 2023, 9:00 AM CST	17	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 5, 2023, 12:00 PM CDT	12	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 14, 2023, 11:00 PM CDT	7.75	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Sep 18, 2025, 5:00 PM CDT	99.5	0.62R	Stopped
Aug 28, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT	133	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 24, 2024, 9:00 PM CST	13	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 18, 2024, 5:01 AM CDT	29.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 19, 2023, 5:00 AM CDT	34.75	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 13, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT	38.5	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 5, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT	40.25	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 28, 2022, 9:00 AM CST	152.5	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 7, 2021, 5:00 AM CDT	48	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 11, 2019, 5:00 AM CDT	33.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 3, 2019, 9:00 AM CDT	51.5	0.83R	Stopped
Mar 29, 2019, 9:01 AM CDT	20	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 11, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT	24.25	0.32R	Stopped
Mar 10, 2017, 10:56 AM CST	11.25	1.09R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 11, 2012, 6:25 AM CDT	6	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 26, 2012, 4:33 AM CST	5.75	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 6, 2012, 11:05 AM CST	5.75	1.91R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 2, 2011, 10:41 AM CST	11.25	0.76R	Stopped
Jun 29, 2009, 10:26 AM CDT	7.75	2.45R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 19, 2008, 6:33 AM CDT	58.5	1.63R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (5)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Date	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Jan 12, 2024	101.75	2.61R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 14, 2023	163.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 16, 2017	24	0.83R	Stopped
Sep 20, 2011	33.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 27, 2010	14.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (10)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 21, 2026, 12:43 PM CDT	7.25	1.97R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 1, 2025, 2:50 PM CDT	5.25	2.76R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 16, 2025, 2:55 PM CDT	4	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 7, 2025, 9:06 AM CDT	10.5	2.05R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 6, 2025, 8:01 PM CDT	4.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 15, 2023, 1:28 PM CDT	4	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 21, 2022, 1:35 PM CDT	9.25	1.43R	Ran ≥1R
May 4, 2022, 12:58 PM CDT	8.75	0.31R	Stopped
Jan 28, 2022, 9:08 AM CST	7.5	0.17R	Stopped
Mar 29, 2020, 5:05 PM CDT	4.5	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (15)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 13, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT	6.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 13, 2026, 8:00 AM CDT	3	2.33R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 10, 2025, 8:50 PM CDT	7.25	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 13, 2025, 12:50 PM CST	2.5	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 23, 2024, 8:35 AM CST	5.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 14, 2023, 8:32 AM CST	6.25	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 25, 2023, 2:51 PM CDT	0.75	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 14, 2022, 12:00 PM CDT	4.25	0.00R	Stopped
May 11, 2022, 1:35 PM CDT	4	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 8, 2022, 11:45 AM CST	5.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 12, 2020, 10:50 AM CDT	5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 19, 2020, 9:20 PM CDT	8	1.97R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 19, 2020, 7:00 PM CDT	2.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 18, 2020, 6:45 PM CDT	2	1.13R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 23, 2018, 8:35 AM CDT	5.25	0.57R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (19)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Mar 6, 2026, 5:00 AM CST	3.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 3, 2026, 11:30 AM CST	2	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 26, 2026, 9:15 AM CST	8.75	0.40R	Stopped
Jan 8, 2026, 5:30 AM CST	2.25	2.78R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 21, 2025, 11:00 AM CST	6.25	1.76R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 12, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT	3	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 27, 2025, 12:15 PM CST	5.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 13, 2023, 1:15 PM CDT	5.75	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 14, 2023, 7:15 AM CDT	4.25	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 6, 2022, 10:00 AM CDT	9.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 27, 2022, 10:30 AM CDT	2.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 9, 2022, 2:15 PM CST	3.25	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 15, 2022, 2:45 AM CST	7.75	0.39R	Stopped
Sep 15, 2021, 9:30 AM CDT	8.25	0.03R	Stopped
Apr 6, 2020, 7:00 PM CDT	4.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 25, 2020, 10:00 AM CDT	12.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 19, 2020, 4:00 AM CDT	8	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 16, 2009, 2:21 PM CST	3.5	1.50R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 28, 2008, 2:00 PM CDT	4.5	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (17)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Feb 16, 2026, 11:30 AM CST	5.25	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 3, 2026, 3:00 PM CST	5.75	1.57R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 27, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT	6	0.88R	Stopped
Jun 4, 2025, 9:30 AM CDT	2.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 19, 2025, 6:30 AM CDT	4	2.31R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 12, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT	2.5	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 15, 2022, 9:00 AM CST	7.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 28, 2022, 2:30 PM CDT	5.75	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 26, 2022, 10:30 AM CDT	7.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 17, 2022, 7:00 AM CDT	2.75	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 22, 2022, 9:30 AM CDT	12	2.25R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 8, 2020, 7:30 AM CDT	6.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 23, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT	9.25	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 12, 2019, 2:34 PM CST	7.25	0.24R	Stopped
Feb 9, 2018, 8:30 AM CST	9.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 14, 2016, 12:37 PM CST	5.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 9, 2016, 3:00 AM CST	7	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Mar 3, 2026, 1:00 PM CST	13.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 19, 2025, 9:00 PM CST	5.25	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 18, 2025, 4:00 AM CST	4.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 16, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT	3	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 23, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT	9.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 16, 2025, 6:00 AM CDT	9	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 13, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT	6.75	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 29, 2024, 12:00 PM CDT	8.25	0.00R	Stopped
May 9, 2024, 12:00 PM CDT	4.5	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 7, 2024, 11:00 AM CST	3	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 6, 2023, 9:00 AM CST	6.25	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 17, 2022, 12:00 PM CST	7.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 7, 2022, 2:00 PM CDT	8.25	0.58R	Stopped
Jul 7, 2022, 9:00 AM CDT	4.5	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 13, 2022, 12:00 PM CDT	8	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 28, 2022, 1:00 PM CST	11	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 14, 2021, 2:00 PM CDT	2	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 6, 2021, 6:00 PM CDT	6	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 23, 2021, 2:01 PM CDT	6.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 8, 2021, 8:00 AM CST	20.75	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (11)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 21, 2026, 5:00 AM CDT	15.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 15, 2025, 1:07 AM CDT	5.75	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 13, 2024, 9:00 PM CDT	1.75	0.00R	Stopped
May 14, 2024, 9:02 AM CDT	10.5	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 10, 2021, 5:00 AM CST	9.75	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 1, 2020, 5:00 AM CST	2.25	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 3, 2020, 9:00 PM CST	58.75	0.93R	Stopped
Jul 22, 2019, 9:00 AM CDT	0.75	0.00R	Stopped
May 9, 2016, 5:07 AM CDT	2.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 26, 2010, 5:05 AM CDT	3.5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 9, 2010, 1:00 AM CDT	7	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (5)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Date	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Mar 21, 2022	14.5	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 22, 2021	22.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 7, 2018	6.75	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 17, 2015	7.75	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 16, 2010	7	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 27, 2026, 7:10 AM CDT	2.8	0.54R	Stopped
Apr 17, 2026, 7:36 AM CDT	2.8	0.54R	Stopped
Apr 13, 2026, 11:29 AM CDT	3.5	0.77R	Stopped
Mar 23, 2026, 6:02 AM CDT	5.8	1.81R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 12, 2026, 8:21 PM CDT	2.9	0.62R	Stopped
Mar 10, 2026, 6:22 PM CDT	2.6	1.65R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 9, 2026, 8:35 PM CDT	2.3	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 5, 2026, 7:29 PM CST	3.2	0.03R	Stopped
Mar 3, 2026, 6:20 PM CST	2.1	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 1, 2026, 5:43 PM CST	11.1	1.59R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 9, 2026, 5:52 PM CST	2.8	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 5, 2026, 3:00 PM CST	4.6	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 5, 2026, 7:33 AM CST	6.7	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 5, 2026, 6:32 AM CST	4.8	0.83R	Stopped
Feb 5, 2026, 12:13 AM CST	6	2.37R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 4, 2026, 11:14 AM CST	2.2	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 3, 2026, 8:41 AM CST	3.1	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 2, 2026, 11:40 PM CST	5.6	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 2, 2026, 8:39 AM CST	12.7	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 27, 2026, 9:22 AM CST	1.1	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Mar 30, 2026, 11:05 PM CDT	6.4	0.37R	Stopped
Mar 26, 2026, 11:36 PM CDT	1.7	0.47R	Stopped
Mar 24, 2026, 3:55 AM CDT	2.8	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 20, 2026, 2:50 AM CDT	3.3	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 18, 2026, 5:50 PM CDT	6.9	0.67R	Stopped
Mar 16, 2026, 7:30 AM CDT	5.5	2.15R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 15, 2026, 7:45 PM CDT	3.2	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 5, 2026, 3:31 PM CST	2	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 6, 2026, 8:50 AM CST	6.2	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 4, 2026, 3:50 PM CST	8	0.20R	Stopped
Feb 4, 2026, 6:25 AM CST	2.6	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 30, 2026, 3:00 AM CST	17.8	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 22, 2026, 9:45 AM CST	2.9	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 6, 2026, 8:55 AM CST	2.4	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 23, 2025, 5:15 PM CST	3.3	1.24R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 15, 2025, 9:10 AM CST	4.8	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 14, 2025, 7:15 PM CST	0.6	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 26, 2025, 1:50 AM CST	3.9	0.26R	Stopped
Nov 21, 2025, 12:50 AM CST	2.8	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 18, 2025, 9:30 AM CST	7.7	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 15, 2026, 6:31 AM CDT	1.3	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 27, 2026, 6:46 AM CDT	3	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 5, 2026, 1:31 AM CST	1.6	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 25, 2026, 11:16 AM CST	4.9	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 13, 2026, 8:15 AM CST	5.4	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 12, 2025, 5:30 AM CST	3.8	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 9, 2025, 8:15 AM CDT	3.3	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 2, 2025, 11:15 PM CDT	3.3	0.58R	Stopped
Sep 29, 2025, 8:45 PM CDT	2.8	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 24, 2025, 8:45 AM CDT	5.3	0.17R	Stopped
Jun 2, 2025, 6:45 AM CDT	4.4	0.57R	Stopped
May 30, 2025, 11:15 AM CDT	3.2	1.75R	Ran ≥1R
May 11, 2025, 9:15 PM CDT	3.8	1.74R	Ran ≥1R
May 5, 2025, 7:45 AM CDT	3.1	2.55R	Ran ≥1R
May 1, 2025, 9:30 PM CDT	2.3	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 7, 2025, 8:45 PM CDT	3	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 4, 2025, 5:45 AM CDT	5.7	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 10, 2024, 8:45 AM CST	3.4	1.38R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 24, 2024, 5:30 PM CST	3.6	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 12, 2024, 8:15 AM CST	2.1	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 28, 2026, 11:32 PM CDT	2.3	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 9, 2026, 4:30 AM CDT	4.6	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 23, 2026, 6:30 PM CDT	7.7	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 4, 2026, 2:00 PM CST	2.2	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 24, 2026, 8:31 PM CST	4.6	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 17, 2026, 11:02 PM CST	6.7	1.63R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 17, 2026, 1:02 AM CST	15.1	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 15, 2026, 11:00 PM CST	1.1	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 14, 2025, 10:30 AM CDT	4.8	2.04R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 9, 2025, 3:30 PM CDT	3.1	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 7, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT	3	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 7, 2025, 12:30 PM CDT	7.2	1.00R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 5, 2025, 6:30 PM CDT	9.9	1.11R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 10, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT	1.6	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 7, 2025, 12:00 PM CDT	1.7	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 1, 2025, 9:30 AM CDT	9.5	0.73R	Stopped
Jun 17, 2025, 11:30 PM CDT	5.3	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
May 28, 2025, 10:30 PM CDT	6.1	1.39R	Ran ≥1R
May 13, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT	4.2	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 3, 2025, 12:00 PM CST	2.7	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Oct 9, 2025, 6:00 AM CDT	3.2	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 7, 2025, 8:00 AM CDT	6.6	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 7, 2025, 6:01 PM CST	3.1	1.52R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 8, 2024, 9:00 AM CDT	10.8	0.18R	Stopped
Aug 7, 2024, 11:00 PM CDT	1.9	1.05R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 5, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT	4.1	0.00R	Stopped
May 2, 2024, 1:02 PM CDT	1.8	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 24, 2024, 3:00 AM CST	3.9	0.36R	Stopped
Mar 22, 2023, 2:01 AM CDT	2.6	0.00R	Stopped
May 30, 2022, 1:04 AM CDT	2.4	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 1, 2022, 3:00 PM CST	5	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 23, 2022, 7:00 PM CST	0.7	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 1, 2022, 6:05 AM CST	1.3	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 20, 2021, 6:01 AM CDT	1.5	0.00R	Stopped
May 5, 2021, 11:01 AM CDT	1.2	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 18, 2021, 1:00 PM CDT	0.7	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 12, 2021, 6:00 AM CST	2.9	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 4, 2021, 3:00 AM CST	2.9	1.52R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 11, 2020, 6:00 PM CDT	4.3	2.63R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 25, 2020, 9:00 AM CDT	2.9	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Jan 28, 2026, 9:00 AM CST	43.3	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 11, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT	5.2	1.25R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 24, 2025, 5:00 AM CST	20.6	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 28, 2025, 5:00 PM CST	2.3	2.70R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 9, 2025, 1:01 AM CST	1.8	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 20, 2024, 5:05 AM CDT	13.3	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 7, 2024, 5:00 PM CDT	6.7	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 20, 2023, 1:00 AM CST	3.9	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 31, 2022, 9:03 PM CDT	1.9	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 1, 2021, 1:01 AM CDT	6	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 28, 2021, 5:00 PM CDT	5.6	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
May 1, 2016, 9:01 PM CDT	2.4	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 22, 2014, 9:29 PM CDT	2.6	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 12, 2014, 5:00 PM CDT	2.5	0.96R	Stopped
Apr 22, 2013, 5:00 PM CDT	3.1	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 11, 2013, 9:30 PM CDT	3	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 4, 2011, 9:03 PM CDT	11.6	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 16, 2011, 9:11 AM CDT	5.5	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 4, 2011, 5:36 AM CDT	0.8	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 5, 2009, 1:44 AM CDT	2.9	1.03R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (5)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Date	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Dec 16, 2025	52.1	0.03R	Stopped
Jul 8, 2021	16.4	0.74R	Stopped
Feb 9, 2016	12	0.65R	Stopped
Jan 6, 2014	10.8	1.78R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 11, 2012	4.4	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (6)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 23, 2026, 7:48 AM CDT	0.28	0.36R	Stopped
Mar 9, 2026, 10:28 PM CDT	0.18	1.78R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 9, 2026, 3:32 AM CDT	0.23	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 5, 2022, 9:58 AM CDT	0.27	2.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 17, 2022, 11:56 AM CDT	0.2	2.25R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 4, 2022, 9:13 AM CST	0.14	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Mar 17, 2026, 3:20 AM CDT	0.38	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 10, 2026, 12:42 PM CDT	0.53	2.68R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 9, 2026, 12:05 PM CDT	0.4	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 17, 2025, 12:59 PM CDT	0.18	1.17R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 21, 2022, 9:30 AM CST	0.68	0.32R	Flat
Sep 21, 2022, 9:27 AM CDT	0.34	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 3, 2022, 10:18 AM CDT	0.25	2.80R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 26, 2022, 10:45 AM CDT	0.39	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 20, 2022, 9:43 AM CDT	0.27	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 1, 2022, 9:56 AM CDT	0.08	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 23, 2022, 8:21 AM CDT	0.2	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 9, 2022, 5:30 PM CST	0.13	2.23R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 3, 2020, 1:25 PM CDT	0.14	0.93R	Stopped
Apr 3, 2020, 9:50 AM CDT	0.32	1.91R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 17, 2019, 1:05 PM CDT	0.29	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 5, 2014, 9:54 AM CST	0.25	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 20, 2009, 1:09 PM CST	0.28	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 28, 2009, 12:47 PM CST	0.3	0.73R	Stopped
Dec 2, 2008, 8:31 AM CST	0.46	2.93R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 13, 2008, 10:52 AM CDT	0.17	1.29R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 27, 2026, 12:15 PM CDT	0.8	1.21R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 9, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT	0.14	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 9, 2026, 5:30 AM CDT	0.5	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 18, 2026, 2:45 PM CDT	0.33	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 4, 2026, 11:45 PM CST	0.35	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 29, 2025, 1:44 PM CDT	0.27	1.56R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 16, 2024, 10:28 AM CDT	0.13	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 14, 2023, 7:18 AM CDT	0.15	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 23, 2022, 8:31 AM CST	0.24	0.75R	Stopped
Oct 19, 2022, 11:34 AM CDT	0.19	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 16, 2022, 6:50 AM CDT	0.21	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 22, 2022, 11:01 AM CDT	0.23	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 18, 2022, 8:45 AM CDT	0.32	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
May 6, 2022, 2:08 AM CDT	0.15	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 31, 2022, 10:56 AM CDT	0.38	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 30, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT	0.24	0.83R	Stopped
Mar 1, 2022, 8:45 PM CST	0.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 23, 2022, 11:00 PM CST	0.25	1.16R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 23, 2021, 9:30 AM CDT	0.15	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 2, 2020, 9:02 AM CST	0.23	0.30R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 17, 2026, 2:01 PM CDT	0.37	1.70R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 27, 2026, 2:30 AM CDT	0.4	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 15, 2026, 9:30 PM CDT	0.46	0.93R	Stopped
Mar 9, 2026, 11:02 PM CDT	1.3	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 9, 2026, 1:00 PM CDT	0.69	1.20R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 27, 2026, 7:37 AM CST	0.23	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 12, 2024, 8:34 AM CDT	0.24	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 31, 2023, 1:22 PM CDT	0.35	0.11R	Stopped
Jun 15, 2023, 10:44 AM CDT	0.14	0.00R	Stopped
May 12, 2023, 6:36 AM CDT	0.18	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 19, 2023, 1:01 AM CST	0.08	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 23, 2022, 8:31 AM CST	0.24	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 29, 2022, 10:32 AM CDT	0.24	2.17R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 18, 2022, 6:30 AM CDT	0.38	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 15, 2022, 8:43 PM CDT	0.36	0.00R	Stopped
May 13, 2021, 7:00 AM CDT	0.14	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 28, 2021, 10:32 AM CDT	0.3	2.33R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 22, 2021, 8:00 AM CST	0.33	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 27, 2020, 1:00 PM CDT	0.21	0.14R	Stopped
Feb 12, 2020, 8:32 AM CST	0.17	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Mar 30, 2026, 11:00 AM CDT	0.93	0.62R	Stopped
Feb 24, 2026, 7:03 PM CST	0.15	0.00R	Stopped
May 12, 2025, 6:05 AM CDT	0.21	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 13, 2025, 11:01 AM CST	0.12	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 21, 2024, 6:15 AM CST	0.23	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 16, 2024, 2:37 AM CDT	0.22	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 19, 2024, 7:15 AM CDT	0.06	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 7, 2023, 3:02 AM CST	0.19	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 8, 2023, 8:00 PM CDT	0.85	1.79R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 28, 2022, 2:01 PM CDT	0.26	0.31R	Stopped
Jun 9, 2022, 12:04 PM CDT	0.2	0.00R	Stopped
May 20, 2022, 4:02 AM CDT	0.5	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 24, 2022, 12:00 AM CST	0.39	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 23, 2022, 9:02 AM CST	1.02	1.57R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 28, 2021, 9:00 PM CST	0.29	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 28, 2021, 1:02 AM CDT	0.31	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 24, 2020, 1:00 PM CDT	0.19	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 19, 2020, 2:07 PM CDT	2.25	0.30R	Stopped
Dec 5, 2018, 7:00 AM CST	0.17	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 5, 2017, 10:03 AM CDT	0.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (19)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Sep 2, 2024, 9:06 PM CDT	0.09	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 18, 2021, 9:01 PM CST	0.25	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 8, 2021, 9:00 PM CDT	0.19	1.95R	Ran ≥1R
May 17, 2021, 9:07 PM CDT	0.14	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 27, 2021, 9:02 AM CDT	0.32	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 12, 2017, 1:00 AM CST	0.18	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 23, 2017, 9:00 AM CDT	0.27	0.00R	Stopped
May 19, 2017, 1:03 AM CDT	0.32	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 28, 2017, 5:01 AM CDT	0.26	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 23, 2017, 1:08 AM CDT	0.08	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 11, 2016, 9:01 PM CDT	0.2	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 6, 2016, 5:00 AM CDT	0.33	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 22, 2015, 5:08 AM CST	0.22	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 10, 2015, 5:02 AM CDT	0.46	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 1, 2012, 9:39 AM CDT	0.63	0.38R	Stopped
Jul 3, 2012, 9:23 AM CDT	0.66	1.33R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 19, 2011, 6:04 AM CDT	0.78	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 17, 2009, 5:00 PM CDT	1.2	1.41R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 3, 2009, 5:59 AM CST	1.45	0.74R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (6)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Date	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Sep 26, 2025	1.23	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 27, 2019	0.25	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 12, 2018	0.66	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 15, 2017	0.71	0.51R	Stopped
Jan 17, 2017	0.99	1.63R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 1, 2016	0.87	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (6)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Jan 22, 2026, 8:35 AM CST	0.013	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 21, 2026, 12:50 AM CST	0.033	0.39R	Stopped
Nov 7, 2022, 9:03 AM CST	0.031	1.06R	Ran ≥1R
May 4, 2022, 7:41 AM CDT	0.015	0.00R	Stopped
May 4, 2022, 7:10 AM CDT	0.026	2.12R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 30, 2008, 12:05 PM CDT	0.021	2.19R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (17)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Jan 11, 2024, 10:26 AM CST	0.018	0.17R	Stopped
Jan 27, 2023, 1:03 PM CST	0.023	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 11, 2023, 12:51 PM CST	0.023	2.35R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 9, 2022, 8:36 AM CST	0.042	0.83R	Stopped
Sep 30, 2022, 9:36 AM CDT	0.035	0.31R	Stopped
Sep 19, 2022, 9:39 AM CDT	0.035	0.94R	Stopped
Sep 19, 2022, 8:19 AM CDT	0.022	1.36R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 15, 2022, 11:17 AM CDT	0.011	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 20, 2022, 9:51 AM CDT	0.037	1.54R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 13, 2022, 7:23 AM CDT	0.02	0.65R	Stopped
Mar 1, 2022, 8:48 AM CST	0.031	1.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 29, 2018, 5:48 AM CST	0.03	1.97R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 14, 2018, 5:35 PM CST	0.047	2.47R	Ran ≥1R
Oct 22, 2008, 9:51 AM CDT	0.007	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 18, 2008, 1:24 PM CDT	0.013	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 18, 2008, 7:58 AM CDT	0.032	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 30, 2008, 9:54 AM CDT	0.03	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Apr 9, 2025, 8:34 AM CDT	0.041	2.54R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 20, 2024, 11:14 AM CST	0.03	1.67R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 28, 2022, 1:09 PM CST	0.054	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 25, 2022, 2:51 AM CST	0.016	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 16, 2022, 1:57 PM CST	0.017	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 11, 2022, 8:00 AM CST	0.053	1.87R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 19, 2022, 9:25 AM CDT	0.022	0.00R	Stopped
May 3, 2022, 9:45 AM CDT	0.063	0.24R	Stopped
May 3, 2022, 4:59 AM CDT	0.034	0.00R	Stopped
Apr 28, 2022, 1:53 AM CDT	0.037	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 15, 2022, 11:00 AM CST	0.029	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 11, 2022, 1:25 PM CST	0.03	0.60R	Flat
Oct 18, 2021, 5:17 AM CDT	0.03	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 17, 2021, 9:18 AM CDT	0.035	0.97R	Stopped
Dec 22, 2014, 10:23 AM CST	0.022	0.86R	Stopped
Sep 15, 2010, 8:14 AM CDT	0.021	1.95R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 29, 2010, 11:30 AM CDT	0.054	0.30R	Stopped
Jun 30, 2010, 7:48 AM CDT	0.023	0.78R	Stopped
Sep 15, 2009, 7:07 AM CDT	0.056	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
May 20, 2009, 8:56 AM CDT	0.027	0.89R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Jan 30, 2026, 8:31 AM CST	0.025	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 29, 2026, 11:49 PM CST	0.025	0.16R	Stopped
Jan 6, 2026, 11:54 PM CST	0.021	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 6, 2025, 1:06 PM CST	0.018	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 14, 2025, 9:57 AM CST	0.022	1.64R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 27, 2023, 12:58 PM CST	0.045	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 16, 2023, 6:50 AM CST	0.022	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 2, 2022, 12:41 PM CDT	0.018	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 16, 2022, 2:09 PM CDT	0.029	1.93R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 16, 2022, 1:09 PM CDT	0.083	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 29, 2022, 12:53 AM CDT	0.02	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 16, 2022, 8:24 AM CDT	0.081	0.48R	Stopped
Jun 1, 2022, 11:53 AM CDT	0.038	2.74R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 11, 2022, 10:34 AM CDT	0.033	0.00R	Stopped
Jan 19, 2022, 8:20 AM CST	0.044	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Nov 10, 2021, 10:28 AM CST	0.034	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Feb 13, 2014, 12:52 PM CST	0.036	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 9, 2014, 10:43 PM CST	0.013	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 24, 2010, 7:42 AM CDT	0.018	1.83R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 17, 2009, 5:52 AM CDT	0.017	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (20)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Feb 4, 2026, 8:02 AM CST	0.129	0.26R	Stopped
Jan 29, 2026, 1:32 AM CST	0.027	0.00R	Stopped
Aug 21, 2025, 7:59 AM CDT	0.028	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 2, 2025, 9:02 PM CST	0.007	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 9, 2023, 10:13 AM CDT	0.029	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 29, 2023, 11:48 AM CDT	0.017	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 21, 2022, 11:34 PM CST	0.033	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 25, 2022, 5:13 AM CDT	0.037	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 23, 2022, 10:37 PM CST	0.056	0.00R	Stopped
Oct 26, 2021, 1:23 PM CDT	0.06	1.92R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 23, 2021, 6:49 AM CDT	0.025	2.24R	Ran ≥1R
Jun 10, 2015, 7:13 AM CDT	0.018	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Jan 23, 2015, 7:16 AM CST	0.029	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 4, 2014, 4:47 AM CST	0.019	0.00R	Stopped
Feb 11, 2013, 12:05 PM CST	0.013	1.62R	Ran ≥1R
Jul 9, 2012, 10:46 AM CDT	0.022	1.41R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 4, 2009, 7:39 AM CST	0.052	1.25R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 31, 2009, 5:54 AM CDT	0.011	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 17, 2008, 7:37 PM CDT	0.03	0.00R	Stopped
May 26, 2008, 5:00 PM CDT	0.025	3.00R	Ran ≥1R

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (17)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Time	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Sep 24, 2025, 10:34 PM CDT	0.017	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 2, 2025, 10:45 AM CDT	0.027	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 4, 2025, 9:22 PM CST	0.075	1.20R	Ran ≥1R
Mar 13, 2023, 10:27 AM CDT	0.028	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 18, 2022, 11:36 AM CDT	0.094	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 13, 2022, 9:50 PM CDT	0.022	0.00R	Stopped
Sep 13, 2021, 10:17 PM CDT	0.038	0.00R	Stopped
Jun 25, 2021, 10:54 AM CDT	0.003	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 11, 2019, 8:00 AM CDT	0.029	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Dec 28, 2017, 9:02 PM CST	0.023	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 21, 2017, 3:30 AM CDT	0.022	0.00R	Stopped
Nov 21, 2016, 7:53 AM CST	0.027	0.00R	Stopped
Dec 31, 2015, 11:47 AM CST	0.029	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Apr 11, 2013, 1:55 AM CDT	0.013	0.00R	Stopped
Jul 14, 2011, 3:40 AM CDT	0.03	3.00R	Ran ≥1R
Sep 3, 2008, 6:47 AM CDT	0.062	0.00R	Stopped
Mar 4, 2008, 8:57 AM CST	0.149	0.00R	Stopped

Sample Bearish Harami Cross Firings (2)

Based on data through Apr 29, 2026

Date	Risk (pts)	Room offered	Result
Dec 15, 2020	0.04	1.25R	Ran ≥1R
Aug 28, 2013	0.052	0.00R	Stopped

Sample backtests (2)

Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.

NQ 15m · Bearish Harami Cross · 2020-2024

Win rate: 55.00%
Profit factor: 1.29
Max drawdown: 7.33%

100 trades View →

ES 15m · Bearish Harami Cross · 2020-2024

Win rate: 53.85%
Profit factor: 0.84
Max drawdown: 3.03%

13 trades View →

Backtest this pattern

Run it on your contracts, timeframes, and dates.

Run backtest →