Pattern Detail

Gartley

The original harmonic pattern: a 0.786 retracement completing an XABCD structure, read as an exhausted pullback turning back with the larger trend.

Completions

15

Completed Gartley structures on NQ over the sample period

Win Rate (decided)

66.7%

Share of decided trades (15 wins plus losses) that hit the target before the stop

Avg Return

+0.17%

Mean outcome across every completion, signed so positive favours the trade

Outcome Breakdown

Wins

Count
10
Avg return
+0.43%

Losses

Count
5
Avg return
-0.34%

Timeouts

Count
0
Resolve window
60 bars
Median return: +0.16% Bullish: 7 Bearish: 8 Strictness: balanced (swing 3, tolerance 5.0%)

Recent Gartley Completions (15)

Date Direction Entry Return Outcome
Aug 21, 2025 Bearish 23,281.5 +0.51% Win
May 13, 2024 Bullish 18,284.25 +0.07% Win
Jul 5, 2018 Bearish 7,105.75 -0.33% Loss
Dec 10, 2015 Bearish 4,645.25 +0.45% Win
Nov 7, 2014 Bearish 4,153.25 +0.16% Win
Oct 29, 2014 Bullish 4,078 -0.19% Loss
Dec 17, 2013 Bullish 3,468.75 +0.29% Win
Sep 24, 2013 Bearish 3,223 +0.42% Win
Dec 28, 2012 Bullish 2,615.75 -0.25% Loss
Dec 12, 2011 Bearish 2,283.25 -0.19% Loss
Nov 30, 2009 Bullish 1,757 +0.65% Win
May 8, 2009 Bearish 1,394.25 +0.61% Win
Feb 25, 2009 Bearish 1,164 -0.73% Loss
Jan 22, 2009 Bullish 1,158.75 +0.98% Win
Dec 18, 2008 Bullish 1,234 +0.10% Win

Detection scan: NQ 15m · 2008-01-02 to 2026-04-24 · generated May 29, 2026

X A B C D
  • B = 0.618 of XA
  • C = 0.382-0.886 of AB
  • D = 1.272-1.618 of BC
  • D = 0.786 of XA
Idealized bullish Gartley. The bearish form is the mirror image.

What this pattern measures

The Gartley is the oldest of the harmonic patterns, named for H.M. Gartley who described the shape in 1935. It is a five-point structure, X to A to B to C to D, defined by Fibonacci ratios between the legs. The signature is the completion: D sits at a 0.786 retracement of the whole X-to-A leg.

This page measures what happened after each completed Gartley, scored by the trade the structure implies: enter at the reversal point, target a 0.618 retracement of the move, stop just beyond the completion.

Definitions used on this page:

  • B retraces 0.618 of XA, C retraces 0.382 to 0.886 of AB, D projects 1.272 to 1.618 of BC, and D lands at 0.786 of XA. All four must hold at once.
  • Pivots are confirmed swing highs and lows at balanced strictness: 3 bars on each side, with a 5% tolerance on every ratio. A pattern is counted only on the bar its final pivot confirms, so nothing is detected in hindsight.
  • The implied trade enters at the close of the confirming bar, targets a 0.618 retracement of the structure, and stops just beyond D. It is given 60 bars to resolve before being marked to market as a timeout.
  • Outcomes are measured on CME:NQ at 15-minute and 5-minute bars.

Why it matters

A Gartley forms inside a trend. The X-to-A move is the trend leg, and everything after it is a pullback that overshoots then completes at a measured depth. D is read as the point where the pullback is exhausted and the original trend is likely to resume. Because D stays well short of X, the Gartley is a “buy the dip” structure rather than a bet on a full reversal, and the shallow completion keeps the stop close.

How to read the numbers

  • Win rate is the share of decided trades, wins plus losses, that reached the target before the stop. Timeouts are excluded from this denominator and reported on their own.
  • Avg return is the mean outcome across every completed pattern, signed so positive favours the trade direction.
  • Avg win and avg loss split the decided trades into their winning and losing sides, useful for weighing the size of wins against losses.
  • Bullish and bearish counts show which direction the structure completed in.

What’s not here

  • No trend filter. The structure is detected on geometry alone, with no check that the larger trend agrees.
  • No confluence with support, resistance, or higher-timeframe levels, which traders normally use to weight a completion.
  • A single contract and two intraday timeframes. Daily Gartleys are far too rare to score.

Keep going

Explore this pattern further with live data.