Fractiz
Pattern Detail
Bullish Harami Cross
Two-candle bullish reversal after a fall: a doji held entirely inside the body of a large prior down candle.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.5%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (+4.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.23×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.21R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.5% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 4.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±4.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 443 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.5% | 42.3% | +4.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.1% | 28.5% | +3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.5% | 20.1% | +5.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.8% | 56.3% | -3.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.7% | 1.5% | -0.8 |
443 occurrences · 5,134,668 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
41.0%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (-0.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.45×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.03R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 41.0% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 0.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±6.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 251 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 41.0% | 41.8% | -0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.1% | 28.1% | -3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.5% | 19.9% | -0.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 58.6% | 56.3% | +2.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.4% | 1.8% | -1.4 |
251 occurrences · 1,150,038 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.7% for a random long entry (+4.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.37×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.20R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.1% of the time vs 41.7% for a random long entry. The 4.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±8.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 141 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.1% | 41.7% | +4.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.2% | 28.0% | +3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 24.8% | 20.0% | +4.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.5% | 55.8% | -3.3 |
| Went sideways | 1.4% | 2.5% | -1.1 |
141 occurrences · 393,544 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (98). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.8% for a random long entry (+3.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.26×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.17R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.9% of the time vs 41.8% for a random long entry. The 3.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±9.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 98 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.9% | 41.8% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.7% | 28.1% | +4.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.4% | 20.1% | +1.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 54.1% | 55.0% | -0.9 |
| Went sideways | 1.0% | 3.3% | -2.2 |
98 occurrences · 197,665 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (56). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (+3.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.23×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.4% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry. The 3.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 56 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.4% | 42.5% | +3.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.1% | 28.9% | +3.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.3% | 20.9% | -6.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.6% | 55.0% | -1.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.4% | -2.4 |
56 occurrences · 98,258 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
57.9%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.0% for a random long entry (+14.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.36×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.45R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 57.9% of the time vs 43.0% for a random long entry. The 14.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 19 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 19 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 57.9% | 43.0% | +14.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 36.8% | 29.4% | +7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 36.8% | 21.0% | +15.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.1% | 55.4% | -13.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.6% | -1.6 |
19 occurrences · 22,487 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 45.1% for a random long entry (-45.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.74×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.18R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 45.1% for a random long entry. The 45.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±69.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 45.1% | -45.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 30.4% | -30.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.6% | -20.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 53.5% | +46.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.4% | -1.4 |
2 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 38.3% for a random long entry (-0.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
4.87×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.16R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.90R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.5% of the time vs 38.3% for a random long entry. The 0.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±33.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 8 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 8 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.5% | 38.3% | -0.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 37.5% | 23.9% | +13.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 37.5% | 15.7% | +21.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 60.3% | -10.3 |
| Went sideways | 12.5% | 1.4% | +11.1 |
8 occurrences · 4,973,170 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.8%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random long entry (+8.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.81×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.35R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.8% of the time vs 39.7% for a random long entry. The 8.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±20.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 23 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 23 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.8% | 39.7% | +8.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 39.1% | 25.8% | +13.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 30.4% | 17.5% | +12.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.2% | 58.6% | -6.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
23 occurrences · 1,163,478 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (32). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
53.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random long entry (+12.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.16×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.19R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 53.1% of the time vs 40.2% for a random long entry. The 12.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±17.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 32 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 53.1% | 40.2% | +12.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 26.4% | -1.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.9% | 18.3% | +3.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.9% | 57.5% | -10.6 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.3% | -2.3 |
32 occurrences · 406,561 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (36). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random long entry (-4.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.63×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.87R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.1% of the time vs 40.5% for a random long entry. The 4.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 36 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.1% | 40.5% | -4.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 16.7% | 26.7% | -10.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 11.1% | 18.7% | -7.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 61.1% | 56.5% | +4.6 |
| Went sideways | 2.8% | 3.0% | -0.2 |
36 occurrences · 205,912 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
38.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.4% for a random long entry (-3.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.35×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.98R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 38.1% of the time vs 41.4% for a random long entry. The 3.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 38.1% | 41.4% | -3.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 19.0% | 27.4% | -8.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 14.3% | 19.4% | -5.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 57.1% | 56.2% | +0.9 |
| Went sideways | 4.8% | 2.4% | +2.3 |
21 occurrences · 102,855 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
27.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (-15.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.32×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.68R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.11R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 27.3% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 15.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±29.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 11 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 11 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 27.3% | 42.3% | -15.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 9.1% | 28.9% | -19.8 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 9.1% | 20.6% | -11.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 72.7% | 56.1% | +16.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
11 occurrences · 23,296 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
80.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 43.9% for a random long entry (+36.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.84×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
2.38R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 80.0% of the time vs 43.9% for a random long entry. The 36.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 80.0% | 43.9% | +36.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 80.0% | 28.3% | +51.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 60.0% | 18.6% | +41.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 20.0% | 54.4% | -34.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.7% | -1.7 |
5 occurrences · 4,710 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (60). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.7%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.2% for a random long entry (+6.4 pts).
Move size vs normal
4.20×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.29R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.03R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.7% of the time vs 40.2% for a random long entry. The 6.4-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 60 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.7% | 40.2% | +6.4 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 36.7% | 26.6% | +10.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 18.6% | +6.4 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.7% | 58.1% | -6.5 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 1.6% | +0.0 |
60 occurrences · 5,273,492 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (57). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.8% for a random long entry (+8.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.70×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.35R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 49.1% of the time vs 40.8% for a random long entry. The 8.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 57 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.1% | 40.8% | +8.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 36.8% | 27.1% | +9.7 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.3% | 19.1% | +7.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 47.4% | 57.4% | -10.1 |
| Went sideways | 3.5% | 1.8% | +1.7 |
57 occurrences · 1,202,903 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (58). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.6%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+5.3 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.79×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.15R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.6% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 5.3-point gap is no bigger than the ±12.7-point margin of error you would get by chance from 58 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.6% | 41.3% | +5.3 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.0% | 27.5% | +3.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.7% | 19.5% | +1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 51.7% | 56.5% | -4.8 |
| Went sideways | 1.7% | 2.2% | -0.5 |
58 occurrences · 413,296 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (53). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
49.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.6% for a random long entry (+7.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.26×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.23R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 49.1% of the time vs 41.6% for a random long entry. The 7.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 53 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 49.1% | 41.6% | +7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 28.3% | 27.8% | +0.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.8% | 19.8% | +0.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 49.1% | 55.8% | -6.8 |
| Went sideways | 1.9% | 2.6% | -0.7 |
53 occurrences · 207,610 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (36). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
33.3%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.3% for a random long entry (-8.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.13×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.00R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.12R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 33.3% of the time vs 42.3% for a random long entry. The 8.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±16.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 36 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 33.3% | 42.3% | -8.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 25.0% | 28.6% | -3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 25.0% | 20.7% | +4.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 66.7% | 55.6% | +11.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.1% | -2.1 |
36 occurrences · 103,079 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
57.1%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.7% for a random long entry (+14.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.55R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.14R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 57.1% of the time vs 42.7% for a random long entry. The 14.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±25.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 14 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 14 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 57.1% | 42.7% | +14.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 42.9% | 29.7% | +13.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 35.7% | 21.8% | +13.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 55.8% | -12.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.5% | -1.5 |
14 occurrences · 23,332 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
0.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 46.2% for a random long entry (-46.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.65×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.10R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.22R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 0.0% of the time vs 46.2% for a random long entry. The 46.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±69.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 2 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 2 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 0.0% | 46.2% | -46.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 0.0% | 32.2% | -32.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 23.6% | -23.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 100.0% | 52.6% | +47.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
2 occurrences · 4,706 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
45.5%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.7% for a random long entry (+5.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
3.79×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.02R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 45.5% of the time vs 39.7% for a random long entry. The 5.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±28.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 11 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 11 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 45.5% | 39.7% | +5.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 27.3% | 26.2% | +1.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 18.2% | 18.3% | -0.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 45.5% | 58.6% | -13.2 |
| Went sideways | 9.1% | 1.7% | +7.4 |
11 occurrences · 5,085,799 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
46.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.6% for a random long entry (+5.8 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.59×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.18R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 46.4% of the time vs 40.6% for a random long entry. The 5.8-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 28 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 28 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 46.4% | 40.6% | +5.8 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 32.1% | 27.3% | +4.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 21.4% | 19.3% | +2.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 53.6% | 57.5% | -4.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.8% | -1.8 |
28 occurrences · 1,174,599 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (52). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
48.1%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (+7.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.19×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.37R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 48.1% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry. The 7.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 52 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 48.1% | 40.9% | +7.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 38.5% | 27.5% | +11.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.9% | 19.7% | +7.3 |
| Stopped < 1R | 50.0% | 56.7% | -6.7 |
| Went sideways | 1.9% | 2.3% | -0.4 |
52 occurrences · 404,950 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (48). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
47.9%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.0% for a random long entry (+7.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.27×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.26R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 47.9% of the time vs 41.0% for a random long entry. The 7.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±13.9-point margin of error you would get by chance from 48 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 47.9% | 41.0% | +7.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 35.4% | 27.5% | +7.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 20.8% | 19.7% | +1.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 52.1% | 56.1% | -4.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.9% | -2.9 |
48 occurrences · 203,708 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
Limited sample (45). Directional at best.
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
44.4%
Not reliable
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.5% for a random long entry (+3.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.42×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.08R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 44.4% of the time vs 41.5% for a random long entry. The 3.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±14.4-point margin of error you would get by chance from 45 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 44.4% | 41.5% | +3.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.1% | 28.1% | +3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 13.3% | 20.3% | -6.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 55.6% | 56.5% | -0.9 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.0% | -2.0 |
45 occurrences · 101,155 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
36.8%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.9% for a random long entry (-4.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.92×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.04R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.09R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 36.8% of the time vs 40.9% for a random long entry. The 4.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 19 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 19 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 36.8% | 40.9% | -4.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 26.3% | 28.2% | -1.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.8% | 20.4% | -4.6 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.2% | 57.8% | +5.3 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
19 occurrences · 23,115 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
40.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 42.5% for a random long entry (-2.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.01×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.12R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.13R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 40.0% of the time vs 42.5% for a random long entry. The 2.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.3-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 40.0% | 42.5% | -2.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 40.0% | 29.0% | +11.0 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 0.0% | 20.5% | -20.5 |
| Stopped < 1R | 60.0% | 56.3% | +3.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
5 occurrences · 4,699 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
50.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.0% for a random long entry (+11.0 pts).
Move size vs normal
3.17×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.61R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 0.99R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 50.0% of the time vs 39.0% for a random long entry. The 11.0-point gap is no bigger than the ±39.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 6 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 6 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 50.0% | 39.0% | +11.0 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 25.8% | +7.5 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 33.3% | 18.1% | +15.2 |
| Stopped < 1R | 33.3% | 59.1% | -25.7 |
| Went sideways | 16.7% | 1.9% | +14.7 |
6 occurrences · 3,527,527 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
37.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.1% for a random long entry (-3.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
2.09×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.92R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.05R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 37.0% of the time vs 40.1% for a random long entry. The 3.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±18.5-point margin of error you would get by chance from 27 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 27 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 37.0% | 40.1% | -3.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 14.8% | 27.0% | -12.2 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 11.1% | 19.2% | -8.1 |
| Stopped < 1R | 63.0% | 58.0% | +5.0 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.9% | -1.9 |
27 occurrences · 900,514 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
29.2%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.4% for a random long entry (-11.2 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.61×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
0.80R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.06R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 29.2% of the time vs 40.4% for a random long entry. The 11.2-point gap is no bigger than the ±19.6-point margin of error you would get by chance from 24 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 24 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 29.2% | 40.4% | -11.2 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 20.8% | 27.2% | -6.3 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 16.7% | 19.6% | -2.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 70.8% | 57.4% | +13.5 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 2.2% | -2.2 |
24 occurrences · 317,082 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
52.4%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.5% for a random long entry (+11.9 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.33×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.29R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 52.4% of the time vs 40.5% for a random long entry. The 11.9-point gap is no bigger than the ±21.0-point margin of error you would get by chance from 21 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 21 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 52.4% | 40.5% | +11.9 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 27.2% | +6.1 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 19.0% | 19.9% | -0.8 |
| Stopped < 1R | 42.9% | 57.0% | -14.2 |
| Went sideways | 4.8% | 2.5% | +2.3 |
21 occurrences · 160,707 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
31.6%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 40.7% for a random long entry (-9.1 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.47×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a bigger move.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.01R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.08R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 31.6% of the time vs 40.7% for a random long entry. The 9.1-point gap is no bigger than the ±22.1-point margin of error you would get by chance from 19 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 19 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 31.6% | 40.7% | -9.1 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 31.6% | 28.0% | +3.6 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 15.8% | 20.5% | -4.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 68.4% | 57.7% | +10.7 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.6% | -1.6 |
19 occurrences · 80,124 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
53.3%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 39.8% for a random long entry (+13.5 pts).
Move size vs normal
1.08×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. About normal.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.30R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.07R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 53.3% of the time vs 39.8% for a random long entry. The 13.5-point gap is no bigger than the ±24.8-point margin of error you would get by chance from 15 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 15 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 53.3% | 39.8% | +13.5 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 33.3% | 28.0% | +5.4 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 26.7% | 20.8% | +5.9 |
| Stopped < 1R | 46.7% | 59.0% | -12.4 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 1.2% | -1.2 |
15 occurrences · 18,549 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
i
How to read this
Everything here is in R, the setup's own risk. 1R is the distance from the entry (the pattern's closing price) to where it would be proven wrong — its lowest low over the 2 bars that form it. So "offered 2R" means price ran twice that distance in your favor at some point before the stop. It does not assume you took profit there: a target is a strategy choice.
Room offered (≥ 1R)
60.0%
Too few to trust
Offered at least 1× its risk before the stop, vs 41.3% for a random long entry (+18.7 pts).
Move size vs normal
0.76×
Realized range over the next 20 bars vs a random bar. Precedes a quieter stretch.
Typical room (20-bar)
1.80R
Average run in favor (capped at 3R), vs 1.10R for a random long entry.
Summary
Offered ≥1R 60.0% of the time vs 41.3% for a random long entry. The 18.7-point gap is no bigger than the ±43.2-point margin of error you would get by chance from 5 occurrences. Not a reliable edge.
Room offered, this setup vs a random long entry
Only 5 occurrences. The breakdown below is shown in full, but a sample this small is anecdotal, a hint, not a measured edge. That is usually a limit of available history, not a flaw in the pattern. For a firmer read, try a lower timeframe or a more active instrument.
| Outcome | This setup | Random entry | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offered ≥ 1R | 60.0% | 41.3% | +18.7 |
| Offered ≥ 2R | 60.0% | 29.1% | +30.9 |
| Offered ≥ 3R | 60.0% | 21.3% | +38.7 |
| Stopped < 1R | 40.0% | 58.1% | -18.1 |
| Went sideways | 0.0% | 0.6% | -0.6 |
5 occurrences · 4,690 random-entry controls · 20-bar horizon
A bullish harami cross is a two-candle bottom that signals selling has stalled. A long down candle comes first, in line with the fall. The next candle is a doji, a bar that opens and closes at nearly the same price, and it sits completely inside the body of that down candle. The big down day showed sellers in control. The doji that follows shows them losing their grip as buyers and sellers reach a standoff.
The harami cross is the doji variant of the harami that Steve Nison singles out in Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques (1991) as an especially sharp signal.
How to spot it
- The market is falling into the pattern.
- The first candle is a long down (red) candle that fits the decline.
- The second candle is a doji, opening and closing at nearly the same level.
- That doji sits entirely within the body of the first candle, both its open and close inside the prior range.
- The smaller and tighter the doji, the cleaner the standoff it marks.
The dashed box on the chart above marks the two candles on a real occurrence, with the decline before and the move after.
The psychology
The long down candle says the sellers are still firmly in charge. Price has been falling, and this bar simply continues the work, closing near its lows with no sign of resistance. Anyone holding long is hurting, and the momentum belongs entirely to the people pressing the market down.
Then the next bar refuses to extend the move. It opens inside the prior range and barely travels at all, finishing right where it began. After a day of one-sided selling, that flat doji is the first time buyers have met the sellers blow for blow. The drop has not reversed yet, but the pressure that drove it has stalled, and a market that was sprinting lower has come to a standstill inside the previous candle.
A stall is not the same as a turn, and whether this one leads to a bounce is what the numbers below sort out.
Does it actually work?
A pattern is a setup, not a trade, so the honest question is not “did it win” but “how much room did it tend to offer before it was proven wrong.” The tabs below answer that across five futures markets (Nasdaq, S&P 500, gold, crude oil, natural gas) and seven timeframes from one minute to one day.
For each occurrence we measure the room the move offered in units of the pattern’s own risk, then set it against what a random entry on the same market would have done. When the pattern offers more room more often than chance, that shows up as a real edge. When it does not, the page says so plainly.
Read it with the sample size in view. On the faster timeframes a pattern can fire thousands of times, enough to trust. On the daily chart it is far rarer, so treat those numbers as a hint rather than a verdict. Thin samples are flagged for you on the page.
How we measured it
- Entry is the close of the final candle of the pattern.
- One unit of risk, 1R, is the distance from that close down to the pattern’s invalidation point: the lowest low of the two candles that form it. If price trades through there, the setup is wrong.
- We then follow the next 20 bars and record how far price ran in your favor, in multiples of that risk, before the stop was hit.
- Every figure is set against a random entry on the same market and timeframe, so the market’s own drift is accounted for.
- No profit target and no position sizing. Where you take profit is a strategy choice; this measures only the room the pattern tends to give.
What this page does not cover
- Volume on the pattern’s candles.
- Whether the pattern forms at a meaningful support level.
- Pairing it with a trend filter or a confirming signal.
- A profit target or position sizing. We use the pattern’s own invalidation point as the stop to define risk, but where you take profit, and how much you put on, are strategy decisions this page leaves to you.
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 6:34 AM CDT | 5.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2026, 2:53 PM CDT | 1.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2026, 12:07 PM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 7:11 AM CDT | 6.75 | 1.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 1, 2026, 12:30 PM CDT | 4.5 | 1.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2026, 5:40 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 29, 2026, 6:08 PM CDT | 6.25 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2026, 7:36 AM CDT | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 10:15 AM CDT | 5.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 9:16 PM CDT | 5.25 | 1.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2026, 3:44 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2026, 10:59 AM CDT | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 37.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 9:31 AM CDT | 5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 15, 2026, 6:58 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 9:11 AM CDT | 11.5 | 1.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2026, 8:16 AM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 7:05 PM CDT | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2026, 6:11 AM CDT | 6.5 | 1.35R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 5:07 AM CST | 7.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 19.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 2:50 PM CDT | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2026, 6:20 AM CDT | 15.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 30, 2026, 11:55 AM CDT | 11.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 25, 2026, 2:05 PM CDT | 21.25 | 2.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 20, 2026, 6:50 AM CDT | 18 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 5:15 AM CDT | 11.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2026, 5:20 AM CDT | 7.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 9:40 AM CDT | 10.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 6:45 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2026, 3:15 PM CST | 10.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2026, 8:20 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 4:45 AM CST | 13.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2026, 3:25 AM CST | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 26, 2026, 3:50 AM CST | 16.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 23, 2026, 2:05 AM CST | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 18, 2026, 6:20 PM CST | 35.25 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Jan 16, 2026, 8:45 AM CST | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 7, 2026, 9:00 PM CST | 9 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Dec 30, 2025, 9:15 AM CST | 13 | 2.02R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2026, 1:30 PM CDT | 25.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2026, 4:48 AM CDT | 7.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 27, 2026, 3:30 AM CDT | 24.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 10:46 AM CDT | 27.25 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 27, 2026, 12:30 PM CST | 37.25 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 17, 2026, 3:00 PM CST | 38 | 1.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 14, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 26.25 | 1.17R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 13, 2026, 11:30 PM CST | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 11, 2026, 6:15 PM CST | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 8, 2026, 7:30 PM CST | 10.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 7, 2026, 3:15 AM CST | 17.25 | 2.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 4, 2026, 8:30 PM CST | 15 | 2.78R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2025, 9:30 PM CST | 28.5 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 12, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 33.5 | 0.99R | Stopped |
| Nov 10, 2025, 10:30 AM CST | 31.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 17, 2025, 8:45 AM CDT | 16.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2025, 2:00 AM CDT | 14.75 | 1.03R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 16, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 12, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT | 12.75 | 1.47R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2025, 9:45 PM CDT | 16.75 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 16.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 5, 2026, 8:00 AM CST | 45.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2026, 10:00 PM CST | 34.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 9, 2025, 6:00 PM CST | 10.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 19, 2025, 11:30 AM CST | 128.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 103.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 10.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 17, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 69.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 13, 2025, 1:35 PM CDT | 47.75 | 0.89R | Stopped |
| Jun 2, 2025, 1:30 AM CDT | 30.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2025, 3:30 AM CDT | 22.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2025, 9:00 AM CDT | 66.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 7, 2025, 11:00 PM CDT | 32.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 28, 2025, 12:30 AM CDT | 11.75 | 2.79R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 27, 2025, 12:00 PM CDT | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 28, 2025, 8:30 AM CST | 133 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2025, 7:30 PM CST | 29.75 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2025, 6:30 PM CST | 13.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 31, 2024, 12:30 PM CST | 15.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 24, 2024, 9:30 AM CDT | 10.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026, 12:00 AM CST | 11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 3, 2025, 8:00 PM CDT | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2025, 12:00 PM CDT | 124 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2024, 5:00 PM CST | 47.75 | 2.80R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 11, 2024, 7:00 PM CST | 9.75 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 3, 2024, 10:01 AM CDT | 21.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 22, 2024, 1:00 PM CDT | 26.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2024, 6:00 PM CST | 19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 4, 2024, 7:00 PM CST | 21 | 2.58R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 24, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT | 15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2023, 10:00 PM CDT | 10 | 0.05R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2023, 10:00 AM CST | 83.75 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Jan 30, 2023, 12:00 PM CST | 23.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 4, 2023, 2:00 PM CST | 95 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| May 18, 2022, 5:00 PM CDT | 45.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 12, 2022, 1:00 AM CDT | 21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 1, 2022, 6:00 PM CDT | 76 | 1.29R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 1, 2022, 2:00 PM CST | 104.75 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2022, 8:00 AM CST | 95.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 30, 2021, 2:00 AM CST | 32.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (19)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 184.75 | 0.18R | Stopped |
| Aug 25, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT | 71.25 | 1.38R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 17, 2023, 9:01 PM CDT | 19.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 19, 2023, 9:00 AM CST | 88 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 30, 2022, 9:02 AM CST | 51 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 12, 2022, 1:00 AM CDT | 48.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2022, 5:00 AM CDT | 52 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 24, 2022, 1:00 AM CST | 115.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2021, 9:00 AM CST | 101.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 6, 2020, 9:00 PM CST | 13.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2018, 9:03 AM CDT | 43.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 5, 2018, 9:00 PM CDT | 38.75 | 1.94R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2018, 9:00 AM CDT | 81 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2016, 5:42 AM CST | 16.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2015, 6:40 AM CST | 34.25 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 21, 2013, 10:36 AM CST | 15.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2011, 11:27 AM CDT | 14.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2009, 8:59 AM CST | 10 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| Apr 14, 2008, 10:38 AM CDT | 5 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2021 | 102.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2013 | 7.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (8)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026, 8:42 AM CST | 7.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2025, 11:48 AM CST | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2025, 6:14 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 3, 2022, 8:39 AM CDT | 1.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 21, 2022, 7:55 AM CST | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2020, 2:50 PM CDT | 10.25 | 0.24R | Flat |
| Mar 12, 2020, 12:38 PM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 12, 2020, 9:05 AM CDT | 3.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026, 9:25 AM CDT | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2025, 8:45 AM CST | 9.5 | 1.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 18, 2025, 11:00 AM CST | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 17, 2025, 10:20 PM CST | 6.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 17, 2025, 9:40 AM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 16, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | 8.5 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| May 30, 2025, 8:50 AM CDT | 9.5 | 2.74R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 19, 2024, 8:30 AM CDT | 6 | 2.88R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 20, 2023, 2:05 PM CST | 7.75 | 1.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 5, 2022, 8:40 AM CDT | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2022, 8:40 AM CDT | 4.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 16, 2022, 8:30 AM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 12, 2022, 2:15 AM CDT | 5.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 11, 2022, 2:50 PM CDT | 5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2022, 8:35 AM CST | 6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 8, 2021, 8:45 AM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 25, 2021, 2:35 PM CST | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2020, 6:15 AM CST | 7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 23, 2020, 2:25 PM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 11, 2020, 8:50 PM CDT | 5.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2026, 7:00 PM CDT | 7.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 10:00 AM CDT | 14.25 | 0.14R | Stopped |
| Feb 19, 2026, 11:00 AM CST | 8.75 | 1.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 13, 2025, 2:15 PM CST | 11.25 | 1.89R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 4, 2025, 12:30 AM CST | 5.25 | 1.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 25, 2025, 11:30 AM CDT | 2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 6, 2025, 10:15 PM CDT | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 28, 2025, 9:30 AM CDT | 12.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2025, 12:45 PM CDT | 4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 13, 2025, 10:30 AM CDT | 18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 7, 2025, 10:45 AM CST | 14.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 20, 2025, 9:00 AM CST | 14.25 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 27, 2024, 10:30 AM CST | 1.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 21, 2024, 2:15 PM CDT | 9 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 11, 2023, 7:33 AM CDT | 6.75 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 14, 2023, 10:00 AM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 21, 2022, 8:45 AM CST | 5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2022, 10:45 AM CST | 5.75 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 28, 2022, 11:00 AM CDT | 7.75 | 1.61R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 2, 2022, 7:00 AM CDT | 2.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 8:30 AM CDT | 16.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 12, 2025, 10:00 AM CST | 12.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 11, 2025, 1:30 PM CDT | 10 | 0.13R | Stopped |
| Jun 25, 2025, 12:02 PM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 28, 2025, 10:00 AM CDT | 2.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 7, 2025, 11:00 AM CST | 10.75 | 1.98R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 31, 2025, 2:30 PM CST | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 18, 2024, 3:01 PM CST | 33 | 0.81R | Flat |
| Nov 27, 2024, 11:00 AM CST | 9.75 | 1.41R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 15, 2024, 1:30 PM CDT | 7.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 30, 2023, 2:30 PM CST | 3.75 | 2.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 22, 2022, 12:30 PM CST | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 15, 2022, 2:30 AM CST | 3.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 13, 2022, 9:32 AM CST | 12.75 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2022, 10:00 AM CST | 8.75 | 0.49R | Stopped |
| May 18, 2022, 8:30 PM CDT | 7.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2022, 11:00 AM CDT | 4.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 17, 2021, 4:30 AM CST | 5.5 | 1.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 28, 2021, 11:01 AM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2025, 12:00 AM CST | 6.75 | 0.59R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2025, 5:01 AM CDT | 6.5 | 1.46R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 6.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 19, 2024, 10:00 AM CST | 20.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 19, 2024, 12:00 PM CDT | 15.25 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 4, 2023, 11:00 AM CDT | 11 | 0.89R | Flat |
| Feb 21, 2023, 1:00 PM CST | 9 | 0.56R | Stopped |
| Nov 18, 2022, 12:00 PM CST | 8.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 7, 2022, 2:00 PM CDT | 18.75 | 0.08R | Stopped |
| Jun 9, 2022, 10:00 AM CDT | 13.5 | 1.11R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 2, 2021, 8:00 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 20, 2020, 10:00 AM CST | 7.25 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2020, 12:00 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 26, 2020, 12:00 PM CDT | 13.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2018, 6:00 PM CST | 4.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2018, 2:00 PM CST | 10.75 | 2.67R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 1, 2016, 1:05 PM CDT | 7.5 | 1.33R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2015, 6:00 PM CDT | 8 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2011, 11:03 PM CDT | 7.5 | 1.53R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 7, 2010, 12:00 PM CDT | 7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (11)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2025, 9:00 PM CDT | 11.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 12, 2024, 1:00 AM CST | 9.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 16, 2023, 1:00 AM CDT | 10.75 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2023, 5:00 AM CST | 27.25 | 1.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 9, 2022, 5:00 AM CDT | 25.75 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 16, 2020, 9:00 PM CST | 7 | 0.96R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2020, 9:00 PM CST | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2015, 9:16 AM CST | 9.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 6, 2015, 5:02 AM CST | 2.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 23, 2012, 9:04 AM CDT | 10.25 | 0.44R | Stopped |
| May 20, 2008, 10:48 AM CDT | 4.25 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2023 | 30 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 25, 2015 | 43 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 8.25 | 2.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 9, 2012 | 3.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 20, 2011 | 16.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026, 10:44 AM CDT | 3.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 16, 2026, 8:56 AM CDT | 9.2 | 1.51R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 10, 2026, 9:45 AM CDT | 2.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 8, 2026, 2:03 AM CDT | 10.1 | 0.24R | Flat |
| Apr 7, 2026, 7:18 PM CDT | 3.2 | 0.34R | Stopped |
| Mar 31, 2026, 7:17 AM CDT | 2.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 29, 2026, 7:15 PM CDT | 2.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 24, 2026, 8:02 PM CDT | 5.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 23, 2026, 2:02 AM CDT | 8.5 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 5:45 PM CDT | 2 | 1.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 19, 2026, 7:22 AM CDT | 2.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 19, 2026, 6:27 AM CDT | 4.7 | 2.64R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 18, 2026, 3:29 PM CDT | 2.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 8:24 AM CDT | 2.5 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 5, 2026, 7:03 PM CST | 2.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2026, 2:59 PM CST | 6.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2026, 8:53 PM CST | 2.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 15, 2026, 8:39 PM CST | 1.5 | 2.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 15, 2026, 6:02 PM CST | 2.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 13, 2026, 10:34 AM CST | 2.4 | 0.63R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026, 8:47 AM CDT | 7.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2026, 9:55 PM CDT | 5.2 | 0.37R | Stopped |
| Mar 24, 2026, 8:20 AM CDT | 2.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 22, 2026, 6:00 PM CDT | 9.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 23.2 | 0.74R | Flat |
| Mar 20, 2026, 12:35 PM CDT | 7.6 | 2.13R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2026, 4:10 AM CDT | 5.1 | 1.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 6, 2026, 7:06 AM CST | 5.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 4, 2026, 4:35 AM CST | 8.2 | 2.30R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 3, 2026, 3:45 AM CST | 5.6 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 25, 2026, 6:05 PM CST | 6.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 16, 2026, 4:15 AM CST | 1.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 30, 2026, 2:40 PM CST | 20.1 | 0.76R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2026, 8:00 AM CST | 4.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 17, 2025, 9:56 AM CST | 6.2 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Dec 9, 2025, 12:10 AM CST | 5 | 2.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 21, 2025, 11:30 AM CST | 3.3 | 1.91R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 20, 2025, 7:10 PM CST | 1.8 | 2.39R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 29, 2025, 9:30 AM CDT | 0.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 4, 2025, 7:30 AM CDT | 3.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026, 6:16 PM CDT | 2.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2026, 2:00 PM CDT | 23.1 | 0.74R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 7:45 AM CST | 29.3 | 0.66R | Stopped |
| Feb 20, 2026, 2:02 AM CST | 7.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 30, 2026, 12:30 AM CST | 7.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 1, 2025, 10:15 PM CST | 1.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 2, 2025, 8:15 PM CST | 5.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2025, 9:17 AM CDT | 1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 3, 2025, 6:45 AM CDT | 3.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 24, 2025, 7:15 AM CDT | 2.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT | 12.1 | 1.14R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 11, 2025, 6:00 AM CDT | 4.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 11, 2025, 5:00 AM CDT | 2.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 8, 2025, 11:15 AM CDT | 7.8 | 0.51R | Stopped |
| May 7, 2025, 2:15 PM CDT | 9.3 | 2.55R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 7, 2025, 12:15 PM CST | 5.1 | 1.82R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 28, 2025, 8:15 AM CST | 4.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 19, 2024, 8:45 AM CDT | 5.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 22, 2024, 11:00 AM CDT | 1.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 1, 2023, 10:32 AM CDT | 0.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026, 4:00 AM CDT | 23.6 | 0.70R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2026, 2:30 AM CDT | 14 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 6, 2026, 3:00 PM CST | 17.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 20, 2026, 5:00 AM CST | 5.1 | 1.65R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2025, 11:00 AM CST | 26.9 | 1.87R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 11, 2025, 4:00 AM CDT | 6.5 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 19, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 7.7 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Jun 16, 2025, 12:00 AM CDT | 6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 11, 2025, 12:30 PM CDT | 5.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2025, 1:30 PM CDT | 2.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 15, 2025, 11:00 AM CDT | 3.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 8, 2024, 3:00 AM CST | 1.8 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 28, 2023, 6:02 AM CST | 3 | 2.37R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 21, 2023, 1:01 AM CDT | 3.3 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Mar 20, 2023, 7:02 PM CDT | 2.1 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2023, 8:00 PM CDT | 1.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 16, 2022, 8:00 AM CDT | 2.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 9, 2022, 9:35 AM CDT | 1.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 31, 2022, 12:09 AM CDT | 2.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2021, 10:30 AM CST | 4.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2025, 7:00 PM CST | 8.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 10, 2025, 10:00 PM CDT | 8 | 0.30R | Stopped |
| May 19, 2025, 7:00 PM CDT | 9.1 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 14, 2025, 10:01 AM CDT | 4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2025, 8:01 AM CST | 10.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 23, 2024, 10:00 AM CDT | 6.6 | 0.61R | Stopped |
| Jun 1, 2023, 3:00 AM CDT | 2.8 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 2, 2022, 8:00 AM CST | 7.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 23, 2022, 1:06 PM CDT | 4.4 | 0.27R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2022, 7:04 PM CDT | 3.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 3, 2021, 5:00 AM CST | 2.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 23, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 5.2 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 2, 2020, 12:00 AM CDT | 2.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2020, 9:00 AM CST | 5.1 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2019, 7:00 AM CDT | 4.7 | 0.60R | Stopped |
| May 1, 2018, 7:04 AM CDT | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 2, 2017, 8:02 AM CST | 4.7 | 0.77R | Stopped |
| Oct 4, 2016, 6:00 PM CDT | 1.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2015, 6:17 AM CDT | 2.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 16, 2015, 9:17 AM CST | 1.7 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (14)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2022, 9:01 PM CST | 3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2022, 9:00 AM CST | 6.7 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 16, 2020, 9:00 PM CDT | 7.9 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 6, 2019, 9:01 AM CST | 1.6 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 13, 2018, 5:00 PM CDT | 2.6 | 1.77R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 25, 2018, 9:02 AM CDT | 3.2 | 1.44R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 3, 2016, 9:03 PM CDT | 1.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 1, 2015, 1:36 AM CDT | 1.9 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 16, 2015, 5:35 AM CDT | 3 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 14, 2013, 5:19 AM CDT | 10.1 | 2.94R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 1, 2011, 5:16 AM CDT | 20.3 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 5, 2010, 5:41 AM CDT | 12.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 15, 2009, 5:34 AM CDT | 3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 10, 2008, 2:15 AM CDT | 4.8 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (2)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | 12 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Mar 5, 2013 | 5.7 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (11)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2026, 9:14 AM CDT | 0.26 | 0.31R | Stopped |
| Feb 2, 2026, 9:17 AM CST | 0.26 | 1.00R | Flat |
| Jun 23, 2025, 9:05 AM CDT | 0.35 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 12, 2025, 10:33 PM CDT | 0.14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 14, 2024, 3:41 PM CDT | 0.39 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 5, 2024, 6:19 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 29, 2022, 10:19 AM CDT | 0.16 | 1.19R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 9, 2022, 12:26 PM CST | 0.37 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 1, 2022, 12:50 PM CST | 0.1 | 2.10R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 8, 2008, 8:51 AM CDT | 0.23 | 0.09R | Stopped |
| Feb 22, 2008, 11:31 AM CST | 0.07 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026, 1:30 AM CDT | 0.23 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2026, 9:00 AM CST | 0.23 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 1, 2026, 7:47 PM CST | 0.29 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 23, 2025, 12:45 PM CDT | 0.53 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2023, 8:55 AM CDT | 0.13 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 28, 2022, 5:00 AM CDT | 0.21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 1, 2022, 9:57 AM CDT | 0.24 | 1.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 28, 2022, 8:55 AM CDT | 0.29 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 22, 2022, 2:35 AM CDT | 0.4 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2022, 8:15 PM CDT | 0.53 | 2.04R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 7, 2022, 8:20 AM CST | 0.84 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 24, 2022, 12:55 PM CST | 0.58 | 0.17R | Stopped |
| Apr 1, 2021, 9:40 AM CDT | 0.55 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 3, 2020, 2:20 PM CDT | 0.56 | 1.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 4, 2015, 7:56 AM CDT | 0.19 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 10, 2015, 12:58 PM CST | 0.31 | 0.58R | Stopped |
| Oct 5, 2010, 8:59 AM CDT | 0.11 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 11, 2008, 10:27 AM CST | 0.4 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 5, 2008, 1:22 PM CST | 0.2 | 2.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 28, 2008, 8:05 AM CDT | 0.2 | 0.70R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2026, 8:45 PM CDT | 0.85 | 2.08R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 26, 2026, 4:46 AM CDT | 0.35 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2026, 12:17 PM CDT | 2.73 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 10, 2026, 10:17 AM CDT | 1.14 | 1.62R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 10, 2025, 10:39 AM CDT | 0.15 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 7, 2025, 10:02 AM CDT | 0.21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 3, 2024, 10:04 AM CDT | 0.18 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 10, 2024, 10:11 AM CST | 0.33 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Jun 14, 2023, 9:28 AM CDT | 0.57 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 8, 2023, 9:32 AM CST | 0.14 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 8, 2022, 12:30 PM CST | 0.23 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 5, 2022, 10:31 AM CST | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 15, 2022, 1:21 PM CDT | 0.23 | 0.43R | Stopped |
| Jun 15, 2022, 9:49 AM CDT | 0.95 | 0.80R | Stopped |
| May 26, 2022, 12:26 PM CDT | 0.1 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2022, 12:15 PM CDT | 0.45 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 11, 2022, 11:46 AM CDT | 0.15 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 30, 2022, 7:41 PM CDT | 0.95 | 0.86R | Stopped |
| Mar 18, 2022, 1:22 PM CDT | 0.25 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 24, 2022, 8:00 AM CST | 0.58 | 0.52R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2026, 11:00 PM CDT | 0.43 | 0.93R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2026, 11:30 AM CDT | 1.72 | 0.73R | Stopped |
| Jun 18, 2025, 3:00 AM CDT | 0.23 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2025, 9:54 AM CDT | 0.68 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2025, 6:56 AM CST | 0.25 | 2.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 5, 2024, 5:42 AM CST | 0.31 | 2.81R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 10, 2024, 10:43 AM CDT | 0.38 | 2.05R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 2, 2023, 7:03 AM CDT | 0.29 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2023, 1:01 PM CDT | 0.24 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2023, 4:31 AM CDT | 0.35 | 1.49R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2022, 3:33 AM CDT | 0.24 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Jul 11, 2022, 2:00 AM CDT | 0.35 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 9, 2022, 1:00 PM CST | 1.66 | 1.75R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 27, 2022, 8:30 PM CST | 0.12 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 25, 2022, 6:30 AM CST | 0.38 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 22, 2021, 2:30 AM CST | 0.13 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 13, 2020, 1:01 PM CDT | 0.25 | 2.24R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 24, 2019, 1:00 PM CDT | 0.47 | 0.19R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2019, 10:00 AM CDT | 0.22 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 13, 2019, 1:00 PM CDT | 0.15 | 0.87R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2025, 3:07 AM CDT | 0.33 | 1.21R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 23, 2025, 8:05 AM CDT | 0.79 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 3, 2025, 1:04 PM CST | 0.38 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Apr 2, 2024, 9:14 AM CDT | 0.59 | 2.31R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 5, 2023, 7:04 AM CST | 0.65 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 12, 2022, 1:01 PM CST | 0.24 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2022, 1:04 PM CST | 0.39 | 0.33R | Stopped |
| Aug 31, 2022, 5:03 AM CDT | 0.9 | 2.71R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 3, 2022, 12:02 PM CDT | 0.47 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jun 14, 2022, 6:01 PM CDT | 0.46 | 2.15R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 1, 2022, 1:00 PM CST | 0.31 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2021, 6:01 AM CDT | 0.21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 11, 2020, 10:00 AM CST | 0.2 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 28, 2020, 9:00 AM CDT | 0.28 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 26, 2020, 10:01 AM CDT | 0.28 | 2.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 13, 2020, 9:06 AM CDT | 0.26 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 1, 2020, 3:00 AM CDT | 0.25 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 20, 2020, 4:00 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2020, 3:00 AM CDT | 0.28 | 2.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2020, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.31 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (19)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2025, 1:22 AM CDT | 0.49 | 1.69R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 21, 2025, 5:03 AM CDT | 0.36 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 3, 2024, 1:04 AM CDT | 0.21 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 17, 2023, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.55 | 0.40R | Stopped |
| Jun 13, 2022, 1:19 AM CDT | 0.5 | 2.96R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 8, 2022, 9:00 PM CDT | 1.42 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 14, 2019, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.93 | 0.42R | Stopped |
| Aug 29, 2017, 9:01 AM CDT | 0.56 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Jan 29, 2015, 1:19 AM CST | 0.24 | 2.12R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 7, 2014, 10:29 AM CDT | 0.62 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 12, 2014, 5:40 AM CDT | 0.55 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2014, 10:04 AM CDT | 0.27 | 1.48R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 10, 2013, 1:12 AM CDT | 0.3 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 2, 2013, 9:16 AM CDT | 0.4 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2011, 9:32 AM CST | 0.28 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 10, 2011, 10:30 AM CDT | 0.75 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Nov 16, 2010, 5:00 PM CST | 0.31 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 10, 2010, 5:00 PM CDT | 0.68 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2008, 10:30 AM CDT | 1.47 | 0.41R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2023 | 2.61 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 19, 2019 | 1.01 | 2.93R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 30, 2017 | 0.67 | 2.18R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 27, 2017 | 1.04 | 0.50R | Stopped |
| Mar 13, 2017 | 0.57 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (6)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022, 1:03 PM CST | 0.047 | 0.64R | Stopped |
| Aug 29, 2022, 7:51 AM CDT | 0.028 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 28, 2010, 9:30 AM CST | 0.086 | 0.45R | Flat |
| Sep 17, 2009, 9:47 AM CDT | 0.021 | 0.71R | Stopped |
| Jul 11, 2008, 1:22 PM CDT | 0.031 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Mar 17, 2008, 8:12 AM CDT | 0.033 | 1.85R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2023, 1:20 PM CST | 0.036 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 14, 2022, 11:31 AM CST | 0.022 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 8, 2022, 12:26 PM CST | 0.025 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 6, 2022, 5:05 PM CST | 0.069 | 1.07R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 2, 2022, 8:46 AM CDT | 0.028 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 31, 2022, 11:10 AM CDT | 0.045 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 28, 2022, 10:59 AM CDT | 0.021 | 1.52R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 19, 2022, 9:20 AM CDT | 0.021 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 12, 2022, 12:16 PM CDT | 0.03 | 0.83R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2022, 8:03 AM CST | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 16, 2021, 8:40 AM CDT | 0.036 | 0.11R | Stopped |
| Nov 14, 2018, 3:41 PM CST | 0.029 | 0.38R | Stopped |
| Sep 17, 2009, 1:06 PM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2008, 12:57 AM CDT | 0.013 | 0.92R | Stopped |
| Oct 6, 2008, 7:35 AM CDT | 0.021 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 1, 2008, 1:24 PM CDT | 0.013 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 30, 2008, 8:53 AM CDT | 0.022 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 5, 2008, 10:49 AM CDT | 0.025 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 27, 2008, 7:59 AM CDT | 0.012 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 28, 2008, 8:51 AM CDT | 0.034 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2024, 9:44 AM CST | 0.021 | 2.57R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 10, 2023, 9:11 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 22, 2022, 2:07 PM CST | 0.021 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 28, 2022, 12:43 PM CST | 0.056 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 23, 2022, 6:43 AM CST | 0.03 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 8, 2022, 11:51 AM CDT | 0.045 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 27, 2022, 9:32 AM CDT | 0.062 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 8, 2022, 9:27 AM CDT | 0.03 | 0.67R | Stopped |
| May 27, 2022, 5:40 AM CDT | 0.04 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 10, 2022, 12:37 PM CDT | 0.027 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 17, 2022, 1:54 AM CST | 0.019 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 4, 2022, 5:58 AM CST | 0.039 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 9, 2021, 7:55 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 8, 2021, 7:33 AM CST | 0.016 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2021, 10:17 AM CDT | 0.009 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 9, 2017, 9:17 AM CST | 0.032 | 0.06R | Stopped |
| Jan 23, 2014, 10:18 AM CST | 0.017 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 2, 2010, 9:35 AM CST | 0.037 | 0.41R | Stopped |
| Oct 9, 2009, 9:09 AM CDT | 0.029 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 22, 2009, 9:27 AM CDT | 0.034 | 1.68R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (20)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2024, 11:42 PM CST | 0.036 | 1.36R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 11, 2024, 9:23 AM CDT | 0.025 | 0.32R | Flat |
| Nov 8, 2023, 10:11 AM CST | 0.006 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 24, 2022, 9:23 AM CST | 0.039 | 0.69R | Stopped |
| Nov 16, 2022, 1:13 AM CST | 0.02 | 1.95R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 7, 2022, 11:02 AM CDT | 0.018 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 26, 2022, 1:59 PM CDT | 0.023 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2021, 8:42 AM CST | 0.011 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 13, 2021, 11:23 AM CST | 0.019 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 21, 2021, 10:39 AM CDT | 0.038 | 2.26R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2020, 9:01 AM CST | 0.025 | 0.20R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2020, 11:18 AM CDT | 0.008 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Apr 23, 2020, 9:18 AM CDT | 0.011 | 2.09R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 18, 2014, 7:43 AM CST | 0.02 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 15, 2010, 9:56 AM CST | 0.029 | 1.86R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 1, 2009, 8:22 AM CST | 0.025 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 13, 2009, 8:32 AM CDT | 0.037 | 2.92R | Ran ≥1R |
| May 13, 2009, 3:09 PM CDT | 0.015 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 10, 2008, 11:24 AM CDT | 0.065 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Aug 28, 2008, 10:53 AM CDT | 0.142 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (19)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2023, 12:32 PM CST | 0.017 | 0.94R | Stopped |
| Jan 10, 2023, 1:02 AM CST | 0.031 | 2.84R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 3, 2022, 12:19 AM CST | 0.076 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 30, 2021, 7:09 AM CST | 0.061 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 22, 2021, 6:43 AM CST | 0.052 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 12, 2017, 10:04 AM CST | 0.021 | 0.62R | Stopped |
| Feb 18, 2015, 2:07 AM CST | 0.018 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Feb 9, 2015, 8:39 AM CST | 0.031 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 10, 2014, 10:35 AM CST | 0.058 | 0.29R | Stopped |
| Jun 27, 2013, 6:01 AM CDT | 0.022 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Nov 3, 2010, 12:43 PM CDT | 0.028 | 2.43R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 4, 2010, 7:18 AM CDT | 0.034 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2009, 9:26 PM CST | 0.02 | 2.50R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 30, 2009, 10:22 AM CST | 0.026 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Sep 17, 2009, 11:56 AM CDT | 0.071 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Aug 20, 2009, 8:35 AM CDT | 0.077 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 15, 2009, 12:29 PM CDT | 0.015 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jan 13, 2009, 8:41 PM CST | 0.03 | 0.53R | Stopped |
| Mar 10, 2008, 8:28 AM CDT | 0.077 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (15)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Time | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2026, 9:07 PM CDT | 0.048 | 0.21R | Stopped |
| Oct 22, 2025, 10:25 AM CDT | 0.078 | 0.28R | Stopped |
| Jul 25, 2025, 7:39 AM CDT | 0.025 | 1.16R | Ran ≥1R |
| Apr 8, 2025, 2:35 AM CDT | 0.033 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| May 4, 2023, 10:09 PM CDT | 0.042 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jan 10, 2023, 10:11 AM CST | 0.039 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Nov 3, 2020, 1:59 AM CST | 0.023 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Mar 17, 2020, 2:30 AM CDT | 0.024 | 1.25R | Ran ≥1R |
| Dec 3, 2018, 9:42 AM CST | 0.097 | 2.99R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 31, 2018, 4:09 AM CDT | 0.018 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Oct 3, 2016, 6:08 AM CDT | 0.023 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jun 10, 2016, 9:54 AM CDT | 0.01 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2011, 4:42 AM CDT | 0.025 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Feb 11, 2011, 2:47 AM CST | 0.035 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Dec 10, 2008, 9:26 AM CST | 0.08 | 1.59R | Ran ≥1R |
Sample Bullish Harami Cross Firings (5)
Based on data through Apr 29, 2026
| Date | Risk (pts) | Room offered | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2017 | 0.042 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Oct 3, 2016 | 0.04 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Sep 22, 2015 | 0.027 | 3.00R | Ran ≥1R |
| Jul 22, 2011 | 0.027 | 0.00R | Stopped |
| Jul 16, 2008 | 0.345 | 0.00R | Stopped |
Sample backtests (2)
Real backtested runs of this pattern, with commissions and slippage. Open one for the full equity curve and metrics, or backtest it yourself on your own contract and dates.